Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Falk.
Metrologia | 2012
Z. Jiang; Vojtech Palinkas; Felicitas Arias; J. Liard; S. Merlet; Herbert Wilmes; L. Vitushkin; Lennart Robertsson; L. Tisserand; F. Pereira Dos Santos; Q. Bodart; R. Falk; Henri Baumann; S Mizushima; J. Mäkinen; M. Bilker-Koivula; Chun-Hsing Lee; In-Mook Choi; B Karaböce; W. Ji; Q. Wu; Diane E. Ruess; Christian Ullrich; Jakub Kostelecky; D. Schmerge; Marc Eckl; Ludger Timmen; N. Le Moigne; Roger Bayer; T. Olszak
The 8th International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters (ICAG2009) took place at the headquarters of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) from September to October 2009. It was the first ICAG organized as a key comparison in the framework of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement of the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM MRA) (CIPM 1999). ICAG2009 was composed of a Key Comparison (KC) as defined by the CIPM MRA, organized by the Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities (CCM) and designated as CCM.G-K1. Participating gravimeters and their operators came from national metrology institutes (NMIs) or their designated institutes (DIs) as defined by the CIPM MRA. A Pilot Study (PS) was run in parallel in order to include gravimeters and their operators from other institutes which, while not signatories of the CIPM MRA, nevertheless play important roles in international gravimetry measurements. The aim of the CIPM MRA is to have international acceptance of the measurement capabilities of the participating institutes in various fields of metrology. The results of CCM.G-K1 thus constitute an accurate and consistent gravity reference traceable to the SI (International System of Units), which can be used as the global basis for geodetic, geophysical and metrological observations of gravity. The measurements performed afterwards by the KC participants can be referred to the international metrological reference, i.e. they are SI-traceable.The ICAG2009 was complemented by a number of associated measurements: the Relative Gravity Campaign (RGC2009), high-precision levelling and an accurate gravity survey in support of the BIPM watt balance project. The major measurements took place at the BIPM between July and October 2009. Altogether 24 institutes with 22 absolute gravimeters (one of the 22 AGs was ultimately withdrawn) and nine relative gravimeters participated in the ICAG/RGC campaign.This paper is focused on the absolute gravity campaign. We review the history of the ICAGs and present the organization, data processing and the final results of the ICAG2009.After almost thirty years of hosting eight successive ICAGs, the CIPM decided to transfer the responsibility for piloting the future ICAGs to NMIs, although maintaining a supervisory role through its Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities.
Metrologia | 2002
L. Vitushkin; M. Becker; Zhiheng Jiang; Olivier Francis; T. M. van Dam; J. E. Faller; J-M Chartier; M. Amalvict; S. Bonvalot; Nicole Debeglia; Sergio Desogus; Michel Diament; François Dupont; R. Falk; G. Gabalda; C. G. L. Gagnon; T. Gattacceca; Alessandro Germak; Jacques Hinderer; Claudio Origlia; O. Jamet; J. Mäkinen; G. Jeffries; R. Käker; Alexander Kopaev; J. Liard; A. Lindau; Laurent Longuevergne; B. Luck; E. N. Maderal
Like all the previous International Comparisons of Absolute Gravimeters (ICAGs) the sixth, ICAG-2001, was held at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). Major improvements in the 2001 campaign were a new measurement strategy using the absolute gravimeters to measure the ties of the gravity network, new sites constructed at the BIPM, improved relative measurements of the ties and gravity gradients, and combined adjustment of the absolute and relative data, realized using new software with a novel data weighting and rejection scheme. The g-values at four sites of the BIPM were measured with an uncertainty of 6 μGal. Good agreement was obtained between the results of the absolute and relative measurements of the ties of the gravity network. The final mean gvalue obtained at the reference site A was 7 μGal less than that obtained in the previous comparison, ICAG-97.
Archive | 2010
Olivier Francis; T. van Dam; Alessandro Germak; M. Amalvict; Roger Bayer; Mirjam Bilker-Koivula; Marta Calvo; G. D’Agostino; T. Dell’Acqua; Andreas Engfeldt; R. Faccia; R. Falk; Olga Gitlein; M. Fernandez; Jon Glenn Omholt Gjevestad; Jacques Hinderer; D. Jones; Jakub Kostelecky; N. Le Moigne; Brian Luck; J. Mäkinen; Dennis B. McLaughlin; T. Olszak; P. Olsson; A. Pachuta; Vojtech Palinkas; Bjørn Ragnvald Pettersen; R. Pujol; I. Prutkin; D. Quagliotti
The second international comparison of absolute gravimeters was held in Walferdange, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in November 2007, in which twenty absolute gravimeters took part. A short description of the data processing and adjustments will be presented here and will be followed by the presentation of the results. Two different methods were applied to estimate the relative offsets between the gravimeters. We show that the results are equivalent as the uncertainties of both adjustments overlap. The absolute gravity meters agree with one another with a standard deviation of 2 μgal (1 gal = 1 cm/s2).
Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions - GGSM 2004 International Association of Geodesy Symposium; Springer-Verlag, Vol. 129 | 2005
Olivier Francis; Tonie van Dam; M. Amalvict; M. de Andrade Sousa; Mirjam Bilker; Ryan M. Billson; G. D’Agostino; Sergio Desogus; R. Falk; Alessandro Germak; Olga Gitlein; D. Jonhson; Fred Klopping; Jakub Kostelecky; Bernard Luck; J. Mäkinen; Dennis B. McLaughlin; E. Nunez; Claudio Origlia; Vojtech Palinkas; Philippe R. Richard; E. Rodriguez; Diane E. Ruess; D. L. Schmerge; Silke Thies; Ludger Timmen; M. Van Camp; D. van Westrum; Herbert Wilmes
The results of an international comparison of absolute gravimeters held in Walferdange, Luxembourg, in November 2003 are presented here in detail. The absolute meters agreed with one another to within a standard deviation less than 2 μGal (1 Gal = 1 cm/s), where we have excluded the results from a single prototype instrument from the analysis. This result, represents the best agreement ever obtained in a comparison of absolute gravimeters. In addition, for the first time, we were able to quantify the effect of the operators on the instrument agreement. The result indicates that the contribution to the errors in the observations due to the operator are less than 1 μGal, i.e. within the observational errors. We also demonstrate that there are no systematic differences between observations taken with FG5’s incorporating the bulk interferometer and those using the fiber optic version of the interferometer.
Metrologia | 2011
Z. Jiang; Olivier Francis; L. Vitushkin; Vojtech Palinkas; Alessandro Germak; M. Becker; Giancarlo D'Agostino; M. Amalvict; Roger Bayer; M. Bilker-Koivula; Sergio Desogus; J. E. Faller; R. Falk; Jacques Hinderer; C. G. L. Gagnon; T. Jakob; E. Kalish; Jakub Kostelecky; Chiungwu Lee; J. Liard; Y. Lokshyn; Brian Luck; J. Mäkinen; S Mizushima; N. Le Moigne; Claudio Origlia; E. R. Pujol; Ph. Richard; Lennart Robertsson; Diane E. Ruess
The Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), S?vres, France, hosted the 7th International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters (ICAG) and the associated Relative Gravity Campaign (RGC) from August to September 2005.ICAG 2005 was prepared and performed as a metrological pilot study, which aimed: To determine the gravity comparison reference values; To determine the offsets of the absolute gravimeters; and As a pilot study to accumulate experience for the CIPM Key Comparisons. This document presents a complete and extensive review of the technical protocol and data processing procedures. The 1st ICAG?RGC comparison was held at the BIPM in 1980?1981 and since then meetings have been organized every 4 years.In this paper, we present an overview of how the meeting was organized, the conditions of BIPM gravimetric sites, technical specifications, data processing strategy and an analysis of the final results. This 7th ICAG final report supersedes all previously published reports.Readings were obtained from participating instruments, 19 absolute gravimeters and 15 relative gravimeters. Precise levelling measurements were carried out and all measurements were performed on the BIPM micro-gravity network which was specifically designed for the comparison.
Archive | 2010
L. Vitushkin; Z. Jiang; Lennart Robertsson; M. Becker; Olivier Francis; Alessandro Germak; G. D’Agostino; Vojtech Palinkas; M. Amalvict; Roger Bayer; Mirjam Bilker-Koivula; Sergio Desogus; J. E. Faller; R. Falk; Jacques Hinderer; C. G. L. Gagnon; T. Jakob; E. Kalish; Jakub Kostelecky; Chiungwu Lee; J. Liard; Y. Lokshyn; Brian Luck; J. Mäkinen; S Mizushima; N. Le Moigne; V. Nalivaev; Claudio Origlia; E. R. Pujol; Philippe R. Richard
The International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters ICAG-2005 was held at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Sevres, France in September 2005. The organization of ICAG-2005, measurement strategy, calculation and presentation of the results were described in a technical protocol pre-developed to the comparison. Nineteen absolute gravimeters carried out 96 series of measurements of free-fall acceleration g at the sites of the BIPM gravity network. The vertical gravity gradients were measured by relative gravimeters. For the first time the budgets of uncertainties were presented.
Bulletin d'information du Bureau Gravimétrique International | 2000
M. Becker; G. Berrino; A. G. Camacho; R. Falk; Olivier Francis; C Gagnon; Carl Gerstenecker; J. Liard; G. Läufer; Bruno Meurers
Metrologia | 2017
David B. Newell; D. van Westrum; Olivier Francis; J. Kanney; J. Liard; A. E. Ramirez; B. Lucero; Brian Ellis; Filippo Greco; A. Pistorio; R. Reudink; Domenico Iacovone; Francesco Baccaro; J. Silliker; R. D. Wheeler; R. Falk; A. Ruelke
Archive | 2007
Ludger Timmen; Olga Gitlein; Jürgen Müller; Heiner Denker; J. Mäkinen; Mirjam Bilker; Herbert Wilmes; R. Falk; Andreas Reinhold; W. Hoppe; Bjørn Ragnvald Pettersen; Ove Christian Dahl Omang; J. G. G. Svendsen; O. Ovstedal; Hans-Georg Scherneck; Bjorn Engen; Andreas Engfeldt; Gabriel Strykowski; René Forsberg
Archive | 2013
Olivier Francis; Henri Baumann; Tomas Volarik; Christian Rothleitner; Gilbert Klein; Marc Seil; Nicolas Dando; Ray Tracey; Carsten Ullrich; Stefaan Castelein; Haiyan Hua; Kang Wu; Shen Chongyang; Xuan Songbo; Hong-Bo Tan; Li Zhengyuan; Vojtech Palinkas; Jakub Kostelecky; Jaakko Mäkinen; Jyri Näränen; Sébastien Merlet; Tristan Farah; Christine Guerlin; Franck Pereira Dos Santos; Nicolas Le Moigne; Cédric Champollion; Sabrina Deville; Ludger Timmen; R. Falk; Herbert Wilmes