R. Danielewicz
Medical University of Warsaw
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Danielewicz.
American Journal of Transplantation | 2007
A. Kwiatkowski; M Wszoła; Maciej Kosieradzki; R. Danielewicz; Krzysztof Ostrowski; P Domagała; Wojciech Lisik; Rafal Nosek; Slawomir Fesolowicz; Janusz Trzebicki; M. Durlik; L. Paczek; A. Chmura; W. Rowinski
Machine perfusion (MP) has been used as the kidney preservation method in our center for over 10 years. The first, small (n = 74) prospective, single‐blinded randomized study comparing MP and Cold Storage (CS) showed that the incidence of delayed graft function was higher after CS. There have been no reports in the literature on the effect of storage modality on long‐term function of renal allografts. This paper presents an analysis of long‐term results of renal transplantation in 415 patients operated on between 1994 and 1999. Of those, 227 kidneys were MP‐stored prior to KTx. The control group consisted of 188 CS kidney transplants. Kidneys were not randomized to MP or to CS. Donor demographics, medical and biochemical data, cold ischemia time, HLA match and recipient data were collected. Standard triple‐drug immunosuppression was administered to both groups. Mortality, graft survival and incidence of return to hemodialysis treatment were analyzed. Despite longer cold ischemia time and poorer donor hemodynamics in MP group, 5‐year Kaplan‐Meier graft survival was better in MP‐stored than in CS‐stored kidneys (68.2% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.02). Conclusion: In this nonrandomized analysis, kidney storage by MP improved graft survival and reduced the number of patients who returned to dialysis.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2002
Grzegorz Michalak; J. Czerwiński; A. Kwiatkowski; R. Danielewicz; Maciej Kosieradzki; Wojciech Lisik; A. Chmura; M Lao; M. Durlik; Janusz Walaszewski; W. Rowinski
SIMULTANEOUS pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKTx) is the procedure of choice for a majority of transplant candidates with end-stage renal disease and diabetes mellitus. Recent evidence supports its benefits on the maintenance of normoglycemia and the arrest or even possibily of reversal of diabetic complications, such as vasculopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. However, pancreas transplant has been associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all the routinely performed organ transplant procedures. A significant number of pancreas grafts are lost early post-transplant secondary to surgical complications. Over the last decade, the operative procedure has been refined and immunosuppressive regiments have improved such that 1-year graft survival routinely exceeds 75%. The purpose of this study was to assess our improved results and to determine other risk factors that may help us decrease the complication rate further.
Journal of Transplantation | 2014
Maciej Kosieradzki; Anna Jakubowska-Winecka; Michal Feliksiak; Ilona Kawalec; Ewa Zawilinska; R. Danielewicz; J. Czerwiński; Piotr Małkowski; W. Rowinski
Public attitude toward deceased donor organ recovery in Poland is quite positive, with only 15% opposing to donation of their own organs, yet actual donation rate is only 16/pmp. Moreover, donation rate varies greatly (from 5 to 28 pmp) in different regions of the country. To identify the barriers of organ donation, we surveyed 587 physicians involved in brain death diagnosis from regions with low (LDR) and high donation rates (HDR). Physicians from LDR were twice more reluctant to start diagnostic procedure when clinical signs of brain death were present (14% versus 5.5% physicians from HDR who would not diagnose death, resp.). Twenty-five percent of LDR physicians (as opposed to 12% of physicians from HDR) would either continue with intensive therapy or confirm brain death and limit to the so-called minimal therapy. Only 32% of LDR physicians would proceed with brain death diagnosis regardless of organ donation, compared to 67% in HDR. When donation was not an option, mechanical ventilation would be continued more often in LDR regions (43% versus 26.7%; P < 0.01). In conclusion, low donation activity seems to be mostly due to medical staff attitude.
Human Immunology | 2014
Grażyna Moszkowska; Hanna Zielińska; Maciej Zieliński; Anna Dukat-Mazurek; Alicja Dębska-Ślizień; Bolesław Rutkowski; D. Lewandowska; R. Danielewicz; Piotr Trzonkowski
Pretransplant identification of allosensitized patients is possible thanks to new technologies, which allow for accurate detection of clinically relevant alloantibodies. Implementation of these methods in the screening of patients awaiting transplantation increased their chance for successful donor-recipient matching. Here, 1460 patients reported to the Polish National Waiting List were screened with the Luminex Screen (LS) solid phase test for anti-HLA antibodies. The patients with detected anti-HLA antibodies were assayed with the Luminex Single Antigen (LSA) tests in order to establish defined antigen specificity of the alloantibodies. The results were compared with data on the immunization assessed with the routine complement-dependent-cytotoxicity panel-reactive-antibody assay (PRA CDC). The study showed significantly higher sensitivity of the LS method when compared with PRA CDC. It has been shown that LSA test is a useful technique identifying the specificities of alloantibodies. In particular, LSA allowed to assess donor specific antibodies (DSA) to previous mismatches (MM) and to determine acceptable HLA mismatches of the potential donors. The introduction of solid phase tests in routine pretransplant diagnostics allowed for faster and more accurate assessment of the immunological risk of the recipients and optimal donor-recipient matching. Hence, the presented algorithm of solid phase assays has become a new standard for the identification of allosensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation in Poland.
Annals of Transplantation | 2015
Robert Gałązkowski; Agata Pawlak; Daniel Rabczenko; Grzegorz Michalak; Michał Farkowski; R. Danielewicz; Maciej Sterliński
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the use of fixed-wing air ambulance (FWAA) services in Poland during the period 2012-2013, with particular emphasis on air transport of organ recipients to transplantation centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data derived from standard FWAA medical documentation. RESULTS In the years 2012-2013 there were 500 emergency (52.7%) and 447 elective (47.3%) missions. Children who were 1-10 years old comprised the single largest group in both emergency (EM) and elective (EL) missions, accounting for 17% of all flights. EM transports carried mainly patients aged 49-59 (18.5%), and 35.1% of all EM transports concerned patients with end-stage renal disease qualified as organ recipients who were transported to transplantation centers. With a total of 2278 kidney transplantations performed in Poland within the period analyzed, up to 7.8% recipients were transported by air medical services. For EL flights, the most numerous group were patients aged 1-10 (25.4%) and this group comprised mainly patients with congenital disorders (17.9%) and cardiovascular diseases (15.8%). The average flight duration was similar for both EM and EL groups (41.7±10.5 min vs. 40.4±8.7 min, respectively) (p=NS), as was the average distance covered (321.8±99.4 km vs. 310.5±87.4 km, respectively) (p=NS). In the case of patients with end-stage renal disease, the average distance and flight time were significantly longer than those for all other groups in total: 382.5±96.4 km vs. 302.6±87.3 km (p<0.001) and 74.9±10.2 min vs. 39.7±8.8 min (p<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The most frequent clinical indication for FWAA transport was end-stage renal disease and most of those flights were carried out as EM. The FWAA service plays a vital role in the organization of pre-transplantation transport to referral centers in Poland. This analysis supports the data for evaluation and potential changes in the Polish distribution and allocation rules for kidney transplantation.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2005
Grzegorz Michalak; A. Kwiatkowski; M. Bieniasz; J. Meszaros; J. Czerwiński; M Wszoła; R. Nosek; K. Ostrowski; A. Chmura; R. Danielewicz; Wojciech Lisik; L. Adadynski; S Fesołowicz; A. Dobrowolska; M. Durlik; W. Rowinski
International Congress of the Transplantation Society | 2003
Maciej Kosieradzki; Julita Kuczynska; Jadwiga Piwowarska; Irena Wegrowicz-Rebandel; A. Kwiatkowski; Wojciech Lisik; Grzegorz Michalak; R. Danielewicz; Leszek Paczek; W. Rowinski
Transplantation Proceedings | 1997
R. Danielewicz; A. Kwiatkowski; W.P Polak; Maciej Kosieradzki; Grzegorz Michalak; I. Wegrowicz; Zbigniew Gaciong; Janusz Walaszewski; W. Rowinski
Annals of Transplantation | 2009
A. Kwiatkowski; M Wszoła; Maciej Kosieradzki; R. Danielewicz; K Ostrowski; P Domagała; Wojciech Lisik; S Fesołowicz; Grzegorz Michalak; Janusz Trzebicki; M. Durlik; L. Paczek; W. Rowinski; A. Chmura
Transplantation Proceedings | 2002
Maciej Kosieradzki; R. Danielewicz; A. Kwiatkowski; W.P Polak; M Wszoła; S Fesołowicz; Grzegorz Michalak; Wojciech Lisik; Wegrowicz-Rebandel I; L Pączek; Janusz Walaszewski; W. Rowinski