Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where R. S. Raymond is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by R. S. Raymond.


Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 1991

Microwave driven extraction of stabilized spin polarized atomic hydrogen

T. Roser; D.G. Crabb; W. A. Kaufman; R. S. Raymond; J.A. Stewart; B. Vuaridel; G.R. Court

Abstract The storage of ultracold spin-polarized hydrogen atoms offers the possibility of producing a high intensity nuclear polarized atomic hydrogen jet. We stored electron spin polarized atomic hydrogen at 0.4 K in an open 5 T magnetic storage cell. We also observed directly, for the first time, the extraction of hydrogen atoms from the storage cell by flipping their spins using a microwave driven transition. The results are being used to design a high intensity jet of nuclear polarized atomic hydrogen to be used as an internal target in the 400 GeV to 3 TeV UNK accelerator.


Physical Review Letters | 2012

HIGHER ORDER SPIN RESONANCES IN 2 . 1 GeV / c POLARIZED PROTON BEAM

M. A. Leonova; J. A. Askari; K. N. Gordon; A. D. Krisch; J. Liu; V. S. Morozov; D. A. Nees; R. S. Raymond; D. W. Sivers; V. K. Wong; F. Hinterberger

Spin resonances can depolarize or spin flip a polarized beam. We studied 1st and higher order spin resonances with stored 2.1  GeV/c vertically polarized protons. The 1st order vertical (ν(y)) resonance caused almost full spin flip, while some higher order ν(y) resonances caused partial depolarization. The 1st order horizontal (ν(x)) resonance caused almost full depolarization, while some higher order ν(x) resonances again caused partial depolarization. Moreover, a 2nd order ν(x) resonance is about as strong as some 3rd order ν(x) resonances, while some 3rd order ν(y) resonances are much stronger than a 2nd order ν(y) resonance. One thought that ν(y) spin resonances are far stronger than ν(x), and that lower order resonances are stronger than higher order; the data do not support this.


SPIN PHYSICS: 18th International Spin Physics Symposium | 2009

Experimental Verification of Predicted Oscillations near a Spin Resonance

V. S. Morozov; A. W. Chao; A. D. Krisch; M. A. Leonova; R. S. Raymond; D. W. Sivers; V. K. Wong; A. Ganshvili; R. Gebel; A. Lehrach; B. Lorentz; R. Maier; D. Prasuhn; H. Stockhorst; D. Welsch; F. Hinterberger; K. Ulbrich; A. Schnase; E. J. Stephenson; N. P. M. Brantjes; C. J. G. Onderwater; M. da Silva

The Chao matrix formalism allows analytic calculations of a beam’s polarization behavior inside a spin resonance. We recently tested its prediction of polarization oscillations occurring in a stored beam of polarized particles near a spin resonance. Using a 1.85 GeV/c polarized deuteron beam stored in COSY, we swept a new rf solenoid’s frequency rather rapidly through 400 Hz during 100 ms, while varying the distance between the sweep’s end frequency and the central frequency of an rf‐induced spin resonance. Our measurements of the deuteron’s polarization for sweeps ending near and inside the resonance agree with the Chao formalism’s predicted oscillations.


Intersections Between Particles and Nuclear Physics | 2008

Analyzing power measurements in high‐P2∥ p‐p elastic scattering

R. S. Raymond; K.A. Brown; R.J. Bruni; P. R. Cameron; D. G. Crabb; R.L. Cummings; F.Z. Khiari; A. D. Krisch; Anna Lin; K. M. Terwilliger; G. T. Danby; Y. Y. Lee; L.G. Ratner; J. R. O’Fallon; D. C. Peaslee; T.S. Bhatia; G. Glass; L. C. Northcliffe

The analyzing power in 28 GeV/c proton/proton elastic scattering was measured at P2∥=5.95 and 6.56 (GeV/c)2 using a polarized proton target and an unpolarized proton beam at the Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS. Results indicate that the analyzing power, A, is rising sharply with P2∥.


AIP Conference Proceedings (American Institute of Physics); (USA) | 2008

The ultra-cold polarized hydrogen jet project

R. S. Raymond; D. G. Crabb; T. Roser; J.A. Stewart; G.R. Court

Research is described on a jet of polarized atomic hydrogen. Atoms in the two lower hyperfine states are trapped at 0.4 k in a 5 T magnetic field. Microwaves at 140 GHz then drive transitions to the upper hyperfine states and these atoms are expelled from the field to form the beam. Atoms have been trapped, transitions driven, and atoms detected outside the trapping field, but preliminary measurements are not fully understood. Studies are continuing.


AIP Conference Proceedings | 2008

A helium film coated quasi‐parabolic mirror to focus a beam of ultra‐cold spin polarized atomic hydrogen

V. G. Luppov; W. A. Kaufman; K. M. Hill; R. S. Raymond; A. D. Kirsch

A 350 mK helium‐4‐coated mirror was used to increase the intensity of an ultra‐cold electron‐spin‐polarized atomic hydrogen beam. The mirror uses the observed specular reflection of atomic hydrogen from a superfluid‐helium‐covered surface. A quasi‐parabolic polished copper mirror was installed with its focus at the 5 mm diameter exit aperture of an atomic hydrogen stabilization cell in the gradient of an 8 T solenoid field. The four‐coned mirror shape, which was designed specifically for operation in the gradient, increased the beam intensity focused by a sextupole magnet into a compression tube detector by a factor of about 7.5.


Proceedings of the 17th International Spin Physics Symposium | 2007

Chao Formalism & Kondratenko Crossing Tests

R. S. Raymond; A. W. Chao; A. D. Krisch; M. Leonova; V. S. Morozov; D. W. Sivers; V. K. Wong; R. Gebel; A. Lehrach; B. Lorentz; R. Maier; D. Prasuhn; A. Schnase; H. Stockhorst; F. Hinterberger; K. Ulbrich; A. M. Kondratenko

We recently started testing Chao’s proposed new matrix formalism for describing the spin dynamics due to a single spin resonance; this seems to be the first generalization of the Froissart‐Stora equation since it was published in 1960. The Chao matrix formalism allows one to calculate analytically the polarization’s behavior inside a resonance, which is not possible using the Froissart‐Stora equation. We recently tested some Chao formalism predictions using a 1.85 GeV/c polarized deuteron beam stored in COSY. We swept an rf dipole’s frequency through 200 Hz while varying the distance from the sweep’s end frequency to an rf‐induced spin resonance’s central frequency. While the Froissart‐Stora formula can make no prediction in this case, the data seem to support the Chao formalism.We also started investigating the new Kondratenko method to preserve beam polarization during a spin resonance crossing; the method uses 3 rapid changes of the crossing rate near the resonance. With a proper choice of crossing par...


Proceedings of the 17th International Spin Physics Symposium | 2007

Unexpected Enhancements and Reductions of RF Resonance Strengths

M. Leonova; A. D. Krisch; V. S. Morozov; R. S. Raymond; D. W. Sivers; V. K. Wong; R. Gebel; A. Lehrach; B. Lorentz; R. Maier; D. Prasuhn; A. Schnase; H. Stockhorst; F. Hinterberger; K. Ulbrich

We recently analyzed all available data on spin-flipping stored beams of polarized protons, electrons, and deuterons. Fitting the modified Froissart-Stora equation to the measured polarization data after crossing an rf-induced spin resonance, we found 10 ‐20-fold deviations from the depolarizing resonance strength equations used for many years. The polarization was typically manipulated by linearly sweeping the frequency of an rf dipole or rf solenoid through an rf-induced spin resonance; spin-flip efficiencies of up to 99:9% were obtained. The Lorentz invariance of an rf dipole’s transverse R Bdl and the weak energy dependence of its spin resonance strength E together imply that even a small rf dipole should allow efficient spin flipping in 100 GeV or even TeV storage rings; thus, it is important to understand these large deviations. Therefore, we recently studied the resonance strength deviations experimentally by varying the size and vertical betatron tune of a 2:1 GeV=c polarized proton beam stored in COSY. We found no dependence of E on beam size, but we did find almost 100-fold enhancements when the rf spin resonance was near an intrinsic spin resonance.


INTERSECTIONS OF PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS: 8th Conference CIPANP2003 | 2004

Spin‐Flipping Polarized Deuterons At COSY

K. Yonehara; A. D. Krisch; V. S. Morozov; R. S. Raymond; V. K. Wong; U. Bechstedt; R. Gebel; A. Lehrach; B. Lorenz; R. Maier; D. Prasuhn; A. Schnase; H. Stockhorst; Dieter Eversheim; F. Hinterberger; H. Rohdjess; K. Ulbrich; W. Scobel

We recently stored a 1.85 GeV/c vertically polarized deuteron beam in the COSY Ring in Julich; we then spin‐flipped it by ramping a new air‐core rf dipole’s frequency through an rf‐induced spin resonance to manipulate the polarization direction of the deuteron beam. We first experimentally determined the resonance’s frequency and set the dipole’s rf voltage to its maximum; then we varied its frequency ramp time and frequency range. We used the EDDA detector to measure the vector and tensor polarization asymmetries. We have not yet extracted the deuteron’s tensor polarization spin‐flip parameters from the measured data, since our short run did not provide adequate tensor analyzing‐power data at 1.85 GeV/c. However, with a 100 Hz frequency ramp and our longest ramp time of 400 s, the deuterons’ vector polarization spin‐flip efficiency was 48±1%.


INTERSECTIONS OF PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS: 8th Conference CIPANP2003 | 2004

Status of the Michigan Ultra‐Cold Spin‐Polarized Hydrogen Jet

K. Yonehara; B. K. Harris; M. C. Kandes; B. H. Kienman; A. D. Krisch; M. Leonova; V. G. Luppov; V. S. Morozov; J. B. Olson; C. C. Peters; R. S. Raymond; D. L. Sisco; N. S. Borisov; V. V. Fimushkin; A. F. Prudkoglyad

Progress on the Michigan ultra‐cold proton‐spin‐polarized atomic‐hydrogen Jet target is presented. We describe the present status of the Jet and some beam test results.

Collaboration


Dive into the R. S. Raymond's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V. K. Wong

University of Michigan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V. G. Luppov

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L.G. Ratner

Brookhaven National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. Roser

University of Michigan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. Stockhorst

Forschungszentrum Jülich

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge