Rachel Rabinovitch

Patterns of failure following surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma: implications for adjuvant local and systemic therapy.

PURPOSE This report is a patterns-of-failure analysis of resected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) performed to determine the relative incidences of local failure (LF) and distant failure, to identify the pathologic features predicting for each using a multivariate analysis, and to assess the relative impact of each form of failure on overall survival (OS). In this way, the potential value of and selection of patients for adjuvant local and/or systemic therapy can be better evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS The records of 172 patients with unilateral, nonmetastatic RCC who were treated with definitive surgery between 1978 and 1988, and who had a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year, were identified through the Memorial Sloan-Kettering tumor registry. Distribution by stage included T1, 10 patients; T2, 102; T3a, 32; T3b, 27; and T4, one. The incidences of positive lymph nodes (LNs) and positive margins were 5.8% and 6.4%, respectively. RESULTS LF developed in only six patients, yielding a 7-year actuarial incidence of 5%. In this subset, four patients developed distant metastases (DM), three occurring concurrently with or before LF. DM developed in 30 patients, yielding a 7-year actuarial incidence of 26%. Among the variables that had an impact on the development of DM according to univariate log-rank tests, only positive LNs (P = .026) and renal vein extension (P = .001) remained as significant independent prognosticators. The overall 7-year actuarial survival rate was 80%. Eleven patients died of RCC during follow-up, nine of whom (82%) died of metastatic disease. CONCLUSION LF is rare following surgical management of RCC, and shows no clear causal relationship with the development of DM. Patients die of DM, and not LF. These data do not support the role of adjuvant radiation therapy in this disease. Patients with LN involvement or renal vein extension have a significantly increased risk for developing DM, and are therefore appropriate candidates for trials investigating systemic therapy.

VARIABILITY OF TARGET AND NORMAL STRUCTURE DELINEATION FOR BREAST CANCER RADIOTHERAPY : AN RTOG MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL AND MULTIOBSERVER STUDY

PURPOSE To quantify the multi-institutional and multiobserver variability of target and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation for breast-cancer radiotherapy (RT) and its dosimetric impact as the first step of a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group effort to establish a breast cancer atlas. METHODS AND MATERIALS Nine radiation oncologists specializing in breast RT from eight institutions independently delineated targets (e.g., lumpectomy cavity, boost planning target volume, breast, supraclavicular, axillary and internal mammary nodes, chest wall) and OARs (e.g., heart, lung) on the same CT images of three representative breast cancer patients. Interobserver differences in structure delineation were quantified regarding volume, distance between centers of mass, percent overlap, and average surface distance. Mean, median, and standard deviation for these quantities were calculated for all possible combinations. To assess the impact of these variations on treatment planning, representative dosimetric plans based on observer-specific contours were generated. RESULTS Variability in contouring the targets and OARs between the institutions and observers was substantial. Structure overlaps were as low as 10%, and volume variations had standard deviations up to 60%. The large variability was related both to differences in opinion regarding target and OAR boundaries and approach to incorporation of setup uncertainty and dosimetric limitations in target delineation. These interobserver differences result in substantial variations in dosimetric planning for breast RT. CONCLUSIONS Differences in target and OAR delineation for breast irradiation between institutions/observers appear to be clinically and dosimetrically significant. A systematic consensus is highly desirable, particularly in the era of intensity-modulated and image-guided RT.

A Phase II trial of brachytherapy alone after lumpectomy for select breast cancer: Tumor control and survival outcomes of RTOG 95-17

PURPOSE Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 95-17 is a prospective Phase II cooperative group trial of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) alone using multicatheter brachytherapy after lumpectomy in select early-stage breast cancers. Tumor control and survival outcomes are reported. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligibility criteria included Stage I/II breast carcinoma confirmed to be <3 cm, unifocal, invasive nonlobular histology with zero to three positive axillary nodes without extracapsular extension. APBI treatment was delivered with either low-dose-rate (LDR) (45 Gy in 3.5-5 days) or high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (34 Gy in 10 twice-daily fractions over 5 days). End points evaluated included in-breast control, regional control, mastectomy-free rate, mastectomy-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The study was designed to analyze the HDR and LDR groups separately and without comparison. RESULTS Between 1997 and 2000, 100 patients were accrued and 99 were eligible; 66 treated with HDR brachytherapy and 33 treated with LDR brachytherapy. Eighty-seven patients had T1 lesions and 12 had T2 lesions. Seventy-nine were pathologically N0 and 20 were N1. Median follow-up in the HDR group is 6.14 years with the 5-year estimates of in-breast, regional, and contralateral failure rates of 3%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. The LDR group experienced similar results with a median follow-up of 6.22 years. The 5-year estimates of in-breast, regional, and contralateral failure rates of 6%, 0%, and 6%, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients treated with multicatheter partial breast brachytherapy in this trial experienced excellent in-breast control rates and overall outcome that compare with reports from APBI studies with similar extended follow-up.

INITIAL EFFICACY RESULTS OF RTOG 0319: THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY (3D-CRT) CONFINED TO THE REGION OF THE LUMPECTOMY CAVITY FOR STAGE I/ II BREAST CARCINOMA

PURPOSE This prospective study (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0319) examines the use of three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Initial data on efficacy and toxicity are presented. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with Stage I or II breast cancer with lesions < or =3 cm, negative margins and with < or =3 positive nodes were eligible. The 3D-CRT was 38.5 Gy in 3.85 Gy/fraction delivered 2x/day. Ipsilateral breast, ipsilateral nodal, contralateral breast, and distant failure (IBF, INF, CBF, DF) were estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Mastectomy-free, disease-free, and overall survival (MFS, DFS, OS) were recorded. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3, was used to grade acute and late toxicity. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were entered and 52 patients are eligible and evaluable for efficacy. The median age of patients was 61 years with the following characteristics: 46% tumor size <1 cm; 87% invasive ductal histology; 94% American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I; 65% postmenopausal; 83% no chemotherapy; and 71% with no hormone therapy. Median follow-up is 4.5 years (1.7-4.8). Four-year estimates (95% CI) of efficacy are: IBF 6% (0-12%) [4% within field (0-9%)]; INF 2% (0-6%); CBF 0%; DF 8% (0-15%); MFS 90% (78-96%); DFS 84% (71-92%); and OS 96% (85-99%). Only two (4%) Grade 3 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS Initial efficacy and toxicity using 3D-CRT to deliver APBI appears comparable to other experiences with similar follow-up. However, additional patients, further follow-up, and mature Phase III data are needed to evaluate the extent of application, limitations, and value of this particular form of APBI.

IMPACT OF NUTRITION SUPPORT ON TREATMENT OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CANCER TREATED WITH DEFINITIVE RADIOTHERAPY: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF RTOG TRIAL 90-03

The aim was to evaluate the relationship between nutrition support (NS) on host toxicity and cancer outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing definitive radiotherapy (XRT).

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Postmastectomy Radiotherapy. Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Breast

This summary focuses on the role of postoperative radiation therapy in patients treated with modified radical mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, particularly in patients receiving systemic therapy.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria (registered) on Postmastectomy Radiotherapy

This summary focuses on the role of postoperative radiation therapy in patients treated with modified radical mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, particularly in patients receiving systemic therapy.

A phase II trial of brachytherapy alone following lumpectomy for stage I or II breast cancer: initial outcomes of RTOG 9517

565 Background: In order to shorten the conventional 6-7 week radiation treatment time, and to treat only the tissue at greatest risk for recurrence, this phase II trial evaluates partial breast irradiation with 4-5 days of interstitial brachytherapy as an alternative to external beam. METHODS Eligibility criteria included patients (pts) with invasive ≤ 3cm non-lobular carcinoma, 0-3 positive axillary nodes with no extracapsular extension and at least 6 nodes removed, negative surgical margins, no residual suspicious microcalcifications, no extensive intraductal component, and no collagen vascular disease. After lumpectomy and axillary dissection, pts were treated with either high (34 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days) or low (45 Gy in 3.5-5 days) dose rate (HDR or LDR) brachytherapy. Treatment volume was the lumpectomy cavity plus 2cm, except where limited by chest wall or skin. Systemic therapy was given after brachytherapy at physician discretion. Endpoints included local and regional control, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS One hundred pts were enrolled and one was ineligible because only a sentinel node was removed. Median follow-up is 3.7 years, range 0.6-5.7. Eighty-seven pts had T1 and 12 had T2 tumors. Seventy-nine were pathologically N0 and 20 were N1. The actuarial 4-year breast and nodal recurrence rate is 3% (3 pts, all HDR, T1N0 x2 and T1N1) and 3% (2 pts, both HDR, T1N0 x2), respectively. Distant metastasis occurred in 6 pts, 3 T1N0 and 3 T2N1, for an actuarial 4-year rate of 6%, HDR 8% and LDR 4%. DFS and OS were 85% and 93% at 4 years (82% and 95% HDR, 90% and 90% LDR). Contralateral breast cancer developed in 3 pts, 1 HDR and 2 LDR. Six pts had non-breast second primaries, 4 HDR and 2 LDR. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that partial breast brachytherapy on this RTOG trial yields excellent tumor control at this early analysis (<1% local failure per year), warranting support for a future phase III trial. [Table: see text].

Late Toxicity and Patient Self-Assessment of Breast Appearance/Satisfaction on RTOG 0319: A Phase 2 Trial of 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy-Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Following Lumpectomy for Stages I and II Breast Cancer

PURPOSE Late toxicities and cosmetic analyses of patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) on RTOG 0319 are presented. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with stages I to II breast cancer ≤3 cm, negative margins, and ≤3 positive nodes were eligible. Patients received three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT; 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily over 5 days). Toxicity and cosmesis were assessed by the patient (P), the radiation oncologist (RO), and the surgical oncologist (SO) at 3, 6, and 12 months from the completion of treatment and then annually. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, was used to grade toxicity. RESULTS Fifty-two patients were evaluable. Median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 1.7-6.4 years). Eighty-two percent of patients rated their cosmesis as good/excellent at 1 year, with rates of 64% at 3 years. At 3 years, 31 patients were satisfied with the treatment, 5 were not satisfied but would choose 3D-CRT again, and none would choose standard radiation therapy. The worst adverse event (AE) per patient reported as definitely, probably, or possibly related to radiation therapy was 36.5% grade 1, 50% grade 2, and 5.8% grade 3 events. Grade 3 AEs were all skin or musculoskeletal-related. Treatment-related factors were evaluated to potentially establish an association with observed toxicity. Surgical bed volume, target volume, the number of beams used, and the use of bolus were not associated with late cosmesis. CONCLUSIONS Most patients enrolled in RTOG 0319 were satisfied with their treatment, and all would choose to have the 3D-CRT APBI again.

RTOG 95-17, a Phase II trial to evaluate brachytherapy as the sole method of radiation therapy for Stage I and II breast carcinoma—year-5 toxicity and cosmesis

PURPOSE Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 95-17, a Phase II trial to evaluate multicatheter brachytherapy (mCathBrachy) as the sole method of radiation therapy for Stage I-II breast cancer (BrCa), was the first cooperative group trial in North America to evaluate accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and include patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This report presents the year-5 toxicity and cosmesis data. METHODS AND MATERIALS After lumpectomy and axillary dissection for invasive BrCa (tumor size <3cm with zero to three positive lymph nodes), 100 patients (pts), 98 evaluable, were treated (txed) with mCathBrachy from 1997 to 2000 with 34Gy administered twice daily in 10 high-dose-rate fractions or 45Gy in 3.5-6 days as a low-dose-rate implant to 1-2cm beyond the lumpectomy bed. The PROs and physician-reported outcomes of toxicity, cosmesis, and tx satisfaction at year-5 are reported here, defined as data submitted 54-78 months after tx. RESULTS Grade (G) 1-2 skin toxicity developed in 78% of the pts and G3 in 13% (no G4). The tx effects included skin dimpling/indentation (37%), fibrosis (45%), telangiectasias (45%), skin catheter marks (54%), and symptomatic fat necrosis (15%). Breast asymmetry was reported in 73%. Rates of excellent-to-good cosmesis were similar between PROs (66%) and radiation oncologists (68%). The PROs of tx satisfaction at year-5 was 75%. CONCLUSIONS RTOG 95-17 documents the year-5 skin toxicity and tx effects of mCathBrachy APBI, which are associated with PROs of good-to-excellent cosmesis and high tx satisfaction. This emphasizes the importance of PROs when assessing BrCa tx. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B39/RTOG 0413 will allow for definitive comparisons between APBI and whole breast radiation therapy.