Rafael Dal-Ré

Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process

The development of new massive sequencing techniques has now made it possible to significantly reduce the time and costs of whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Although WGS will soon become a routine testing tool, new ethical issues have surfaced. In light of these concerns, a systematic review of papers published by expert authors on IC or specific ethical issues related to IC for WGS analysis in the clinical setting has been conducted using the Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Additionally, a search was conducted for international ethical guidelines for genetic studies published by scientific societies and ethical boards. Based on these documents, a minimum set of information to be provided to patients in the IC form was determined. Fourteen and seven documents from the database search and from scientific societies, respectively, were selected. A very high level of consistency between them was found regarding the recommended IC form content. Pre-test counselling and general information common to all genetic tests should be included in the IC form for WGS for diagnostic purposes, but additional information addressing specific issues on WGS are proposed, such as a plan for the ethical, clinically oriented return of incidental findings. Moreover, storage of additional information for future use should also be agreed upon with the patient in advance. Recommendations for WGS studies in the clinical setting concerning both the elements of information and the process of obtaining the IC as well as how to handle the results obtained are proposed.

Response of Preterm Newborns to Immunization With a Hexavalent Diphtheria–Tetanus–Acellular Pertussis–Hepatitis B Virus–Inactivated Polio and Haemophilus influenzae Type b Vaccine: First Experiences and Solutions to a Serious and Sensitive Issue

Objective. Preterm infants are at increased risk from infections and should be vaccinated at the usual chronological age. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a hexavalent diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis–hepatitis B virus–inactivated polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) vaccine in preterm infants. Methods. In a comparative trial, 94 preterm infants between 24 and 36 weeks (mean ± SD gestational age: 31.05 ± 3.45 weeks; mean birth weight: 1420 ± 600 g) and a control group of 92 full-term infants were enrolled to receive 3 doses of a DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine at 2, 4, and 6 months. Immunogenicity was assessed in serum samples that were taken before and 4 weeks after primary vaccination. Evaluation of reactogenicity was based on diary cards. Results. All preterm (n = 93) and full-term (n = 89) infants who were included in the immunogenicity analysis had seroprotective titers to diphtheria; tetanus; and polio virus types 1, 2, and 3. The immune response to the Hib and hepatitis B components was lower in preterm than in full-term infants: 92.5% versus 97.8% and 93.4% versus 95.2%, respectively. Vaccine response rates for pertussis antigens were >98.9% in both study groups. Although most geometric mean titers were lower in preterm infants, titers were similar for pertussis, a major threat for premature infants. The vaccine was well tolerated, and there were no differences in reactogenicity between groups. Some extremely immature infants experienced transient cardiorespiratory events within the 72 hours after the first vaccination with no clinical repercussion. Conclusions. Preterm infants who were immunized with the hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine at 2, 4, and 6 months displayed good immune response to all antigens. The availability of this vaccine greatly facilitates the vaccination of premature infants.

Effect of eprosartan and losartan on uric acid metabolism in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE The influence of angiotensin II AT-1 receptor antagonists on uric acid metabolism, and the potential differences among them with regard to this effect, remains to be precisely established. This study was designed to compare the effects of losartan and eprosartan on uric acid metabolism in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in hypertensive patients. SETTING Outpatient clinic. PATIENTS Following a 2- to 3-week single-blind placebo run-in period, 60 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 and < or = 114 mmHg were randomized. Fifty-eight patients completed the study. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive losartan 50 mg or eprosartan 600 mg once daily for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint was the change in the ratio of urinary uric acid/creatinine in the period 0-4 h of a 24 h urine collection after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included 24 h urinary uric acid excretion, as well as serum urate and anti-hypertensive efficacy. RESULTS Mean urinary uric acid/creatinine changes from baseline were 0.14 (day 1) and 0.11 (week 4) for losartan and -0.04 for eprosartan (at both day 1 and week 4; P < 0.01 between groups at both time-points). The mean increase in 24 h urinary uric acid excretion with losartan was 0.7 mmol/24 h (25% increase from baseline) at both day 1 and week 4. No significant difference was observed in the change of serum urate levels versus baseline between both treatment groups after 4 weeks (- 23.4 and - 19.5 micromol/l for losartan and eprosartan, respectively). Patients with hyperuricaemia in both treatment groups showed similar modifications of uric acid metabolism compared with non-hyperuricaemic subjects. Blood pressure control (sitting diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or < 100 mmHg with a decrease of at least 10 mmHg from baseline) was achieved in 22 patients (73%) with eprosartan and in 16 (53%) with losartan. CONCLUSIONS Losartan increased uric acid excretion in hypertensive patients, whilst eprosartan did not Neither AT-1 receptor antagonist substantially modified serum urate concentrations.

Making prospective registration of observational research a reality

Key information about human observational studies should be publicly available before the study is initiated. The vast majority of health-related observational studies are not prospectively registered and the advantages of registration have not been fully appreciated. Nonetheless, international standards require approval of study protocols by an independent ethics committee before the study can begin. We suggest that there is an ethical and scientific imperative to publicly preregister key information from newly approved protocols, which should be required by funders. Ultimately, more complete information may be publicly available by disclosing protocols, analysis plans, data sets, and raw data.

Call to improve transparency of trials of non-regulated interventions

The public and clinicians require transparent, quality evidence for all interventions. Trials of non-regulated interventions are common, and efforts to improve their registration and publication compared with drug trials are overdue, say Rafael Dal-Ré, Michael Bracken, and John Ioannidis

Association of common genetic variants with risperidone adverse events in a Spanish schizophrenic population

Risperidone non-compliance is often high due to undesirable side effects, whose development is in part genetically determined. Studies with genetic variants involved in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of risperidone have yielded inconsistent results. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the putative association of genetic markers with the occurrence of four frequently observed adverse events secondary to risperidone treatment: sleepiness, weight gain, extrapyramidal symptoms and sexual adverse events. A series of 111 schizophrenia inpatients were genotyped for genetic variants previously associated with or potentially involved in risperidone response. Presence of adverse events was the main variable and potential confounding factors were considered. Allele 16Gly of ADRB2 was significantly associated with a higher risk of sexual adverse events. There were other non-significant trends for DRD3 9Gly and SLC6A4 S alleles. Our results, although preliminary, provide new candidate variants of potential use in risperidone safety prediction.

Lack of pharmacologic interaction between paroxetine and alprazolam at steady state in healthy volunteers.

Abstract: This investigation aimed to provide evidence on the lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of paroxetine (20 mg/d) and alprazolam (1 mg/d) in combined therapy. In addition, the central effects of both drugs when administered alone and in combination were assessed to rule out any relevant synergistic depressant central effect. Twenty-five healthy young adult volunteers participated in a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, repeated dose (15 days), 4-period crossover study. Each subject received each of 4 treatment sequences (ie, paroxetine-alprazolam placebo, alprazolam-paroxetine placebo, paroxetine-alprazolam, and paroxetine placebo-alprazolam placebo) in randomized order. The ratios for area under the curve within a dosing interval and maximum plasma concentration of the paroxetine plus alprazolam sequence to single agent paroxetine were 1.07 (90% confidence interval = 0.99 to 1.16) and 1.05 (90% confidence interval = 0.97 to 1.13), respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatments. Similarly, for alprazolam, ratios for the combined to the single treatment sequence were 0.99 (90% confidence interval = 0.93 to 1.05) and 1.00 (90% confidence interval = 0.94 to 1.07) for area under the curve within a dosing interval and maximum plasma concentration, respectively, showing no evidence for interaction. Comparative pharmacodynamics on the combination was assessed using 6 Psychomotor Performance Tests and 5 Visual Analogue Scales focused on mood variables. Alprazolam and paroxetine plus alprazolam induced similar and significant performance impairment and sedation after both single and repeated dose administration, being less evident on day 15. After dosing, paroxetine plus alprazolam showed a lower recovery pattern than alprazolam alone, especially on day 15. No treatment sequence showed cumulative effects after repeated dose administration. Psychomotor Performance Tests and Visual Analogue Scales data suggested lack of pharmacodynamic interactions. Accordingly, study results showed no evidence for pharmacologic interactions between paroxetine and alprazolam at steady state. The most commonly reported adverse event was drowsiness, with a higher incidence under both single and combined alprazolam treatments.

Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: why monitoring matters

John Ioannidis and colleagues explain how clinical trial outcomes are less fixed than we think and advocate transparency in documenting why they change

CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status might be associated with better response to risperidone treatment.

The variability in the antipsychotic response is, to some extent, genetically determined. Several studies have attempted to establish a role for genetic variation in genes coding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, but to date, no definite genetic predictive marker has been identified. We aimed to explore the putative role of 19 genetic variants and risperidone clinical improvement in 76 White schizophrenic inpatients, measured as change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). CYP2D6 poor metabolism was significantly associated with greater clinical improvement in total PANSS and a trend was also found for MDR1 3435C>T to higher total PANSS scores in 3435T carriers. This study suggests the importance that genetic variability on pharmacokinetic factors may have in risperidone response and gives evidence for the need for further investigation in order to establish the actual predictive value and clinical utility that CYP2D6 genotyping might have in risperidone therapy management.

Disclosure of investigators' recruitment performance in multicenter clinical trials: a further step for research transparency.

Rafael Dal-Ré and colleagues argue that the recruitment targets and performance of all site investigators in multi-centre clinical trials should be disclosed in trial registration sites before a trial starts, and when it ends.