R. H. de T. e B. de Góes
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. H. de T. e B. de Góes.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2018
J.R. Gandra; C.S. Takiya; T.A. Del Valle; Euclides Reuter de Oliveira; R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; E.R.S. Gandra; J.D.O. Batista; H.M.C. Araki
Chitosan is a biopolymer derived from chitin deacetylation, present in the exoskeleton of crustaceans and insects. Chitosan has been evaluated as rumen modulator and silage additive due to its antimicrobial properties. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of both chitosan and a bacterial additive on microbiological quality, chemical composition, nutrient in vitro degradation, fermentative profile, and total losses of whole-soybean plant silage (SS) harvested at R6 stage. Four treatments in a factorial arrangement were randomly assigned to 40 experimental minisilos as no additives (CON), 8 g/t fresh forage of microbial inoculant (INO; Kera SIL, Kera Nutrição Animal, Bento Gonçalves, Brazil); 5 g/kg of fresh forage chitosan (CHI); and CHI + INO. Microbial inoculant was composed of Lactobacillus plantarum (4.0 × 1010 cfu/g) and Propionibacterium acidipropionici (2.6 × 1010 cfu/g). The CHI and INO alone increased counts of lactic bacteria and anaerobic bacteria and decreased counts of mold and yeast in SS. The CHI or INO alone increased in vitro degradation of dry matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber, and decreased nonfiber carbohydrate content of SS. Chitosan increased NH3-N and lactate concentrations and decreased ethanol concentration in SS. The CHI increased dry matter recovery from SS; INO increased silage aerobic stability. The combination of CHI+INO showed the lowest value of gas losses. In general, the combination of CHI and INO had small positive effects on gas losses of SS; however, both CHI or INO alone improved nutrient in vitro degradation and decreased mold and yeast in SS. Chitosan or INO utilization improves SS quality.
Revista Agrarian | 2013
E. R. de Oliveira; Flávio Pinto Monção; R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; A. M. de A. Gabriel; Lais Valenzuela Moura; Beatriz Lempp; Daniela E. Graciano; A. T. C. Tochetto
Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences | 2017
J.R. Gandra; E.R. de Oliveira; R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; K.M.P. de Oliveira; C.S. Takiya; T.A. Del Valle; H.M.C. Araki; K. Silveira; Dinnara Layza Souza da Silva; A. G. Da Silva Pause
Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science | 2017
H.M.C. Araki; E.R. de Oliveira; J.R. Gandra; R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; C.S. Takiya; A.G. Jacaúna; K.M.P. de Oliveira; D.N. Vasques; N.R. Brandão Cônsolo; T.A. Del Valle; N. Duan Orbach
Archivos De Zootecnia | 2016
R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; M. M. Yoshiraha Carneiro; K. C. Silva Brabes; R. de Paula Lana
Archivos De Zootecnia | 2016
R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; M. M. Yoshiraha Carneiro; K. C. Silva Brabes; R. de Paula Lana
Revista Agrarian | 2014
E. R. de Oliveira; Flávio Pinto Monção; R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; A. M. de A. Gabriel; I. C. de L. A. Paz; I. de A. Nääs; Rodrigo Couto Santos; Lais Valenzuela Moura
Revista Agrarian | 2014
E. R. de Oliveira; Flávio Pinto Monção; R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; A. M. de A. Gabriel; Beatriz Lempp; M. da G. Morais; Lucas Lanner Freitas; Fabiano Wust Pedroso
Revista Agrarian | 2013
R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; Hellen Leles Lima; Sara Letícia Nocchi Cerilo; M. G. de M. Gressler; E. R. de Oliveira; K. C. da S. Brabes; Katherini Aline Guimarães Nogueira; K. T. D. Veloso
PUBVET | 2011
R. H. de T. e B. de Góes; Rosielen Augusto Patussi; K. A. de Souza; E. R. de Oliveira; M. G. de M. Gressler; Hellen Leles Lima; K. C. da S. Brabes; A. M. de A. Gabriel