R. Pieters

Significant difference in outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on pediatric vs adult protocols in the Netherlands

Significant difference in outcome for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on pediatric vs adult protocols in the Netherlands

Relation between age, immunophenotype and in vitro drug resistance in 395 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia : Implications for treatment of infants

The prognosis of infant ALL, characterized by a high incidence of the immature CD10 negative B-lineage ALL (proB ALL) is poor. This study aimed to determine the resistance profile of infant ALL cells. In vitro drug resistance was determined by the MTT assay of 395 children with ALL at initial diagnosis: there were 21 infants <1.5 years of which nine <1 year, 284 children aged 1.5–10 years (intermediate age group) and 90 children >10 years. Immunophenotyping resulted in 310 cALL/preB ALL, 69 T-ALL, 15 proB ALL and one unknown cases. The following drugs were tested: daunorubicin, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, idarubicin (Ida), prednisolone (Pred), dexamethasone (DXM), vincristine (VCR), Asparaginase (Asp), 6-MP, 6-TG, AraC, VM26 and 4-HOO-ifosfamide (Ifos). Infants <1.5 years were significantly more resistant to pred (>500-fold), Asp (11-fold) and VM26 (2.7-fold) but significantly more sensitive to Ara-C (2.3-fold) compared to the intermediate age group. When analyzing infants <1 year of age similar results were found. prob all cells (seven infants <1.5 years; eight children >1.5 years) were significantly more resistant to glucocorticoids, Asp, thiopurines, anthracyclines and Ifos compared to cALL/preB ALL but more sensitive to Ara-C. Cells from children >10 years were significantly more resistant to Pred, DXM, Asp, Ida and 6-MP. T-ALL cells showed a strong resistance to Pred, Asp and VCR and a mild but significant resistance to all other drugs except thiopurines and VM26. We conclude that the poor prognosis of infant ALL is associated with a resistance to glucocorticoids and Asp. However, ALL cells from infants show a relatively high sensitivity to Ara-C which suggests that infants with ALL might benefit from treatment schedules that incorporate more Ara-C than the current treatment protocols.

Patient Stratification Based on Prednisolone-Vincristine-Asparaginase Resistance Profiles in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PURPOSE To confirm the prognostic value of a drug resistance profile combining prednisolone, vincristine, and l-asparaginase (PVA) cytotoxicity in an independent group of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with a different protocol and analyzed at longer follow-up compared with our previous study of patients treated according to the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG) ALL VII/VIII protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS Drug resistance profiles were determined in 202 children (aged 1 to 18 years) with newly diagnosed ALL who were treated according to the German Cooperative Study Group for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (COALL)-92 protocol. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 4.1 to 9.3 years), the 5-year disease-free survival probability (pDFS) rate +/- SE was 69% +/- 7.0%, 83% +/- 4.4%, and 84% +/- 6.8% for patients with resistant (PVA score 7 to 9), intermediate-sensitive (PVA score 5 to 6), and sensitive (SPVA score 3 to 4) profiles, respectively (sensitive and intermediate-sensitive v resistant, P </=.05). Resistant patients were at increased risk of an early event (nonresponse or relapse within 2.5 years of diagnosis) compared with sensitive and intermediate-sensitive patients (P =.03). The profile did not identify patients at higher risk of late relapse, which was also observed for DCLSG ALL-VII/VIII patients now analyzed at a median of 7.5 years of follow-up (range, 4.4 to 10.8 years). Despite being nondiscriminative for late relapses, the resistant profile was still the strongest prognostic factor for COALL-92 patients in a multivariate analysis including known risk factors (P =.07). CONCLUSION Drug resistance profiles identify patients at higher risk of early treatment failures and may, therefore, be used to improve risk-group stratification of children with ALL.

Increased expression of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Expression of the multidrug resistance proteins P-glycoprotein, encoded by the MDR1 gene, multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) and the lung resistance-related protein or major vault protein (LRP/MVP) is associated with clinical resistance to chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recently, the breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP), the equivalent of mitoxantrone-resistant protein (MXR) or placental ABC transporter (ABCP), was described in AML. We investigated MDR1, MRP1, LRP/MVP and BCRP mRNA expression simultaneously in 20 paired clinical AML samples from diagnosis and relapse or refractory disease, using quantitative Taqman analysis. In addition, standard assays for P-glycoprotein expression and function were performed. BCRP was the only resistance protein that was expressed at a significantly higher RNA level (median 1.7-fold, P = 0.04) at relapsed/refractory state as compared to diagnosis. In contrast, LRP/MVP mRNA expression decreased as disease evolved (P = 0.02), whereas MDR1 and MRP1 mRNA levels were not different at relapse as compared to diagnosis. Also, at the protein level no difference of MDR1 between diagnosis and relapse was found. A significant co-expression of BCRP and MDR1 was found at diagnosis (r = 0.47, P = 0.04). The present results suggest that BCRP, but not MDR1, MRP1 or LRP/MVP is associated with clinical resistant disease in AML.

Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid sensitivity and resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Glucocorticoids (GC) are probably the most important drugs in the treatment of ALL. Despite the extensive use of GC for many years, little is known about the molecular mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance. This review summarizes the knowledge on GC cytotoxicity in leukemia. The relevance of polymorphisms, splice variants and the number and regulation of the GC receptor are discussed. The role of multidrug resistance proteins, glutathione and glutathione S-transferase is evaluated, as well as the influence of the different heat-shock chaperone (hsp 90 and 70) and co-chaperone proteins (BAG-1 and others) which form a complex together with the GC receptor. Finally, the transactivation and transrepression (via NF-κB and AP-1 binding) of a wide range of genes (like c-myc) which initiates the final apoptosis pathway are discussed and suggestions for future directions of research in ALL patients are given.

The prognostic significance of membrane transport-associated multidrug resistance (MDR) proteins in leukemia.

A major problem in the treatment of leukemia is the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. There are several ways for cancer cells to develop resistance or defense mechanisms against cytotoxic drugs. This review paper will focus on membrane transport-associated multidrug resistance (MDR). The proteins involved, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), MRP1 and LRP/MVP, share the ability to act as drug transport proteins. Following upregulation of the mdr-1 gene, the energy-dependent transmembrane P-gp overexpression results in diminished intracellular concentrations of anthracyclins, vinca-alkaloids and epipodophyllotoxins. The other transmembrane protein, MRP1, also has intracellular epitopes which are involved in intracellular redistribution and sequestration of drugs. The last named mechanism has also been ascribed to LRP, a protein which only occurs intracellularly. In leukemia patients, cellular drug resistance profiles determined in vitro at the time of presentation show a strong correlation with outcome. In AML, mdr-1 overexpression at diagnosis is a strong independent predictor for CR and long-term survival. In ALL, mdr-1 expression is of minor importance for prediction of outcome. In AML, MRP1 expression at diagnosis is not correlated with clinical response and survival in most studies. In ALL, MRP1 expression at diagnosis is not associated with response and long-term survival in the few studies on this aspect which have been published. The studies on LRP in AML emphasize the importance of the correlation between LRP-expression and anthracycline accumulation and suggest that LRP-expression has prognostic value at diagnosis. However, there is an equal number of studies where a predictive value in the case of LRP-expression in de novo AML cannot be shown. The highest levels of LRP have been reported in multiple relapses of ALL. Furthermore, new membrane-associated drug transport proteins have been reported including the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP), the anthracyclin resistance-associated protein (ARA), five new homologues of MRP (MRP2, or MOAT, MRP3, MRP4, MRP5, and MRP6), the sister of P-glycoprotein (sP-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Studies on the (clinical) significance of these proteins have not yet been reported.

The human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 mediates in vitro cytarabine sensitivity in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia

Cytarabine (ara-C) is the most effective agent for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Aberrant expression of enzymes involved in the transport/metabolism of ara-C could explain drug resistance. We determined mRNA expression of these factors using quantitative-real-time-PCR in leukemic blasts from children diagnosed with de novo AML. Expression of the inactivating enzyme pyrimidine nucleotidase-I (PN-I) was 1.8-fold lower in FAB-M5 as compared to FAB-M1/2 (P=0.007). In vitro sensitivity to deoxynucleoside analogues was determined using the MTT-assay. Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) mRNA expression and ara-C sensitivity were significantly correlated (rp=−0.46; P=0.001), with three-fold lower hENT1 mRNA levels in resistant patients (P=0.003). hENT1 mRNA expression also seemed to correlate inversely with the LC50 values of cladribine (rp=−0.30; P=0.04), decitabine (rp=−0.29; P=0.04) and gemcitabine (rp=−0.33; P=0.02). Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) and cytidine deaminase (CDA) mRNA expression seemed to correlate with in vitro sensitivity to gemcitabine (rp=−0.31; P=0.03) and decitabine (rp=0.33; P=0.03), respectively. The dCK/PN-I ratio correlated inversely with LC50 values for gemcitabine (rp=−0.45, P=0.001) and the dCK/CDA ratio seemed to correlate with LC50 values for decitabine (rp=−0.29; 0.04). In conclusion, decreased expression of hENT1, which transports ara-C across the cell membrane, appears to be a major factor in ara-C resistance in childhood AML.

Favorable prognostic impact of NPM1 gene mutations in childhood acute myeloid leukemia, with emphasis on cytogenetically normal AML

Nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations occur frequently in adult cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) and confer favorable outcome. We investigated the frequency and prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations in childhood AML (n=298), specifically focusing on the CN-AML subgroup (n=100). Mutations were found in 8.4%, and clustered significantly in the CN-AML subgroup (22%). No mutations were found in patients below the age of 3 years; in CN-AML, there was an increasing incidence above this age. In the overall group, NPM1 mutations conferred an independent favorable prognostic impact on event-free survival (5-year pEFS 66 vs 39%; P=0.02), which did not translate into a significantly better overall survival (5-year pOS 68 vs 56%; P=0.30). However, when the favorable cytogenetic subgroups [inv(16) and t(8;21)] were excluded from the NPM1 wild-type group, the difference in pOS was borderline statistically significant (68 vs 45%; P=0.07). In the CN-AML cohort, NPM1 mutations were an independent prognostic factor on pEFS (80 vs 39%; P=0.01), and pOS (85 vs 60%; P=0.06), which was not influenced by FLT3/ITD. However, in NPM1 wild-type CN-AML, FLT3/ITD-positive patients had a significantly worse outcome (pEFS 48 vs 18%; P<0.001). We conclude that NPM1 mutations confer a favorable prognosis in childhood AML and in CN-AML in particular.

Mononuclear cells contaminating acute lymphoblastic leukaemic samples tested for cellular drug resistance using the methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium assay

The methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT) assay is a drug resistance assay which cannot discriminate between malignant and non-malignant cells. We previously reported that samples with > or = 80% leukaemic cells at the start of culture give similar results in the MTT assay and the differential staining cytotoxicity assay, in which a discrimination between malignant and non-malignant cells can be made. However, the percentage of leukaemic cells may change during culture, which might affect the results of the MTT assay. We studied 106 untreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) samples with > or = 80% leukaemic cells at the start of culture. This percentage decreased below 80% in 28%, and below 70% in 13%, of the samples after 4 days of culture. A decrease below 70% occurred more often in case of 80-89% leukaemic cells (9/29) than in case of > or = 90% leukaemic cells at the start of culture (5/77, P = 0.0009). Samples with < 70% leukaemic cells after culture were significantly more resistant to 6 out of 13 drugs, and showed a trend towards being more resistant to two more drugs, than samples with > or = 80% leukaemic cells. No such differences were seen between samples with 70-79% and samples with > or = 80% leukaemic cells after culture. We next studied in another 30 ALL samples whether contaminating mononuclear cells could be removed by using immunoamagnetic beads. Using a beads to target cell ratio of 10:1, the percentage of leukaemic cells increased from mean 72% (s.d. 9.3%) to mean 87% (s.d. 6.7%), with an absolute increase of 2-35%. The recovery of leukaemic cells was mean 82.1% (range 56-100%, s.d. 14.0%). The procedure itself did not influence the results of the MTT assay in three samples containing only leukaemic cells. We conclude that it is important to determine the percentage of leukaemic cells at the start and at the end of the MTT assay and similar drug resistance assays. Contaminating mononuclear cells can be successfully removed from ALL samples using immunomagnetic beads. This approach may increase the number of leukaemic samples which can be evaluated for cellular drug resistance with the MTT assay or a similar cell culture drug resistance assay.

In vitro drug sensitivity of normal peripheral blood lymphocytes and childhood leukaemic cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood.

In vitro drug sensitivity of leukaemic cells might be influenced by the contamination of such a sample with non-malignant cells and the sample source. To study this, sensitivity of normal peripheral blood (PB) lymphocytes to a number of cytostatic drugs was assessed with the MTT assay. We compared this sensitivity with the drug sensitivity of leukaemic cells of 38 children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. We also studied a possible differential sensitivity of leukaemic cells from bone marrow (BM) and PB. The following drugs were used: Prednisolone, dexamethasone, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, cytosine arabinoside, vincristine, vindesine, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, mafosfamide (Maf), 4-hydroperoxy-ifosfamide, teniposide, mitoxantrone, L-asparaginase, methotrexate and mustine. Normal PB lymphocytes were significantly more resistant to all drugs tested, except to Maf. Leukaemic BM and PB cells from 38 patients (unpaired samples) showed no significant differences in sensitivity to any of the drugs. Moreover, in 11 of 12 children with acute leukaemia of whom we investigated simultaneously obtained BM and PB (paired samples), their leukaemic BM and PB cells showed comparable drug sensitivity profiles. In one patient the BM cells were more sensitive to most drugs than those from the PB, but the actual differences in sensitivity were small. We conclude that the contamination of a leukaemic sample with normal PB lymphocytes will influence the results of the MTT assay. The source of the leukaemic sample, BM or PB, does not significantly influence the assay results.