Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where R. Handberg is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by R. Handberg.


Science | 2012

Kepler-36: A Pair of Planets with Neighboring Orbits and Dissimilar Densities

Joshua A. Carter; Eric Agol; W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Katherine M. Deck; Y. Elsworth; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; S. J. Hale; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Matthew J. Holman; Daniel Huber; Christopher Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; Jack J. Lissauer; Eric D. Lopez; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; T. S. Metcalfe; A. Miglio; Leslie A. Rogers; D. Stello; William J. Borucki; Steve Bryson

So Close and So Different In our solar system, the rocky planets have very distinct orbits from those of the gas giants. Carter et al. (p. 556, published online 21 June) report on a planetary system where this pattern does not apply, posing a challenge to theories of planet formation. Data from the Kepler space telescope reveal two planets with radically different densities orbiting the same star with very similar orbital periods. One planet has a rocky Earth-like composition and the other is akin to Neptune. The Kepler spacecraft detected a super-Earth and a Neptune-like planet in very tightly spaced orbits around the same star. In the solar system, the planets’ compositions vary with orbital distance, with rocky planets in close orbits and lower-density gas giants in wider orbits. The detection of close-in giant planets around other stars was the first clue that this pattern is not universal and that planets’ orbits can change substantially after their formation. Here, we report another violation of the orbit-composition pattern: two planets orbiting the same star with orbital distances differing by only 10% and densities differing by a factor of 8. One planet is likely a rocky “super-Earth,” whereas the other is more akin to Neptune. These planets are 20 times more closely spaced and have a larger density contrast than any adjacent pair of planets in the solar system.


Science | 2011

Ensemble asteroseismology of solar-type stars with the NASA Kepler mission.

W. J. Chaplin; Hans Kjeldsen; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Sarbani Basu; A. Miglio; T. Appourchaux; Timothy R. Bedding; Y. Elsworth; R. A. García; R. L. Gilliland; Léo Girardi; G. Houdek; C. Karoff; S. D. Kawaler; T. S. Metcalfe; J. Molenda-Żakowicz; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; M. J. Thompson; G. A. Verner; J. Ballot; Alfio Bonanno; I. M. Brandão; Anne-Marie Broomhall; H. Bruntt; T. L. Campante; E. Corsaro; O. L. Creevey; G. Doğan; Lisa Esch; Ning Gai

Measurements of 500 Sun-like stars show that their properties differ from those predicted by stellar population models. In addition to its search for extrasolar planets, the NASA Kepler mission provides exquisite data on stellar oscillations. We report the detections of oscillations in 500 solar-type stars in the Kepler field of view, an ensemble that is large enough to allow statistical studies of intrinsic stellar properties (such as mass, radius, and age) and to test theories of stellar evolution. We find that the distribution of observed masses of these stars shows intriguing differences to predictions from models of synthetic stellar populations in the Galaxy.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

Kepler-22b: A 2.4 Earth-radius Planet in the Habitable Zone of a Sun-like Star

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Jason F. Rowe; Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Lisa Kaltenegger; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

A search of the time-series photometry from NASAs Kepler spacecraft reveals a transiting planet candidate orbiting the 11th magnitude G5 dwarf KIC 10593626 with a period of 290 days. The characteristics of the host star are well constrained by high-resolution spectroscopy combined with an asteroseismic analysis of the Kepler photometry, leading to an estimated mass and radius of 0.970 ± 0.060 M ☉ and 0.979 ± 0.020 R ☉. The depth of 492 ± 10 ppm for the three observed transits yields a radius of 2.38 ± 0.13 Re for the planet. The system passes a battery of tests for false positives, including reconnaissance spectroscopy, high-resolution imaging, and centroid motion. A full BLENDER analysis provides further validation of the planet interpretation by showing that contamination of the target by an eclipsing system would rarely mimic the observed shape of the transits. The final validation of the planet is provided by 16 radial velocities (RVs) obtained with the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer on Keck I over a one-year span. Although the velocities do not lead to a reliable orbit and mass determination, they are able to constrain the mass to a 3σ upper limit of 124 M ⊕, safely in the regime of planetary masses, thus earning the designation Kepler-22b. The radiative equilibrium temperature is 262 K for a planet in Kepler-22bs orbit. Although there is no evidence that Kepler-22b is a rocky planet, it is the first confirmed planet with a measured radius to orbit in the habitable zone of any star other than the Sun.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2013

FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF KEPLER PLANET-CANDIDATE HOST STARS USING ASTEROSEISMOLOGY

Daniel Huber; W. J. Chaplin; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Ronald L. Gilliland; Hans Kjeldsen; Lars A. Buchhave; Debra A. Fischer; Jack J. Lissauer; Jason F. Rowe; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Sarbani Basu; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; C. Karoff; David W. Latham; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; Geoffrey W. Marcy; A. Miglio; Victor Silva Aguirre; D. Stello; T. Arentoft; Timothy R. Bedding; Christopher J. Burke; Jessie L. Christiansen; Y. Elsworth; Michael R. Haas; Steven D. Kawaler

We have used asteroseismology to determine fundamental properties for 66 Kepler planet-candidate host stars, with typical uncertainties of 3% and 7% in radius and mass, respectively. The results include new asteroseismic solutions for four host stars with confirmed planets (Kepler-4, Kepler-14, Kepler-23 and Kepler-25) and increase the total number of Kepler host stars with asteroseismic solutions to 77. A comparison with stellar properties in the planet-candidate catalog by Batalha et al. shows that radii for subgiants and giants obtained from spectroscopic follow-up are systematically too low by up to a factor of 1.5, while the properties for unevolved stars are in good agreement. We furthermore apply asteroseismology to confirm that a large majority of cool main-sequence hosts are indeed dwarfs and not misclassified giants. Using the revised stellar properties, we recalculate the radii for 107 planet candidates in our sample, and comment on candidates for which the radii change from a previously giant-planet/brown-dwarf/stellar regime to a sub-Jupiter size or vice versa. A comparison of stellar densities from asteroseismology with densities derived from transit models in Batalha et al. assuming circular orbits shows significant disagreement for more than half of the sample due to systematics in the modeled impact parameters or due to planet candidates that may be in eccentric orbits. Finally, we investigate tentative correlations between host-star masses and planet-candidate radii, orbital periods, and multiplicity, but caution that these results may be influenced by the small sample size and detection biases.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013

Asteroseismic Fundamental Properties of Solar-type Stars Observed by the NASA Kepler Mission

W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; Daniel Huber; Aldo M. Serenelli; Luca Casagrande; V. Silva Aguirre; Warrick H. Ball; O. L. Creevey; Laurent Gizon; R. Handberg; C. Karoff; R. Lutz; J. P. Marques; A. Miglio; D. Stello; Marian Doru Suran; D. Pricopi; T. S. Metcalfe; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; J. Molenda-Żakowicz; T. Appourchaux; J. Christensen-Dalsgaard; Y. Elsworth; R. A. García; G. Houdek; Hans Kjeldsen; Alfio Bonanno; T. L. Campante; E. Corsaro; P. Gaulme

We use asteroseismic data obtained by the NASA Kepler mission to estimate the fundamental properties of more than 500 main-sequence and sub-giant stars. Data obtained during the first 10 months of Kepler science operations were used for this work, when these solar-type targets were observed for one month each in survey mode. Stellar properties have been estimated using two global asteroseismic parameters and complementary photometric and spectroscopic data. Homogeneous sets of effective temperatures, T eff, were available for the entire ensemble from complementary photometry; spectroscopic estimates of T eff and [Fe/H] were available from a homogeneous analysis of ground-based data on a subset of 87 stars. We adopt a grid-based analysis, coupling six pipeline codes to 11 stellar evolutionary grids. Through use of these different grid-pipeline combinations we allow implicitly for the impact on the results of stellar model dependencies from commonly used grids, and differences in adopted pipeline methodologies. By using just two global parameters as the seismic inputs we are able to perform a homogenous analysis of all solar-type stars in the asteroseismic cohort, including many targets for which it would not be possible to provide robust estimates of individual oscillation frequencies (due to a combination of low signal-to-noise ratio and short dataset lengths). The median final quoted uncertainties from consolidation of the grid-based analyses are for the full ensemble (spectroscopic subset) approximately 10.8% (5.4%) in mass, 4.4% (2.2%) in radius, 0.017 dex (0.010 dex) in log g, and 4.3% (2.8%) in mean density. Around 36% (57%) of the stars have final age uncertainties smaller than 1 Gyr. These ages will be useful for ensemble studies, but should be treated carefully on a star-by-star basis. Future analyses using individual oscillation frequencies will offer significant improvements on up to 150 stars, in particular for estimates of the ages, where having the individual frequency data is most important.


Science | 2013

Stellar Spin-Orbit Misalignment in a Multiplanet System

Daniel Huber; Joshua A. Carter; Mauro Barbieri; A. Miglio; Katherine M. Deck; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Benjamin T. Montet; Lars A. Buchhave; W. J. Chaplin; S. Hekker; Josefina Montalban; Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; T. L. Campante; Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Y. Elsworth; D. Stello; T. Arentoft; Eric B. Ford; Ronald L. Gilliland; R. Handberg; Andrew W. Howard; Howard Isaacson; John Asher Johnson; C. Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; David W. Latham; Mikkel N. Lund

Misaligned Planets Stars with multiple coplanar planets have not been seen to show misalignments between the equatorial plane of the star and the orbital plane of the planets—a diagnostic of the dynamical history of planetary systems. Huber et al. (p. 331) analyzed the Kepler 56 planetary system, which contains a giant-sized and an intermediate-sized planet. The planets have orbits that are close to coplanar, but the planetary orbits are misaligned with the stellar equator. A third companion in a wide orbit, which could be another star or a planet, could explain the misaligned configuration. Kepler observations show that stellar spin-orbit misalignments are not confined to planetary systems with hot Jupiters. Stars hosting hot Jupiters are often observed to have high obliquities, whereas stars with multiple coplanar planets have been seen to have low obliquities. This has been interpreted as evidence that hot-Jupiter formation is linked to dynamical disruption, as opposed to planet migration through a protoplanetary disk. We used asteroseismology to measure a large obliquity for Kepler-56, a red giant star hosting two transiting coplanar planets. These observations show that spin-orbit misalignments are not confined to hot-Jupiter systems. Misalignments in a broader class of systems had been predicted as a consequence of torques from wide-orbiting companions, and indeed radial velocity measurements revealed a third companion in a wide orbit in the Kepler-56 system.


Nature | 2013

A sub-Mercury-sized exoplanet

Jason F. Rowe; Jack J. Lissauer; Daniel Huber; Francois Fressin; Steve B. Howell; Stephen T. Bryson; W. J. Chaplin; J.-M. Desert; Eric D. Lopez; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Fergal Mullally; Darin Ragozzine; Guillermo Torres; Elisabeth R. Adams; Eric Agol; D. Barrado; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Andrea K. Dupree; Y. Elsworth; Mark E. Everett; Debra A. Fischer; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney

Since the discovery of the first exoplanets, it has been known that other planetary systems can look quite unlike our own. Until fairly recently, we have been able to probe only the upper range of the planet size distribution, and, since last year, to detect planets that are the size of Earth or somewhat smaller. Hitherto, no planets have been found that are smaller than those we see in the Solar System. Here we report a planet significantly smaller than Mercury. This tiny planet is the innermost of three that orbit the Sun-like host star, which we have designated Kepler-37. Owing to its extremely small size, similar to that of the Moon, and highly irradiated surface, the planet, Kepler-37b, is probably rocky with no atmosphere or water, similar to Mercury.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

A Uniform Asteroseismic Analysis of 22 Solar-type Stars Observed by Kepler

S. Mathur; T. S. Metcalfe; M. Woitaszek; H. Bruntt; G. A. Verner; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; O. L. Creevey; G. Doğan; Sarbani Basu; C. Karoff; D. Stello; T. Appourchaux; T. L. Campante; W. J. Chaplin; R. A. García; Timothy R. Bedding; O. Benomar; Alfio Bonanno; S. Deheuvels; Y. Elsworth; P. Gaulme; Joyce Ann Guzik; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; W. Herzberg; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; L. Piau; P.-O. Quirion; C. Regulo; Mary Tork Roth

Asteroseismology with the Kepler space telescope is providing not only an improved characterization of exoplanets and their host stars, but also a new window on stellar structure and evolution for the large sample of solar-type stars in the field. We perform a uniform analysis of 22 of the brightest asteroseismic targets with the highest signal-to-noise ratio observed for 1 month each during the first year of the mission, and we quantify the precision and relative accuracy of asteroseismic determinations of the stellar radius, mass, and age that are possible using various methods. We present the properties of each star in the sample derived from an automated analysis of the individual oscillation frequencies and other observational constraints using the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal (AMP), and we compare them to the results of model-grid-based methods that fit the global oscillation properties. We find that fitting the individual frequencies typically yields asteroseismic radii and masses to ~1% precision, and ages to ~2.5% precision (respectively, 2, 5, and 8 times better than fitting the global oscillation properties). The absolute level of agreement between the results from different approaches is also encouraging, with model-grid-based methods yielding slightly smaller estimates of the radius and mass and slightly older values for the stellar age relative to AMP, which computes a large number of dedicated models for each star. The sample of targets for which this type of analysis is possible will grow as longer data sets are obtained during the remainder of the mission.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015

Ages and fundamental properties of Kepler exoplanet host stars from asteroseismology

Silva Aguirre; G. R. Davies; Sarbani Basu; J. Christensen-Dalsgaard; O. L. Creevey; T. S. Metcalfe; Timothy R. Bedding; Luca Casagrande; R. Handberg; Mikkel N. Lund; Poul Nissen; W. J. Chaplin; D. Huber; Aldo M. Serenelli; D. Stello; V. Van Eylen; T. L. Campante; Y. Elsworth; R. L. Gilliland; S. Hekker; C. Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; M. Lundkvist

We present a study of 33 {\it Kepler} planet-candidate host stars for which asteroseismic observations have sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratio to allow extraction of individual pulsation frequencies. We implement a new Bayesian scheme that is flexible in its input to process individual oscillation frequencies, combinations of them, and average asteroseismic parameters, and derive robust fundamental properties for these targets. Applying this scheme to grids of evolutionary models yields stellar properties with median statistical uncertainties of 1.2\% (radius), 1.7\% (density), 3.3\% (mass), 4.4\% (distance), and 14\% (age), making this the exoplanet host-star sample with the most precise and uniformly determined fundamental parameters to date. We assess the systematics from changes in the solar abundances and mixing-length parameter, showing that they are smaller than the statistical errors. We also determine the stellar properties with three other fitting algorithms and explore the systematics arising from using different evolution and pulsation codes, resulting in 1\% in density and radius, and 2\% and 7\% in mass and age, respectively. We confirm previous findings of the initial helium abundance being a source of systematics comparable to our statistical uncertainties, and discuss future prospects for constraining this parameter by combining asteroseismology and data from space missions. Finally we compare our derived properties with those obtained using the global average asteroseismic observables along with effective temperature and metallicity, finding an excellent level of agreement. Owing to selection effects, our results show that the majority of the high signal-to-noise ratio asteroseismic {\it Kepler} host stars are older than the Sun.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2010

A PRECISE ASTEROSEISMIC AGE AND RADIUS FOR THE EVOLVED SUN-LIKE STAR KIC 11026764

T. S. Metcalfe; M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro; M. J. Thompson; J. Molenda-Żakowicz; T. Appourchaux; W. J. Chaplin; G. Doğan; P. Eggenberger; Timothy R. Bedding; H. Bruntt; O. L. Creevey; P.-O. Quirion; D. Stello; Alfio Bonanno; V. Silva Aguirre; Sarbani Basu; Lisa Esch; Ning Gai; M. Di Mauro; Alexander G. Kosovichev; Irina N. Kitiashvili; J. C. Suárez; Andrés Moya; L. Piau; R. A. García; J. P. Marques; Antonio Frasca; K. Biazzo; S. G. Sousa; S. Dreizler

The primary science goal of the Kepler Mission is to provide a census of exoplanets in the solar neighborhood, including the identification and characterization of habitable Earth-like planets. The asteroseismic capabilities of the mission are being used to determine precise radii and ages for the target stars from their solar-like oscillations. Chaplin et al. published observations of three bright G-type stars, which were monitored during the first 33.5 days of science operations. One of these stars, the subgiant KIC 11026764, exhibits a characteristic pattern of oscillation frequencies suggesting that it has evolved significantly. We have derived asteroseismic estimates of the properties of KIC 11026764 from Kepler photometry combined with ground-based spectroscopic data. We present the results of detailed modeling for this star, employing a variety of independent codes and analyses that attempt to match the asteroseismic and spectroscopic constraints simultaneously. We determine both the radius and the age of KIC 11026764 with a precision near 1%, and an accuracy near 2% for the radius and 15% for the age. Continued observations of this star promise to reveal additional oscillation frequencies that will further improve the determination of its fundamental properties.

Collaboration


Dive into the R. Handberg's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. J. Chaplin

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. L. Campante

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Y. Elsworth

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge