Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rachael Pitt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rachael Pitt.


Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education | 2009

Graduate attribute development and employment outcomes: tracking PhD graduates

Catherine Manathunga; Rachael Pitt; Christa Critchley

The provision of diversified research training is regarded as one of the most significant contributions made by the Australian Cooperative Research Centres (CRC) programme [Howard Partners 2003, Evaluation of the cooperative research centres programme, Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, ACT]. Yet, a systematic evaluation of Australia’s CRC research training programmes and outcomes has not yet been undertaken. This article reports on a pilot questionnaire designed to provide the beginnings of such an evaluation. Participants were science‐based research graduates who were awarded with a PhD within the four‐year period 2000–2003 and had completed the majority of their PhD project either in a university school or in a CRC environment. The questionnaire results provide insights into participants’ perceptions of the graduate attributes they developed prior to and during their PhD studies. It also investigates their perceptions about the relative importance of particular skills in university and industry settings. This article argues that understanding the perceptions and employment experiences of recent research graduates is a vital way of ensuring that PhD programmes are more effectively designed to prepare research graduates for a range of careers. In particular, these results confirm the importance of constant re‐evaluation and improvement of all PhD training programmes.


Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management | 2016

Academic superheroes? A critical analysis of academic job descriptions

Rachael Pitt; Inger Mewburn

ABSTRACT For over a decade, debate has raged about the nature and purpose of the PhD, including its role as preparation for working in academia. Academic work has changed a great deal in the last 60 years, yet our doctoral curriculum has remained relatively static. While there is increasing interest in matching PhD programmes to ‘real world’ needs, there is a surprising lack of research to inform research curriculum development at this level. If we take the position that the PhD is still the best way to prepare for academic work, what skills and attributes should we help graduates develop for this destination? This article analyses a set of academic job advertisements and asks: What do academic employers really want from the PhD now?


Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education | 2012

Students’ experiences of supervision in academic and industry settings: results of an Australian study

Se Morris; Rachael Pitt; Catherine Manathunga

The joint supervision of Research Higher Degree (RHD) students by an industry and university supervisor is likely to increase in forthcoming years with a rise in the number of university–industry collaborations. Research students may become involved in these collaborative arrangements for a variety of reasons and may launch into their RHD without considering how they will serve two masters, and how this complex relationship will affect their RHD experience. Moreover, little research has been conducted to assess the impact of these arrangements on current RHD students’ experiences. The experiences of students with academic and industry supervisors were, therefore, explored in a survey of confirmed RHD students at an Australian research‐intensive university. This paper investigates whether RHD students conducting research in traditional academic settings have a different experience to students working on industry‐related projects in industry settings, specifically in regards to supervision and institutional access and engagement.


Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education | 2013

Enhancing professional writing skills of veterinary technology students: linking assessment and clinical practice in a communications course

Patricia Clarke; Daniel Schull; Glen T. Coleman; Rachael Pitt; Catherine Manathunga

Veterinary technology is an emerging profession within the veterinary and allied animal health fields in Australia and affords graduates the opportunity to contribute to the small but growing body of literature within this discipline. This study describes the introduction of a contextualised assessment task to develop students’ research capability, competence and confidence in professional writing, and to engage them with the academic publishing process. Students worked in self-selected dyads to author a scientific case report, of publishable standard, based on authentic cases from their clinical practicum. Intrinsic to the task, students attended a series of workshops that explored topics such as critiquing the literature, professional writing styles and oral presentation skills. Assessment was multi-staged with progressive feedback, including peer review, and culminated with students presenting their abstracts at a mock conference. Students reported the task to be an enjoyable and valuable learning experience which improved their competence and confidence in scientific writing; supported by a comparison of previously submitted work. Linking scientific writing skills to clinical practice experiences enhanced learning outcomes and may foster the professionalisation of students within this emerging discipline.


Journal of Veterinary Medical Education | 2015

Client Perspectives on Desirable Attributes and Skills of Veterinary Technologists in Australia: Considerations for Curriculum Design

Patricia Clarke; John Al-Alawneh; Rachael Pitt; Daniel Schull; Glen T. Coleman

Client or service user perspectives are important when designing curricula for professional programs. In the case of veterinary technology, an emerging profession in the veterinary field in Australasia, client views on desirable graduate attributes, skills, and knowledge have not yet been explored. This study reports on a survey of 441 veterinary clients (with 104 responses) from four veterinary practices in Brisbane, Queensland, conducted between October 2008 and February 2009. The included veterinary practices provided clinical placements for veterinary technology undergraduates and employment for veterinary technology graduates (2003-2007). Client socio-demographic data along with ratings of the importance of a range of technical (veterinary nursing) skills, emotional intelligence, and professional attributes for veterinary technology graduates were collected and analyzed. Overall, the majority of clients viewed technical skills, emotional intelligence, and professional attributes as important in the clinical practice of veterinary technology graduates with whom they interacted in the veterinary practice. Client interviews (n=3) contextualized the survey data and also showed that clients attached importance to graduates demonstrating professional competence. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis revealed four distinct groupings of clients within the data based on their differing perceptions. Using a multivariable proportional-odds regression model, it was also found that some client differences were influenced by demographic factors such as gender, age, and number of visits annually. For example, the odds of female clients valuing emotionality and sociability were greater than males. These findings provide useful data for the design of a professionalizing and market-driven veterinary technology curriculum.


Medical Teacher | 2013

Identifying common learning outcomes for health: celebrating diversity and maximising benefit from regulatory necessity

Maree O’Keefe; Amanda Henderson; Rachael Pitt

13 and second-year students who had not yet received lectures on musculoskeletal diseases. Clinical students had completed all coursework and at least six months of required clinical clerkships. We compared the proportion of students endorsing the pharmaceutical advertisement’s explanation between the two groups using a 2 test. We received 247 responses, which after excluding students who stated that they did not have enough of an understanding, yielded 120 responses, 86 pre-clinical and 37 clinical. Half of pre-clinical students chose the television advertisement’s explanation with 27% of students endorsing the Mayo Clinic’s explanation. In contrast, only 16% of clinical students endorsed the advertisement’s explanation with 49% endorsing the Mayo Clinic’s explanation. The decrease between preclinical to clinical students endorsing a pharmaceutical explanation (p5 0.01) and increase between students endorsing Mayo Clinic’s explanation (p1⁄4 0.02) were both significant. The study’s main finding suggests that pre-clinical medical students’ understanding of FM may be influenced by DTCA and that after sufficient medical education, students’ understanding of FM becomes more influenced by evidence-based sources, successfully reversing any influence DTCA may have.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2008

Perceptions in health and medical research careers : the Australian Society for Medical Research Workforce Survey

Maria Kavallaris; Sarah Meachem; Mark D. Hulett; Catherine West; Rachael Pitt; Jennifer J Chesters; Warren Laffan; Paul Boreham; Levon M. Khachigian


Studies in Higher Education | 2012

Evaluating industry-based doctoral research programs: perspectives and outcomes of Australian Cooperative Research Centre graduates

Catherine Manathunga; Rachael Pitt; Laura Cox; Paul Boreham; George D. Mellick; Paul Lant


Archive | 2006

Poverty in Queensland

D. Arts; Rachael Pitt; Warren Laffan; Paul Boreham; David Hundt; Fiona Caniglia


Archive | 2016

The use of machine learning to analyse job advertisements for doctoral employability [Abstract]

Inger Mewburn; William Grant; Hanna Suominen; Rachael Pitt; Stephanie Kizimchuk

Collaboration


Dive into the Rachael Pitt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Warren Laffan

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Boreham

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Schull

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Inger Mewburn

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Western

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Se Morris

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amanda Henderson

Princess Alexandra Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge