Rachel English

The effectiveness and reliability of peer-marking in first-year medical students

Background  Peer‐marking has been suggested as a method to enhance self‐directed learning and reflection, although whether this improves performance is unclear. This study evaluated the impact of peer‐marking on examination performance and investigated its reliability and acceptability to students.

A Prospective Analysis of Implementation of Multi-Disciplinary Team Decisions in Breast Cancer

Abstract:  Multi‐disciplinary teams (MDTs) management of patients with cancer is mandatory in the United Kingdom, and auditing team decision‐making by examining rates of decision implementation and reasons for nonimplementation may inform this practice. Consecutive breast cancer MDT decisions, subsequent decision implementation, and reasons for nonimplementation were prospectively recorded. Factors associated with nonimplementation of the MDT decision were analyzed with logistic regression. Of 289 consecutive MDT decisions involving 210 women, 20 (6.9%, 95% CIs 4.3%–10.5%) were not implemented. Most changed MDT decisions did so because of patient preferences (n = 13, 65%), with the discovery of new clinical information (n = 3) and individual doctor’s views (n = 4) also leading to decision nonimplementation. MDT decisions were significantly less likely to be adhered to in patients with confirmed malignant disease compared to those with benign or ‘unknown’ disease categories (p < 0.001) and MDT decisions in older patients were significantly more likely not to be implemented than in younger patients (p = 0.002). Auditing nonimplementation of MDT recommendations and examining reasons for changed decisions is a useful process to monitor team performance and to identify factors that need more attention during the MDT meeting to ensure that the process makes optimal patient centered decisions.

A prospective analysis of implementation of multi-disciplinary team decisions in breast cancer

Abstract:  Multi‐disciplinary teams (MDTs) management of patients with cancer is mandatory in the United Kingdom, and auditing team decision‐making by examining rates of decision implementation and reasons for nonimplementation may inform this practice. Consecutive breast cancer MDT decisions, subsequent decision implementation, and reasons for nonimplementation were prospectively recorded. Factors associated with nonimplementation of the MDT decision were analyzed with logistic regression. Of 289 consecutive MDT decisions involving 210 women, 20 (6.9%, 95% CIs 4.3%–10.5%) were not implemented. Most changed MDT decisions did so because of patient preferences (n = 13, 65%), with the discovery of new clinical information (n = 3) and individual doctor’s views (n = 4) also leading to decision nonimplementation. MDT decisions were significantly less likely to be adhered to in patients with confirmed malignant disease compared to those with benign or ‘unknown’ disease categories (p < 0.001) and MDT decisions in older patients were significantly more likely not to be implemented than in younger patients (p = 0.002). Auditing nonimplementation of MDT recommendations and examining reasons for changed decisions is a useful process to monitor team performance and to identify factors that need more attention during the MDT meeting to ensure that the process makes optimal patient centered decisions.

Time to go wireless? A 15-year single institution experience of radioisotope occult lesion localisation (ROLL) for impalpable breast lesions

INTRODUCTION Wire guided localisation (WGL) is the standard localisation technique for impalpable breast lesions. Radio-guided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) has been proposed as an alternative. We have been performing ROLL for therapeutic wide local excisions (WLE) and diagnostic excision biopsies (DEB) for the last 15 years. We present the largest reported consecutive series of ROLL excisions to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand thirty nine consecutive patients who underwent ROLL for impalpable breast lesions were identified from a prospectively collected database. 673 patients underwent WLE and 366 patients underwent DEB. Data were analysed from proformas completed at the time of the procedure by the radiologist and operating surgeon. These data were supplemented with an analysis of patient electronic records including specimen radiograph and histopathology reports. RESULTS 99.1% of ROLL WLE revealed histological diagnoses of invasive cancer or DCIS. 98.7% of radiological abnormalities were identified on WLE post-excision radiographs (97.5% following DEB). Complete excision was recorded in 79.0% of the WLE patients following histological evaluation. 31.7% of DEB cases were pathologically upgraded to a malignant diagnosis. The presence of microcalcification, preoperative underestimation of the lesion size and symptomatic referral predisposed to incomplete excision status. DISCUSSION ROLL is a safe and effective technique to localise impalpable breast lesions. In addition ROLL has potential technical and logistic advantages over WGL.