R. Sheridan
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Sheridan.
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | 2011
Karen Miguel; Joshua A. Hirsch; R. Sheridan
As medical errors and patient harm mount in todays healthcare arena, healthcare administrators have turned to high efficiency, high reliability, and high risk industries for strategies and guidance. By adopting elements of Crew Resource Management (CRM), healthcare teams have been shown to work more effectively together, allowing for earlier recognition of medical errors and catching them before they cause serious patient harm.
Vascular Medicine | 2016
Melissa D Chittle; Rahmi Oklu; Richard M. Pino; Ping He; R. Sheridan; Joanne Martino; Joshua A. Hirsch
This study was undertaken to determine the impact of shared decision-making when selecting a sedation option, from no sedation (local anesthetic), minimal sedation (anxiolysis with a benzodiazepine) or moderate sedation (benzodiazepine and opiate), for venous access device placement (port-a-cath and tunneled catheters) on patient choice, satisfaction and recovery time. This is an IRB-approved, HIPPA-compliant, retrospective study of 198 patients (18–85 years old, 60% female) presenting to an ambulatory vascular interventional radiology department for venous access device placement between 22 October 2014 and 7 October 2015. Patients were educated about sedation options and given the choice of undergoing the procedure with no sedation (local anesthetic only), or minimal or moderate sedation. Satisfaction was assessed through three survey questions. No sedation was selected by 53/198 (27%), minimal sedation by 71/198 (36%) and moderate sedation by 74/198 (37%). All subjects would recommend the option to another patient and valued the opportunity to select a sedation option. Post-procedure recovery time differences were statistically significant (p<0.0001) with median recovery times of 0 minutes for no sedation, 38 minutes for minimal sedation and 64 minutes for moderate sedation. In conclusion, patient sedation preference for venous access device placement is variable, signifying there is a role for shared decision-making as it empowers the patient to select the option most aligned with his or her goals. The procedure is well-tolerated, associated with high satisfaction, and the impact on departmental flow is notable because patients choosing no or minimal sedation results in a decreased post-procedure recovery time burden.
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | 2016
Melissa D Chittle; Teresa Vanderboom; Judith Borsody-Lotti; Suvranu Ganguli; Patricia Hanley; Joanne Martino; Peter R. Mueller; Alexandra Penzias; Catherine Saltalamacchia; R. Sheridan; Joshua A. Hirsch
Neurointerventionalists have long partnered with certain types of clinical associates to provide longitudinal care. This overview summarizes differences in education, background, roles, and scopes of practice of the various clinical associates (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, radiology practitioner assistants, radiologist assistants, and nursing care coordinators). Key differences and similarities are highlighted to alleviate confusion about the roles clinical associates can assume on a neurointerventional service. This overview is intended to guide practices as they consider broadening their clinical support teams.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2016
Alexander S. Misono; Peter R. Mueller; Joshua A. Hirsch; R. Sheridan; Assad U. Siddiqi; Raymond W. Liu
PURPOSE Interventional radiology (IR) has historically failed to fully capture the value of evaluation and management services in the inpatient setting. Understanding financial benefits of a formally incorporated billing discipline may yield meaningful insights for interventional practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A revenue modeling tool was created deploying standard financial modeling techniques, including sensitivity and scenario analyses. Sensitivity analysis calculates revenue fluctuation related to dynamic adjustment of discrete variables. In scenario analysis, possible future scenarios as well as revenue potential of different-size clinical practices are modeled. RESULTS Assuming a hypothetical inpatient IR consultation service with a daily patient census of 35 patients and two new consults per day, the model estimates annual charges of
Archive | 2015
Chieh Suai Tan; R. Sheridan; Steven Wu
2.3 million and collected revenue of
Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2011
Ernest J Byers; Max A. Gomez; R. Sheridan; Nelson W. Orr; Joshua A. Hirsch
390,000. Revenues are most sensitive to provider billing documentation rates and patient volume. A range of realistic scenarios-from cautious to optimistic-results in a range of annual charges of
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | 2010
Max A. Gomez; Ernest J Byers; Preston Stingley; R. Sheridan; Joshua A. Hirsch
1.8 million to
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2016
E. Balesh; Alexander S. Misono; H. Attaya; Eric Wehrenberg-Klee; S. Rao; K. Specht; S. Bonk; S. Loomis; R. Sheridan; Peter R. Mueller; T.G. Walker
2.7 million and a collected revenue range of
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2017
Alexander S. Misono; Eric Wehrenberg-Klee; S. Rao; S Fadl; H. Attaya; S. Bonk; R. Sheridan; S. Loomis; Peter R. Mueller; T.G. Walker
241,000 to
The Journal of the Association for Vascular Access | 2018
Melissa D Chittle; Erin McIntyre; Judy Borsody Lotti; Catherine Saltalamacchia; R. Sheridan; Peter R. Mueller; Karen Sepucha
601,000. Even a small practice with a daily patient census of 5 and 0.20 new consults per day may expect annual charges of