R. Maki

Risk assessment in solitary fibrous tumors: validation and refinement of a risk stratification model

Solitary fibrous tumors are an uncommon sarcoma type characterized by NAB2–STAT6 gene fusion. While solitary fibrous tumors metastasize in 5–25% of cases, it has historically been challenging to determine which specific tumor and patient characteristics predict aggressive behavior. We previously reported on a novel risk stratification scheme for solitary fibrous tumors incorporating patient age, tumor size, and mitotic activity to predict risk of metastasis. Herein we validate this risk stratification scheme in an independent, lower-risk population of 79 patients with primary non-meningeal solitary fibrous tumors, and propose incorporating tumor necrosis as a fourth variable to further improve the risk score. Fifty-seven percent of cases were considered low risk, 29% intermediate risk, and 14% high risk for metastasis. Of 50 patients with sufficient clinical follow-up data, no metastases developed in the low-risk patients (n=23), while there was a 7% 10-year metastatic risk in the intermediate risk group (n=17), and a 49% 5-year metastatic risk for the high-risk patients (n=10). When tumor necrosis was added as a fourth variable to the model, predictive power was enhanced. Under the revised stratification, the proportion of tumors identified as low risk increased to 66%, with no metastasis at 10 years, intermediate risk cases comprised 24% with 10% risk of metastasis at 10 years, and high risk comprised 10% of cases with 73% risk of metastasis at 5 years. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, this fourth-variable stratification provided significant discrimination between the risk groups (P=0.0005). These findings confirmed the clinical utility of our previously published risk stratification model and support the inclusion of necrosis as a fourth variable in the model.

Activity of Pazopanib and Trabectedin in Advanced Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma

BACKGROUND Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an exceedingly rare and orphan disease, without active drugs approved in the front line. Pazopanib and trabectedin are licensed for sarcoma treatment from second-line, but very little and contradictory data are available on their activity in ASPS. Lacking ongoing and/or planned clinical trials, we conducted a multi-institutional study involving the reference sites for sarcoma in Europe, U.S., and Japan, within the World Sarcoma Network, to investigate the efficacy of pazopanib and trabectedin. MATERIALS AND METHODS From May 2007, 14 of the 27 centers that were asked to retrospectively review their databases had identified 44 advanced ASPS patients treated with pazopanib and/or trabectedin. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Among 30 patients who received pazopanib, 18 were pretreated (13 with other antiangiogenics). Response was evaluable in 29/30 patients. Best responses were 1 complete response, 7 partial response (PR), 17 stable disease (SD), and 4 progressions. At a 19-month median follow-up, median PFS was 13.6 months (range: 1.6-32.2+), with 59% of patients progression-free at 1 year. Median OS was not reached.Among 23 patients treated with trabectedin, all were pretreated and evaluable for response. Best responses were 1 PR, 13 SD, and 9 progressions. At a 27-month median follow-up, median PFS was 3.7 months (range: 0.7-109), with 13% of patients progression-free at 1 year. Median OS was 9.1 months. CONCLUSION The value of pazopanib in advanced ASPS is confirmed, with durable responses, whereas the value of trabectedin appears limited. These results are relevant to defining the best approach to advanced ASPS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This retrospective study, conducted among the world reference centers for treatment of sarcoma, confirms the value of pazopanib in patients with advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), with dimensional and durable responses, whereas trabectedin shows a limited activity. Alveolar soft part sarcoma is resistant to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Pazopanib and trabectedin are licensed for treatment of sarcoma from second line; in the lack of prospective clinical trials, these results are relevant to defining ASPS best management and strongly support initiatives aimed at obtaining the approval of pazopanib in the front line of the disease.