R. J. van Det

Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Repair is Feasible in 40% of Patients

INTRODUCTION Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) still has a high mortality. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) may be the way to improve survival rates. However, it is not clear how many patients with rAAA will be suitable for acute EVAR. METHODS Between October 2000 and April 2002 all patients with acute symptomatic or ruptured AAA were assessed for EVAR on an intention-to-treat basis with emergency computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Patient and logistic characteristics were analysed. We used two commercially available aorto uni-iliac devices with a maximum proximal diameter of 28 and 34 mm. RESULTS Five out of 26 patients were excluded for CTA and EVAR because of severe and persistent hypotension (3 pts) or logistic reasons (2 pts, both eligible). Twelve patients were found not eligible for EVAR due to unsuitable infrarenal aortic neck length (3 pts), neck diameter (1 pt) or a combination of both (8 pts). The remaining six patients were treated with EVAR. After 6 months no graft failure or aneurysm related deaths were recorded in the EVAR group. CONCLUSION A total of 28% of patients with symptomatic or ruptured AAA was treated with EVAR. A potential 42% of patients could have been suitable for EVAR, if the correct devices had been in stock and all patients had been properly assessed.

Outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of endovascular treatment

The effect on outcome of the introduction of endovascular techniques for the exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is largely unknown. The aim of the study was to contrast the early and mid‐term outcome after open and endovascular AAA repair.

Dacron or ePTFE for Femoro-popliteal Above-Knee Bypass Grafting: Short- and Long-term Results of a Multicentre Randomised Trial

OBJECTIVES To compare expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) prosthesis and collagen-impregnated knitted polyester (Dacron) for above-knee (AK) femoro-popliteal bypass grafts. DESIGN A prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1992 and 1996, 228 AK femoro-popliteal bypass grafts were randomly allocated to either an ePTFE (n=114) or a Dacron (n=114) vascular graft (6mm in diameter). Patients were eligible for inclusion if presenting with disabling claudication, rest pain or tissue loss. Follow-up was performed and included clinical examination and duplex ultrasonography at all scheduled intervals. All patients were treated with warfarin. The main end-point of this study was primary patency of the bypass graft at 2, 5 and 10 years after implantation. Secondary end-points were mortality, primary assisted patency and secondary patency. Cumulative patency rates were calculated with life-table analysis and with log-rank test. RESULTS After 5 years, the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates were 36% (confidence interval (CI): 26-46%), 46% (CI: 36-56%) and 51% (CI: 41-61%) for ePTFE and 52% (CI: 42-62%) (p=0.04), 66% (CI: 56-76%) (p=0.01) and 70% (CI: 60-80%) (p=0.01) for Dacron, respectively. After ten years these rates were respectively 28% (CI:18-38%), 31% (CI:19-43%) and 35% (CI: 23-47%) for ePTFE and 28% (CI: 18-38%), 49% (CI: 37-61%) and 49% (CI: 37-61%) for Dacron. CONCLUSION During prolonged follow-up (10 years), Dacron femoro-popliteal bypass grafts have superior patency compared to those of ePTFE grafts. Dacron is the graft material of choice if the saphenous vein is not available.

Randomized clinical trial of continuous sutures or non-penetrating clips for radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula

Despite several modifications to the original design, patency rates of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas have changed little since the first report in 1966. The use of non‐penetrating clips for vascular anastomosis on the outcome of such fistulas was studied.

Superior Two-year Results of Externally Unsupported Polyester Compared to Supported Grafts in Above-knee Bypass Grafting: A Multicenter Randomised Trial

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare externally supported thin wall knitted polyester (P-EXS) and externally unsupported thin wall knitted polyester (P-non-EXS) for above-knee (AK) femoro-popliteal bypass grafting. DESIGN A prospective multicenter randomised clinical trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 1999 and 2008, 265 AK femoro-popliteal bypass grafts (6 mm in diameter) were performed, including 136 P-EXS and 129 P-non-EXS. The selection of patients was based on the presence of disabling claudication or critical ischaemia. Follow-up took place at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and included clinical examination and duplex ultrasonography. The main end points of this study were primary patency rates at one and two years. Secondary end points were mortality, and primary assisted and secondary patency rates. Cumulative patency rates were calculated with life-table analysis and log-rank testing. RESULTS The 1-year primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates were 65%, 70% and 84%, respectively, for P-EXS and 76% (p = 0.05), 82% (p = 0.03) and 88% (p = 0.35), respectively, for P-non-EXS. Two-year primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates were 45%, 57% and 70%, respectively, for P-EXS and 62% (p = 0.003), 75% (p = 0.005) and 84% (p = 0.02), respectively, for P-non-EXS. The overall mortality rate after two years was 11.3%. CONCLUSION In above-knee femoro-popliteal bypass grafting patency rates of externally supported knitted polyester grafts were inferior to their unsupported counterpart. ISRCTN: At the time this study started this number was not the standard.

Angiography in the surgical treatment of occluded ePTFE haemodialysis fistulas: a retrospective comparative study in two hospitals

An internal arteriovenous (A-V) fistula fashioned at the wrist of the nondominant arm is the ideal form of angioaccess in patients requiring maintenance haemodialysis1. However, this technique is often not feasible, since adequate superficial arm veins are absent in many patients. In these patients an internal A-V access may be created by using venous autografts, modified allografts or xenografts, or prosthetic graft materials.