R. Tirona

Phase I/II Study of a Five-fraction Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy Treatment for Low-risk Localised Prostate Cancer: Early Results of pHART3

AIMS Most men with low-risk localised prostate cancer prefer treatments with high control rates and minimal disruption to their lives. Hypofractionating external radiation treatments can theoretically maintain high bioequivalent tumour doses, decrease treatment visits and decrease acute and late toxicities. The aim of this study was to assess the toxicity and feasibility of a hypofractionated accelerated regimen for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study was a phase I/II study in which patients with T1-2b, Gleason < or = 6 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 10 ng/ml prostate cancer received 35Gy in five fractions, once a week over 29 days. Treatment was delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy on standard linear accelerators, with daily image guidance using gold seed fiducials, and a 4mm clinical target volume to planning target volume margin. RESULTS As of January 2008, the target accrual of 30 patients had been reached and all had completed treatment and at least 6 months of follow-up. Dose-volume histogram objectives were achievable in all patients. Treatment was very well tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 genitourinary toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity nor fatigue observed (95% confidence interval 0-12%). As a group, compared with baseline, the following additional grade 2 toxicities were observed: 13% genitourinary, 7% gastrointestinal and 10% fatigue. At 6 months all scores had returned to or improved over baseline. The median PSA before treatment was 6.0 ng/ml. At 6 months, the median PSA was 1.8 ng/ml and 75% had a PSA < or = 3.0 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS This novel technique using standard linear accelerators seems feasible and is well tolerated. Further follow-up will be carried out to document late toxicity and efficacy.

PET CT THRESHOLDS FOR RADIOTHERAPY TARGET DEFINITION IN NON- SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER: HOW CLOSE ARE WE TO THE PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS?

PURPOSE Optimal target delineation threshold values for positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) radiotherapy planning is controversial. In this present study, different PET CT threshold values were used for target delineation and then compared pathologically. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 31 non-small-cell lung cancer patients underwent PET CT before surgery. The maximal diameter (MD) of the pathologic primary tumor was obtained. The CT-based gross tumor volumes (GTV(CT)) were delineated for CT window-level thresholds at 1,600 and -300 Hounsfield units (HU) (GTV(CT1)); 1,600 and -400 (GTV(CT2)); 1,600 and -450 HU (GTV(CT3)); 1,600 and -600 HU (GTV(CT4)); 1,200 and -700 HU (GTV(CT5)); 900 and -450 HU (GTV(CT6)); and 700 and -450 HU (GTV(CT7)). The PET-based GTVs (GTV(PET)) were autocontoured at 20% (GTV(20)), 30% (GTV(30)), 40% (GTV(40)), 45% (GTV(45)), 50% (GTV(50)), and 55% (GTV(55)) of the maximal intensity level. The MD of each image-based GTV in three-dimensional orientation was determined. The MD of the GTV(PET) and GTV(CT) were compared with the pathologically determined MD. RESULTS The median MD of the GTV(CT) changed from 2.89 (GTV(CT2)) to 4.46 (GTV(CT7)) as the CT thresholds were varied. The correlation coefficient of the GTV(CT) compared with the pathologically determined MD ranged from 0.76 to 0.87. The correlation coefficient of the GTV(CT1) was the best (r=0.87). The median MD of GTV(PET) changed from 5.72 cm to 2.67 cm as the PET thresholds increased. The correlation coefficient of the GTV(PET) compared with the pathologic finding ranged from 0.51 to 0.77. The correlation coefficient of GTV(50) was the best (r=0.77). CONCLUSION Compared with the MD of GTV(PET), the MD of GTV(CT) had better correlation with the pathologic MD. The GTV(CT1) and GTV(50) had the best correlation with the pathologic results.

Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy Using Concomitant Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Boost Technique for Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Acute Toxicity Results

PURPOSE To evaluate the acute toxicities of hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy (RT) using a concomitant intensity-modulated RT boost in conjunction with elective pelvic nodal irradiation for high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This report focused on 66 patients entered into this prospective Phase I study. The eligible patients had clinically localized prostate cancer with at least one of the following high-risk features (Stage T3, Gleason score >or=8, or prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/mL). Patients were treated with 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvic lymph nodes using a conventional four-field technique. A concomitant intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost of 22.5 Gy in 25 fractions was delivered to the prostate. Thus, the prostate received 67.5 Gy in 25 fractions within 5 weeks. Next, the patients underwent 3 years of adjuvant androgen ablative therapy. Acute toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, weekly during treatment and at 3 months after RT. RESULTS The median patient age was 71 years. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level and Gleason score was 18.7 ng/L and 8, respectively. Grade 1-2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were common during RT but most had settled at 3 months after treatment. Only 5 patients had acute Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, in the form of urinary incontinence (n = 1), urinary frequency/urgency (n = 3), and urinary retention (n = 1). None of the patients developed Grade 3 or greater gastrointestinal or Grade 4 or greater genitourinary toxicity. CONCLUSION The results of the present study have indicated that hypofractionated accelerated RT with a concomitant intensity-modulated RT boost and pelvic nodal irradiation is feasible with acceptable acute toxicity.