Radu Bachmann

Novel insight into the role of microbiota in colorectal surgery

Recent literature undeniably supports the idea that the microbiota has a strong influence on the healing process of an intestinal anastomosis. Understanding the mechanisms by which the bacterial community of the gut influences intestinal healing could open the door for new preventive and therapeutic approaches. Among the different mechanisms, data have shown that the production of specific reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activation of specific formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) regulate intestinal wound healing. Evidence suggests that specific gut microbes such as Lactobacillus spp and Akkermansia muciniphila help to regulate healing processes through both ROS-dependent and FPR-dependent mechanisms. In this review, we will discuss the current knowledge and future perspectives concerning the impact of microbiota on wound healing. We will further review available evidence on whether mechanical bowel preparation and the use of specific antibiotics are beneficial or harmful procedures, an ongoing matter of debate. These practices have a profound effect on the gut microbiota composition at the level of both the mucosal and the luminal compartments. Therefore, a key question remains unanswered: should we continue to prepare the gut before surgical intervention? Current knowledge and data do not clearly support the use of one technique or another to avoid complications such as anastomotic leak. There is an urgent need for appropriate interventions with a deep microbiota analysis to investigate both the surgical technical benefits of a proper anastomosis compared with the potential effect of the gut microbes (beneficial vs harmful) on the processes of wound healing and anastomotic leakage reduction.

Reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect with biologic mesh after resection of a desmoid tumor in a patient with a Gardner's syndrome.

Abstract Introduction: Desmoid tumors are rare proliferative and invasive benign lesions. They can be sporadic, but in most instances, desmoid tumors develop in the context of Gardner’s syndrome with principal localization in the abdominal cavity and abdominal wall. Case-report: We report the case of a 24-year-old female presenting Gardner’s syndrome with a symptomatic abdominal wall desmoid tumor. Lack of response to medical treatment led to surgical management consisting in a complete resection and parietal reconstruction with a biologic mesh. Postoperative course was uneventful and there was no evidence of recurrence at 12 months of follow-up. Discussion: Conventional treatment of abdominal wall desmoid tumors consists in a wide and radical resection. However, complete resection is not always feasible because of difficulty to differentiate the desmoid tumor from adjacent tissues. The surgical approach may require different techniques to repair the parietal defect including prosthetic material such as synthetic or biologic meshes. Biological mesh is an ideal alternative to synthetic graft, mainly in case of infection. Conclusion: We have encountered a case of a symptomatic growing desmoid tumor of the abdominal wall in a young patient with Gardner’s syndrome, successfully treated by complete resection and reconstruction with a biologic mesh to correct the parietal defect.

Para-anal lipoma as a rare consequence to perineal trauma. Case-report and review of the literature

Abstract Introduction: Lipomas are the most common benign mesenchymal tumors which can be found in any part of the body. Nevertheless, their etiology and pathogenesis remain unknown. It is hypothesized that some of these lesions could result from an acute or chronic trauma. Patients and methods: We report a case of a 54-year-old man presenting a perineal lipoma which volume grew rapidly after he fell on his buttock, in the context of inaugural epileptic seizure. Pelvic MRI showed a voluminous fatty mass, measuring 6.6 × 5 × 9 cm without any signs of local invasion. Furthermore, we review the latest research on lipomas originating from traumatic lesion. Results: The mass was completely excised in one block under general anesthaesia, using an elliptical incision and a deep dissection. We did not close the skin incision in view of the cutaneous defect. Post-operative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged from hospital two days after the operation. Histopathology indicated a reorganised lipoma with no evidence of malignancy. Conclusion: Perineal lipomas are extremely rare, pathological examination of imaging guided biopsies are needed to exclude malignancy especially a well-differentiated liposarcoma. MRI remains the first option and radical surgical excision is the gold standard treatment.