R.J. Mapletoft

Exogenous control of follicular wave emergence in cattle

Variability in ovarian response to superstimulatory treatments and in the interval from PGF20 treatment to es&us in cattle is largely attributable to the status of follicular wave development at the time of treatment. To date, most treatments designed to control follicular wave development have been based on removal of the suppressive effect of the dominant follicle, either physically (by electrocauterization or ultrasound-guided follicle ablation) or hormonally (by GnRH or estradiol and progestogen treatment), and thereby induce the emergence of a new follicular wave at a specific time after treatment. Treatment of progestogen-implanted cattle with estradiol-17P (E-17P) resulted in suppression of the dominant follicle and emergence of a new follicular wave 4.3 d9.1 d later. Superstimulatory treatments initiated 4 d after E-17P treatment in progestogen-implanted cattle resulted in a superovulatory response comparable to that of cattle in which superstimulatory treatments were initiated on the second follicular wave. In another study, induced follicular wave emergence, regardless of the stage of the estrous cycle, resulted in similar superovulatory response and higher fertilization rates in heifers than when superstimulatory treatments were initiated 8 to 12 d after estrus (traditional approach). Finally, es&us synchronization treatments with E-17P plus progesterone and PGF2, have resulted in synchronous estms and ovulation. Overall, it appears that treatment with E- 17s and progestogen in combination may be used to effectively control and synchronize follicular wave development and may have important implications in artificial control of ovarian cyclicity and superovulation.

The control of follicular wave development for self-appointed embryo transfer programs in cattle

Our expanding knowledge of the control of follicular wave dynamics during the bovine estrous cycle has resulted in renewed enthusiasm for the prospects of precisely controlling the follicular and luteal dynamics and finely controlling the time of ovulation. Follicular wave development can be controlled mechanically by ultrasound-guided follicle ablation or hormonally by treatments with GnRH or estradiol and progestogen/progesterone in combination. Treatment of cattle with GnRH in combination with prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF) 7 d later and a second GnRH 48 h after PGF (known as Ovsynch) has resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates after fixed-time AI in lactating dairy cows and in recipients in which embryos were transferred without estrus detection. Alternatively, treatments with estradiol and progestogen/progesterone-releasing devices resulted in synchronous emergence of a new follicular wave and, when a second estradiol treatment was given 24 h after device removal, synchronous ovulation and high pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI. Self-appointed embryo transfer (without estrus detection) using estradiol and progesterone treatments have resulted in pregnancy rates comparable with those obtained with recipients transferred 7 d after estrus. Furthermore, estradiol and progesterone treatments combined with PGF and eCG (given 1 d after the expected time of wave emergence) have resulted in high rates of recipients selected for transfer (84.6%) and an overall pregnancy rate of 48.7% (recipients pregnant/recipients treated). Estradiol and progestogen/progesterone treatments have also been widely used for self-appointed superstimulation protocols with equivalent embryo production to that of donor cows superstimulated using the traditional approach beginning 8 to 12 d after estrus. In summary, exogenous control of luteal and follicular development facilitates the application of assisted reproductive technologies in cattle by offering the possibility of planning the superstimulation of donors and synchronization of recipients at a self-appointed time, without the necessity of estrus detection and without sacrificing results.

Ovarian superstimulatory response relative to follicular wave emergence in heifers

Two experiments were designed to evaluate the responsiveness of beef heifers to superstimulatory treatments administered during the first follicular wave. Heifers were examined daily (Experiment 1) or twice daily (Experiment 2) by ultrasonography to determine the status of follicular wave development and the day of initiation of superstimulatory treatment. Heifers in both experiments were superstimulated with a total dose of 10 ml Folltropin (equivalent to 200 mg of NIH-FSH-P1), divided into 10 equal intramuscular injections over 5 days. On the last day of treatment, heifers received 500 mug of cloprostenol after each injection of Folltropin to induce luteolysis. In the respective groups, superstimulatory treatments were initiated on Day -1, Day 0 (day of ovulation) or Day +1 for Experiment 1, and on Day -1, Day 0, Day +1 or Day +2 for Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the number of ovulations in each ovary was assessed by ultrasonography and by counting the number of corpora lutea (CL) in each ovary at slaughter. The correlation between both techniques for assessing ovulatory response was high (r= 0.98; P< 0.0001), and there was no significant difference in the mean number of ovulations detected by ultrasound (5.7+/-1.1) versus the mean number of CL counted at slaughter (6.2+/-1.2). In Experiment 1, the mean (+/- SEM) number of CL counted at slaughter in heifers treated on Day -1 (9.4+/-3.8) and Day 0 (7.3+/-1.6) was higher (P< 0.05) than that of heifers treated on Day +1 (0.7+/-0.3). The mean number of follicles >/=7 mm in diameter on the last day of treatment was also higher (P<0.05) in the Day -1 group compared with the Day +1 group; the Day 0 group was intermediate. In Experiment 2, the mean number of ovulations was higher (P< 0.05) in the Day 0 group (18.4+/-3.4) than the Day -1 (9.5+/-2.3), Day +1 (6.7+/-2.2) or Day +2 (6.5+/-2.3) groups. Heifers in the Day -1, and Day 0 groups had more (P< 0.05) follicles >/=7 mm at the end of treatment compared with heifers in the Day +1 or the Day +2 group. The stated hypothesis was supported: exogenous FSH treatment initiated at the time of wave emergence, near the expected time of the endogenous wave-eliciting FSH surge, has a positive effect on the superstimulatory response. A higher superstimulatory response was elicited when treatments were initiated on the day of, or the day before, wave emergence compared with that of later treatments.

Ovarian follicular wave emergence after treatment with progestogen and estradiol in cattle

Abstract An experiment was designed to evaluate the effects of treatment with progestogen and estradiol-17β (E-17β), in combination, at different stages of development of the dominant follicle, on follicular development and subsequent wave emergence. Cross-bred beef cows (n = 12) and heifers (n = 25) were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups on Day 0 (ovulation). Treatment groups were untreated control animals and those that were given progestogen ear implants on Day 2, 5 or 8 and injected intramuscularly with 5 mg E-17β in sesame oil on Day 3, 6 or 9, respectively. Ovarian ultrasonography was performed daily from Day 0 until progestogen implant removal, 4 days after the emergence of the post-treatment follicular wave. The mean (± SEM) time (days) to cessation of growth and onset of regression of the dominant follicle of the first wave were earlier (P

Follicular wave dynamics after estradiol-17β treatment of heifers with or without a progestogen implant

Abstract Two experiments were designed to evaluate the effects of estradiol-17β (E-17β) on follicular wave dynamics and gonadotropin in cattle. The first experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of 5 mg E-17β administered on Day 1 (ovulation=Day 0) in heifers with or without a progestogen (SMB) ear implant. The dominant follicle in heifers treated with E-17β+SMB ceased to grow 1 d after E-17β treatment and subsequently regressed resulting in early emergence of the next follicular wave. Conversely, E-17β treatment of non-implanted heifers resulted in transient or incomplete suppression of the dominant follicle, and delayed emergence of the next follicular wave (P

Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in beef heifers

A study was designed to characterise ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers treated with porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on days 3, 6 or 9 (ovulation = day 0), corresponding to the growing, early-static, and late-static phases of the first follicular wave. Following ovulation, 65 beef heifers were assigned, by replicate, to the following seven treatment groups: 25 mg im of pLH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); 100 microg im of GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); or controls (no treatment; n = 11). Ovulation occurred within 36 h in 67%, 100% and 67% of heifers treated with pLH and in 89%, 56% and 22% of heifers treated with GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9, respectively (treatment-by-day interaction, P < 0.09). Combined for all treatment days, ovulation rates were 78% and 56% in pLH- and GnRH-treated groups, respectively (P < 0.09). Overall, mean day (+/- SD) of emergence of the second follicular wave in heifers that ovulated was different from that in controls or in heifers that did not ovulate (P < 0.05). Mean (+/- SD) day of emergence of the second wave occurred earlier (day 5.6+/-1.2; P < 0.05) in heifers that ovulated after treatment on day 3 (n = 14) than in controls (day 8.7+/-1.6; n = 11); however, wave emergence in all heifers treated on day 6 (day 8.1+/-0.5; n = 18) did not differ from controls, regardless of whether or not ovulation occurred. In the heifers that ovulated in response to treatment on day 9 (n = 8), the emergence of the second follicular wave was delayed (day 10.9+/-0.4; P < 0.05). The day of emergence of the second wave in the 14 treated heifers that failed to ovulate, irrespective of the day of treatment (day 8.9+/-1.4) did not differ from control heifers. The emergence of the second wave was more synchronous in day 6 heifers (regardless of whether they ovulated) and in day 9 heifers that ovulated compared to control heifers (P < 0.05). Results did not support the hypothesis that the administration of pLH or GnRH at known stages of the follicular wave in cycling heifers would consistently induce ovulation or atresia and, thereby, induce emergence of a new follicular wave at a predictable interval. New wave emergence was induced consistently (1.3 days post-treatment) only in those animals that ovulated in response to treatment. However, 22% of LH-treated heifers and 44% of GnRH-treated heifers failed to ovulate. Treatments did not induce atresia of the dominant follicle or alter the interval to new wave emergence in animals that did not ovulate in response to treatment.

Variability in gonadotrophin preparations as a factor in the superovulatory response

Abstract Much of the variability in superovulatory response has been attributed to variation in ovarian response of individual animals. Alternatively, differences in the relative abundance of FSH and LH activity in gonadotrophin preparations may contribute to superovulatory variation. This report presents evidence for variability in LH and FSH activity among equine chorionic gonadotrophin, porcine FSH and human menopausal gonadotrophins. Lower ratios of FSH LH activity appeared to reduce ovulatory success in rats, and addition of PLH to FSH-P reduced superovulation in crossbred cows.

Follicle deviation and ovulatory capacity in Bos indicus heifers

The objectives of Experiment 1 were to determine the interval from ovulation to deviation, and diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) and largest subordinate follicle (SF) at deviation in Nelore (Bos indicus) heifers by two methods (observed and calculated). Heifers (n = 12) were examined ultrasonographically every 12 h from ovulation (Day 0) to Day 5. The time of deviation and diameter of the DF and largest SF at deviation did not differ (P>0.05) between observed and calculated methods. Overall, deviation occurred 2.5+/-0.2 d (mean +/- S.E.M.) after ovulation, and diameters for DF and largest SF at deviation were 6.2+/-0.2 and 5.9 +/- 0.2 mm, respectively. Experiment 2 was designed to determine the size at which the DF acquires ovulatory capacity in B. indicus heifers. Twenty-nine heifers were monitored every 24 h by ultrasonography, from ovulation until the DF reached diameters of 7.0-8.4 mm (n=9), 8.5-10.0 mm (n=10), or >10.0 mm (n=10). At that time, heifers were treated with 25 mg of pLH and monitored by ultrasonography every 12 h for 48 h. Ovulation occurred in 3 of 9, 8 of 10, and 9 of 10 heifers, respectively (P<0.05). In summary, there was no significant difference between observed and calculated methods of determining the beginning of follicle deviation. Deviation occurred 2.5 d after ovulation when the DF reached 6.2 mm, and ovulatory capacity was acquired by DF as small as 7.0 mm.

Induction of follicular wave emergence for estrus synchronization and artificial insemination in heifers

The objective was to synchronize follicular wave emergence among cattle for synchronization of estrus and ovulation, and to determine pregnancy rate after AI at observed estrus. At random stages of the estrous cycle, a controlled internal drug release device (CIDR-B) was inserted intravaginally (Day 0) in 67 cross-bred beef heifers, and they were randomly allocated to receive either no further treatment (Control; n = 18); 5 mg of estradiol-17beta and 100 mg of progesterone im (E/P; n = 16); 100 microg im of GnRH (GnRH; n = 16); or transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular ablation of all follicles > or = 5 mm (FA; n = 17). All heifers received a luteolytic dose of PGF (repeated 12 h later), and CIDR-B were removed on Days 9, 8, 6 or 5, in Control, E/P, GnRH or FA groups, respectively, so the dominant follicle of the induced wave was exposed to exogenous progesterone for a similar period of time in each group. Mean (+/- SEM) intervals (and range, in days) from treatment to follicular wave emergence in these groups were 3.5 +/- 0.6 (-2 to 8), 3.4 +/- 0.1 (3 to 4), 1.5 +/- 0.3 (-1 to 4), and 1.0 +/- 0.1 (0 to 2), respectively. Although the interval was longest (P<0.01) in the E/P and Control groups, it was least variable (P<0.01) in the E/P and FA groups. Intervals (and range, in days) from CIDR-B removal (and first PGF treatment) to estrus were 2.3 +/- 0.2 (1.5 to 4.5), 2.2 +/- 0.2 (1.5 to 3.0), 2.1 +/- 0.1,(1.5 to 3.5), and 2.5 +/- 0.1 (2.0 to 3.5), and to ovulation were 3.5 +/- 0.2 (2.5 to 5.5), 3.4 +/- 0.1 (3.0 to 4.5), 3.5 +/- 0.1 (2.5 to 4.5), and 3.8 +/- 0.1 (3.0 to 4.5), for Control, E/P, GnRH and FA groups, respectively (ns). The proportion of heifers displaying estrus was higher in the Control than in the FA group (94% versus 65%, P<0.05) and intermediate in EP and GnRH groups (87% and 75%). Heifers were inseminated approximately 12 h prior to ovulation (based on estrous behavior and ultrasound examinations). Pregnancy rates were 78%, 80%, 69% and 65% for Control, E/P, GnRH and FA groups, respectively (P=0.73). Results support the hypothesis that synchronous follicular wave emergence results in synchronous follicle development and, following progesterone removal, synchronous estrus and ovulation with high pregnancy rates to AI. The synchrony of estrus and ovulation in the E/P, GnRH and FA groups suggest that these treatments, in combination with CIDR-B, could be adapted to fixed-time insemination programs.

The use of progestins in regimens for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle.

Four experiments were conducted to investigate modifications to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-based fixed-time Al protocols in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, the effect of reducing the interval from GnRH treatment to prostaglandin (PGF) was examined. Lactating beef cows (n = 111) were given 100 mg gonadorelin (GnRH) on Day 0 (start of treatment) and either 500 microg cloprostenol (PGF) on Day 6 with Al and 100 microg GnRH 60 h later, or PGF on Day 7 with Al and GnRH 48 h later (6- or 7-day Co-Synch regimens). Pregnancy rates were 32/61 (53.3%) versus 26/50 (52.0%), respectively (P = 0.96). In Experiment 2. cattle (n = 196) were synchronized with a 7-day Co-Synch regimen and received either no further treatment or a CIDR-B device (Days 0-7). Pregnancy rates were 32/71 (45.1%) versus 33/77 (42.9%) in cows (P < 0.8), and 9/23 (39.1 %) versus 17/25 (68.0%) in heifers (P < 0.05). In Experiment 3, 49 beef heifers were randomly assigned to receive 12.5 mg pLH on Day 0, PGF on Day 7 and 12.5 mg of pLH on Day 9 with Al 12 h later (pLH Ovsynch), or similar treatment plus a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B), or 1 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 100 mg progesterone on Day 0, a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (EB/ P4 + CIDR-B), PGF on Day 7 (at the time of CIDR-B removal) and 1 mg i.m. EB on Day 8 with AI on Day 9 (52 h after PGF). Pregnancy rate in the EB/P4 + CIDR-B group (75.0%) was higher (P < 0.04) than in the pLH Ovsynch group (37.5%): the pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B group was intermediate (64.7%). In Experiment 4, 266 non-lactating cows were allocated to a 7-day Co-Synch protocol (Co-Synch), a 7-day Co-Synch plus 0.6 mg per head per day melengestrol acetate (MGA) from Days 0 to 6 inclusive (Co-Synch + MGA) or MGA (Days 0-6) plus 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone on Day 0. 500 microg PGF on Day 7, 1 mg EB on Day 8 and fixed-time Al 28 h later (EB/ P4 + MGA). Pregnancy rates (P < 0.25) were 44.8% (39/87: Co-Synch), 47.8% (43/90; Co-Synch + MGA), and 60.7% (54/89: EB/P4 + MGA). In conclusion, a 6- or 7-day interval from GnRH to PGF in a Co-Synch regimen resulted in similar pregnancy rates in cows. The addition of a progestin to a Co-Synch or Ovsynch regimen significantly improved pregnancy rates in heifers but not in cows. Progestin-based regimens that included EB consistently resulted in high pregnancy rates to fixed-time Al.