Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rachel A. Myers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rachel A. Myers.


Genetics in Medicine | 2016

Clinical utility of a Web-enabled risk-assessment and clinical decision support program.

Lori A. Orlando; R. Ryanne Wu; Rachel A. Myers; Adam H. Buchanan; Vincent C. Henrich; Elizabeth R. Hauser; Geoffrey S. Ginsburg

Purpose:Risk-stratified guidelines can improve quality of care and cost-effectiveness, but their uptake in primary care has been limited. MeTree, a Web-based, patient-facing risk-assessment and clinical decision support tool, is designed to facilitate uptake of risk-stratified guidelines.Methods:A hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of three clinics (two intervention, one control). Participants: consentable nonadopted adults with upcoming appointments. Primary outcome: agreement between patient risk level and risk management for those meeting evidence-based criteria for increased-risk risk-management strategies (increased risk) and those who do not (average risk) before MeTree and after. Measures: chart abstraction was used to identify risk management related to colon, breast, and ovarian cancer, hereditary cancer, and thrombosis.Results:Participants = 488, female = 284 (58.2%), white = 411 (85.7%), mean age = 58.7 (SD = 12.3). Agreement between risk management and risk level for all conditions for each participant, except for colon cancer, which was limited to those <50 years of age, was (i) 1.1% (N = 2/174) for the increased-risk group before MeTree and 16.1% (N = 28/174) after and (ii) 99.2% (N = 2,125/2,142) for the average-risk group before MeTree and 99.5% (N = 2,131/2,142) after. Of those receiving increased-risk risk-management strategies at baseline, 10.5% (N = 2/19) met criteria for increased risk. After MeTree, 80.7% (N = 46/57) met criteria.Conclusion:MeTree integration into primary care can improve uptake of risk-stratified guidelines and potentially reduce “overuse” and “underuse” of increased-risk services.Genet Med 18 10, 1020–1028.


EBioMedicine | 2016

Systems Pharmacogenomics Finds RUNX1 Is an Aspirin-Responsive Transcription Factor Linked to Cardiovascular Disease and Colon Cancer.

Deepak Voora; A. Koneti Rao; Gauthami Jalagadugula; Rachel A. Myers; Emily Harris; Thomas L. Ortel; Geoffrey S. Ginsburg

Aspirin prevents cardiovascular disease and colon cancer; however aspirins inhibition of platelet COX-1 only partially explains its diverse effects. We previously identified an aspirin response signature (ARS) in blood consisting of 62 co-expressed transcripts that correlated with aspirins effects on platelets and myocardial infarction (MI). Here we report that 60% of ARS transcripts are regulated by RUNX1 – a hematopoietic transcription factor - and 48% of ARS gene promoters contain a RUNX1 binding site. Megakaryocytic cells exposed to aspirin and its metabolite (salicylic acid, a weak COX-1 inhibitor) showed up regulation in the RUNX1 P1 isoform and MYL9, which is transcriptionally regulated by RUNX1. In human subjects, RUNX1 P1 expression in blood and RUNX1-regulated platelet proteins, including MYL9, were aspirin-responsive and associated with platelet function. In cardiovascular disease patients RUNX1 P1 expression was associated with death or MI. RUNX1 acts as a tumor suppressor gene in gastrointestinal malignancies. We show that RUNX1 P1 expression is associated with colon cancer free survival suggesting a role for RUNX1 in aspirins protective effect in colon cancer. Our studies reveal an effect of aspirin on RUNX1 and gene expression that may additionally explain aspirins effects in cardiovascular disease and cancer.


Implementation Science | 2015

Protocol for the “Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings” study

R. Ryanne Wu; Rachel A. Myers; Catherine A. McCarty; David Dimmock; Michael H. Farrell; Deanna S. Cross; Troy D. Chinevere; Geoffrey S. Ginsburg; Lori A. Orlando

BackgroundRisk assessment with a thorough family health history is recommended by numerous organizations and is now a required component of the annual physical for Medicare beneficiaries under the Affordable Care Act. However, there are several barriers to incorporating robust risk assessments into routine care. MeTree, a web-based patient-facing health risk assessment tool, was developed with the aim of overcoming these barriers. In order to better understand what factors will be instrumental for broader adoption of risk assessment programs like MeTree in clinical settings, we obtained funding to perform a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study in primary care clinics at five diverse healthcare systems. Here, we describe the study’s protocol.Methods/designMeTree collects personal medical information and a three-generation family health history from patients on 98 conditions. Using algorithms built entirely from current clinical guidelines, it provides clinical decision support to providers and patients on 30 conditions. All adult patients with an upcoming well-visit appointment at one of the 20 intervention clinics are eligible to participate. Patient-oriented risk reports are provided in real time. Provider-oriented risk reports are uploaded to the electronic medical record for review at the time of the appointment. Implementation outcomes are enrollment rate of clinics, providers, and patients (enrolled vs approached) and their representativeness compared to the underlying population. Primary effectiveness outcomes are the percent of participants newly identified as being at increased risk for one of the clinical decision support conditions and the percent with appropriate risk-based screening. Secondary outcomes include percent change in those meeting goals for a healthy lifestyle (diet, exercise, and smoking). Outcomes are measured through electronic medical record data abstraction, patient surveys, and surveys/qualitative interviews of clinical staff.DiscussionThis study evaluates factors that are critical to successful implementation of a web-based risk assessment tool into routine clinical care in a variety of healthcare settings. The result will identify resource needs and potential barriers and solutions to implementation in each setting as well as an understanding potential effectiveness.Trial registrationNCT01956773


Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2017

Impact of Genetic Testing and Family Health History Based Risk Counseling on Behavior Change and Cognitive Precursors for Type 2 Diabetes

R. Ryanne Wu; Rachel A. Myers; Elizabeth R. Hauser; Allison Vorderstrasse; Alex Cho; Geoffrey S. Ginsburg; Lori A. Orlando

Family health history (FHH) in the context of risk assessment has been shown to positively impact risk perception and behavior change. The added value of genetic risk testing is less certain. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) FHH and genetic risk counseling on behavior and its cognitive precursors. Subjects were non-diabetic patients randomized to counseling that included FHH +/− T2D genetic testing. Measurements included weight, BMI, fasting glucose at baseline and 12xa0months and behavioral and cognitive precursor (T2D risk perception and control over disease development) surveys at baseline, 3, and 12xa0months. 391 subjects enrolled of which 312 completed the study. Behavioral and clinical outcomes did not differ across FHH or genetic risk but cognitive precursors did. Higher FHH risk was associated with a stronger perceived T2D risk (pKendallxa0<xa00.001) and with a perception of “serious” risk (pKendallxa0<xa00.001). Genetic risk did not influence risk perception, but was correlated with an increase in perception of “serious” risk for moderate (pKendallxa0=xa00.04) and average FHH risk subjects (pKendallxa0=xa00.01), though not for thexa0highxa0FHH risk group. Perceived control over T2D risk was high and not affected by FHH or genetic risk. FHH appears to have a strong impact on cognitive precursors of behavior change, suggesting it could be leveraged to enhance risk counseling, particularly when lifestyle change is desirable. Genetic risk was able to alter perceptions about the seriousness of T2D risk in those with moderate and average FHH risk, suggesting that FHH could be used to selectively identify individuals who may benefit from genetic risk testing.


Genetics in Medicine | 2018

Developing a common framework for evaluating the implementation of genomic medicine interventions in clinical care: the IGNITE Network’s Common Measures Working Group

Lori A. Orlando; Nina R. Sperber; Corrine I. Voils; Marshall Nichols; Rachel A. Myers; R. Ryanne Wu; Tejinder Rakhra-Burris; Kenneth D. Levy; Mia A. Levy; Toni I. Pollin; Yue Guan; Carol R. Horowitz; Michelle A. Ramos; Stephen E. Kimmel; Caitrin W. McDonough; Ebony Madden; Laura J. Damschroder

PurposeImplementation research provides a structure for evaluating the clinical integration of genomic medicine interventions. This paper describes the Implementing Genomics in Practice (IGNITE) Network’s efforts to promote (i) a broader understanding of genomic medicine implementation research and (ii) the sharing of knowledge generated in the network.MethodsTo facilitate this goal, the IGNITE Network Common Measures Working Group (CMG) members adopted the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide its approach to identifying constructs and measures relevant to evaluating genomic medicine as a whole, standardizing data collection across projects, and combining data in a centralized resource for cross-network analyses.ResultsCMG identified 10 high-priority CFIR constructs as important for genomic medicine. Of those, eight did not have standardized measurement instruments. Therefore, we developed four survey tools to address this gap. In addition, we identified seven high-priority constructs related to patients, families, and communities that did not map to CFIR constructs. Both sets of constructs were combined to create a draft genomic medicine implementation model.ConclusionWe developed processes to identify constructs deemed valuable for genomic medicine implementation and codified them in a model. These resources are freely available to facilitate knowledge generation and sharing across the field.


Circulation | 2017

Transcription Factor RUNX1 Regulates Platelet PCTP (Phosphatidylcholine Transfer Protein): Implications for Cardiovascular Events Differential Effects of RUNX1 Variants

Guangfen Mao; Natthapol Songdej; Deepak Voora; Lawrence E. Goldfinger; Fabiola E. Del Carpio-Cano; Rachel A. Myers; A. Koneti Rao

Background: PCTP (phosphatidylcholine transfer protein) regulates the intermembrane transfer of phosphatidylcholine. Higher platelet PCTP expression is associated with increased platelet responses on activation of protease-activated receptor 4 thrombin receptors noted in black subjects compared with white subjects. Little is known about the regulation of platelet PCTP. Haplodeficiency of RUNX1, a major hematopoietic transcription factor, is associated with thrombocytopenia and impaired platelet responses on activation. Platelet expression profiling of a patient with a RUNX1 loss-of-function mutation revealed a 10-fold downregulation of the PCTP gene compared with healthy controls. Methods: We pursued the hypothesis that PCTP is regulated by RUNX1 and that PCTP expression is correlated with cardiovascular events. We studied RUNX1 binding to the PCTP promoter using DNA-protein binding studies and human erythroleukemia cells and promoter activity using luciferase reporter studies. We assessed the relationship between RUNX1 and PCTP in peripheral blood RNA and PCTP and death or myocardial infarction in 2 separate patient cohorts (587 total patients) with cardiovascular disease. Results: Platelet PCTP protein in the patient was reduced by ≈50%. DNA-protein binding studies showed RUNX1 binding to consensus sites in ≈1 kB of PCTP promoter. PCTP expression was increased with RUNX1 overexpression and reduced with RUNX1 knockdown in human erythroleukemia cells, indicating that PCTP is regulated by RUNX1. Studies in 2 cohorts of patients showed that RUNX1 expression in blood correlated with PCTP gene expression; PCTP expression was higher in black compared with white subjects and was associated with future death/myocardial infarction after adjustment for age, sex, and race (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval 1.6–2.7; P<0.0001). RUNX1 expression is known to initiate at 2 alternative promoters, a distal P1 and a proximal P2 promoter. In patient cohorts, there were differential effects of RUNX1 isoforms on PCTP expression with a negative correlation in blood between RUNX1 expressed from the P1 promoter and PCTP expression. Conclusions: PCTP is a direct transcriptional target of RUNX1. PCTP expression is associated with death/myocardial infarction in patients with cardiovascular disease. RUNX1 regulation of PCTP may play a role in the pathogenesis of platelet-mediated cardiovascular events.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2017

INFLUENCE OF SEX ON PLATELET RESPONSE TO ASPIRIN AND TICAGRELOR

Kevin Friede; Margaret Infeld; Ru-San Tan; Rachel A. Myers; Deepak Voora

Background: Aspirins benefits for prevention of coronary artery disease differs by sex. While aspirin equally suppresses its target COX-1 in both sexes, platelets in women treated with aspirin retain greater platelet reactivity to COX-1-independent agonists in whole blood. Whether these differences


Genetics in Medicine | 2018

Implementation, adoption, and utility of family health history risk assessment in diverse care settings: evaluating implementation processes and impact with an implementation framework

R. Ryanne Wu; Rachel A. Myers; Nina R. Sperber; Corrine I. Voils; Joan M. Neuner; Catherine A. McCarty; Irina V. Haller; Melissa Harry; Kimberly G. Fulda; Deanna S. Cross; David Dimmock; Teji Rakhra-Burris; Adam H. Buchanan; Geoffrey S. Ginsburg; Lori A. Orlando

PurposeThis paper describes the implementation outcomes associated with integrating a family health history–based risk assessment and clinical decision support platform within primary care clinics at four diverse healthcare systems.MethodsA type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. Uptake and implementation processes were evaluated using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.ResultsOne hundred (58%) primary care providers and 2514 (7.8%) adult patients enrolled. Enrolled patients were 69% female, 22% minority, and 32% Medicare/Medicaid. Compared with their respective clinic’s population, patient-participants were more likely to be female (69 vs. 59%), older (mean age 57 vs. 49), and Caucasian (88 vs. 69%) (all p values <0.001). Female (81.3% of females vs. 78.5% of males, p valueu2009=u20090.018) and Caucasian (Caucasians 90.4% vs. minority 84.1%, p valueu2009=u20090.02) patient-participants were more likely to complete the study once enrolled. Patient-participant survey responses indicated MeTree was easy to use (95%), and patient-participants would recommend it to family/friends (91%). Minorities and those with less education reported greatest benefit. Enrolled providers reflected demographics of underlying provider population.ConclusionFamily health history–based risk assessment can be effectively implemented in diverse primary care settings and can effectively engage patients and providers. Future research should focus on finding better ways to engage young adults, males, and minorities in preventive healthcare.


Blood | 2016

PCTP (Phosphatidylcholine Transfer Protein) is Regulated By RUNX1 in Platelets/Megakaryocytes and is Associated with Adverse Cardiovascular Events

Natthapol Songdej; Guangfen Mao; Deepak Voora; Lawrence E. Goldfinger; Fabiola E. Del Carpio-Cano; Rachel A. Myers; A. K. Rao


PMC | 2018

Developing a Common Framework for Evaluating the Implementation of Genomic Medicine Interventions in Clinical Care: The IGNITE Network’s Common Measures Working Group

Lori A. Orlando; Nina R. Sperber; Corrine I. Voils; Marshall Nichols; Rachel A. Myers; R. Ryanne Wu; Tejinder Rakhra-Burris; Kenneth D. Levy; Mia A. Levy; Toni I. Pollin; Yue Guan; Carol R. Horowitz; Michelle A. Ramos; Stephen E. Kimmel; Caitrin W. McDonough; Ebony Madden; Laura J. Damschroder

Collaboration


Dive into the Rachel A. Myers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Corrine I. Voils

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carol R. Horowitz

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge