Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rachel Collings is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rachel Collings.


Antioxidants & Redox Signaling | 2011

Selenium in Human Health and Disease

Susan J. Fairweather-Tait; Yongping Bao; Martin R. Broadley; Rachel Collings; Dianne Ford; John E. Hesketh; Rachel Hurst

This review covers current knowledge of selenium in the environment, dietary intakes, metabolism and status, functions in the body, thyroid hormone metabolism, antioxidant defense systems and oxidative metabolism, and the immune system. Selenium toxicity and links between deficiency and Keshan disease and Kashin-Beck disease are described. The relationships between selenium intake/status and various health outcomes, in particular gastrointestinal and prostate cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and male fertility, are reviewed, and recent developments in genetics of selenoproteins are outlined. The rationale behind current dietary reference intakes of selenium is explained, and examples of differences between countries and/or expert bodies are given. Throughout the review, gaps in knowledge and research requirements are identified. More research is needed to improve our understanding of selenium metabolism and requirements for optimal health. Functions of the majority of the selenoproteins await characterization, the mechanism of absorption has yet to be identified, measures of status need to be developed, and effects of genotype on metabolism require further investigation. The relationships between selenium intake/status and health, or risk of disease, are complex but require elucidation to inform clinical practice, to refine dietary recommendations, and to develop effective public health policies.


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2010

Selenium bioavailability: current knowledge and future research requirements

Susan J. Fairweather-Tait; Rachel Collings; Rachel Hurst

Information on selenium bioavailability is required to derive dietary recommendations and to evaluate and improve the quality of food products. The need for robust data is particularly important in light of recent suggestions of potential health benefits associated with different intakes of selenium. The issue is not straightforward, however, because of large variations in the selenium content of foods (determined by a combination of geologic/environmental factors and selenium supplementation of fertilizers and animal feedstuffs) and the chemical forms of the element, which are absorbed and metabolized differently. Although most dietary selenium is absorbed efficiently, the retention of organic forms is higher than that of inorganic forms. There are also complications in the assessment and quantification of selenium species within foodstuffs. Often, extraction is only partial, and the process can alter the form or forms present in the food. Efforts to improve, standardize, and make more widely available techniques for species quantification are required. Similarly, reliable and sensitive functional biomarkers of selenium status are required, together with improvements in current biomarker methods. This requirement is particularly important for the assessment of bioavailability, because some functional biomarkers respond differently to the various selenium species. The effect of genotype adds a potential further dimension to the process of deriving bioavailability estimates and underlines the need for further research to facilitate the process of deriving dietary recommendations in the future.


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2012

Selenium and prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Rachel Hurst; Lee Hooper; Teresa Norat; Rosa Lau; Dagfinn Aune; Darren C. Greenwood; Rui Vieira; Rachel Collings; Linda J. Harvey; Jonathan A C Sterne; R Beynon; Jelena Savovic; Susan J. Fairweather-Tait

BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a growing public health problem. Several human studies have shown a potentially protective effect of selenium, but the conclusions from published reports are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE The objective was to examine the evidence for relations between selenium intake, selenium status, and prostate cancer risk. DESIGN This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and prospective cohort studies. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Continuous Update Project database was searched up to September 2010. The studies included reported measurements of selenium intake or status (plasma, serum, or toenail selenium), assessments of prostate cancer cases (number of events), and the RR in the adult population. Meta-analyses were performed, and study quality, heterogeneity, and small study effects were assessed. Dose-response meta-analyses were used, with restricted cubic splines and fractional polynomials for nonlinear trends, to investigate the association between selenium status and prostate cancer risk. RESULTS Twelve studies with a total of 13,254 participants and 5007 cases of prostate cancer were included. The relation between plasma/serum selenium and prostate cancer in a nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis showed that the risk decreased with increasing plasma/serum selenium up to 170 ng/mL. Three high-quality studies included in the meta-analysis of toenail selenium and cancer risk indicated a reduction in prostate cancer risk (estimated RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.61) with a toenail selenium concentration between 0.85 and 0.94 μg/g. CONCLUSION The relation between selenium status and decreased prostate cancer risk was examined over a relatively narrow range of selenium status; further studies in low-selenium populations are required.


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2013

The absorption of iron from whole diets: a systematic review

Rachel Collings; Linda J. Harvey; Lee Hooper; Rachel Hurst; Tracey J Brown; Jennifer Ansett; Maria King; Susan J. Fairweather-Tait

BACKGROUND Absorption factors are required to convert physiologic requirements for iron into Dietary Reference Values, but the absorption from single meals cannot be used to estimate dietary iron absorption. OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a systematic review of iron absorption from whole diets. DESIGN A structured search was completed by using the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception to November 2011. Formal inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and data extraction, validity assessment, and meta-analyses were undertaken. RESULTS Nineteen studies from the United States, Europe, and Mexico were included. Absorption from diets was higher with an enhancer (standard mean difference: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.85; P = 0.001) and was also higher when compared with low-bioavailability diets (standard mean difference: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.51, 1.41; P < 0.0001); however, single inhibitors did not reduce absorption (possibly because of the limited number of studies and participants and their heterogeneity). A regression equation to calculate iron absorption was derived by pooling data for iron status (serum and plasma ferritin) and dietary enhancers and inhibitors from 58 individuals (all from US studies): log[nonheme-iron absorption, %] = -0.73 log[ferritin, μg/L] + 0.11 [modifier] + 1.82. In individuals with serum ferritin concentrations from 6 to 80 μg/L, predicted absorption ranged from 2.1% to 23.0%. CONCLUSIONS Large variations were observed in mean nonheme-iron absorption (0.7-22.9%) between studies, which depended on iron status (diet had a greater effect at low serum and plasma ferritin concentrations) and dietary enhancers and inhibitors. Iron absorption was predicted from serum ferritin concentrations and dietary modifiers by using a regression equation. Extrapolation of these findings to developing countries and to men and women of different ages will require additional high-quality controlled trials.


Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition | 2013

EURRECA—Estimating Zinc Requirements for Deriving Dietary Reference Values

Rachel Hurst; Rachel Collings; Linda J. Harvey; Maria King; Lee Hooper; Jildau Bouwman; Mirjana Gurinovic; Susan J. Fairweather-Tait

Zinc was selected as a priority micronutrient for EURRECA, because there is significant heterogeneity in the Dietary Reference Values (DRVs) across Europe. In addition, the prevalence of inadequate zinc intakes was thought to be high among all population groups worldwide, and the public health concern is considerable. In accordance with the EURRECA consortium principles and protocols, a series of literature reviews were undertaken in order to develop best practice guidelines for assessing dietary zinc intake and zinc status. These were incorporated into subsequent literature search strategies and protocols for studies investigating the relationships between zinc intake, status and health, as well as studies relating to the factorial approach (including bioavailability) for setting dietary recommendations. EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library CENTRAL, and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases were searched for studies published up to February 2010 and collated into a series of Endnote databases that are available for the use of future DRV panels. Meta-analyses of data extracted from these publications were performed where possible in order to address specific questions relating to factors affecting dietary recommendations. This review has highlighted the need for more high quality studies to address gaps in current knowledge, in particular the continued search for a reliable biomarker of zinc status and the influence of genetic polymorphisms on individual dietary requirements. In addition, there is a need to further develop models of the effect of dietary inhibitors of zinc absorption and their impact on population dietary zinc requirements.


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2009

Plasma hepcidin concentrations significantly predict interindividual variation in iron absorption in healthy men

Mark Roe; Rachel Collings; Jack R. Dainty; Dorine W. Swinkels; Susan J. Fairweather-Tait

BACKGROUND Iron absorption is proposed to be regulated by circulating hepcidin, but, to date, little data are available to evaluate this relation in humans. OBJECTIVE Stored samples from a human iron absorption study were used to test the hypothesis that differences in plasma hepcidin explain interindividual variation in iron absorption. DESIGN Hepcidin-25 concentrations were measured in fasting samples from men aged > or = 40 y (n = 33) recruited to a study investigating the relation between the HFE genotype, iron absorption, and iron status. RESULTS Log iron absorption was negatively correlated with serum ferritin (r = -0.59, P < 0.001) and with plasma hepcidin (r = -0.55, P < 0.001) but was unaffected by genotype. There was a positive correlation (r = 0.82, P < 0.001) between hepcidin (mean: 2.3; range: 0.1-7.8 nmol/L) and ferritin (mean: 70; range: 9-208 microg/L). Multiple linear regression models showed that plasma hepcidin in isolation significantly predicted 36% of the interindividual variation in iron absorption. CONCLUSIONS Plasma hepcidin and serum ferritin concentrations are highly correlated, and, in the normal range of plasma hepcidin values, 36% of interindividual differences in iron absorption are explained by differences in circulating plasma hepcidin.


International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research | 2011

EURRECA's Approach for Estimating Micronutrient Requirements

Christophe Matthys; Pieter van’t Veer; Lisette C. P. G. M. de Groot; Lee Hooper; Adriënne Cavelaars; Rachel Collings; Rosalie A. M. Dhonukshe-Rutten; Linda J. Harvey; Amelie Casgrain; Fanny Rollin; Laura Contor

In Europe, micronutrient dietary reference values have been established by (inter)national committees of experts and are used by public health policy decision-makers to monitor and assess the adequacy of diets within population groups. The approaches used to derive dietary reference values (including average requirements) vary considerably across countries, and so far no evidence-based reason has been identified for this variation. Nutrient requirements are traditionally based on the minimum amount of a nutrient needed by an individual to avoid deficiency, and is defined by the bodys physiological needs. Alternatively the requirement can be defined as the intake at which health is optimal, including the prevention of chronic diet-related diseases. Both approaches are confronted with many challenges (e. g., bioavailability, inter and intra-individual variability). EURRECA has derived a transparent approach for the quantitative integration of evidence on Intake-Status-Health associations and/or Factorial approach (including bioavailability) estimates. To facilitate the derivation of dietary reference values, EURopean micronutrient RECommendations Aligned (EURRECA) is developing a process flow chart to guide nutrient requirement-setting bodies through the process of setting dietary reference values, which aims to facilitate the scientific alignment of deriving these values.


The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2014

Biomarker responses to folic acid intervention in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Maresa Duffy; Leane Hoey; Catherine Hughes; J. J. Strain; Audrey Rankin; Olga W. Souverein; Carla Dullemeijer; Rachel Collings; Lee Hooper; Helene McNulty

BACKGROUND The task of revising dietary folate recommendations for optimal health is complicated by a lack of data quantifying the biomarker response that reliably reflects a given folate intake. OBJECTIVE We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis in healthy adults to quantify the typical response of recognized folate biomarkers to a change in folic acid intake. DESIGN Electronic and bibliographic searches identified 19 randomized controlled trials that supplemented with folic acid and measured folate biomarkers before and after the intervention in apparently healthy adults aged ≥18 y. For each biomarker response, the regression coefficient (β) for individual studies and the overall pooled β were calculated by using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Folate biomarkers (serum/plasma and red blood cell folate) increased in response to folic acid in a dose-response manner only up to an intake of 400 μg/d. Calculation of the overall pooled β for studies in the range of 50 to 400 μg/d indicated that a doubling of folic acid intake resulted in an increase in serum/plasma folate by 63% (71% for microbiological assay; 61% for nonmicrobiological assay) and red blood cell folate by 31% (irrespective of whether microbiological or other assay was used). Studies that used the microbiological assay indicated lower heterogeneity compared with studies using nonmicrobiological assays for determining serum/plasma (I(2) = 13.5% compared with I(2) = 77.2%) and red blood cell (I(2) = 45.9% compared with I(2) = 70.2%) folate. CONCLUSIONS Studies administering >400 μg folic acid/d show no dose-response relation and thus will not yield meaningful results for consideration when generating dietary folate recommendations. The calculated folate biomarker response to a given folic acid intake may be more robust with the use of a microbiological assay rather than alternative methods for blood folate measurement.


International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research | 2010

Estimating the bioavailability factors needed for setting dietary reference values

Susan J. Fairweather-Tait; Rachel Collings

Estimated average requirements for micronutrients are central to deriving Dietary Reference Values. These are used for nutrition policies and programs, and also for regulatory and labeling purposes, and are traditionally devised to cover the needs of virtually all individuals in any population group. In order to estimate the average requirement, an appropriate endpoint (biomarker) is selected which describes the relationship between dietary intake and health. However, for some micronutrients, such as zinc, there are no good biomarkers, and for others, such as iron, the intake-status relationship is confounded by variations in absorption. Average requirements for these nutrients are derived using a factorial approach in which physiological needs for tissue growth and maintenance and endogenous losses are estimated, and the total converted to a dietary requirement by taking into account the overall absorption from the diet; i. e. multiplying the requirement by a bioavailability factor. The latter can be determined using algorithms, or estimates from absorption studies, some of which are described in this short review paper.


Proceedings of the Nutrition Society | 2011

Risk–benefit analysis of mineral intakes: case studies on copper and iron

Susan J. Fairweather-Tait; Linda J. Harvey; Rachel Collings

Dietary reference values for essential trace elements are designed to meet requirements with minimal risk of deficiency and toxicity. Risk-benefit analysis requires data on habitual dietary intakes, an estimate of variation and effects of deficiency and excess on health. For some nutrients, the range between the upper and lower limits may be extremely narrow and even overlap, which creates difficulties when setting safety margins. A new approach for estimating optimal intakes, taking into account several health biomarkers, has been developed and applied to selenium, but at present there are insufficient data to extend this technique to other micronutrients. The existing methods for deriving reference values for Cu and Fe are described. For Cu, there are no sensitive biomarkers of status or health relating to marginal deficiency or toxicity, despite the well-characterised genetic disorders of Menkes and Wilsons disease which, if untreated, lead to lethal deficiency and overload, respectively. For Fe, the wide variation in bioavailability confounds the relationship between intake and status and complicates risk-benefit analysis. As with Cu, health effects associated with deficiency or toxicity are not easy to quantify, therefore status is the most accessible variable for risk-benefit analysis. Serum ferritin reflects Fe stores but is affected by infection/inflammation, and therefore additional biomarkers are generally employed to measure and assess Fe status. Characterising the relationship between health and dietary intake is problematic for both these trace elements due to the confounding effects of bioavailability, inadequate biomarkers of status and a lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers for health outcomes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Rachel Collings's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda J. Harvey

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lee Hooper

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachel Hurst

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amelie Casgrain

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olga W. Souverein

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jack R. Dainty

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maria King

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge