Rachael G. Hunter

The Importance of Hydrology in Restoration of Bottomland Hardwood Wetland Functions

Bottomland hardwood (BLH) forests have important biogeochemical functions and it is well known that certain structural components, including pulsed hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation, enhance these functions. It is unclear, however, how functions of restored BLH wetlands compare to mature, undisturbed wetlands. We measured a suite of structural and functional attributes in replicated natural BLH wetlands (NAT), restored BLH wetlands with hydrology re-established (RWH), and restored BLH wetlands without hydrology re-established (RWOH) in this study. Trees were replanted in all restored wetlands at least four years prior to the study and those wetlands with hydrology re-established had flashboard risers placed in drainage ditches to allow seasonal surface flooding. Vegetation, soils, and selected biogeochemical functions were characterized at each site. There was a marked difference in woody vegetation among the wetlands that was due primarily to site age. There was also a difference in herbaceous vegetation among the restored sites that may have been related to differences in age or hydrology. Water table fluctuations of the RWH wetlands were comparable to those of the NAT wetlands. Thus, placing flashboard risers in existing drainage ditches, along with proper management, can produce a hydroperiod that is similar to that of a relatively undisturbed BLH. Average length of saturation within the upper 15 cm of soils was 37, 104, and 97 days for RWOH, RWH, and NAT, respectively. Soil moisture, denitrification potential, and soluble organic carbon concentrations differed among wetland sites, but soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations, heterotrophic microbial activity, and readily mineralizable carbon concentrations did not. Significant linear relationships were also found between soil moisture and heterotrophic microbial activity, readily mineralizable carbon, and soluble organic carbon. In addition, sedimentation rates were higher in NAT and RWH wetlands than in RWOH sites. Results of this study suggest that reconnection of bottomland hardwood wetlands to their surrounding watershed through the restoration of surface hydrology is necessary to restore wetland functions important to nutrient and sediment removal.

Impacts of Secondarily Treated Municipal Effluent on a Freshwater Forested Wetland After 60 Years of Discharge

Secondarily treated municipal effluent from Breaux Bridge, Louisiana has been discharged into the Cypriere Perdue forested wetland since the early 1950s. Approximately one million gallons per day (3,785 m−3 day−1) are discharged into the 1470 ha wetland, with average total nitrogen and phosphorus loading rates of 1.15 g N m−2 yr−1 and 0.31 g P m−2 yr−1, respectively. Vegetation and water quality of this wetland, along with a reference wetland, were monitored. Study sites were dominated by bald cypress and water tupelo, and species composition did not change significantly during the time of monitoring. Mean litterfall was higher near the effluent discharge point compared to sites located further away or the reference site. Mean stem growth was lower at the site furthest from the discharge point compared to the other sites. Nutrient concentrations measured at the site where water exits the assimilation area and at the reference site were not significantly different. Removal efficiencies for total nitrogen and phosphorus are typical of other forested wetlands receiving treated effluent in Louisiana, ranging between 65 and 90%. These results demonstrate that this wetland assimilates nutrients to background concentrations even after 60 years of operation, stimulating productivity, and causing no measurable impacts to the wetland or to the river into which the water eventually flows.

Using Natural Wetlands for Municipal Effluent Assimilation: A Half-Century of Experience for the Mississippi River Delta and Surrounding Environs

An assimilation wetland is a natural (non-constructed) wetland into which secondarily-treated, disinfected, non-toxic municipal effluent is discharged. In the Mississippi River Delta, the wetland is typically either a freshwater forested wetland (e.g., baldcypress-water tupelo) or a freshwater emergent wetland. These wetlands have been hydrology altered, some extensively, with freshwater input reduced from historical norms. Discharge of freshwater effluent with nutrients and suspended sediments into an assimilation wetland increases vegetation productivity and accretion and combats subsidence. Effluent discharge rate into an assimilation wetland depends on wetland size and effluent nutrient concentrations. Design and construction of an assimilation wetland requires a Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (LDNR) Coastal Use Permit (CUP), a Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) permit, a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 404 permit, and an LDEQ Water Quality Certification, along with potential levee board permit applications. Both a feasibility study and an ecological baseline study are conducted before discharge of treated effluent begins. Assimilation wetlands are designed with a minimum of four monitoring sites; three located along a transect from the discharge to the area where surface water leaves the wetland, and the fourth, a reference area, located in an ecologically similar wetland nearby. As part of the LDEQ LPDES permit, study sites within an assimilation wetland are monitored continually for the life of the project, including vegetation productivity and species composition, sediment accretion, hydrology, and surface water nutrient and metals concentrations. There are ten active assimilation wetlands in coastal Louisiana and another four with permit applications pending. Results of annual monitoring show nutrient concentrations of surface waters decrease with distance, reaching background levels before water leaves the wetland. While nutrient concentrations decrease, vegetative productivity is enhanced. In degraded forested wetlands being used as assimilation wetlands, baldcypress and water tupelo seedlings are often planted, which thrive in the nutrient rich environment. However, nutria are attracted to vegetation with increased nutrient concentrations, and herbivory severely damaged one emergent wetland receiving municipal effluent, killing both herbaceous vegetation and unprotected tree seedlings. After culling of nutria, the wetland recovered. This introduced species must be monitored and controlled in any assimilation wetland. Here we review the history of assimilation wetlands in the Mississippi River Delta to show how advances in scientific understanding, growing regulatory sophistication, and controversy have shaped this program.