R.M. Zagari

Short-term low-dose triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection causes antral gastritis and is strongly associated with duodenal ulcer relapse. Eradication of H. pylori infection may be difficult to achieve due to antimicrobial resistance, side effects and poor patient compliance. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and patient compliance of short-term triple therapy with clarithromycin, omeprazole and tinidazole. Methods: Triple therapy, comprising clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily, omeprazole 20 mg once daily and tinidazole 500 mg twice daily, was administered to 65 patients with H. pylori gastritis for 1 week. H. pylori infection before and after treatment was determined by histology, the urease test and the 13C-urea breath test. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, during which four antral biopsy specimens were taken, and the 13C-urea breath test were performed in all patients before treatment and at 1 and 6 months after treatment. Drug tolerance was evaluated by patient interviews and compliance by counting returned pills at the end of treatment. Results: Sixty-three patients with H. pylori infection were studied. One month after treatment, on intent-to-treat analysis, H. pylori infection had been eradicated in 62 out of 65 patients (95.4%), confirmed by a negative urease test, 13C-urea breath test and histological examination of antral biopsy specimens. All patients were free of infection 6 months after treatment ended. All but one patient completed treatment and took more than 90% of the prescribed medication. There were no side effects except for one case of mild nausea (not severe enough to stop treatment) and one case of urticaria, following which treatment was withdrawn. Conclusions: Short-term, low-dose triple therapy with clarithromycin, omeprazole and tinidazole is highly effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection. The lack of side effects and good compliance are important for successful eradication.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus in the general population: the Loiano–Monghidoro study

Objective: Existing endoscopy-based data on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in the general population are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate typical symptoms and complications of GORD, and their associated risk factors, in a representative sample of the Italian population. Methods: 1533 adults from two Italian villages were approached to undergo symptom assessment using a validated questionnaire and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Data were obtained from 1033 individuals (67.4% response rate). Results: The prevalence of reflux symptoms was 44.3%; 23.7% of the population experienced such symptoms on at least 2 days per week (frequent symptoms). The prevalence rates of oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus in the population were 11.8% and 1.3%, respectively. Both frequent (relative risk (RR) 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 to 3.9) and infrequent (RR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.0) reflux symptoms were associated with the presence of oesophagitis. No reflux symptoms were reported by 32.8% of individuals with oesophagitis and 46.2% of those with Barrett’s oesophagus. Hiatus hernia was associated with frequent reflux symptoms and oesophagitis, and was present in 76.9% of those with Barrett’s oesophagus. We found no association between body mass index and reflux symptoms or oesophagitis. Conclusions: GORD is common in Italy, but the prevalence of Barrett’s oesophagus in the community is lower than has been reported in selected populations. Both frequent and infrequent reflux symptoms are associated with an increased risk of oesophagitis. Individuals with oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus often have no reflux symptoms.

Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Medline and PubMed databases were searched on epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori for the period of April 2013–March 2014. Several studies have shown that the prevalence of H. pylori is still high in most countries. In north European and North American populations, about one‐third of adults are still infected, whereas in south and east Europe, South America, and Asia, the prevalence of H. pylori is often higher than 50%. H. pylori remains highly prevalent in immigrants coming from countries with high prevalence of H. pylori. However, the lower prevalence of infection in the younger generations suggests a further decline of H. pylori prevalence in the coming decades. Low socioeconomic conditions in childhood are confirmed to be the most important risk factors for H. pylori infection. Although the way the infection is transmitted is still unclear, interpersonal transmission appears to be the main route. Finally, H. pylori recurrence after successful eradication can still occur, but seems to be an infrequent event.

Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Precut papillotomy is considered a risk factor for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications; however whether the complication risk is due to precut itself or to the prior prolonged attempts is still debated; therefore, early precut implementation has been suggested to reduce the complication rate. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cannulation and complication rates of early precut implementation with persistent attempts by the standard approach. METHODS RCTs that compared cannulation and complication rates of the early precut implementation and of persistent attempts by the standard approach were included. Summary effect sizes were estimated by odds ratio (OR) with a random-effects model and by Peto OR. RESULTS Six RCTs with a total of 966 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Overall cannulation rates were 90 % in both randomization groups (OR 1.20; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.54 - 2.69). Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 2.5 % of patients randomized to the early precut groups and in 5.3 % of patients from the persistent attempts groups (OR 0.47; 95 %CI 0.24 - 0.91). The overall complication rates, considering pancreatitis, bleeding, cholangitis, and perforation rates, were 5.0 % in the early precut groups and 6.3 % in the persistent attempts groups (OR 0.78; 95 %CI 0.44 - 1.37). CONCLUSIONS RCTs that investigated the issue of timing of the precut procedure were limited. Current evidence suggests that in experienced hands the early implementation of precut and persistent cannulation attempts have similar overall cannulation rates; early precut implementation reduces post-ERCP pancreatitis risk but not the overall complication rate. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Can a Wire-Guided Cannulation Technique Increase Bile Duct Cannulation Rate and Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis?: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES:The most common technique used to achieve primary deep biliary cannulation is the standard contrast-assisted method. To increase the success rate and reduce the risk of complications, a wire-guided cannulation strategy has been proposed. Prospective studies provided conflicting results as to whether the wire-guided cannulation technique increases the cannulation rate and reduces post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) pancreatitis risk compared with the standard method. The objective of this study was to carry out a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compares primary biliary cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates with the wire-guided method and the standard cannulation technique.METHODS:Literature searches of electronic databases and online clinical trial registers up to March 2009 were conducted to identify RCTs comparing primary cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis rates with the wire-guided method and the standard cannulation technique. A meta-analysis of these clinical trials was performed.RESULTS:Five RCTs were included. Overall, the primary cannulation rates reported with the wire-guided cannulation technique and the standard method were 85.3 and 74.9%, respectively. The pooled analysis of all the selected studies comparing the wire-guided cannulation technique with the standard method yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 2.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–3.31). The pooled analysis comparing the post-ERCP pancreatitis rates for the wire-guided-cannulation groups with those for the standard-method groups yielded an OR of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13–0.41).CONCLUSIONS:This meta-analysis shows that the wire-guided technique increases the primary cannulation rate and reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the standard contrast-injection method. Further large, well-performed, randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Systematic review: Helicobacter pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric cancer

Helicobacter pylori is recognized as one of the most significant risk factors for gastric cancer, and H. pylori eradication has been proposed as a possible primary chemo‐preventive strategy to reduce gastric cancer incidence.

Comparison of 1 and 2 weeks of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the HYPER Study

Background: Triple therapy is recommended for Helicobacter pylori eradication, yet consensus on the duration of treatment is lacking. Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1- and 2-week regimens of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in a large, multicentre, double-blind and randomised study. Methods: A total of 909 H pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcer, enrolled in 81 endoscopy units in Italy, were randomised to receive omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for either 1 week (OAC1W) or 2 weeks (OAC2W) or omeprazole and amoxicillin for 2 weeks. H pylori eradication was assessed by histological examination and carbon-13 urea breath test 4 weeks after treatment. Results: Both the intention-to-treat (ITT; n = 907) and per protocol (PP; n = 661) analyses showed no significant differences between the eradication rates of OAC1W (ITT 79.7%; PP 83.6%) and OAC2W (ITT 81.7%; PP 84.9%; ITT p = 0.53; PP p = 0.71). Both triple omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin regimens gave significantly higher eradication rates compared with omeprazole and amoxicillin treatment (ITT 44.6%; PP 42.8%; p<0.001). Poor compliance was reported in 18.6%, 17.3% and 15.1% (p = 0.51) of patients for OAC2W, OAC1W and omeprazole and amoxicillin, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 9.9% and 9.6% (p = 0.88) of patients for OAC2W and OAC1W, respectively, and in 5.9% for omeprazole and amoxicillin (p = 0.11). Conclusions: 1-week and 2-week triple treatments for H pylori eradication are similar in terms of efficacy, safety and patient compliance.

Epidemiology of Functional Dyspepsia and Subgroups in the Italian General Population: An Endoscopic Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS Population-based endoscopic studies are needed to assess the epidemiology of functional dyspepsia (FD) and the newly suggested subgroups of meal-related symptoms and epigastric pain. We evaluated the prevalence of, and risk factors for, FD in the Italian general population. METHODS A total of 1533 inhabitants of 2 villages were invited to undergo symptom evaluation using a validated questionnaire, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and (13)C-urea breath test; 1033 subjects (67.4%) took part. RESULTS Of the 1033 subjects, 156 (15.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.9-17.3) had dyspepsia, and of these 114 (11%; 95% CI, 9.2-12.9) had FD. Of the 114 subjects with FD, 77 (67.5%) had meal-related symptoms (postprandial fullness and/or early satiation) and 55 (48.2%) had epigastric pain. Only 18 subjects (15.8%) had both meal-related symptoms and epigastric pain; this was fewer than expected by chance alone (P < .001). Unemployment (odds ratio [OR], 5.80; 95% CI, 1.56-21.60), divorce (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.10-6.91), smoking (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.11-2.70), and irritable bowel syndrome (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.85-6.19) were significantly associated with FD. Unemployment, divorce, and irritable bowel syndrome were associated with both meal-related symptoms and epigastric pain, while smoking was associated only with meal-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS FD is present in 11% of the Italian general population. Unemployment and divorce seem to increase the risk of FD, and smoking seems to be associated with meal-related symptoms. Two distinct subgroups of FD, as suggested by Rome III, seem to exist in the general population.

The risk of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of persons with colon cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS Increasing evidence indicates that inherited susceptibility is important in the pathogenesis of colorectal neoplasia. The aim of this study was to clarify whether having only one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer increases the risk of developing adenomatous polyps and whether total colonoscopy is an appropriate screening measure in these patients. METHODS The frequency of such a history was evaluated in 397 asymptomatic patients who underwent total colonoscopy. Of these patients, 155 had colorectal polyps and the remaining 242 did not have polyps. RESULTS Among polyp cases, 27 of 155 (17.4%) had a positive history; among those without polyps, 12 of 242 (5.0%) had a positive history. Alternatively expressed, 27 of 39 patients (69%) with family history and 128 of 358 patients (36%) without family history had adenomas. The estimated risk for polyps associated with family history was 1.9. Among polyp cases, 14 of 27 patients (51.9%) with family history and 32 of 128 patients (25.0%) without family history had only proximal polyps (chi 2 test; P = 0.006; odds ratio, 3.2), In the same groups, frequency of high-grade dysplasia was 8 of 27 patients (29.6%) and 16 of 128 patients (12.5%), respectively (chi 2 test; P = 0.04; odds ratio, 2.9). CONCLUSIONS Relative to subjects with no family history, asymptomatic patients with one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer had nearly double the risk of developing adenomatous polyps, greater frequency of severely dysplastic lesions, and significantly higher frequency of proximal polyp location. This suggests that total colonoscopy screening is indicated in these subjects.

Dyspeptic Symptoms and Endoscopic Findings in the Community: The Loiano–Monghidoro Study

OBJECTIVES:We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of endoscopic findings and their association with dyspeptic symptoms in the community.METHODS:A total of 1,533 inhabitants of two villages were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey, and 1,033 were recruited. Participants underwent a validated dyspepsia questionnaire, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and a 13C-urea breath test.RESULTS:Endoscopic findings were present in 17.6% of asymptomatic subjects and in 27.4% of those with dyspeptic symptoms. The prevalence of esophagitis and Barretts esophagus in subjects with dyspeptic symptoms and without prominent reflux symptoms was 8.1 and 1.5%, respectively, and was similar to that of asymptomatic subjects (8.5 and 0.7%, respectively). Esophagitis was significantly associated with dyspeptic symptoms only in subjects with concomitant prominent reflux symptoms. Peptic ulcer (PU) was present in 8.8% of subjects with dyspeptic symptoms without reflux symptoms and similarly in 9.4% of those with prominent reflux symptoms. Subjects with dyspeptic symptoms and concomitant prominent reflux symptoms had an increased risk of having an underlying PU (odds ratio 2.74, 95% confidence interval 1.30–5.78).CONCLUSIONS:Almost three-quarters of subjects with dyspeptic symptoms do not have endoscopic findings and, in addition, esophagitis may not be the cause of dyspeptic symptoms in subjects without prominent reflux symptoms. PU may be the cause of dyspeptic symptoms in a subgroup of subjects with prominent reflux symptoms.