Rafael Herranz

Intraoperative presacral electron boost following preoperative chemoradiation in T3–4Nx rectal cancer: initial local effects and clinical outcome analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To analyze early results of a single institution experience using adjuvant intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) presacral boost in locally advanced rectal cancer following preoperative chemoradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a 63 month period (March 1995-June 2000), 100 consecutive T(3-4)N(x) rectal cancer patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation (45-50 Gy plus oral Tegafur or 5-Fluorouracil continuous intravenous infusion), radical surgery and IOERT presacral boost (mean dose, 12.5 Gy; range, 10-15 Gy). Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU-leucovorin: 4-6 cycles) was given to 52 patients. The median age was 63 years, and 39 patients were >or=70 years old (65 males). Clinical staging was performed with computed tomography (94%) and/or endorectal ultrasound (71%) categorizing 90 cT(3), 10 cT(4), 20 cN(x), and 36 cN(+). Abdomino-perineal resection was performed in 41 cases. RESULTS The IOERT cancellation rate was 6%. With a median follow-up of 23 months in IOERT treated patients, three developed pelvic recurrence: one anastomotic and one in the posterior vaginal wall (simultaneously with distant metastatic disease); and one presacral (in-field IOERT) as the only site of initial failure. Distant metastasis has been observed in 14 patients (exceptionally in pT(0-1) downstaged patients: 1/20; 5%). Overall treatment tolerances, including neoadjuvant and surgical segments, were acceptable. The actuarial 4-year estimations of local control, disease-free and overall survival are 94, 75 and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS IOERT electron boost to the presacral region is feasible to integrate systematically in the intensive combined treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, including neoadjuvant chemoradiation segment. Topography of pelvic recurrences identified 2/3 relapses located in non-IOERT boosted anatomic intrapelvic sites: posterior vaginal wall and anastomotic suture. Presacral recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer seems to be of low incidence, in a non-subspecialized academic surgical practice coordinated with a multidisciplinary oncology evaluation context, if an IOERT boost is included as a component of treatment together with preoperative chemoradiation.

Pathologic downstaging of T3–4Nx rectal cancer after chemoradiation: 5-fluorouracil vs. Tegafur

PURPOSE To describe downstaging effects in locally advanced rectal cancer induced by 2 fluopirimidine radiosensitizing agents given through different routes in conjunction with preoperative radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS From March 1995 to December 1999, two consecutive groups of patients with cT3-4Nx rectal cancer (94% CT scan, 71% endorectal ultrasound) were treated with either (1) 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 25 fractions) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (500-1,000 mg/m2 by 24-h continuous i.v. infusion on Days 1-4 and 21-25) or (2) oral Tegafur (1,200 mg/day on Days 1-35, including weekends). Surgery was performed 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. RESULTS The total T downstaging rate was 46% in the 5-FU group and 53% in the Tegafur group. Subcategories were downstaged by the sensitizing agents (5-FU vs. Tegafur) as follows: pT0-1, 14% vs. 23%; pT2, 32% vs. 32%; pT3, 49% vs. 37%; pT4, 5% vs. 7%; and N(0), 74% vs. 86%. Analysis of residual malignant disease in the specimen discriminated mic/mac subgroups (mic: <20% of microscopic cancer residue), with evident superior downstaging effects in the Tegafur-treated group: pTmic 23% vs. 58% (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS When administered concurrent with pelvic irradiation, oral Tegafur induced downstaging rates in both T and N categories superior to those induced by intermediate doses of 5-FU by continuous i.v. infusion. In this pilot experience, oral Tegafur reproduced the characteristics of downstaging described previously when full doses of 5-FU have been combined with radiotherapy.

Prognostic Impact of External Beam Radiation Therapy in Patients Treated With and Without Extended Surgery and Intraoperative Electrons for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: 16-Year Experience in a Single Institution

PURPOSE To analyze prognostic factors associated with survival in patients after intraoperative electrons containing resective surgical rescue of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). METHODS AND MATERIALS From January 1995 to December 2011, 60 patients with LRRC underwent extended surgery (n=38: multiorgan [43%], bone [28%], soft tissue [38%]) or nonextended (n=22) surgical resection, including a component of intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy (IOERT) to the pelvic recurrence tumor bed. Twenty-eight (47%) of these patients also received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (range, 30.6-50.4 Gy). Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 36 months (range, 2-189 months), and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rates for locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) were 86%, 52%, and 44%; and 78%, 53%, 43%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R1 resection, EBRT at the time of pelvic rerecurrence, no tumor fragmentation, and non-lymph node metastasis retained significance with regard to LRR. R1 resection and no tumor fragmentation showed a significant association with OS after adjustment for other covariates. CONCLUSIONS EBRT treatment integrated for rescue, resection radicality, and not involved fragmented resection specimens are associated with improved LRC in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Additionally, tumor fragmentation could be compensated by EBRT. Present results suggest that a significant group of patients with LRRC may benefit from EBRT treatment integrated with extended surgery and IOERT.

OC-0480: External radiation therapy, extended surgery and intraoperative electrons for oligorrecurent pelvic cancer

Purpose/Objective: To analyze prognostic factors associated with survival in patients after intensified radio-surgical rescue of oligorecurrent pelvic cancer, particularly the influence of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Materials and Methods: From January 1995 to december 2011, 81 patients [colorectal (46%); gynecologic (26%); retroperitoneal sarcoma (18%)] underwent extended surgery [multiorgan (58%), bone (23%), vascular (9%), soft tissue (43%)] and intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy [IOERT (10-15 Gy)] to the pelvic recurrence tumor bed. 35 (43%) of these patients also received EBRT (30.6-50.4 Gy). Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Median follow-up was 34 months (3-189 months), and the 13-, and 5-year rates of locoregional control (LRC) were 83%, 53%, and 41%, respectively. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed worse LRC for those patients who did not received integrated EBRT treatment for the pelvic recurrence rescue (p=0.003), and had non-radical resection (p=0.01). On multivariate analysis, integrated EBRT treatment, non-radical resection, and tumor fragmentation retained significance (p=0.002,p=0.004, and p=0.05, respectively). Conclusions: EBRT treatment integrated for rescue, radical resection, and abscence of tumor fragmentation are associated with improved LRC in patients with oligorecurrent pelvic cancer. Present results suggest that patients with oligorecurrent pelvic disease ma ybenefit from EBRT treatment integrated with extended surgery and IOERT.