Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rachel Reed is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rachel Reed.


BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2017

Women’s descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions

Rachel Reed; Rachael Sharman; Christian Inglis

BackgroundMany women experience psychological trauma during birth. A traumatic birth can impact on postnatal mental health and family relationships. It is important to understand how interpersonal factors influence women’s experience of trauma in order to inform the development of care that promotes optimal psychosocial outcomes.MethodsAs part of a large mixed methods study, 748 women completed an online survey and answered the question ‘describe the birth trauma experience, and what you found traumatising’. Data relating to care provider actions and interactions were analysed using a six-phase inductive thematic analysis process.ResultsFour themes were identified in the data: ‘prioritising the care provider’s agenda’; ‘disregarding embodied knowledge’; ‘lies and threats’; and ‘violation’. Women felt that care providers prioritised their own agendas over the needs of the woman. This could result in unnecessary intervention as care providers attempted to alter the birth process to meet their own preferences. In some cases, women became learning resources for hospital staff to observe or practice on. Women’s own embodied knowledge about labour progress and fetal wellbeing was disregarded in favour of care provider’s clinical assessments. Care providers used lies and threats to coerce women into complying with procedures. In particular, these lies and threats related to the wellbeing of the baby. Women also described actions that were abusive and violent. For some women these actions triggered memories of sexual assault.ConclusionCare provider actions and interactions can influence women’s experience of trauma during birth. It is necessary to address interpersonal birth trauma on both a macro and micro level. Maternity service development and provision needs to be underpinned by a paradigm and framework that prioritises both the physical and emotional needs of women. Care providers require training and support to minimise interpersonal birth trauma.


Journal of Perinatal Education | 2010

Evaluation of a Practice-Development Initiative to Improve Breastfeeding Rates

Margaret Barnes; Julie Cox; Bronwyn Doyle; Rachel Reed

The benefits of breastfeeding for infant, mother, family, and community are well recognized, and increasing breastfeeding rates is considered an important health-promotion strategy. Improving breastfeeding knowledge and practice among individuals caring for breastfeeding women is considered an important aspect of this strategy. The practice-development initiative described in this article aimed to improve hospital-based breastfeeding rates through the implementation of The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding. The initiative included the development and implementation of an education program aimed at changing and improving breastfeeding practices. The program was evaluated in three ways: changes in breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge; client preparation for breastfeeding and satisfaction during the postnatal period; and staff knowledge and skills.


Journal of Perinatal Education | 2012

Outcomes for women and infants following assisted conception: implications for perinatal education, care, and support.

Margaret Barnes; Anne Roiko; Rachel Reed; Cath Williams; Kerry Willcocks

Assisted conception is becoming an increasingly more common treatment option for women and couples who experience fertility problems. Links have been made in the literature between assisted conception and a greater incidence of pregnancy or birth complications, low birth weight or premature babies, and babies with congenital abnormalities. In addition, evidence suggests that the experience of assisted conception may influence the development of early mothering relationships and impact parenting adjustment. Although this commentary article does not strategically review all available literature, it provides an overview of the health issues that women and families undergoing assisted conception have experienced or may experience. Through raising awareness and promoting discussion of these issues, practitioners will be better equipped to provide informed education and support.


International journal of childbirth | 2016

Women's Experience of Birth: Childbirth as a Rite of Passage

Rachel Reed; Margaret Barnes; Jennifer Rowe

BACKGROUND: Within midwifery, there is a move toward reclaiming and promoting physiological birth. Because midwifery is woman-centered in nature, it is essential that the experience of birth is understood from the woman’s perspective. To date, there has been little research focusing exclusively on women’s experience of physiological birth. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore women’s experiences of physiological birth. METHOD: A narrative approach was taken, and in-depth face-to-face interviews were used to gather birth stories. The participants were 10 women who had recently experienced a physiological birth. Data were analyzed to identify themes occurring across the narratives. FINDINGS: The findings are presented within the explanatory framework of childbirth as a rite of passage composing of three phases: separation, liminal, and incorporation. During birth, women separated from the external world and sought to minimize external and internal distractions. In the liminal phase, they entered “their own world” and experienced an altered state of consciousness. After their baby was born, they reintegrated with the external world and incorporated their birth experience into their sense of self. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that women’s experiences during physiological birth are multidimensional and not aligned with biomedical descriptions of physically defined stages of labor. Birth was an empowering and transformative experience for the women in the study. The rites of passage framework may assist with developing a discourse about birth that resonates with women’s experiences.


BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2017

The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study

Lauren Kearney; Mary Kynn; Alison Craswell; Rachel Reed

BackgroundMidwife facilitated, group models of antenatal care have emerged as an alternative to conventional care both within Australia and internationally. Group antenatal care can be offered in a number of different ways, however usually constitutes a series of sessions co-ordinated by a midwife combining physical assessment, antenatal education and peer support in a group setting. Midwife-led group antenatal care is viewed positively by expectant mothers, with no associated adverse outcomes identified in the published literature for women or their babies when compared with conventional care. Evidence of an improvement in outcomes is limited. The aim of this study was to compare mode of birth (any vaginal birth with caesarean birth) between pregnant women accessing midwife-led group antenatal care and conventional individual antenatal care, in Queensland, Australia.MethodsThis was a retrospective matched cohort study, set within a collaborative antenatal clinic between the local university and regional public health service in Queensland, Australia. Midwife-led group antenatal care (n = 110) participants were compared with controls enrolled in conventional antenatal care (n = 330). Groups were matched by parity, maternal age and gestation to form comparable groups, selecting a homogeneous sample with respect to confounding variables likely to affect outcomes.ResultsThere was no evidence that group care resulted in a greater number of caesarean births. The largest increase in the odds of caesarean birth was associated with a previous caesarean birth (p < 0.001), no previous birth (compared with previous vaginal birth) (p < 0.003), and conventional antenatal care (p < 0.073). The secondary outcomes (breastfeeding and infant birth weight) which were examined between the matched cohorts were comparable between groups.ConclusionsThere is no evidence arising from this study that there was a significant difference in mode of birth (caesarean or vaginal) between group and conventional care. Group care was associated with a lower risk of caesarean birth after controlling for previous births, with the highest chance for a vaginal birth being a woman who has had a previous vaginal birth and was in group care. Conversely, the highest risk of caesarean birth was for women who have had a previous caesarean birth and conventional care.


Contemporary Nurse | 2009

Nursing's orphans: how the system of nursing education in Australia is undermining professional identity.

Wendy Madsen; Margaret McAllister; Judith Godden; Jennene Greenhill; Rachel Reed


Nurse Education Today | 2010

Teaching nursing’s history: A national survey of Australian Schools of Nursing, 2007–2008

Margaret McAllister; Wendy Madsen; Judith Godden; Jennene Greenhill; Rachel Reed


Midwifery | 2016

Paternal mental health following perceived traumatic childbirth

Christian Inglis; Rachael Sharman; Rachel Reed


Women and Birth | 2016

'Expecting and Connecting' Group Pregnancy Care: Evaluation of a collaborative clinic.

Alison Craswell; Lauren Kearney; Rachel Reed


Women and Birth | 2016

Midwifery practice during birth: Ritual companionship

Rachel Reed; Jennifer Rowe; Margaret Barnes

Collaboration


Dive into the Rachel Reed's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margaret Barnes

University of the Sunshine Coast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lauren Kearney

University of the Sunshine Coast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachael Sharman

University of the Sunshine Coast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Young

University of the Sunshine Coast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Rowe

University of the Sunshine Coast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alison Craswell

University of the Sunshine Coast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa Davenport

University of the Sunshine Coast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margaret McAllister

Central Queensland University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge