R. D. Gelber
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. D. Gelber.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1992
Barry A. Gusterson; R. D. Gelber; A. Goldhirsch; Karen N. Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; Carl-Magnus Rudenstam; Rastko Golouh; Richard J. Reed
PURPOSEnTo evaluate the prognostic importance of immunocytochemically determined c-erbB-2 overexpression in the primary tumors of patients with breast cancer.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPrimary tumors from 1,506 breast cancer patients (760 node-negative and 746 node-positive) who were treated in the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V were studied. Node-negative patients were allocated randomly to either a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) or no adjuvant treatment, and node-positive patients received either a prolonged chemotherapy (with tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients) or a single perioperative cycle.nnnRESULTSnTumors from 16% of the node-negative patients and 19% of the node-positive patients were found to be c-erbB-2-positive. In both groups c-erbB-2 positivity correlated with negative progesterone receptors (PR), negative estrogen receptors (ER), and high tumor grade. Lobular carcinomas were all negative, and, thus support the view that such tumors represent a defined subtype of breast carcinoma. The expression of c-erbB-2 was prognostically significant for node-positive but not for node-negative patients. However, in both subgroups, the prognostic significance was greater for patients who had received more adjuvant therapy. For node-positive patients, the effect of prolonged-duration therapy on disease-free survival (DFS) was greater for patients without c-erbB-2 overexpression (hazards ratio [HR], = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.72) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.16). Similarly, for node-negative patients, the effect of PeCT on DFS was greater for those without c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.09) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66 to 2.25).nnnCONCLUSIONnWe conclude that tumors with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 oncogene are less responsive to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-containing adjuvant therapy regimens than those with a normal amount of gene product.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996
Malcolm A. Smith; Diane C. Arthur; Bruce M. Camitta; Andrew J. Carroll; William M. Crist; Paul S. Gaynon; R. D. Gelber; Nyla A. Heerema; E L Korn; M Link; Sharon B. Murphy; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeanette Pullen; G Reamon; Stephen E. Sallan; Harland N. Sather; J J Shuster; R Simon; Michael E. Trigg; David G. Tubergen; Uckun Fm; Richard S. Ungerleider
PURPOSEnTo define more uniform criteria for risk-based treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop in September 1993. Participants included representatives from the Childrens Cancer Group (CCG), Pediatric Oncology Group (POG), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), St Jude Childrens Research Hospital (SJCRH), and the CTEP.nnnMETHODSnWorkshop participants presented and reviewed data from ALL clinical trials, using weighted averages to combine outcome data from different groups.nnnRESULTSnFor patients with B-precursor (ie, non-T, non-B) ALL, the standard-risk category (4-year event-free survival [EFS] rate, approximately 80%) will include patients 1 to 9 years of age with a WBC count at diagnosis less than 50,000/microL. The remaining patients will be classified as having high-risk ALL (4-year EFS rate, approximately 65%). For patients with T-cell ALL, different treatment strategies have yielded different conclusions concerning the prognostic significance of T-cell immunophenotype. Therefore, some groups/institutions will classify patients with T-cell ALL as high risk, while others will assign risk for patients with T-cell ALL based on the uniform age/WBC count criteria. Workshop participants agreed that the risk category of a patient may be modified by prognostic factors in addition to age and WBC count criteria, and that a common set of prognostic factors should be uniformly obtained, including DNA index (DI), cytogenetics, early response to treatment (eg, day-14 bone marrow), immunophenotype, and CNS status.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe more uniform approach to risk-based treatment assignment and to collection of specific prognostic factors should increase the efficiency of future ALL clinical research.
The Lancet | 1999
Rj Cote; H Fpeterson; B Chaiwun; R. D. Gelber; A. Goldhirsch; M Castiglione-Gertsch; Barry A. Gusterson; A.M. Neville
BACKGROUNDnThis study was designed to ascertain whether immunohistochemical methods could improve the detection of metastases in primary breast-cancer patients whose axillary lymph nodes were classified, by conventional methods, as disease free.nnnMETHODSnIpsilateral lymph nodes (negative for metastases by routine histology) from 736 patients (participants in Trial V of the International [Ludwig] Breast Cancer Study) were examined by serial sectioning and staining with haematoxylin and eosin (two sections from each of six levels) and by immunohistochemistry of a single section (with two anticytokeratins AE-1 and CAM 5.2). After median follow-up of 12 years, disease-free and overall survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.nnnFINDINGSnOccult nodal metastases were detected by serial sectioning and haematoxylin and eosin in 52 (7%) of 736 patients and by immunohistochemistry in 148 (20%). Only two (3%) of 64 invasive lobular or mixed invasive lobular and ductal cancers had node micrometastases, detected by haematoxylin and eosin, compared with 25 (39%) by immunohistochemistry. Occult metastases, detected by either method, were associated with significantly poor disease-free and overall survival in postmenopausal but not in premenopausal patients. Immunohistochemically detected occult lymph-node metastases remained an independent and highly significant predictor of recurrence even after control for tumour grade, tumour size, oestrogen-receptor status, vascular invasion, and treatment assignment (hazard ratio 1.79 [95% CI 1.17-2.74], p=0.007).nnnINTERPRETATIONnThe immunohistochemical examination of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes is a reliable, prognostically valuable, and simple method for the detection of occult nodal metastases. Immunohistochemistry is recommended as a standard method of node examination in postmenopausal patients.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1986
Luis A. Clavell; R. D. Gelber; Harvey J. Cohen; Suzanne Hitchcock-Bryan; Cassady; Nancy J. Tarbell; Blattner; Ramana Tantravahi; Pearl Leavitt; Stephen E. Sallan
We prospectively assigned 289 consecutive children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia to receive one of two treatment programs on the basis of the presence or absence of certain risk factors at the time of diagnosis. Patients at high risk (62 percent of the total) had one or more of the following risk factors: age below two or above nine years, a white-cell count of 20,000 per cubic millimeter or more, the presence of T-cell immunologic markers, radiologic evidence of a mediastinal mass, and involvement of the central nervous system. Patients in both the standard-risk and high-risk groups were treated for two years, receiving intensive remission-induction therapy, central nervous system prophylaxis, weekly administration of high-dose asparaginase, and multiple-drug continuation therapy (which in the high-risk group included doxorubicin and a larger dose of prednisone). At a median follow-up of 35 months, the mean (+/- SE) event-free survival rates at four years among the patients in the standard-risk and high-risk groups were 86 +/- 4 percent and 71 +/- 4 percent, respectively (P = 0.003), for a total event-free survival of 77 +/- 3 percent. Within the high-risk group, the white-cell count at diagnosis and the sex of the patient were not significant prognostic indicators, but age below 12 months at diagnosis was associated with a very poor outcome. As compared with previous methods, this treatment program using four-drug induction and intensive asparaginase therapy has resulted in improved event-free survival in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1989
A. Goldhirsch; R. D. Gelber; R J Simes; Paul Glasziou; A. S. Coates
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer remains controversial because the potential benefits in terms of prolongation of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) must be balanced against the toxicity of treatment. Following mastectomy, 463 evaluable postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either chemoendocrine therapy for 1 year, or endocrine therapy alone for 1 year, or no adjuvant therapy (Ludwig Trial III). At 7-years median follow-up, OS was longer for the chemoendocrine-treated patients compared with controls (P = .04) and compared with the adjuvant endocrine therapy-alone group (P = .08). In order to balance this therapeutic advantage against the toxic effects of treatment, OS time was divided into time with toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms and toxicity (TWiST), and time after systemic relapse (REL). TOX and REL were weighted by coefficients of utility relative to TWiST and the results added to give a period of quality-adjusted survival (Q-TWiST). Benefits measured by Q-TWiST generally favored chemoendocrine therapy. For example, if TOX and REL were both given utility coefficients of 0.5 relative to 1.0 for TWiST, then by 7 years the average Q-TWiST for chemoendocrine therapy was 6.7 months longer than for no-adjuvant therapy (P = .05) and 4.1 months longer than for endocrine therapy alone (P = .20). Quality-adjusted survival analysis is recommended in assessing costs and benefits of toxic adjuvant therapy. In this example, it supports the use of chemoendocrine therapy in postmenopausal node-positive patients for a wide range of relative values assigned to periods with symptoms and toxicity.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1990
Rebecca Gelman; R. D. Gelber; Henderson Ic; C. N. Coleman; J R Harris
Studies of radiation therapy and/or surgery in the treatment of cancer frequently use actuarial methods to estimate curves of time to local failure and compare two such curves with statistical methods originally developed for survival data. In such analyses, patients who fail first in distant sites or die before local failure are considered censored for time to local failure. While the arithmetic of these calculations is usually correct, the interpretation of the results is almost universally incorrect. For example, an actuarial Kaplan-Meier curve of time to breast recurrence after breast conserving treatment consistently overestimates the percentage of patients who would benefit from a subsequent mastectomy. Actuarial methods require the assumption that time to local failure and time to distant failure are statistically independent. For most human malignancies this is not a reasonable assumption, since there are always some patient subgroups at high risk of both local and distant failure and some patient subgroups at low risk for either type of failure. Without the assumption of independence, the time to local failure distribution is not well defined. The basic problem is that estimating time to local failure falls into the category of analyzing competing risks, since the various causes of failure are competing for the same patient. For this reason, the effects of a particular treatment on local failure cannot be assessed separately from its effects on distant failure. This report explains the concepts of statistical independence, nonidentifiability, and competing risks and illustrates the pitfalls of using actuarial methods to assess local tumor control.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2003
Arne Wallgren; Marco Bonetti; R. D. Gelber; A. Goldhirsch; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Stig Holmberg; Jurij Lindtner; B. Thürlimann; Martin F. Fey; I.D. Werner; John Forbes; Karen N. Price; Alan S. Coates; John P. Collins
PURPOSEnTo explore prognostic factors for locoregional failures (LRF) among women treated for invasive breast cancer within clinical trials of adjuvant therapies.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnThe study population consisted of 5,352 women who were treated with a modified radical mastectomy and enrolled in one of seven International Breast Cancer Study Group randomized trials. A total of 1,275 women with node-negative disease received either no adjuvant therapy or a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy, and 4,077 women with node-positive disease received adjuvant chemotherapy of at least 3 months duration and/or tamoxifen. Median follow-up is 12 to 15.5 years.nnnRESULTSnIn women with node-negative disease, factors associated with increased risk of LRF were vascular invasion (VI) and tumor size greater than 2 cm for premenopausal and VI for postmenopausal patients. Of the 1,275 patients, 345 (27%) met criteria for the highest risk groups, and the 10-year cumulative incidences of LRF with or without distant metastases were 16% for premenopausal and 19% for postmenopausal women. For the node-positive cohort, number of nodes and tumor grade were factors for both menopausal groups, with additional prediction provided by VI for premenopausal and tumor size for postmenopausal patients. Of the 4,077 patients, 815 (20%) met criteria for the highest risk groups, and 10-year cumulative incidences were 35% for premenopausal and 34% for postmenopausal women.nnnCONCLUSIONnLRFs are a significant problem after mastectomy alone even for some patients with node-negative breast cancer, as well as after mastectomy and adjuvant treatment for some subgroups of patients with node-positive disease. In addition to number of positive lymph nodes, predictors of LRF include tumor-related factors, such as vascular invasion, higher grade, and larger size.
European Journal of Cancer | 1998
Olivia Pagani; A. O’Neill; M. Castiglione; R. D. Gelber; A. Goldhirsch; C.M Rudenstam; Jurij Lindtner; J Collins; Diana Crivellari; Alan S. Coates; Franco Cavalli; Beat Thürlimann; Edda Simoncini; Martin F. Fey; Karen N. Price; Hans-Jörg Senn
Adjuvant chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea has been shown to be associated with reduced relapses and improved survival for premenopausal breast cancer patients. Amenorrhoea was, therefore, studied to define features of chemotherapy (i.e. duration and timing) and disease-related factors which are associated with its treatment effects. We reviewed data from IBCSG Trial VI, in which accrual was between July 1986 and April 1993. 1196 of the 1475 eligible patients (81%) were evaluable for this analysis. The median follow-up was 60 months. Women who experienced amenorrhoea had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) than those who did not (P = 0.0004), although the magnitude of the effect was reduced when adjusted for other prognostic factors (P = 0.09). The largest treatment effect associated with amenorrhoea was seen in patients assigned to receive only three initial CMF courses (5-yr DFS: 67% versus 49%, no amenorrhoea; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P = 0.002). DFS differences between amenorrhoea categories were larger for patients with ER/PR positive tumours (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, patients whose menses returned after brief amenorrhoea had a DFS similar to those whose menses ceased and did not recover (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.62; P = 0.63). The effects associated with a permanent or temporary chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea are especially significant for node-positive breast cancer patients who receive a suboptimal duration of CMF chemotherapy. Cessation of menses, even for a limited time period after diagnosis of breast cancer, might be beneficial and should be prospectively investigated, especially in patients with oestrogen receptor-positive primaries.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1994
Marshall A. Schorin; S Blattner; R. D. Gelber; Nancy J. Tarbell; Mia Donnelly; Virginia M. Dalton; Harvey J. Cohen; Stephen E. Sallan
PURPOSEnThe goals of this treatment program were as follows: to improve event-free survival (EFS) rates for high-risk (HR) patients by increasing the intensity of induction treatment; to improve EFS rates for infants by adding a special postinduction intensification; to treat the CNS using cranial irradiation doses that were lower than in our historic control group; and to confirm our previously obtained good results for children with T-cell disease.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnTwo hundred twenty children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from all risk groups, including infants and patients with T-cell disease, were treated between 1985 and 1987 with multiagent chemotherapy and cranial irradiation.nnnRESULTSnThe 7-year EFS rate (+/- SE) for all 220 patients was 78% +/- 3% at a median follow-up duration of 6.2 years, 89% +/- 4% for the 82 patients classified as standard risk (SR), and 72% +/- 4% for the remaining 138 patients classified as HR and very high risk (VHR). Eleven infants had an EFS rate of 55% +/- 15% that might be attributable to treatment with high doses of methotrexate and cytarabine (ara-c). Twenty children with T-cell disease had an EFS rate of 70% +/- 10%. CNS leukemia relapse (isolated or combined with bone marrow) occurred in four of 82 SR patients who received 18 Gy of cranial irradiation and four of 138 HR and VHR patients who received 24 Gy.nnnCONCLUSIONnThis protocol, which featured early intensive treatment including asparaginase, doxorubicin, and cranial irradiation, provided good long-term disease control for children with ALL.
The Lancet | 1996
C. Hürny; J. Bernhard; M. Castiglione-Gertsch; Alan S. Coates; H.F. Peterson; R. D. Gelber; John F Forbes; C-M. Rudenstam; E. Simoncini; D. Crivellari; A. Goldhirsch; H.-J. Senn
BACKGROUNDnAdjuvant therapy for early breast cancer is effective but may be toxic. Our aim was to investigate the impact of the presence, timing, and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients perceptions of their quality of life (QL).nnnMETHODSnInternational Breast Cancer Study Group trial VI assessed adjuvant chemotherapy in 1475 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients, and trial VII assessed adjuvant tamoxifen or chemoendocrine therapy in 1212 postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients were asked to complete a QL questionnaire-single-item linear analogue self-assessment scales measured physical wellbeing, mood, appetite, and perceived adjustment/coping. QL was assessed in this way at the beginning of treatment, 2 months after the start of treatment, every 3 months, and at 1 and 6 months after recurrence.nnnFINDINGSnBaseline QL scores decreased as the number of involved axillary nodes increased (for example, mean mood score: 66.1 for women with one positive node, 66.4 for two to four positive nodes, 61.3 for five to nine positive nodes, and 59.1 for ten or more positive nodes; p = 0.008 for trends), and were lower in patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative than in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours (61.4 vs 66.3, p = 0.0009). All treatment groups showed substantial improvement in QL scores during adjuvant therapy. Patterns of QL scores reflected presence, duration, and timing of cytotoxic treatment. Longer initial cytotoxic therapy delayed improvement in QL scores. Later cytotoxic therapy had transient adverse effects. Anticipation of future therapy also affected QL scores.nnnINTERPRETATIONnOverall, chemotherapy had a measurable adverse effect on QL, but this effect was transient and minor compared with patients adaptation/coping after diagnosis and surgery. This finding should encourage patients and doctors to choose appropriate adjuvant therapy with less concern for initial toxicity.