R.P. Akkermans

Detecting patients at a high risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: cross sectional case finding study

Abstract Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of case finding of patients at risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, whether the method is suitable for use in general practice, how patients should be selected, and the time required. Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Two semirural general practices in the Netherlands. Participants: 651 smokers aged 35 to 70 years. Main outcome measures: Short standardised questionnaire on bronchial symptoms for current smokers, lung function with a spirometer, and the quality of the spirometric curve. Results: Of the 201 smokers not taking drugs for a pulmonary condition, 169 produced an acceptable curve (fulfilling American Thoracic Society criteria). Of these, 30 (18%, 95% confidence interval 12% to 24%) had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <80% of predicted. When smokers were preselected on the basis of chronic cough, the proportion with an FEV1 <80% of predicted increased to 27% (17 of 64; 12% to 38%). Chronic cough was a better predictor of airflow obstruction than other symptoms, such as wheeze and dyspnoea. The presence of two symptoms was a slightly better predictor than cough only (odds ratio 3.02 (1.37 to 6.64) v 2.50 (1.14 to 5.52)). Age was also a good predictor of obstruction; smokers over 60 with cough had a 48% chance of having an obstruction. The mean time needed for spirometry was four minutes. Detecting one smoker with an FEV1 <80% of predicted cost €5 to €10. Conclusions: Trained practice assistants could check all patients who smoke for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at little cost to the practice. Cough and age are the most important predictors of the disease. By testing one smoker a day, an average practice could identify one patient at risk a week.

Slowing the Deterioration of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Observed during Bronchodilator Therapy by Adding Inhaled Corticosteroids: A 4-Year Prospective Study

Rates of morbidity and mortality due to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have increased during the last two decades [1, 2]. These increases might be related to the use of bronchodilator therapy without anti-inflammatory medication [3, 4]. Recently, two studies found that regular bronchodilator treatment had adverse effects on the control of asthma [5] and the progression of asthma and COPD [6]. In a previous study of 160 patients with asthma or COPD [6], we found that continuous treatment with a bronchodilator (ipratropium bromide, 40 g, or salbutamol, 400 g, four times daily) was associated with a much higher annual decline in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared with treatment on demand. It is unclear whether an unfavorable course of asthma or COPD during bronchodilator therapy alone can be reversed or decelerated by additional anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. We studied 56 of the 160 patients who had an unfavorable disease course during bronchodilator therapy alone (an annual decline in FEV1 of at least 80 mL/y in combination with at least two exacerbations per year). These 56 patients (28 with asthma and 28 with COPD) were also treated with an inhaled corticosteroid (beclomethasone dipropionate, 800 g daily) during years 3 and 4 of the study. We assessed whether the worsening of their disease during bronchodilator therapy alone was reversed or decelerated by additional anti-inflammatory treatment with beclomethasone. The outcome measures were dynamic lung function indices (annual decline in pre- and postbronchodilator FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR], and forced inspiratory volume in 1 second [FIV1]), static lung function indices (residual volume [RV], ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC), inspiratory vital capacity [IVC]), nonspecific bronchial responsiveness (assessed by determining the concentration of histamine that provokes a 20% decrease in FEV1 [Pc 20]), exacerbations, and respiratory symptoms. Methods Patients Patient selection has been previously described [6]. In short, 29 family physicians in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, selected all patients who were 30 years or older and had symptoms of asthma or COPD. Only patients who showed mild-to-moderate airway obstruction (FEV1 > 50% of the predicted value [7]) or bronchial hyper-responsiveness to histamine (Pc 20 8 mg/mL) were included in the study. Patients dependent on inhaled corticosteroids who had chronic heart failure, malignant disorders, or other severe life-threatening diseases were excluded from the study. Of these patients, 160 (59 with asthma and 101 with COPD) completed the bronchodilator trial. During the 2 years of bronchodilator treatment, a rapid decline in FEV1 ( 80 mL/y) and a relatively high exacerbation rate ( 1/y) were observed in a subgroup of 56 patients (35%). Because of their unfavorable disease course, these patients were selected for additional treatment with inhaled beclomethasone for 2 years. The criteria for diagnosis of asthma or COPD were based on the standards of the American Thoracic Society [8]. Asthma was defined [6, 8] by a combination of factors: bronchial hyper-responsiveness to histamine (Pc 20 8 mg/mL); reversible obstruction (an improvement in FEV1 of more than 15% of the prebronchodilator value 60 minutes after the administration of both salbutamol, 400 g, and ipratropium bromide, 80 g); dyspnea; and allergy (defined as at least one positive result on seven radioallergosorbent tests that assessed sensitivity to pollen from weeds, grasses, and trees; cats and dogs; house dust mite; and Aspergillus fumigatus) or wheezing. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was defined [6, 8] by the combination of chronic cough or chronic sputum production for at least 3 months during at least 2 consecutive years; and continuous bronchus obstruction (FEV1 85% of the predicted value). The separate features of asthma and COPD overlap (for instance, some asthmatic patients had chronic cough, and some COPD patients had a Pc 20 8 mg/mL), but the definitions based on feature combinations ensured that no patients with asthma also had COPD and vice versa [6]. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University of Nijmegen. All patients gave informed consent. Study Design and Treatment At the start of the 4-year intervention study, the patients were randomly assigned to one of two parallel treatment regimens: continuous bronchodilator therapy (four times daily) or treatment on demand (dry powder inhalations during symptomatic periods) [6]. The patients used salbutamol, 400 g, during 1 year and ipratropium bromide, 40 g, during the other year; both were administered as dry powder inhalations. The sequence of the drugs was determined by random allocation. During years 3 and 4, the 56 patients received 400 g of beclomethasone, two times daily, in combination with 400 g of salbutamol or 40 g of ipratropium bromide, four times daily (all dry powder inhalations). The bronchodilator inhaled during year 2 was also used in years 3 and 4. During the first 2 years of the study, 27 of the 56 patients received bronchodilator therapy on demand (of the 27, 15 had asthma and 12 had COPD). For patients treated on demand, the mean (SE) daily number of dry powder inhalations of salbutamol or ipratropium bromide was 1.2 0.3 in those with asthma and 0.8 0.2 in those with COPD. During years 3 and 4, 28 patients received salbutamol (15 with asthma and 13 with COPD) and 28 received ipratropium bromide (13 with asthma and 15 with COPD). Once every 3 months, inhalation technique and compliance with the prescribed medication were checked. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouths after the dry powder inhalations. During the second year of beclomethasone therapy, a single-blind prospective study was done to assess patient compliance with beclomethasone and the additional bronchodilator. Compliance was measured by counting capsules at the end of a 4-month period. Patients were unaware that their medication was counted after this period. Lung Function, Nonspecific Bronchial Responsiveness, and Reversibility All measurements were carried out by two qualified laboratory assistants during exacerbation-free periods. No bronchodilator was inhaled for at least 8 hours before the pulmonary function tests. At the start and after 24 and 48 months of the study, the inspiratory vital capacity (IVC), residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), and total lung capacity (TLC) were assessed using the wet Gould spirometer (Sensormedics, Bilthoven, the Netherlands) according to the standards of the European Coal and Steel Community [7]. The FEV1, bronchial responsiveness to histamine, and the reversibility of airway obstruction were assessed at 6-month intervals using the Microspiro HI-298 (Chest Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) [9]. Moreover, FEV1 and reversibility were also assessed after 1 and 13 months of study [6]. The best of three forced expiratory maneuvers, with the highest sum of the forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1, was used for data analysis. The bronchial responsiveness to histamine was measured according to the method described by Cockcroft and colleagues [10]. Results were expressed as the concentration of histamine that provoked a 20% decrease in FEV1 (Pc 20). After the FEV1 had returned to the baseline value, the bronchodilating response (reversibility) was assessed 60 minutes after the administration of both 80 g of ipratropium bromide and 400 g of salbutamol (metered dose aerosol) [6]. The bronchodilating response was expressed as the increase in FEV1 relative to the predicted value of the FEV1. Peak Expiratory Flow Assessments Once a week (on the same day and at the same time), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured with the Assess peak flow meter (HealthScan Products, Cedar Grove, New Jersey) [11] in the morning and in the evening. The highest value of three measurements was included in the analysis. The diurnal PEFR index (absolute difference between the evening value and the morning value divided by the highest value) was calculated. Exacerbations Our definition of exacerbation was based on that of Fletcher as modified by Boman and colleagues [12]. When an exacerbation occurred, a 10-day course of oral prednisone was administered. Patients received 25 mg for 2 days, 20 mg for 2 days, 15 mg for 2 days, and so forth. Symptoms and Adverse Effects Using a scale of 0 to 4, all patients recorded, on a weekly basis, the presence and severity of symptoms (cough, phlegm, dyspnea, fatigue, disturbed sleep at night). The adverse effects of medication (dysphonia and oropharyngeal irritation) were recorded by the patients once every 3 months. Moreover, every 6 months, the presence and severity of oral candidiasis were assessed using a questionnaire (no, light, or severe symptoms). Smoking At the start of the study, smoking history was assessed in pack-years. During the study, the average number of cigarettes smoked per day was also recorded in weekly diary entries. Power Calculations Assuming that the clinically relevant, decreased annual decline in FEV1 during beclomethasone treatment is 25 mL/y and that the residual standard deviation is 50 mL/y, the coefficient of variation is 25/50 or 0.5. Based on an of 0.05 and a of 0.20 (power:1 0.2, or 0.8), the required number of patients for the study would be 51. Based on an estimated dropout rate of 10%, the required initial number of study patients would be 56. Statistical Analysis Data on outcome variables obtained before and during beclomethasone therapy were compared. Differences were tested by repeated-measures analysis of variance, the paired Student t-test for normally distributed variables, and the Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test for non-normally distributed variables. Before the analysis, the Pc 20 values were 2log transformed. The an

Long term effects of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the long term management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still unclear. A meta-analysis of the original data sets of the randomised controlled trials published thus far was therefore performed. The main question was: “Are inhaled corticosteroids able to slow down the decline in lung function (FEV1) in COPD?” METHODS A Medline search of papers published between 1983 and 1996 was performed and three studies were selected, two of which were published in full and one in abstract form. Patients with “asthmatic features” were excluded from the original data. Ninety five of the original 140 patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids (81 with 1500 μg beclomethasone daily, six with 1600 μg budesonide daily, and eight with 800 μg beclomethasone daily) and 88 patients treated with placebo (of the initial 144 patients) were included in the analysis. The effect on FEV1 was assessed by a multiple repeated measurement technique in which points of time in the study and treatment effects (inhaled corticosteroids compared with placebo) were investigated. RESULTS No baseline differences were observed (mean age 61 years, mean FEV145% predicted). The estimated two year difference in prebronchodilator FEV1 was +0.034 l/year (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.005 to 0.063) in the inhaled corticosteroid group compared with placebo. The postbronchodilator FEV1 showed a difference of +0.039 l/year (95% CI –0.006 to 0.084). No beneficial effect was observed on the exacerbation rate. Worsening of the disease was the reason for drop out in four patients in the treatment group compared with nine in the placebo group. In the treatment group six of the 95 subjects dropped out because of an adverse effect which may have been related to the treatment compared with two of the 88 patients in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis in patients with clearly defined moderately severe COPD showed a beneficial course of FEV1 during two years of treatment with relatively high daily dosages of inhaled corticosteroids.

Self-management of asthma in general practice, asthma control and quality of life: a randomised controlled trial

Background: A study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of asthma self-management in general practice. Methods: Nineteen general practices were randomly allocated to usual care (UC) or self-management (SM). Asthma patients were included after confirmation of the GP diagnosis. Follow up was 2 years. Patients kept diary cards and visited the lung function laboratory every 6 months. Outcomes were number of successfully treated weeks, limited activity days, asthma specific quality of life, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1 reversibility, concentration of histamine provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% or more (PC20 histamine), and amount of inhaled steroids. Results: A total of 214 patients were included in the study (104 UC/110 SM; one third of the total asthma population in general practice); 62% were female. The mean percentage of successfully treated weeks per patient in the UC group was 72% (74/103 weeks) compared with 78% (81/105 weeks) in the SM group (p=0.003). The mean number of limited activity days was 1.2 (95% CI 0.5 to 1.9) in the SM group and 3.9 (95% CI 2.5 to 5.4) in the UC group. The estimated increase in asthma quality of life score was 0.10 points per visit in the UC group and 0.21 points per visit in the SM group (p=0.055). FEV1, FEV1 reversibility, and PC20 histamine did not change. There was a saving of 217 puffs of inhaled steroid per patient in favour of the SM group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Self-management lowers the burden of illness as perceived by patients with asthma and is at least as effective as the treatment usually provided in Dutch primary care. Self-management is a safe basis for intermittent treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

Perceptions of cardiovascular risk among patients with hypertension or diabetes

We aimed to examine risk perceptions among patients at moderate to high cardiovascular risk. A questionnaire about perceived absolute risk of myocardial infarction and stroke was sent to 2424 patients with hypertension or diabetes. Response rate was 86.3% and 1557 patients without atherosclerotic disease were included. Actual cardiovascular risk was calculated by using Framingham risk functions. A total of 363 (23.3%) of the 1557 patients did not provide any risk estimates and these were particularly older patients, patients with a lower educational level, and patients reporting no alcohol consumption. The remaining 1194 patients tended to overestimate their risk. In 42.3% (497/1174) and 46.8% (541/1155) of the cases, patients overestimated their actual 10-year risk for myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively, by more than 20%. Older age, smoking, familial history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and actual absolute risk predicted higher levels of perceived absolute risk. Male sex, higher scores for an internal health locus of control, lower scores for a physician locus of control, and self-rated excellent or (very) good health were positively related to higher accuracy. In conclusion, patients showed inadequate perceptions of their absolute risk of cardiovascular events and physicians should thus provide greater information about absolute risk when offering preventive therapy.

The relationship between organisational characteristics and the effects of clinical guidelines on medical performance in hospitals, a meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo measure the effectiveness of strategies to implement clinical guidelines andthe influence of organisational characteristics on hospital care.MethodsSystematic review and meta regression analysis including randomisedcontrolled trials, controlled clinical trials and controlled before-and-after studies.Results53 studies were identified, including 81 comparisons. The total effect of allintervention strategies appeared to be Odds ratio 2.13 (SD 1.72-2.65). Interventionstrategies (such as educational material, reminders, feedback) and other professionalinterventions that mostly comprised revisions of professional roles were found to berelatively strong components of multi faceted interventions. Outcomes of organisationaleffect modifiers were better in a learning environment in inpatient studies than inoutpatient studies. Interventions developed outside hospitals yielded better outcomes; OR4.62 (SD 2.82-7.57) versus OR 1.78 (SD 1.36-2.23).ConclusionBoth single and multifaceted interventions seemed to be effective in hospitalsettings. Evidence for the effects of organisational determinants remained limited.

Relation of the perception of airway obstruction to the severity of asthma.

BACKGROUND Patients with a poor perception of their symptoms of asthma seem to have an increased risk of an asthma attack. The influence of factors such as airway calibre, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, age and sex on the “perceptiveness” of a patient are poorly understood. It is of clinical importance to identify patients who are likely to have a poor perception of their symptoms. We have studied the perception of bronchoconstriction by asthmatic patients during a histamine provocation test and analysed the influence of bronchial obstruction, hyperresponsiveness, sex, and age. We were particularly interested to establish whether there was any difference in perception between subjects with a greater or lesser severity of asthma (expressed as bronchial obstruction, hyperresponsiveness). METHODS One hundred and thirty four patients with allergic asthma underwent a histamine provocation test. The FEV1 was measured after each inhalation of histamine. Subjects were asked to rate subjective quantification of the sensation of breathlessness on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The relationship between changes in VAS values and the reduction in FEV1 as a percentage of the baseline value was analysed by determining the linear regression slope (α) between the two parameters and indicates the perception of airway obstruction. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the effect of baseline FEV1, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, sex and age on the “perceptiveness” for bronchoconstriction. RESULTS The median value of the slope α (indicating the perception of airway obstruction) was 0.91 (25–75th percentile: 0.48–1.45). Age and sex had no influence on the perception of bronchoconstriction. Both initial bronchial tone (baseline FEV1) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20) showed a significant correlation with the perception of bronchoconstriction. The regression coefficients for FEV1 and 2log PC20 in the multiple regression model were 0.20 and 0.10. Patients who had a low baseline FEV1 and/or a high bronchial responsiveness to histamine were more likely to show a low perceptiveness for bronchoconstriction during the challenge test. CONCLUSIONS Low baseline FEV1 and high bronchial responsiveness are associated with a low degree of “perceptiveness” for bronchoconstriction. This suggests that patients with a more severe degree of asthma either show adaptation of “perceptiveness” for airway obstruction or that low perceptiveness leads to more severe asthma.

Comprehensive self management and routine monitoring in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in general practice: randomised controlled trial

Objective To assess the long term effects of two different modes of disease management (comprehensive self management and routine monitoring) on quality of life (primary objective), frequency and patients’ management of exacerbations, and self efficacy (secondary objectives) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in general practice. Design 24 month, multicentre, investigator blinded, three arm, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Setting 15 general practices in the eastern part of the Netherlands. Participants Patients with COPD confirmed by spirometry and treated in general practice. Patients with very severe COPD or treated by a respiratory physician were excluded. Interventions A comprehensive self management programme as an adjunct to usual care, consisting of four tailored sessions with ongoing telephone support by a practice nurse; routine monitoring as an adjunct to usual care, consisting of 2-4 structured consultations a year with a practice nurse; or usual care alone (contacts with the general practitioner at the patients’ own initiative). Outcome measures The primary outcome was the change in COPD specific quality of life at 24 months as measured with the chronic respiratory questionnaire total score. Secondary outcomes were chronic respiratory questionnaire domain scores, frequency and patients’ management of exacerbations measured with the Nijmegen telephonic exacerbation assessment system, and self efficacy measured with the COPD self-efficacy scale. Results 165 patients were allocated to self management (n=55), routine monitoring (n=55), or usual care alone (n=55). At 24 months, adjusted treatment differences between the three groups in mean chronic respiratory questionnaire total score were not significant. Secondary outcomes did not differ, except for exacerbation management. Compared with usual care, more exacerbations in the self management group were managed with bronchodilators (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 6.82) and with prednisolone, antibiotics, or both (3.98, 1.10 to 15.58). Conclusions Comprehensive self management or routine monitoring did not show long term benefits in terms of quality of life or self efficacy over usual care alone in COPD patients in general practice. Patients in the self management group seemed to be more capable of appropriately managing exacerbations than did those in the usual care group. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00128765.

Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial responsiveness in patients with "corticosteroid naive" mild asthma: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids are the most efficacious anti-inflammatory drugs in asthma. International guidelines also advocate the early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in corticosteroid naive patients. A study was undertaken to assess the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with corticosteroid naive asthma by conventional meta-analysis. METHODS A Medline search of papers published between January 1966 and June 1998 was performed and 11 papers were selected in which the patients had no history of treatment with inhaled or oral corticosteroids. Bronchial responsiveness to bronchoconstricting agents was considered as the main outcome parameter. Doubling doses (DD) of histamine or methacholine were calculated. RESULTS The total effect size of inhaled corticosteroids (average daily dose 1000 μg) versus placebo in the 11 studies was +1.16 DD (95% confidence interval (CI) +0.76 to +1.57). When only the eight short term studies (2–8 weeks) were analysed the effect size of the bronchoconstricting agent was +0.91 DD (95% CI +0.65 to +1.16). No relationship was found between the dose of inhaled corticosteroid used and the effect on bronchial responsiveness. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis in patients with corticosteroid naive asthma indicates that, on average, high doses of inhaled corticosteroids decrease bronchial hyperresponsiveness in 2–8 weeks. It remains unclear whether there is a dose-response relationship between inhaled corticosteroids and effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Multifaceted support to improve clinical decision making in diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial in general practice

Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve the clinical decision making of general practitioners (GPs) for patients with diabetes. To identify practice characteristics which predict success.