Rachel M. Quinn
Imperial College London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rachel M. Quinn.
Ecological Entomology | 1997
Rachel M. Quinn; Kevin J. Gaston; Tim M. Blackburn; Brian Eversham
1. A positive relationship between the local abundances and regional distributions of species in an assemblage has been observed for a wide variety of taxa, but its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood.
Ecological Entomology | 1997
Rachel M. Quinn; Kevin J. Gaston; David B. Roy
1. The interspecific relationship between the distributions of consumers and resources is examined, using data for macrolepidoptera (moths) in Britain.
Biological Conservation | 1994
Rachel M. Quinn; John H. Lawton; B.C. Eversham; S.N. Wood
Abstract We investigated the effect of five plant and habitat characteristics on the national distribution of scarce British plants defined as those occurring in 16–50 10 × 10 km squares (‘loci’). In all 139 species considered, loci were more aggregated than expected by chance. Habitat, dispersal ability and pollination type were significantly correlated with pattern of locus distribution. Seed size and life history were unrelated to the degree of aggregation of loci. The most important result from a conservation perspective is the tendency for plants with poor dispersal ability to have more aggregated distributions (i.e. they have loci closer together) than plants with good dispersal ability. One implication of this result may be that re-introduction or translocation could be useful techniques for supplementing natural dispersal in the management of such species.
Oecologia | 1996
Rachel M. Quinn; Kevin J. Gaston; Henry R. Arnold
Many different measures of range size are used for both empirical and conservation purposes. The possible consequences of the particular methods used in determining observed patterns of results are seldom considered. Using species of butterflies and freshwater molluses in Britain, we investigate the relationship between the range sizes measured by nine different methods and the sets of rare species they distinguish. A comparison of range sizes measured at different scales. Britain and Europe, is also made for the butterflies. We find that for many studies involving range size the various measures of range size are interchangeable. With respect to the identification of rare species the results are not as clear.
Journal of Applied Ecology | 2000
Kevin J. Gaston; Tim M. Blackburn; Jeremy J. D. Greenwood; Richard D. Gregory; Rachel M. Quinn; John H. Lawton
Conservation Biology | 1999
John R. Prendergast; Rachel M. Quinn; John H. Lawton
Journal of Animal Ecology | 2001
Matthew J. R. Cowley; Chris D. Thomas; David B. Roy; Robert J. Wilson; Jorge L. León‐Cortés; David Gutiérrez; Caroline R. Bulman; Rachel M. Quinn; D. Moss; Kevin J. Gaston
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 1997
Tim M. Blackburn; Kevin J. Gaston; Rachel M. Quinn; Henry R. Arnold; Richard D. Gregory
Journal of Biogeography | 1999
Tim M. Blackburn; Kevin J. Gaston; Rachel M. Quinn; Richard D. Gregory
Ecography | 1998
Rachel M. Quinn; Kevin J. Caston; David B. Roy