Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where R. William Henry is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by R. William Henry.


Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2008

Transcriptional regulation of human small nuclear RNA genes

Gauri W. Jawdekar; R. William Henry

The products of human snRNA genes have been frequently described as performing housekeeping functions and their synthesis refractory to regulation. However, recent studies have emphasized that snRNA and other related non-coding RNA molecules control multiple facets of the central dogma, and their regulated expression is critical to cellular homeostasis during normal growth and in response to stress. Human snRNA genes contain compact and yet powerful promoters that are recognized by increasingly well-characterized transcription factors, thus providing a premier model system to study gene regulation. This review summarizes many recent advances deciphering the mechanism by which the transcription of human snRNA and related genes are regulated.


PLOS ONE | 2010

Brg1 Is Required for Cdx2-Mediated Repression of Oct4 Expression in Mouse Blastocysts

Kai Wang; Satyaki Sengupta; Luca Magnani; Catherine A. Wilson; R. William Henry; Jason G. Knott

During blastocyst formation the segregation of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm is governed by the mutually antagonistic effects of the transcription factors Oct4 and Cdx2. Evidence indicates that suppression of Oct4 expression in the trophectoderm is mediated by Cdx2. Nonetheless, the underlying epigenetic modifiers required for Cdx2-dependent repression of Oct4 are largely unknown. Here we show that the chromatin remodeling protein Brg1 is required for Cdx2-mediated repression of Oct4 expression in mouse blastocysts. By employing a combination of RNA interference (RNAi) and gene expression analysis we found that both Brg1 Knockdown (KD) and Cdx2 KD blastocysts exhibit widespread expression of Oct4 in the trophectoderm. Interestingly, in Brg1 KD blastocysts and Cdx2 KD blastocysts, the expression of Cdx2 and Brg1 is unchanged, respectively. To address whether Brg1 cooperates with Cdx2 to repress Oct4 transcription in the developing trophectoderm, we utilized preimplantation embryos, trophoblast stem (TS) cells and Cdx2-inducible embryonic stem (ES) cells as model systems. We found that: (1) combined knockdown (KD) of Brg1 and Cdx2 levels in blastocysts resulted in increased levels of Oct4 transcripts compared to KD of Brg1 or Cdx2 alone, (2) endogenous Brg1 co-immunoprecipitated with Cdx2 in TS cell extracts, (3) in blastocysts Brg1 and Cdx2 co-localize in trophectoderm nuclei and (4) in Cdx2-induced ES cells Brg1 and Cdx2 are recruited to the Oct4 promoter. Lastly, to determine how Brg1 may induce epigenetic silencing of the Oct4 gene, we evaluated CpG methylation at the Oct4 promoter in the trophectoderm of Brg1 KD blastocysts. This analysis revealed that Brg1-dependent repression of Oct4 expression is independent of DNA methylation at the blastocyst stage. In toto, these results demonstrate that Brg1 cooperates with Cdx2 to repress Oct4 expression in the developing trophectoderm to ensure normal development.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2004

Distinct Mechanisms for Repression of RNA Polymerase III Transcription by the Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Protein

Heather A. Hirsch; Gauri W. Jawdekar; Kang Ae Lee; Liping Gu; R. William Henry

ABSTRACT The retinoblastoma (RB) protein represses global RNA polymerase III transcription of genes that encode nontranslated RNAs, potentially to control cell growth. However, RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes exhibit diverse promoter structures and factor requirements for transcription, and a universal mechanism explaining global repression is uncertain. We show that RB represses different classes of RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes via distinct mechanisms. Repression of human U6 snRNA (class 3) gene transcription occurs through stable promoter occupancy by RB, whereas repression of adenovirus VAI (class 2) gene transcription occurs in the absence of detectable RB-promoter association. Endogenous RB binds to a human U6 snRNA gene in both normal and cancer cells that maintain functional RB but not in HeLa cells whose RB function is disrupted by the papillomavirus E7 protein. Both U6 promoter association and transcriptional repression require the A/B pocket domain and C region of RB. These regions of RB contribute to U6 promoter targeting through numerous interactions with components of the U6 general transcription machinery, including SNAPC and TFIIIB. Importantly, RB also concurrently occupies a U6 promoter with RNA polymerase III during repression. These observations suggest a novel mechanism for RB function wherein RB can repress U6 transcription at critical steps subsequent to RNA polymerase III recruitment.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2005

The p53 Tumor Suppressor Protein Represses Human snRNA Gene Transcription by RNA Polymerases II and III Independently of Sequence-Specific DNA Binding

Anastasia Gridasova; R. William Henry

ABSTRACT Human U1 and U6 snRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerases II and III, respectively. While the p53 tumor suppressor protein is a general repressor of RNA polymerase III transcription, whether p53 regulates snRNA gene transcription by RNA polymerase II is uncertain. The data presented herein indicate that p53 is an effective repressor of snRNA gene transcription by both polymerases. Both U1 and U6 transcription in vitro is repressed by recombinant p53, and endogenous p53 occupancy at these promoters is stimulated by UV light. In response to UV light, U1 and U6 transcription is strongly repressed. Human U1 genes, but not U6 genes, contain a high-affinity p53 response element located within the core promoter region. Nonetheless, this element is not required for p53 repression and mutant p53 molecules that do not bind DNA can maintain repression, suggesting a reliance on protein interactions for p53 promoter recruitment. Recruitment may be mediated by the general transcription factors TATA-box binding protein and snRNA-activating protein complex, which interact well with p53 and function for both RNA polymerase II and III transcription.


Journal of Medicinal Chemistry | 2009

Nuclear Factor-κB Mediated Inhibition of Cytokine Production by Imidazoline Scaffolds

Daljinder K. Kahlon; Theresa A. Lansdell; Jason S. Fisk; Christopher D. Hupp; Timothy L. Friebe; Stacy Hovde; A. Daniel Jones; Richard D. Dyer; R. William Henry; Jetze J. Tepe

The mammalian nuclear transcription factor NF-kappaB is responsible for the transcription of multiple cytokines, including the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Inhibition of the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-kappaB has therefore been identified as a possible therapeutic treatment for RA. We describe herein the synthesis and biological activity of a series of imidazoline-based scaffolds as potent inhibitors of NF-kappaB mediated gene transcription in cell culture as well as inhibitors of TNF-alpha and IL-6 production in interleukin 1 beta (IL-1beta) stimulated human blood.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2009

The perinucleolar compartment is directly associated with DNA.

John Norton; Chen Wang; Alison Gjidoda; R. William Henry; Sui Huang

The perinucleolar compartment (PNC) is a nuclear subdomain that is unique to tumor cells, and the percentage of cells in a population containing PNCs (PNC prevalence) indicates the level of malignancy of that population. Here, we utilize anti-cancer drugs and other exogenous stimuli to investigate the structure and function of the PNC. Screening of clinically used anti-cancer drugs revealed two types of drugs disassemble PNCs and do so through their specific molecular actions. Transcription inhibitors reduce PNC prevalence in parallel with RNA polymerase III transcription reduction, and a subset of DNA-damaging drugs and stimuli (UV radiation) disassemble the PNC. Inhibition of cellular DNA damage response demonstrated that the DNA damage itself, not the response or polymerase III inhibition, is responsible for PNC disassembly, suggesting that the maintenance of the PNC is dependent upon DNA integrity. Analyses of the types of DNA damage that cause PNC disassembly show that interstrand DNA base pairing, not strand continuity, is important for PNC integrity, indicating that the PNC components are directly interacting with the DNA. Complementary cell biology experiments demonstrated that the number of PNCs per cell increases with the rounds of endoreplication and that PNCs split into doublets during mid S phase, both of which are phenotypes that are typical of a replicating DNA loci. Together, these studies validate PNC disassembly as a screening marker to identify chemical probes and revealed that the PNC is directly nucleated on a DNA locus, suggesting a potential role for the PNC in gene expression regulation.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2003

The Small Nuclear RNA-activating Protein 190 Myb DNA Binding Domain Stimulates TATA Box-binding Protein-TATA Box Recognition

Craig S. Hinkley; Heather A. Hirsch; Liping Gu; Brandon LaMere; R. William Henry

Human U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) gene transcription by RNA polymerase III requires cooperative promoter binding involving the snRNA-activating protein complex (SNAPc) and the TATA-box binding protein (TBP). To investigate the role of SNAPc for TBP function at U6 promoters, TBP recruitment assays were performed using full-length TBP and a mini-SNAPc containing SNAP43, SNAP50, and a truncated SNAP190. Mini-SNAPc efficiently recruits TBP to the U6 TATA box, and two SNAPc subunits, SNAP43 and SNAP190, directly interact with the TBP DNA binding domain. Truncated SNAP190 containing only the Myb DNA binding domain is sufficient for TBP recruitment to the TATA box. Therefore, the SNAP190 Myb domain functions both to specifically recognize the proximal sequence element present in the core promoters of human snRNA genes and to stimulate TBP recognition of the neighboring TATA box present in human U6 snRNA promoters. The SNAP190 Myb domain also stimulates complex assembly with TBP and Brf2, a subunit of a snRNA-specific TFIIIB complex. Thus, interactions between the DNA binding domains of SNAP190 and TBP at juxtaposed promoter elements define the assembly of a RNA polymerase III-specific preinitiation complex.


Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2013

RNA polymerase III repression by the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein.

Alison Gjidoda; R. William Henry

The retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor protein regulates multiple pathways that influence cell growth, and as a key regulatory node, its function is inactivated in most cancer cells. In addition to its canonical roles in cell cycle control, RB functions as a global repressor of RNA polymerase (Pol) III transcription. Indeed, Pol III transcripts accumulate in cancer cells and their heightened levels are implicated in accelerated growth associated with RB dysfunction. Herein we review the mechanisms of RB repression for the different types of Pol III genes. For type 1 and type 2 genes, RB represses transcription through direct contacts with the core transcription machinery, notably Brf1-TFIIIB, and inhibits preinitiation complex formation and Pol III recruitment. A contrasting model for type 3 gene repression indicates that RB regulation involves stable and simultaneous promoter association by RB, the general transcription machinery including SNAPc, and Pol III, suggesting that RB may impede Pol III promoter escape or elongation. Interestingly, analysis of published genomic association data for RB and Pol III revealed added regulatory complexity for Pol III genes both during active growth and during arrested growth associated with quiescence and senescence. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Transcription by Odd Pols.


ACS Chemical Biology | 2013

Noncompetitive modulation of the proteasome by imidazoline scaffolds overcomes bortezomib resistance and delays mm tumor growth in vivo

Theresa A. Lansdell; Michelle A. Hurchla; Jingyu Xiang; Stacy Hovde; Katherine N. Weilbaecher; R. William Henry; Jetze J. Tepe

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant disorder of differentiated B-cells for which standard care involves the inhibition of the proteasome. All clinically used proteasome inhibitors, including the chemotherapeutic drug bortezomib, target the catalytic active sites of the proteasome and inhibit protein proteolysis by competing with substrate binding. However, nearly all (~97%) patients become intolerant or resistant to treatments within a few years, after which the average survival time is less than 1 year. We describe herein the inhibition of the human proteasome via a noncompetitive mechanism by the imidazoline scaffold, TCH-13. Consistent with a mechanism distinct from that of competitive inhibitors, TCH-013 acts additively with and overcomes resistance to bortezomib. Importantly, TCH-013 induces apoptosis in a panel of myeloma and leukemia cell lines, but in contrast, normal lymphocytes, primary bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC), and macrophages are resistant to its cytotoxic effects. TCH-013 was equally effective in blocking MM cell growth in co-cultures of MM cells with hBMSC isolated from CD138 negative bone marrow (BM) samples of MM patients. The cellular activity translated well in vivo where TCH-013 delayed tumor growth in an MM xenograft model to a similar extent as bortezomib.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2007

The Protein Kinase CK2 Phosphorylates SNAP190 to Negatively Regulate SNAPC DNA Binding and Human U6 Transcription by RNA Polymerase III

Liping Gu; Rhonda D. Husain-Ponnampalam; Susanne Hoffmann-Benning; R. William Henry

Human U6 small nuclear RNA gene transcription by RNA polymerase III requires the general transcription factor SNAPC, which binds to human small nuclear RNA core promoter elements and nucleates pre-initiation complex assembly with the Brf2-TFIIIB complex. Multiple components in this pathway are phosphorylated by the protein kinase CK2, including the Bdp1 subunit of the Brf2-TFIIIB complex, and RNA polymerase III, with negative and positive outcomes for U6 transcription, respectively. However, a role for CK2 phosphorylation of SNAPC in U6 transcription has not been defined. In this report, we investigated the role of CK2 in modulating the transcriptional properties of SNAPC and demonstrate that within SNAPC, CK2 phosphorylates the N-terminal half of the SNAP190 subunit at two regions (amino acids 20-63 and 514-545) that each contain multiple CK2 consensus sites. SNAP190 phosphorylation by CK2 inhibits both SNAPC DNA binding and U6 transcription activity. Mutational analyses of SNAP190 support a model wherein CK2 phosphorylation triggers an allosteric inhibition of the SNAP190 Myb DNA binding domain.

Collaboration


Dive into the R. William Henry's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stacy Hovde

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jetze J. Tepe

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Liping Gu

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yiliang Wei

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Liang Zhang

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge