R. Put
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Put.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2003
R. Put; Catherine Perrin; F. Questier; Danny Coomans; D.L. Massart; Y. Vander Heyden
The use of the classification and regression tree (CART) methodology was studied in a quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) context on a data set consisting of the retentions of 83 structurally diverse drugs on a Unisphere PBD column, using isocratic elutions at pH 11.7. The response (dependent variable) in the tree models consisted of the predicted rention factor (log kw) of the solutes, while a set of 266 molecular descriptors was used as explanatory variables in the tree building. Molecular descriptors related to the hydrophobicity (log P and Hy) and the size (TPC) of the molecules were selected out of these 266 descriptors in order to describe and predict retention. Besides the above mentioned, CART was also able to select hydrogen-bonding and molecular complexity descriptors. Since these variables are expected from QSRR knowledge, it demonstrates the potential of CART as a methodology to understand retention in chromatographic systems. The potential of CART to predict retention and thus occasionally to select an appropriate system for a given mixture was also evaluated. Reasonably good prediction, i.e. only 9% serious misclassification, was observed. Moreover, some of the misclassifications probably are inherent to the data set applied.
Analytica Chimica Acta | 2008
Melanie Dumarey; R. Put; E. Van Gyseghem; Y. Vander Heyden
Developing an analytical separation procedure for an unknown mixture is a challenging issue. An important example is the separation and quantification of a new drug and its impurities. One approach to start method development is the screening of the mixture on dissimilar chromatographic systems, i.e. systems with large selectivity differences. After screening, the most suited system is retained for further method development. In a step prior to such strategy dissimilar chromatographic systems need to be selected. In this paper the performance of different chemometric selection approaches, described in the literature, was visually evaluated and compared. Additionally, orthogonal projection approach (OPA) was tested as another potential selection method. All techniques, including the OPA method, were able to select (a set of) dissimilar chromatographic systems and many similarities between the selections were observed. However, the Kennard and Stone algorithm performed best in selecting the most dissimilar systems in the earliest steps of the selection procedure. The generalized pairwise correlation method (GPCM) and the auto-associative multivariate regression trees (AAMRT) were also performing well. OPA and weighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (WPGMA) are less preferable.
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems | 2005
Timothy Hancock; R. Put; Danny Coomans; Yvan Vander Heyden; Yvette Everingham
Analytica Chimica Acta | 2007
R. Put; Y. Vander Heyden
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems | 2005
F. Questier; R. Put; Danny Coomans; B. Walczak; Y. Vander Heyden
Journal of Chromatography A | 2004
R. Put; Q.S. Xu; D.L. Massart; Y. Vander Heyden
Journal of Proteome Research | 2006
R. Put; M. Daszykowski; Tomasz Baczek; Y. Vander Heyden
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis | 2005
Eric Deconinck; Q.S. Xu; R. Put; Danny Coomans; D.L. Massart; Y. Vander Heyden
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis | 2006
E. Van Gyseghem; Bieke Dejaegher; R. Put; Péter Forlay-Frick; A. Elkihel; M. Daszykowski; Károly Héberger; D.L. Massart; Y. Vander Heyden
Proteomics | 2007
R. Put; Yvan Vander Heyden