R. Jobe Fix

Factors Associated With Local Recurrence After Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer

ObjectiveTo examine the incidence of local recurrence (LR) and factors associated with it in a population of patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate reconstruction for invasive carcinoma. Summary Background DataThe efficacy of SSM has been challenged by concerns about increased risks of LR. MethodsA consecutive series of 173 patients (176 cancers) with invasive carcinoma underwent SSM and immediate breast reconstruction (June 1986 to December 1997). Data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank statistic test, and the Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsMean patient age was 47 ± 9 years (27% were 40 or younger). The AJCC stages were 1 = 43%, 2 = 52%, and 3 = 5%. Thirty percent of tumors were poorly differentiated. With a median follow-up of 73 months, the LR rate was 4.5%. The mean local relapse-free interval was 26 months. Seventy-five percent of patients who presented with LR developed distant metastases and died of disease within a mean of 21 months. On univariate analysis, factors associated with higher LR rate were tumor stage 2 or 3, tumor size larger than 2 cm, node-positive disease, and poor tumor differentiation. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98%, 94%, and 88%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with decreased survival were advanced stage, presence of LR, and absence of hormone therapy. LR was a highly significant predictor of tumor-related death. ConclusionsThere is a low incidence of LR after SSM, and it is associated with advanced disease at presentation. LR is an independent risk factor for tumor-related death.

Endoscopic forehead lift: review of technique, cases, and complications.

Endoscopy has provided a significant improvement in the surgical rejuvenation of the upper face. It offers a minimally invasive alternative that avoids many of the undesirable effects associated with the coronal approach. The standard minimal access forehead endoscopic procedure consists of a subperiosteal undermining through three small triangular prehairline incisions. To successfully elevate the eyebrows, it is essential to release the periosteum at the level of the supraorbital rims and ablate the brow depressor muscles of the glabella. Until the periosteum reattaches itself, elevation is maintained by a temporary suspension suture between staples at the incision sites and 5 cm posterior to the hairline. The transverse closure of the triangular skin incisions achieves some additional elevation. The biplanar approach adds a partial subcutaneous undermining of the forehead to the endoscopic technique and allows plication of the frontalis muscle and excision of excess forehead skin. It is offered to patients with very ptotic eyebrows, deep transverse wrinkles, or a high forehead. The prehairline incision is a disadvantage but is tolerated quite well in older patients. The medical records of 393 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic forehead lift from 1994 to 2000 were reviewed. Because seven patients had the endoscopic forehead lift repeated, the number of forehead endoscopies totaled 400. The complication rate was quite acceptable and did not markedly increase when a forehead lift was performed in combination with other facial procedures. The endoscopic forehead lift consistently attenuated the transverse forehead wrinkles, reduced the glabellar frown lines, and raised the eyebrows. It provided an appearance that was less tired and angry in addition to opening the area around the eyes. Long-term follow-up has shown that the endoscopic forehead lift produces lasting and predictable results.

Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction.

Muscle sparing and perforator flaps techniques for breast reconstruction have focused in reducing the donor site morbidity. Theoretically this may result in a less robust blood supply to the flap. The purpose of this study was to assess flap ischemic complications with the pedicle, free, and the different muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAMs) flaps for breast reconstruction and determine the factors associated with these complications. A total of 301 consecutive patients that underwent 399 breast reconstructions were retrospectively reviewed. Patient, oncologic, and reconstruction data were recorded. A flap ischemic complication scale was design including: wound healing problems, skin flap necrosis, fat necrosis, partial flap loss, and total flap loss. Analysis of donor site complications, bilateral and unilateral reconstructions were also performed. There were 147 pedicle TRAM and 154 free TRAM with the following subgroup distribution: MS-0 = 102; MS-1 = 37; and MS-2 = 15 patients. The groups were comparable in relation to age, comorbidities, cancer stage, and treatment. The overall complication rate after reconstruction had no statistical differences between the groups. The variables related to flap ischemia were statistically lower in the free TRAM. Mild and severe fat necrosis were the indicators with a statistical difference. The MS-0 group had lower ischemic complications and fat necrosis than the pedicled group, but no differences were observed for the MS-1 and MS-2 groups. The same results were seen in the unilateral reconstructions but not in the bilateral ones. No differences in donor site bulging or hernia were observed between the groups. In our study, the free TRAM flap demonstrated lower ischemic complications than the pedicle TRAM. A trend for decreased flap blood supply when more muscle is preserved and less number of perforators are used with a constant tissue volume was observed.

Use of the omentum in chest-wall reconstruction.

Increased use of the omentum in chest-wall reconstruction has paralleled the refinement of anatomic knowledge and the development of safe mobilization techniques. Important anatomic points are the omental attachments to surrounding structures, the major blood supply from the left and right gastroepiploic vessels, and the collateral circulation via the gastroepiploic arch and Barkows marginal artery. Mobilization of the omentum to the thorax involves division of its attachments to the transverse colon and separation from the greater curvature to fabricate a bipedicled flap. Most anterior chest wounds and virtually all mediastinal wounds can be covered with the omentum based on both sets of gastroepiploic vessels. The arc of transposition is increased when the omentum is based on a single pedicle, allowing coverage of virtually all chest-wall defects. The final method of increasing flap length involves division of the gastroepiploic arch and reliance on Barkows marginal artery as collateral circulation to maintain flap viability. With regard to chest-wall reconstruction, we have included the omentum in the armamentarium of flaps used to cover mediastinal wounds. The omentum is our flap of choice for the reconstruction of most radiation injuries of the chest wall. The omentum may also be used to provide protection to visceral anastomoses, vascular conduits, and damaged structures in the chest, as well as to cover defects secondary to tumor excision or trauma. In brief, the omentum has proved to be a most dependable and versatile flap, particularly applicable to chest-wall reconstruction.

Abdominoplasty repair for abdominal wall hernias.

The objectives of abdominal hernial repair are to reconstruct the structural integrity of the abdominal wall while minimizing morbidity. Current techniques include primary closure, staged repair, and the use of prosthetic materials. Techniques for abdominoplasty include the use of the transverse lower abdominal incision and the resection of excess skin. By incorporating these aspects into hernial repairs, the procedures are made safer and the results are improved. The medical records were reviewed of 123 consecutive patients who underwent hernial repair. Seventy-six of these patients underwent a total of 82 herniorrhaphies using an abdominoplasty approach. This included using a transverse lower abdominal incision with or without extending it into an inverted-T incision. The hernial defect was then identified and isolated. Repair was obtained with primary fascial closure and plication, primary fascial approximation and reinforcement with absorbable Vicryl mesh, or placement of permanent mesh with or without fascial approximation. Overall, 8 of 82 hernias recurred. Most complications were minor and could be managed with local wound care only. Major complications included one enterocutaneous fistula, one occurrence of skin flap necrosis requiring operative debridement and skin grafting, and one delayed permanent mesh extrusion 2 years after repair. The abdominoplasty approach isolates the incision from the hernial defect and repair. This technique is safe with a low risk of complications and a low rate of recurrence. It is particularly helpful in obese patients, in patients with multiple hernias, and in those patients with recurrent hernias.

Reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi flap after skin-sparing mastectomy.

The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous island flap was once the standard for breast reconstruction. With the increased use of tissue expanders and the development of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for autologous tissue breast reconstruction, use of the latissimus dorsi has decreased. To reassess the role of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction, a retrospective review was performed to evaluate women who had skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap and permanent implants. The postoperative aesthetic results and donor site morbidity, including contour deformity and scarring, were examined. Satisfactory results were obtained in 17 of 18 patients. Complications were noted in 5 patients, and all were minor. Using the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and a permanent breast prosthesis for immediate reconstruction is successful because it provides sufficient muscular coverage of the implant. In addition, it provides a good aesthetic result using a single-stage procedure. Illustrative cases are presented.

Immediate nipple reconstruction on a free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Background: Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex is usually deferred until breast mound reconstruction is complete. The authors review their experience with a technique that allows for shaping of a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap and immediate nipple reconstruction and compare this technique with delayed nipple reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective chart review demonstrated 21 patients who underwent immediate nipple reconstruction, 10 of whom had complete photographs and records for review. Ninety patients underwent delayed nipple reconstruction. Twenty of these patients were chosen for comparison, 15 of whom had complete photographs and records. Age, body mass index, comorbidities, procedures required, complications, and time to completion were reviewed. A multiobserver, multicharacteristic, standardized photographic review of cosmetic outcomes was conducted. Results: Time from mastectomy to completion of reconstruction, not including areolar tattooing, was 1 day (median) versus 125 days (median) in the immediate and delayed groups, respectively (p = 0.003). The number of procedures required to complete reconstruction before areolar tattooing was one (median) in the immediate group and two (median) in the delayed group (p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Subjective review demonstrated no difference in the aesthetic outcome of the breast mound or nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Conclusions: Patients having immediate nipple reconstruction in the setting of a free TRAM breast reconstruction completed their reconstruction earlier, required fewer procedures, and had aesthetic results comparable to patients having traditional delayed nipple reconstruction. Complications and revision rates were comparable.

Mastectomy With Breast Reconstruction in Previously Augmented Patients : Indications for Implant Removal

Surgeons performing breast reconstruction in previously augmented patients can either leave the preexisting implant in place and incorporate the implant into the reconstruction, or remove the implant, usually performing an implant exchange. The focus of this study is to identify indications for implant removal in previously augmented patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent breast reconstruction from 1997–2007 at University of Alabama, Birmingham Medical Center. Of these patients, 54 had previous augmentation with silicone or saline implants. Twenty-two of these underwent bilateral breast reconstruction, making a total of 76 reconstructed breasts. Patients were followed for a mean of 2.1 years (range 0.1–5.1 years). The mean body mass index was 23.0 (range 18–30). Implants were explanted in all but one patient. Reasons for implant removal or exchange included subglandular position (n = 39), aged silicone implant (n = 50), rupture or leak (n = 24), implant exposure (n = 1), and infection (n = 1). Some patients had more than one reason for explantation. We recommend removal of preexisting implants for patients who have implants in a subglandular position, ruptures or leaks, site infections, implant exposures, capsular contractures, pain, indolent seromas, aged silicone implants, poor cosmesis, plans for or history of radiotherapy, and close proximity of tumor to implant. We also remove implants to respect patient preferences and to achieve symmetry in our reconstruction. Consequently, we find in our practice that most of previously augmented patients who undergo breast reconstruction will also undergo implant removal.