R. Charco

Liver Transplant Using Donors After Unexpected Cardiac Death: Novel Preservation Protocol and Acceptance Criteria

Donors after cardiac death (DCD) suffer irreversible cardiac arrest prior to donation. We describe our liver transplant experience with DCD whose cardiac arrest is unexpected, not following the removal of ventilatory support, whom we maintain with normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (NECMO). A potential donor goes into cardiac arrest outside the hospital and is brought to the hospital under continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The donor is declared dead and placed on a cardiocompressor. Femoral vessels are cannulated and connected to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to establish NECMO. Blood parameters and CPB pump flow are monitored throughout NECMO, which is continued until cold preservation. From April 2002 to May 2006, 10 of 40 potential DCD livers were transplanted. Only one graft was lost to primary nonfunction (PNF) and another to hepatic artery thrombosis. Posttransplant hepatic function was good. Certain parameters, such as CPR and NECMO times, hepatic transaminases during NECMO, and donor age, determined the viability of DCD liver grafts and were used to establish criteria for their acceptance. Though considered marginal, unexpected DCD can represent an important source of viable livers for transplant if strict acceptance criteria are employed and they are maintained with NECMO prior to recovery.

Ischemic pre-conditioning in deceased donor liver transplantation: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

To assess the immediate and long‐term effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in deceased donor. liver transplantation (LT), we designed a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 60 donors: control group (CTL, n = 30) or study group (IPC, n = 30). IPC was induced by 10‐min hiliar clamping immediately before recovery of organs. Clinical data and blood and liver samples were obtained in the donor and in the recipient for measurements. IPC significantly improved biochemical markers of liver cell function such as uric acid, hyaluronic acid and Hypoxia‐Induced Factor‐1alpha (HIF‐1α) levels. Moreover, the degree of apoptosis was significantly lower in the IPC group. On clinical basis, IPC significantly improved the serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and reduced the need for reoperation in the postoperative period. Moreover, the incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF) was lower in the IPC group, but did not achieve statistical significance. We conclude that 10‐min IPC protects against I/R injury in deceased donor LT.

Liver Transplantation for Malignant Diseases: Selection andPattern of Recurrence

Liver transplantation (LT) for malignant tumors should be accepted if, with adequate case selection, long-term results are similar to those in patients transplanted for benign diseases. The aim of the present study was to reexamine selection criteria for LT in malignant diseases with particular emphasis on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. One hundred-three of 369 patients transplanted in our unit had HCC in cirrhosis (28%), 15 of which were incidental tumors, and 234 patients underwent LT for non-cholestatic cirrhosis. Pretransplant arterial chemoembolization(TACE) was performed in 36 cases (41%) of known HCC. Only early,well-delimited tumors in advanced cirrhosis with no extrahepatic disease were accepted for LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma characteristics included mean tumor size (3.1 cm), multiple (59%), bilobular involvement (31%), and vascular invasion (9.2%). Postoperative mortality was 4%. Median follow-up was 67.5 months. Tumor recurrence rate was 14.5%, 33% (5/15) in incidental tumors and 11.4% (10/88) in known HCC and by tumor stage (pTNM): 7.7% (1/13) in stage I, 16.7%(5/30) in stage II, 15% (3/20) in stage III, and 17% (6/35) in stage IV. Mean time for recurrence was 20.6 months. Tumoral vascular invasion, tumor differentiation, and satellite tumors were significant factors for tumor recurrence in univariate analysis, whereas tumor vascular invasion was the only significant factor for tumor recurrence in multivariate analysis. Actuarial survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 66%, 58%, respectively, in patients with HCC and were similar to those of cirrhotic patients 76%, 67%, 63%, respectively. In conclusion, patients with early HCC in cirrhosis are good candidates for LT; results are similar when compared with those of cirrhotic patients without tumor. Liver transplantation for other malignancies is admitted only in fibrolamellar hepatoma, hepatoblastoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma without extrahepatic disease, and in metastases from carcinoid tumors.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in patients undergoing liver transplantation: a Spanish matched cohort multicenter study.

Objective:To evaluate the outcome of patients with hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (I-CC) on pathological examination after liver transplantation for HCC. Background:Information on the outcome of cirrhotic patients undergoing a transplant for HCC and with a diagnosis of HCC-CC or I-CC by pathological study is limited. Methods:Multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort 1:2 study. Study group: 42 patients undergoing a transplant for HCC and with a diagnosis of HCC-CC or I-CC by pathological study; and control group: 84 patients with a diagnosis of HCC. I-CC subgroup: 27 patients compared with 54 controls; HCC-CC subgroup: 15 patients compared with 30 controls. Patients were also divided according to the preoperative tumor size and number: uninodular tumors 2 cm or smaller and multinodular or uninodular tumors 2 cm or larger. Median follow-up: 51 (range, 3–142) months. Results:The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rate differed between the study and control groups (83%, 70%, and 60% vs 99%, 94%, and 89%, respectively; P < 0.001). Differences were found in 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates between the I-CC subgroup and their controls (78%, 66%, and 51% vs 100%, 98%, and 93%; P < 0.001), but no differences were observed between the HCC-CC subgroup and their controls (93%, 78%, and 78% vs 97%, 86%, and 86%; P = 0.9). Patients with uninodular tumors 2 cm or smaller in the study and control groups had similar 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate (92%, 83%, 62% vs 100%, 80%, 80%; P = 0.4). In contrast, patients in the study group with multinodular or uninodular tumors larger than 2 cm had worse 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates than their controls (80%, 66%, and 61% vs 99%, 96%, and 90%; P < 0.001). Conclusions:Patients with HCC-CC have similar survival to patients undergoing a transplant for HCC. Preoperative diagnosis of HCC-CC should not prompt the exclusion of these patients from transplant option.

Outcome and hepatic hemodynamics in liver transplant patients with portal vein arterialization.

Few cases of successful portal vein arterialization in orthotopic and auxiliary liver transplantation have been reported.

“Very Early” Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients: Should Liver Transplantation Be Reconsidered in These Patients?

A retrospective cohort multicenter study was conducted to analyze the risk factors for tumor recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) in cirrhotic patients found to have an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) on pathology examination. We also aimed to ascertain whether there existed a subgroup of patients with single tumors ≤2 cm (“very early”) in which results after LT can be acceptable. Twenty‐nine patients comprised the study group, eight of whom had a “very early” iCCA (four of them incidentals). The risk of tumor recurrence was significantly associated with larger tumor size as well as larger tumor volume, microscopic vascular invasion and poor degree of differentiation. None of the patients in the “very early” iCCA subgroup presented tumor recurrence compared to 36.4% of those with single tumors >2 cm or multinodular tumors, p = 0.02. The 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year actuarial survival of those in the “very early” iCCA subgroup was 100%, 73% and 73%, respectively. The present is the first multicenter attempt to ascertain the risk factors for tumor recurrence in cirrhotic patients found to have an iCCA on pathology examination. Cirrhotic patients with iCCA ≤2 cm achieved excellent 5‐year survival, and validation of these findings by other groups may change the current exclusion of such patients from transplant programs.

Influence of anti-HLA antibodies and positive T-lymphocytotoxic crossmatch on survival and graft rejection in human liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS The role of crossmatching in liver transplantation is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate retrospectively the effect of sensitization and IgG lymphocytotoxic crossmatching on liver transplantation. METHODS/RESULTS Over 5 years, 20 of 243 (8.2%) first liver transplants were performed with a positive crossmatch and their outcome was compared with the remaining 223 performed with a negative crossmatch. Women had a higher incidence of positive crossmatch than men (p < 0.001). Significant differences in mean panel reactive antibody of 2.7% and 43.3% were found in negative and positive crossmatch patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Severe early rejection resulting in graft loss occurred in eight of 20 positive crossmatch patients, and only one of 223 negative crossmatch patients (p < 0.001). Five of the remaining positive crossmatch patients suffered several acute rejection episodes some months after liver transplantation. Two of 20 in the positive crossmatch group developed chronic rejection (10%) compared with ten of 223 negatives (4.4%) (N.S). Nine of 16 positive crossmatch female recipients suffered graft loss and seven died, representing 1-year graft and patient survival of 56% and 43%, respectively. Fifteen of 68 negative crossmatch female recipients presented graft loss and 12 died, accounting for 1-year patient and graft survival of 82% and 78% (p < 0.005), respectively. Five patients (20%) displayed positive crossmatch at the time of retransplantation, compared with 24 (10%) who were negative (N.S). CONCLUSION Our experience confirms the adverse impact of a positive crossmatch in liver transplantation, particularly in female recipients. Candidates with high panel reactive antibody are more likely to display a positive crossmatch, and therefore to develop early severe rejection and graft failure.

Biliary complications secondary to late hepatic artery thrombosis in adult liver transplant patients

Abstract Biliary complications (BC) are the usual presentation of late hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) of the liver graft. Our aim was to study the clinical features and outcome of BC secondary to HAT compared to BC which occurred in liver transplant (LT) patients with patent vessels. We present a retrospective study of 224 LTs performed in 204 patients between 1988 and 1996. The mean recipient x s age was 51 years. A choledochocholedochostomy without T‐tube was used as biliary reconstruction in most cases (67%); in 12%, a choledochojejunostomy was performed. An iliac conduit was necessary in 15 % of cases and back‐table arterial reconstruction was performed in 10 % of cases of anatomic variants in graft arteries. Different donor, recipient and intraoperative variables, as well as treatment and outcome, were studied in the two groups of patients presenting BC with or without HAT. BC occurred in 38 cases (17%) whereas HAT was diagnosed in 11 cases (4.9%). Therefore, 23 % of BC encountered after LT were secondary to HAT. Nine cases of late HAT manifested as BC, septicaemia (88 %) and hepatic bilomas (8 cases). Percutaneous or surgical drainage of hepatic bilomas was performed in all cases, followed by retransplantation in six cases (66%). BC secondary to HAT appeared later than the rest of BC. Donor age was the only significant predisposing factor found in our study. Graft survival is significantly reduced as most patients needed re‐transplantation. In conclusion, BC secondary to HAT presented later in livers from older donors in the form of biliary sepsis and hepatic biloma. Retransplantation was ultimately required in most cases and graft survival was significantly diminished.

Indications and management of everolimus after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE Our aim was to assess our experience with the use and management of everolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Among the 759 patients who underwent transplantation from 1988 to 2008, 25 (3.2%) received immunosuppression with everolimus. Their mean age was 55.6 years. We analyzed indications for use, time between transplantation and introduction of everolimus, as well as its efficacy, side effects, and patient survival. RESULTS The indications for everolimus treatment were: extended hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the explanted liver (n = 6; 24%); HCC recurrence during follow-up (n = 4; 16%); de novo tumor (n = 6; 24%); refractory rejection (n = 3; 12%); side effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI; n = 3; 12%); and other causes (n = 3; 12%). Mean time between OLT and everolimus treatment was 40 +/- 33 months (range, 10 days-178 months). Mean follow-up after conversion was 10 +/- 9 months (range, 1.5-25 months). More than half of the patients resolved the event for which the drug was indicated: 75% of patients with refractory rejection; 60% of those with renal insufficiency; and 100% of those converted for neurotoxicity or hepatotoxicity. Two patients with recurrent HCC and 1 with extended HCC died at a mean time of 10.5 months. The 6 cases of de novo tumors were operated and are healthy. Side effects were dyslipidemia in 8 and infection in 2. Five patients (20%) discontinued the drug. CONCLUSIONS In the early posttransplantation period, everolimus is indicated for refractory rejection or as prophylaxis for recurrence of extended tumors. In any time but especially in the late period, everolimus is indicated for patients with serious side effects due to a CNI or to a de novo tumor.

Tankyrase inhibition blocks Wnt/β-catenin pathway and reverts resistance to PI3K and AKT inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Purpose: Oncogenic mutations in the KRAS/PI3K/AKT pathway are one of the most frequent alterations in cancer. Although PI3K or AKT inhibitors show promising results in clinical trials, drug resistance frequently emerges. We previously revealed Wnt/β-catenin signaling hyperactivation as responsible for such resistance in colorectal cancer. Here we investigate Wnt-mediated resistance in patients treated with PI3K or AKT inhibitors in clinical trials and evaluate the efficacy of a new Wnt/tankyrase inhibitor, NVP-TNKS656, to overcome such resistance. Experimental Design: Colorectal cancer patient-derived sphere cultures and mouse tumor xenografts were treated with NVP-TNKS656, in combination with PI3K or AKT inhibitors.We analyzed progression-free survival of patients treated with different PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in correlation with Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation, oncogenic mutations, clinicopathological traits, and gene expression patterns in 40 colorectal cancer baseline tumors. Results: Combination with NVP-TNKS656 promoted apoptosis in PI3K or AKT inhibitor-resistant cells with high nuclear β-catenin content. High FOXO3A activity conferred sensitivity to NVP-TNKS656 treatment. Thirteen of 40 patients presented high nuclear β-catenin content and progressed earlier upon PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibition. Nuclear β-catenin levels predicted drug response, whereas clinicopathologic traits, gene expression profiles, or frequent mutations (KRAS, TP53, or PIK3CA) did not. Conclusions: High nuclear β-catenin content independently predicts resistance to PI3K and AKT inhibitors. Combined treatment with a Wnt/tankyrase inhibitor reduces nuclear β-catenin, reverts such resistance, and represses tumor growth. FOXO3A content and activity predicts response to Wnt/β-catenin inhibition and together with β-catenin may be predictive biomarkers of drug response providing a rationale to stratify colorectal cancer patients to be treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 22(3); 644–56. ©2015 AACR.