R.J.M. van Spanning

FnrP and NNR of Paracoccus denitrificans are both members of the FNR family of transcriptional activators but have distinct roles in respiratory adaptation in response to oxygen limitation

The Paracoccus denitrificansfnrP gene encoding a homologue of the Escherichia coli FNR protein was localized upstream of the gene cluster that encodes the high‐affinity cbb3‐type oxidase. FnrP harbours the invariant cysteine residues that are supposed to be the ligands of the redox‐sensitive [4Fe–4S] cluster in FNR. NNR, another FNR‐like transcriptional regulator in P. denitrificans, does not. Analysis of FnrP and NNR single and double mutants revealed that the two regulators each exert exclusive control on the expression of a discrete set of target genes. In FnrP mutants, the expression of cytochrome c peroxidase was blocked, that of membrane‐bound nitrate reductase and the cbb3‐type oxidase was significantly reduced, whilst the activity of the bb3‐type quinol oxidase was increased. The amounts of the nitrite and nitric oxide reductases in these FnrP mutants were the same as in the wild type. NNR mutants, on the other hand, were disturbed exclusively in the concentrations of nitrite reductase and nitric oxide reductase. An FnrP.NNR double mutant combined the phenotypes of the single mutant strains. In all three mutants, the concentrations and/or activities of the aa3‐type oxidase, cytochrome c550, cytochrome c552, and nitrous oxide reductase equalled those in the wild type. As the FNR boxes in front of the FnrP‐ and NNR‐regulated genes are highly similar to or even identical to each other, the absence of cross‐talk between the regulation by FnrP and NNR implies that as yet unidentified factors are important in the control. It is proposed that the redox state of an intracellular redox couple other than the oxygen/water couple is one of the factors that modulates the activity of FnrP.

The organisation of proton motive and non-proton motive redox loops in prokaryotic respiratory systems.

Respiration is fundamental to the aerobic and anaerobic energy metabolism of many prokaryotic and most eukaryotic organisms. In principle, the free energy of a redox reaction catalysed by a membrane-bound electron transport chain is transduced via the generation of an electrochemical ion (usually proton) gradient across a coupling membrane that drives ATP synthesis. The proton motive force (pmf) can be built up by different mechanisms like proton pumping, quinone/quinol cycling or by a redox loop. The latter couples electron transport to a net proton transfer across the membrane without proton pumping. Instead, charge separation is achieved by quinone-reactive enzymes or enzyme complexes whose active sites for substrates and quinones are situated on different sides of the coupling membrane. The necessary transmembrane electron transport is usually accomplished by the presence of two haem groups that face opposite sides of the membrane. There are many different enzyme complexes that are part of redox loops and their catalysed redox reactions can be either electrogenic, electroneutral (non-proton motive) or even pmf-consuming. This article gives conceptual classification of different operational organisations of redox loops and uses this as a platform from which to explore the biodiversity of quinone/quinol-cycling redox systems.

Emerging principles of inorganic nitrogen metabolism in Paracoccus denitrificans and related bacteria.

The taxonomy of Paracoccus denitrificans and related bacteria is discussed. Evidence is given which shows that the physiological differences between P. denitrificans and Thiosphaera pantotropha are less fundamental than previously thought. A proposal to consider a species P. pantotropha is mentioned. The properties of the denitrifying enzymes and the genes involved in their formation in P. denitrificans is discussed. The synthesis of the membrane-bound nitrate reductase is regulated by FNR, that of the nitrite- and nitric oxide reductase by NNR. Evidence is given that FNR acts as a redox sensor rather than an oxygen sensor. The occurrence of aerobic denitrification and coupled heterotrophic nitrification-denitrification in the original strain of Thiosphaera pantotropha are explained by a limiting respiratory activity which activates FNR. Aerobic denitrification leads to a lower growth yield and an increase in µmax in batch culture when a limiting respiratory activity is assume d and when excess substrate is present. Coupled heterotrophic nitrification-denitrification gives a smaller increase in µmax and a more drastic reduction in yield. Both processes are thus advantageous to the organism. In a chemostat with limiting substrate these processes are disadvantageous. T. pantotropha has lost the ability for aerobic denitrification during extended cultivation. Possibly the substrate concentration was limiting during extended cultivation giving a selective advantage to variants which have lost these properties. The calculations predict that P. denitrificans should be able to grow chemolithotrophically with hydroxylamine.

C1 metabolism in Paracoccus denitrificans: genetics of Paracoccus denitrificans.

Paracoccus denitrificans is able to grow on the C1 compounds methanol and methylamine. These compounds are oxidized to formaldehyde which is subsequently oxidized via formate to carbon dioxide. Biomass is produced by carbon dioxide fixation via the ribulose biphosphate pathway. The first oxidation reaction is catalyzed by the enzymes methanol dehydrogenase and methylamine dehydrogenase, respectively. Both enzymes contain two different subunits in an α2β2 configuration. The genes encoding the subunits of methanol dehydrogenase (moxF andmoxI) have been isolated and sequenced. They are located in one operon together with two other genes (moxJ andmoxG) in the gene ordermoxFJGI. The function of themoxJ gene product is not yet known.MoxG codes for a cytochromec551i, which functions as the electron acceptor of methanol dehydrogenase. Both methanol dehydrogenase and methylamine dehydrogenase contain PQQ as a cofactor. These so-called quinoproteins are able to catalyze redox reactions by one-electron steps. The reaction mechanism of this oxidation will be described. Electrons from the oxidation reaction are donated to the electron transport chain at the level of cytochromec. P. denitrificans is able to synthesize at least 10 differentc-type cytochromes. Five could be detected in the periplasm and five have been found in the cytoplasmic membrane. The membrane-bound cytochromec1 and cytochromec552 and the periplasmic-located cytochromec550 are present under all tested growth conditions. The cytochromesc551i andc553i, present in the periplasm, are only induced in cells grown on methanol, methylamine, or choline. The otherc-type cytochromes are mainly detected either under oxygen limited conditions or under anaerobic conditions with nitrate as electron acceptor or under both conditions. An overview including the induction pattern of allP. denitrificans c-type cytochromes will be given. The genes encoding cytochromec1, cytochromec550, cytochromec551i, and cytochromec553i have been isolated and sequenced. By using site-directed mutagenesis these genes were mutated in the genome. The mutants thus obtained were used to study electron transport during growth on C1 compounds. This electron transport has also been studied by determining electron transfer rates inin vitro experiments. The exact pathways, however, are not yet fully understood. Electrons from methanol dehydrogenase are donated to cytochromec551i. Further electron transport is either via cytochromec550 or cytochromec553i to cytochromeaa3. However, direct electron transport from cytochromec551i to the terminal oxidase might be possible as well. Electrons from methylamine dehydrogenase are donated to amicyanin and then via cytochromec550 to cytochromeaa3, but other routes are used also.P. denitrificans is studied by several groups by using a genetic approach. Several genes have already been cloned and sequenced and a lot of mutants have been isolated. The development of a host/vector system and several techniques for mutation induction that are used inP. denitrificans genetics will be described.

Regulation of oxidative phosphorylation: the flexible respiratory network of Paracoccus denitrificans

Paracoccus denitrificans is a facultative anaerobic bacterium that has the capacity to adjust its metabolic infrastructure, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, to the prevailing growth condition. In this bacterium the relative activity of distinct catabolic pathways is subject to a hierarchical control. In the presence of oxygen the aerobic respiration, the most efficient way of electron transfer-linked phosphorylation, has priority. At high oxygen tensionsP. denitrificans synthesizes an oxidase with a relatively low affinity for oxygen, whereas under oxygen limitation a high-affinity oxidase appears specifically induced. During anaerobiosis, the pathways with lower free energy-transducing efficiency are induced. In the presence of nitrate, the expression of a number of dehydrogenases ensures the continuation of oxidative phosphorylation via denitrification. After identification of the structural components that are involved in both the aerobic and the anaerobic respiratory networks ofP. denitrificans, the intriguing next challenge is to get insight in its regulation. Two transcription regulators have recently been demonstrated to be involved in the expression of a number of aerobic and/or anaerobic respiratory complexes inP. denitrificans. Understanding of the regulation machinery is beginning to emerge and promises much excitement in discovery.

MauE and MauD proteins are essential in methylamine metabolism of Paracoccus denitrificans

Synthesis of enzymes involved in methylamine oxidation via methylamine dehydrogenase (MADH) is encoded by genes present in the mau cluster. Here we describe the sequence of the mauE and mauD genes from Paracoccus denitrificans as well as some properties of mauE and mauD mutants of this organism. The amino acid sequences derived from the mauE and mauD genes showed high similarity with their counterparts in related methylotrophs. Secondary structure analyses of the amino acid sequences predicted that MauE is a membrane protein with five transmembrane-spanning helices and that MauD is a soluble protein with an N-terminal hydrophobic tail. Sequence comparison of MauD proteins from different organisms showed that these proteins have a conserved motif, Cys-Pro-Xaa-Cys, which is similar to a conserved motif found in periplasmic proteins that are involved in the biosynthesis of bacterial periplasmic enzymes containing haem c and/or disulphide bonds. The mauE and mauD mutant strains were unable to grow on methylamine but they grew well on other C1-compounds. These mutants grown under MADH-inducing conditions contained normal levels of the natural electron acceptor amicyanin, but undetectable levels of the β-subunit and low levels of the α-subunit of MADH. It is proposed, therefore, that MauE and MauD are specifically involved in the processing, transport, and/or maturation of the β-subunit and that the absence of each of these proteins leads to production of a non-functional β-subunit which becomes rapidly degraded.

The NosX and NirX Proteins of Paracoccus denitrificans Are Functional Homologues: Their Role in Maturation of Nitrous Oxide Reductase

The nos (nitrous oxide reductase) operon of Paracoccus denitrificans contains a nosX gene homologous to those found in the nos operons of other denitrifiers. NosX is also homologous to NirX, which is so far unique to P. denitrificans. Single mutations of these genes did not result in any apparent phenotype, but a double nosX nirX mutant was unable to reduce nitrous oxide. Promoter-lacZ assays and immunoblotting against nitrous oxide reductase showed that the defect was not due to failure of expression of nosZ, the structural gene for nitrous oxide reductase. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy showed that nitrous oxide reductase in cells of the double mutant lacked the Cu(A) center. A twin-arginine motif in both NosX and NirX suggests that the NosX proteins are exported to the periplasm via the TAT translocon.

Genetics of C1 metabolism regulation in Paracoccus denitrificans

Paracoccus denitrificans is a facultative anaerobic bacterium that can be found in soil, sewage or sludge. The readily changing composition of these habitats forces this bacterium to adapt its metabolism frequently to the available carbon and free- energy sources. In addition to heterotrophic growth, P. denitrificans is able to grow autotrophically with either hydrogen, thiosulphate or reduced C1 compounds (methanol, methylamine or formate) as electron donors. To adjust smoothly to the changing environment, unicellular organisms have evolved signal transduction systems that report to the cytoplasm aspects of the changes of the extracellular conditions. Our research focuses on the question: through which signal transduction routes does P. denitrificans adapt its C1 metabolism and how do these routes communicate with each other.

DNA Supercoiling by Gyrase is Linked to Nucleoid Compaction

The genes of E. coli are located on a circular chromosome of 4.6 million basepairs. This 1.6 mm long molecule is compressed into a nucleoid to fit inside the 1-2 μm cell in a functional format. To examine the role of DNA supercoiling as nucleoid compaction force we modulated the activity of DNA gyrase by electronic, genetic, and chemical means. A model based on physical properties of DNA and other cell components predicts that relaxation of supercoiling expands the nucleoid. Nucleoid size did not increase after reduction of DNA gyrase activity by genetic or chemical means, but nucleoids did expand upon chemical inhibition of gyrase in chloramphenicol-treated cells, indicating that supercoiling may help to compress the genome.

Cytochromes c 550,c 552, and c 1 in the Electron Transport Network of Paracoccus denitrificans: Redundant or Subtly Different in Function?

Paracoccus denitrificans strains with mutations in the genes encoding the cytochrome c(550), c(552), or c(1) and in combinations of these genes were constructed, and their growth characteristics were determined. Each mutant was able to grow heterotrophically with succinate as the carbon and free-energy source, although their specific growth rates and maximum cell numbers fell variably behind those of the wild type. Maximum cell numbers and rates of growth were also reduced when these strains were grown with methylamine as the sole free-energy source, with the triple cytochrome c mutant failing to grow on this substrate. Under anaerobic conditions in the presence of nitrate, none of the mutant strains lacking the cytochrome bc(1) complex reduced nitrite, which is cytotoxic and accumulated in the medium. The cytochrome c(550)-deficient mutant did denitrify provided copper was present. The cytochrome c(552) mutation had no apparent effect on the denitrifying potential of the mutant cells. The studies show that the cytochromes c have multiple tasks in electron transfer. The cytochrome bc(1) complex is the electron acceptor of the Q-pool and of amicyanin. It is also the electron donor to cytochromes c(550) and c(552) and to the cbb(3)-type oxidase. Cytochrome c(552) is an electron acceptor both of the cytochrome bc(1) complex and of amicyanin, as well as a dedicated electron donor to the aa(3)-type oxidase. Cytochrome c(550) can accept electrons from the cytochrome bc(1) complex and from amicyanin, whereas it is also the electron donor to both cytochrome c oxidases and to at least the nitrite reductase during denitrification. Deletion of the c-type cytochromes also affected the concentrations of remaining cytochromes c, suggesting that the organism is plastic in that it adjusts its infrastructure in response to signals derived from changed electron transfer routes.