R. Geoffrey Burwell

STUDIES IN THE TRANSPLANTATION OF BONE, V. The Capacity of Fresh and Treated Homografts of Bone to Evoke Transplantation Immunity

1. Experiments to examine the antigenicity of homologous bone tissues in rats are reported. The tissues studied included fresh marrow-free cortical bone blocks and chips, fresh, boiled, frozen and freeze-dried marrow-containing iliac bone, fresh iliac bone devoid of marrow, and fresh red marrow. 2. The various tissues were transplanted from hooded to Wistar rats. Three weeks later a skin graft from each donor was transplanted to its respective host to detect the presence of transplantation immunity, which was indicated by the early rejection of the skin graft. 3. Homografts of fresh cortical bone evoked transplantation immunity indicating that it contained transplantation antigens which were also in the skin. 4. Homografts of fresh marrow-containing iliac bone also evoked transplantation immunity, which was shown to be caused by the red marrow. 5. Fresh iliac homografts devoid of marrow did not elicit transplantation immunity. This suggests that iliac bone tissue may not contain transplantation antigens or that the small amount of iliac bone inserted was insufficient. 6. Microscopy of the grafts, removed after three weeks, showed that the inflammatory infiltrations around the bone homografts and autografts were not very different, but that the amount of new bone formed was different. The autografts produced a lot of new bone, the homografts only a little. 7. It is suggested that the immune response evoked in the host by the foreign graft impairs the formation of new bone by fresh homografts of cortical blocks, cortical chips and marrow-containing iliac bone. 8. The impairment of new bone formation by homografts of marrow-free iliac bone is discussed. Such bone grafts fail to evoke detectable transplantation immunity. Why these grafts do not form more new homologous bone than the other homografts studied, is not clear. 9. Homografts of boiled and frozen iliac bone do not evoke any detectable change in the sensitivity of the host to donor tissue. 10. Homografts of freeze-dried marrow-containing iliac bone elicit a slight but significant prolongation of the survival of skin homografts. The implication, in terms of modern immunological theory, is that in such grafts certain tissue antigens still persist.

STUDIES IN THE TRANSPLANTATION OF BONE VII. The Fresh Composite Homograft-Autograft of Cancellous Bone

1. Previous immunological studies have shown that homografts of fresh marrow-free iliac bone are only weakly, if at all, antigenic. 2. In view of this finding an attempt was made to produce a foreign bone graft capable of forming new bone as readily as an iliac autograft by the following method. Living cells of high osteogenic potential and of autologous type were introduced into the graft by combining homologous fresh marrow-free iliac bone with the animal9s own red marrow to form a fresh composite homograft-autograft of cancellous bone. 3. Such fresh composite homograft-autografts were inserted into a muscular site in Wistar rats and removed for microscopical examination at intervals of one to seven days and at two, six and twelve weeks after transplantation. 4. It is found that bone and marrow together as a fresh composite homograft-autograft form considerably more new bone than do either of the components of the graft transplanted separately. Homografts of fresh marrow-free iliac bone form, in general, a small amount of early phase and late phase new bone. Autografts of red marrow transplanted alone to a muscular site formed new bone in thirteen to thirty experiments (43 per cent). 5. The stimulus to osteogenesis, and the cellular source of osteoblasts, in marrow autografts is discussed in the light of present knowledge. The concept is suggested that after its transplantation there develops in marrow an inductive system leading to osteoblastic differentiation and bone formation. It is proposed that the necrosis of a portion of a marrow graft liberates osteogenic substances which are taken up by primitive wandering cells derived from littoral cells lining the vascular sinusoids of the surviving portions of the marrow which are induced, thereby, to differentiate as osteoblasts. 6. The cellular source of osteoblasts in a fresh composite homograft-autograft of cancellous bone is discussed. It is deduced that the new bone is derived mainly from the contained marrow of the graft, by mechanisms similar to those leading to osteoblastic differentiation in transplanted autografts of marrow. 7. The stimulus to the greater formation of new bone by fresh composite autograft-homografts than by autografts of marrow transplanted alone is discussed. Two explanations are suggested: 1) a more extensive necrosis of marrow in a composite homograft-autograft than in marrow transplanted alone; and 2) an inductive effect of bone upon marrow. 8. The new bone formed by autografts of fresh marrow-containing iliac bone, it is concluded, is derived not only from osteoblasts on the surfaces of the grafted bone but also from primitive wandering cells derived from littoral cells lining the vascular sinusoids of the surviving portions of its marrow. 9. Mechanisms which may play a role in the histogenesis of woven bone are discussed. 10. The significance of the relation of bone and marrow is considered briefly in the light of knowledge concerning the venous patterns of bone and marrow.

RECOMBINED GRAFTS OF BONE AND MARROW

1. This paper reports a histological study of the fate of sheep and calf cancellous bone grafts impregnated with autologous red marrow of Wistar rats and implanted intramuscularly as composite xenograft-autografts for two to twelve weeks. It also includes some biochemical estimations of certain types of sheep and calf bone used to prepare these composite grafts. 2. Only one of 223 devitalised bone xenografts implanted without autologous marrow formed new bone; in contrast 216 of 223 transplanted with marrow formed new bone. 3. The new bone formed by the composite grafts is derived from the autologous marrow. There was no evidence for an inductive effect upon the marrow of the various types of xenograft bone studied as described previously for allograft bone (Burwell 1966). 4. The highest score of new bone formation was found in composite grafts based on fully deproteinised sheep iliac bone prepared at Oswestry. Statistically this score was significantly higher than those registered by composite grafts prepared from intact (frozen and freeze-dried), decalcified (frozen and freeze-dried) and Kiel sheep bone, and by Kiel and Oswestry calf bone (Table II). 5. The histological evidence reported suggests that the high score with the sheep Oswestry composite grafts is because Oswestry bone is feebly immunogenic, if at all; and that such feeble or absent immunogenicity permits more marrow cells to differentiate into osteoblasts and lay down new bone without impediment. 6. The lower scores of new bone formation in most of the undeproteinised composite grafts of sheep origin—intact frozen, intact freeze-dried and Kiel—are attributed to residual immunogenicity within the organic material of the donor bone, because each type evoked the formation of mature plasma cells. 7. The Kiel bone grafts appeared to evoke less of a plasma cell reaction and may be less immunogenic than the intact and decalcified bone xenografts. 8. The sheep Oswestry CXA9s formed significantly more new bone than did the calf Oswestry CXA9s. This difference may be due to the different physical properties of the bone obtained from old sheep compared with the bone obtained from a young calf.

STUDIES IN THE TRANSPLANTATION OF BONE, III. The Immune Responses of Lymph Notes Draining Components of Fresh Homologous Cancellous Bone and Homologous Bone Treated by Different Methods

1. The antigenicity of cancellous bone has been investigated in ninety-seven rabbits. 2. The immune responses of lymph nodes draining fresh homografts of cancellous bone (Burwell and Gowland 1961 b ) has been used as a histological indicator of the antigenicity of components of fresh homologous cancellous bone and also of the antigenicity of homologous bone subjected to a variety of physical or chemical treatments. 3. The principal antigenic component of a fresh homograft of iliac cancellous bone is the nucleated cells of the red marrow. 4. Homologous marrow-free cancellous bone does not usually produce cytological evidence of an immune response in the lymph node draining the graft, unless new homograft bone formation occurs. 5. The treatment of marrow-containing cancellous bone by boiling, freezing at - 20 degrees Centigrade, freeze-drying, irradiation or by merthiolate solution impairs the transplantation antigenicity of the tissue as a homograft. 6. The immersion of cancellous bone in a glycerol-serum-Ringer solution which is then slowly cooled to - 79 degrees Centigrade, stored for one week and then rapidly thawed, allows considerable preservation of the antigenicity of the red marrow. 7. Knowledge concerning the antigenicity of fresh and treated homologous bone is discussed. 8. Evidence is presented to show that the large and medium lymphoid cell response of lymph nodes draining homografts is due principally to the T-antigens, rather than H-antigens, of the grafts. 9. The changes which occur in the first regional lymph nodes draining tissue homografts may provide another test system to assess the transplantation antigenicity of foreign tissues or extracts of foreign tissues other than bone.

STUDIES IN THE TRANSPLANTATION OF BONE: I. Assessment of Antigenicity. Serological Studies

1. An immunological examination of the sera of thirty rabbits which had received primary and secondary homografts of cancellous bone into a subcutaneous site did not reveal the presence of circulating precipitins, haemagglutinins or passive haemagglutinins. These findings are consistent with the observations of Bonfiglio and his colleagues (1955). 2. Electrophoretic examination of the serum of four rabbits receiving primary and secondary homografts of bone into an intramuscular site did not reveal any change in the serum protein fractions. 3. A search for auto-antibodies produced by primary and secondary autografts of cancellous bone was unsuccessful in fifteen rabbits. 4. The multiple injections of saline extracts of bone into four rabbits did not evoke the production of demonstrable circulating antibodies, results which are in accord with the findings of Bonfiglio and colleagues (1955) and Curtiss and colleagues (1959). 5. For the first time the production of classical antibodies in response to injections of extracts of heterologous bone has been recorded. The repeated injections of a saline extract of rabbit bone intraperitoneally into ten mice produced demonstrable precipitins and passive haemagglutinins both to protein and polysaccharide fractions present in the bone extracts. 6. Knowledge concerning the production of humoral antibodies to transplants and extracts of bone has been reviewed.

STUDIES IN THE TRANSPLANTATION OF BONE IV. The Immune Responses of Lymph Nodes Draining Second-set Homografts of Fresh Cancellous Bone

1. The response of the first regional lymph node to a homograft of fresh iliac cancellous bone inserted subcutaneously into the rabbit9s ear three weeks after the introduction of a similar graft from the same donor into the same ear has been investigated in thirty rabbits. Fifteen rabbits which received second-set autografts of cancellous bone have also been studied. 2. The insertion of second-set homografts of fresh marrow-containing cancellous bone evokes an immune secondary response in the lymph nodes draining the grafts. 3. The increase in weight of the first regional lymph nodes on the side receiving second-set homografts is more rapid and of greater magnitude than that of nodes draining first-set homografts of cancellous bone. Second-set autografts evoke weight changes in the draining nodes similar to those in nodes draining first-set autografts of cancellous bone. 4. The histological changes which occur in the lymph nodes draining the second-set homografts (secondary response) are described and compared with those occurring in lymph nodes draining first-set homografts of cancellous bone (primary response). 5. In the primary response the distribution of large and medium lymphoid cells is throughout an activated sector of the cortex of the lymph node (Burwell and Gowland 1961), but in the secondary response these cells are found peripherally within the activated sector of the node. In both the primary and the secondary responses large and medium lymphoid cells are found in the medullary trabeculae of the lymph nodes. 6. The differences between the primary response of lymph nodes draining a tissue homograft (cancellous bone) and the primary response of lymph nodes draining classical antigens, and reported by other workers, are described. 7. Knowledge concerning the inflammatory response in the tissues of the host surrounding homografts of fresh cortical and cancellous bone implanted into animals previously sensitised to tissue from the respective donor is reviewed. 8. The late phase of new bone formation by homografts of fresh cancellous bone is discussed in the light of immunological studies.