R. De Marco
Sapienza University of Rome
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. De Marco.
Transplantation | 2012
A. Holanda-Cavalcanti; Erika F. Campos; Patricia C. Grenzi; R. De Marco; G. F. Rampim; Helio Tedesco-Silva; Jose O. Medina-Pestana; Maria Gerbase-DeLima
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of different levels of preformed anti-HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA), revealed by Luminex single antigen beads assay (SAB) in kidney transplants performed with negative complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches against donor T (CDC-anti-human globulin) and B lymphocytes. The study comprised 298 recipients of first (N=256) or second (N=42) kidney grafts, transplanted in a single center, between 2001 and 2006. At the time of transplantation no information regarding Luminex-detected antibodies was available. In this study, stored pretransplant sera were screened for anti-HLA antibodies (Labscreen® Mixed, One Lambda) and the positive ones were further analyzed with the SAB assay (Labscreen® Single Antigen, One Lambda). In the SAB assay, all reactions with normalized mean fluorescence intensity (nMFI) >300 were classified as positive and DSA were defined as antibodies against HLA-A, B or DR mismatches. Based on these results, the recipients were divided into three groups: PRA+,DSA+, PRA+,DSA-, and PRA-. Females, non-white patients, retransplants, and ATG induction therapy were significantly (p< 0.001) more frequent among PRA+ recipients. The proportion of transplants with deceased donors was the same in the three groups (42, 43 and 36%, in PRA+,DSA+, PRA+,DSA-, and PRArecipients, respectively). The mean time of post-transplant follow-up was 57.8, 59.0 and 54.4 months for PRA+,DSA+, PRA+,DSA-, and PRArecipients, respectively. Graft survival curves were constructed with Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test; Cox regression analysis was used to calculate risk of graft loss. Graft survival did not differ between the three above mentioned groups of recipients. We then sub-divided the PRA+,DSA+ recipients into the following DSA nMFI ranges: 300-1,500, >1,500-3,000, >3,000-6,000 and >6,000. No difference in graft survival was observed among PRA+,DSA+ with nMFIs 300-1,500, PRA+,DSA-, and PRArecipients. On the other hand, no graft survival difference was observed among recipients with DSA with nMFIs >1,500-3,000, >3,000-6,000 or >6,000. Therefore, further analyses were conducted considering only two groups of recipients: one comprising all recipients without DSA or with DSA < 1500 nMFI (N=228), and the other comprising recipients with DSA >1,500 MFI (N=70). Graft survival was significantly lower (p< 0.001) in recipients with DSA >1,500 MFI (one-year graft survival: 78.6% vs 92.1%; 5-year graft survival: 64.3% vs 78.9%). DSA >1500 MFI conferred a relative risk of 4.4 (95% CI 1.7-11.1) for graft loss at one year and of 3.0 (95% CI 1.4-6.4) for late graft loss in recipients with functional kidneys at one year. Recipients transplanted with DSA >1500 nMFI also presented lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (Cockroft-Gault formula), at the first month (43.0±19.9 vs. 56.0±20.3 ml/min, p< 0.001) and first year (56.6±17.2 vs. 65.0±21.2 ml/min, p< 0.01). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that DSAs directed to HLA-A, B and DR mismatches with nMFIs from 300 to 1,500 did not have any influence on the transplant outcome, whereas DSAs with nMFIs >1,500, although not associated with immediate graft losses, conferred a risk for graft dysfunction already at the end of the first month, and a risk for long-term graft loss. 900
Journal of Hepatology | 2017
Paolo Caraceni; Oliviero Riggio; Paolo Angeli; Carlo Alessandria; Sergio Neri; F.G. Foschi; F. Levantesi; A. Airoldi; S. Boccia; G.S. Baroni; S. Fagiuoli; Giacomo Laffi; R. Cozzolongo; V. Di Marco; V. Sangiovanni; F. Morisco; Pierluigi Toniutto; Antonio Gasbarrini; R. De Marco; F. De Leonardis; Irene Cacciola; G. Elia; A. Federico; Sara Massironi; R. Guarisco; G. Marin; G. Ballardini; M. Rendina; Silvia Nardelli; Salvatore Piano
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2015
Mauro Bernardi; Oliviero Riggio; Paolo Angeli; Carlo Alessandria; Sergio Neri; F.G. Foschi; F. Levantesi; S. Boccia; A. Airoldi; S. Fagiuoli; G. Svegliati-Baroni; Giacomo Laffi; R. Cozzolongo; G. Butera; V. Sangiovanni; Pierluigi Toniutto; M.A. Zocco; R. De Marco; F. Morisco; F. De Leonardis; Irene Cacciola; G. Elia; A. Federico; Sara Massironi; R. Guarisco; A. Marin; Salvatore Piano; C. Elia; Silvia Nardelli; D. Maiorca
Transplantation | 2014
R. De Marco; Gerbase M. De Lima
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2011
Franco Radaelli; Silvia Paggi; G. De Pretis; O. Triossi; S. Ierace; S. Crotta; A. Gabbrielli; A. Lauri; P. Occhipinti; D. Drago; O. Tarantino; E. Tasini; Enrico Colombo; R. Pometta; Luca Ferraris; P. Brosolo; R. De Marco; M.M. Terpin; R. Franch; S. Peyre; F. Magnolfi; M. Marini; Aurora Bortoli; A. Solinas
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2010
Arrigo Barabino; E. Castellano; Angela Calvi; P. Gandullia; Silvia Vignola; Serena Arrigo; R. De Marco
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2007
Paola Barsotti; M. Siciliano; R. De Marco; A. Molinaro; A. Onetti Muda; N. Gualtieri; M. Merli; A.F. Attili; P.B. Berloco; M. Rossi; S. Ginanni Corradini
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2007
F. Liguori; Nicole Domingo; Gd Tebala; C. Ripani; R. De Marco; M. Siciliano; A.F. Attili; Denis Lairon; Huguette Lafont; P. Lechene de la Porte; S. Ginanni Corradini
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2006
S. Ginanni-Corradini; A. Eramo; M. Siciliano; R. De Marco; M.A. Burza; F. Lignori; M. Merli; G. Novelli; Giancarlo Ferretti; P.B. Berloco; A.F. Attili; M. Rossi
Transplantation | 2004
M. Rossi; R. De Marco; M. Siciliano; F. Liguori; M Iappelli; F. Pugliese; F. Ruberto; A. Eramo; R. Pretagostini; Francesco Nudo; A. Bussotti; M. Merli; G. Novelli; P.B. Berloco; A.F. Attili; S. Ginanni Corradini