R.G. Seyler
Ohio State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R.G. Seyler.
Nuclear Physics | 1969
R.G. Seyler
Abstract The most general parity and time reversal invariant form for the spin - 1 2 − spin −1 scattering amplitude matrix is obtained. The polarization observables (cross section, spin - 1 2 polarization, spin-1 polarization, and spin correlation) which arise upon scattering polarized spin - 1 2 by unpolarized spin-1 particles are expressed in terms of the coefficients of this general form. A phase shift parameterization of these coefficients is also given.
Nuclear Physics | 1969
Claude Petitjean; Louis Brown; R.G. Seyler
Abstract Angular distributions of polarization in 6Li(p, p)6Li have been measured to an accuracy of about 0.01 at 11 energies from 1.2 to 3.2 MeV with a target of 20 keV thickness at 2 MeV. These data and cross section measurements of others are reproduced well by a set of phase shifts, which vary reasonably with energy and which are complex because a reaction channel is open. The 2S-, 4S- and 4P-phases suffice for the analysis. Neither 2P-phases nor mixing parameters are found to be important. The 4 P 5 2 phase resonates at 1.8 MeV as expected. The broad resonance at 5 MeV can be reproduced equally well with either the 4 P 3 2 or the 4 P 1 2 phase resonating, the former agreeing with a previous spin assignment. Measurements of cross section, proton polarization and 6Li vector polarization cannot distinguish between the two sets, but measurements of 6Li tensor polarization could. The uniqueness of the phases is discussed and a polarization contour map is presented.
Physical Review Letters | 1974
L. G. Arnold; R.G. Seyler; T.R. Donoghue; Louis Brown; Urs Rohrer
We have examined the difference between polarization and analyzing power for the reaction
Nuclear Physics | 1969
J.D. McCullen; R.G. Seyler
^{3}\mathrm{H}(p,n)^{3}\mathrm{He}
Nuclear Physics | 1971
L.J.B. Goldfarb; R.G. Seyler
. We find that this difference is due to the presence of
Physical Review C | 1982
H. R. Weller; H. Hasan; S. Manglos; G. Mitev; N. R. Roberson; S.L. Blatt; H. J. Hausman; R.G. Seyler; Richard N. Boyd; T.R. Donoghue; M. A. Kovash; A. D. Bacher; C.C. Foster
^{3}P_{2}\ensuremath{\leftrightarrow}^{3}F_{2}
Physical Review Letters | 1974
L. G. Arnold; R.G. Seyler; Louis Brown; T.I. Bonner; Erich Steiner
transitions which are enhanced in the vicinity of the lowest
Physical Review Letters | 1980
R. C. McBroom; H. R. Weller; S. H. Manglos; N. R. Roberson; S. A. Wender; D. R. Tilley; D. M. Skopik; L.C. Arnold; R.G. Seyler
{2}^{\ensuremath{-}}
Physical Review C | 1984
S.L. Blatt; H. J. Hausman; L.G. Arnold; R.G. Seyler; Richard N. Boyd; T.R. Donoghue; P. Koncz; M. A. Kovash; A. D. Bacher; C.C. Foster
state of
Physical Review C | 1984
R.G. Seyler; H. R. Weller
^{4}\mathrm{He}