Rafe Donahue

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C in Pakistan: prevalence and risk factors §

BACKGROUND Pakistan carries one of the worlds highest burdens of chronic hepatitis and mortality due to liver failure and hepatocellular carcinomas. However, national level estimates of the prevalence of and risk factors for hepatitis B and hepatitis C are currently not available. METHODS We reviewed the medical and public health literature over a 13-year period (January 1994-September 2007) to estimate the prevalence of active hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C in Pakistan, analyzing data separately for the general and high-risk populations and for each of the four provinces. We included 84 publications with 139 studies (42 studies had two or more sub-studies). RESULTS Methodological differences in studies made it inappropriate to conduct a formal meta-analysis to determine accurate national prevalence estimates, but we estimated the likely range of prevalence in different population sub-groups. A weighted average of hepatitis B antigen prevalence in pediatric populations was 2.4% (range 1.7-5.5%) and for hepatitis C antibody was 2.1% (range 0.4-5.4%). A weighted average of hepatitis B antigen prevalence among healthy adults (blood donors and non-donors) was 2.4% (range 1.4-11.0%) and for hepatitis C antibody was 3.0% (range 0.3-31.9%). Rates in the high-risk subgroups were far higher. CONCLUSIONS Data suggest a moderate to high prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in different areas of Pakistan. The published literature on the modes of transmission of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in Pakistan implicate contaminated needle use in medical care and drug abuse and unsafe blood and blood product transfusion as the major causal factors.

Multi-institutional Experience Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for Ventral Hernia Repair in a Compromised Surgical Field

BACKGROUND A complex ventral hernia repair (CVHR) involves a compromised surgical field where gastrointestinal, biliary, and genitourinary procedures are performed. Complex ventral hernia is a significant problem in trauma, emergency, and elective general surgery in which prosthetic material is contraindicated. In this clinical scenario, primary fascia closure carries a 50% risk of developing a hernia. The other option is a planned ventral hernia with delayed repair. HYPOTHESIS Human acellular dermal matrix is a suitable implant for CVHR in a compromised surgical field. DESIGN Multi-institutional, 5-year retrospective review. SETTING Four academic medical centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Each center obtained institutional review board approval. Patients included in the review had undergone CVHR with human acellular dermal matrix. Data collected included age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), comorbidities, size of fascial defect, wound classification, hospital length of stay, length of follow-up, and mortality. Primary outcomes were surgical site infection, fistula recurrence, and hernia recurrence. Both chi2 and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Two hundred forty patients met the study criteria. Their mean (SD) age was 52.2 (15.0) years, and 132 (55.0%) were men. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (115 patients [47.9%]), and the mean defect size was 201 cm2. The mean hospital length of stay was 17.2 days, and the mean follow-up was 317 days. The overall mortality was 2.9%. The hernia recurrence rate was 17.1% (41 patients). Repair of a fistula or stoma was associated with hernia recurrence (P = .03) and with fistula recurrence (P < .001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated surgical site infection and body mass index of greater than 30 to be independent risks of hernia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Human acellular dermal matrix is a suitable alternative for CVHR in a compromised surgical field. The hernia recurrence rate with human acellular dermal matrix in a compromised surgical field is less than that seen with primary repair, offering additional and improved surgical options for CVHR in this group of patients. Stoma or fistula takedown at the time of CVHR continues to be associated with significant complications.

Feeding the Open Abdomen

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine if early enteral nutrition improves outcome for trauma patients with an open abdomen (OA). METHODS Retrospective review was used to identify 78 patients who required an OA for >or=4 hospital days, survived, and had available nutrition data. Demographic data and nutrition data comprising enteral nutrition initiation day and daily % target goal were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups: early enteral feeding (EEN), initiated <or=4 days within celiotomy; and late enteral feeding (LEN; >4 days). Outcomes included infectious complications, early closure of the abdominal cavity (<8 days from original celiotomy), and fistula formation. RESULTS Fifty-three of 78 (68%) patients were men, with a mean age of 35 years; 74% had blunt trauma. Forty-three of 78 (55%) patients had EEN, whereas 35 of 78 (45%) had LEN. There was no difference with respect to demographics, injury severity, or infectious complication rates. Thirty-two of 43 (74%) patients with EEN had early closure of the abdominal cavity, whereas 17 of 35 (49%) patients with late feeding had early closure (p = .02). Four of 43 (9%) patients with EEN demonstrated fistula formation, whereas 9 of 35 (26%) patients with late feeding formed fistulae (p = .05). The EEN group had lower hospital charges (p = .04) by more than

Autologous Breast Reconstruction: The Vanderbilt Experience (1998 to 2005) of Independent Predictors of Displeasing Outcomes

50,000. CONCLUSIONS EEN in the OA was associated with (1) earlier primary abdominal closure, (2) lower fistula rate, (3) lower hospital charges.

Establishing the Relationship Between Clinical Outcome and Extent of Osseous Bridging Between Computed Tomography Assessment in Isolated Hindfoot and Ankle Fusions

BACKGROUND Optimal surgical outcomes are dependent on an appreciation of comorbid conditions that may handicap results. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to delineate risk factors for complications after autologous breast reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN An institutional database was constructed of patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction from 1998 to 2005. Variables captured included age, diabetes and smoking status, prereconstruction radiation therapy, concomitant breast resection, preoperative albumin, flap type, and body mass index (BMI; based on World Health Organization classifications: BMI>25, overweight; >30, obese). The primary outcome was noninfectious wound complications (NIWC), a novel classification based on the extent of tissue derangement and need for operative intervention. Secondary outcomes were wound infection, hematoma, hernia, and fat necrosis. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS The analysis included 200 flaps (transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous [TRAM]=171; latissimus dorsi=29) in 180 patients. There were 19 infections (9.5%), 3 total flap losses (1.5%), 14 hematomas (7%), and 11 donor-site hernias (6%). The incidences of fat necrosis and any NIWC were 18% and 36%, respectively. Mean followup was 13.1 months (range 1.1 to 51.7 months). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that obesity (BMI>30) is a statistically significant independent risk factor for any NIWC (hazards ratio=6.58; 95% CI, 2.85 to 15.18; p < 0.01) and for NIWC requiring operative treatment (NIWC>or=3; hazard ratio=6.23; 95% CI 2.15 to 18.05; p < 0.01). Increased BMI predicts NIWC, NIWC requiring operative intervention, and wound infection (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that obesity is a strong predictor of simple and complex NIWC and of wound infection after autologous breast reconstruction. Obese patients should be counseled about their significantly increased risk of experiencing these unwanted outcomes.

Site Selection and Pain Outcome After Autologous Bone Graft Harvest

Background: Determining the success of joint fusion operations is often a diagnostic dilemma, and many factors may be considered. Most would agree that the broad categories of clinical success and radiographic success are likely most useful to determine the overall success of a joint fusion operation. Very little evidence exists to assist the surgeon in determining what constitutes a successful radiographic fusion. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of osseous bridging as measured by computed tomography (CT) that was associated with a good clinical outcome as measured by the 12-Item Short Form (SF-12), Foot Function Index (FFI), and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) clinical outcomes questionnaires at 24 weeks. Methods: Patients who had isolated joint fusions were evaluated (n = 275) to determine the correlation of extent of osseous bridging with clinical outcome. The extent of osseous bridging across the joint in question was categorized as absent (0%-24%), minimal (25%-49%) moderate (50%-74%), or complete (75%-100%). Clinical outcome scores included the SF-12, FFI, and AOFAS outcomes score. Results: Patients evaluated to have at least minimal osseous bridging at fusion sites (25%-49%) on CT reported a clinically important improvement in SF-12, FFI, and AOFAS, whereas those with “absent” osseous bridging (0%-24%) did not report a clinically important improvement in outcome scores. Conclusion: This study suggests that osseous bridging of greater than 25% to 49% at the fusion site measured by CT may be necessary to consider a hindfoot or ankle fusion clinically successful. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Does autogenous bone graft work? A logistic regression analysis of data from 159 papers in the foot and ankle literature

Background: In foot and ankle surgery, there are multiple sites used for autologous bone graft, including the proximal (PT) or distal tibia (DT), calcaneus (C), and iliac crest (ICBG). There has been no comparison between these anatomic areas and the potential for acute or persistent pain at 1 year. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare patient-reported outcomes of acute and persistent pain at 1 year after surgery to determine if harvest site selection made a difference. Methods: As part of a clinical trial examining ankle and hindfoot fusion rates with autograft compared with synthetic graft, the autologous bone graft harvest sites were assessed with visual analog pain outcome scores at 3, 24, 36, and 52 weeks after surgery. Patients with a score of 20+ defined clinically significant pain. Four harvest sites were compared: ICBG, PT, DT, and C. Fisher exact test was used to compare the graft site pain between locations. Results: Twelve percent of subjects reported clinically significant pain at 24 weeks and 8.5% at 52 weeks postoperatively. Each lower extremity harvest site (C, DT, PT) showed higher rates of clinically significant graft harvest site pain than the ICBG at 52 weeks. Conclusions: Autologous bone graft harvest carried a risk of persistent pain at up to 1 year (weeks 24-52) in 18% of patients. Lower-extremity bone graft sites had the greatest risk for persistent pain at 1 year. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Survey on the Need for Bone Graft in Foot and Ankle Fusion Surgery

BACKGROUND While autogenous cancellous iliac crest bone graft is the gold standard for foot and ankle surgery, it lacks Level I evidence. Although one third of all graft cases performed in the United States today rely on allograft, some surgeons believe no graft is necessary. We hypothesized that a systematic review of the foot and ankle literature would reveal that (1) autogenous bone graft during foot and ankle arthrodesis would demonstrate healing rates that were superior to the use of either using allograft or no bone graft at all, and (2) these differences would be even more dramatic in patients having risk factors that impair bone healing. To our knowledge, neither of these assessments to date has ever been performed with this body of literature. The goal of this study was to review the use and union rates of bone graft during foot and ankle arthrodesis and determine if autogenous bone graft was superior. METHODS A literature search was performed to include articles between 1959 and 2012 using autograft, allograft, and/or no bone graft for foot and/or ankle arthrodesis. Case reports involving fewer than four patients, investigations failing to incorporate outcome data, those involving orthobiologic augmentation, and those including vascularized graft, xenograft, or pediatric patients were excluded. Recorded search results included patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-operative diagnosis, surgical procedure, bone graft type and indication, union rate, method of fixation, patient satisfaction, all outcome scores, definition of healing/success, and any listed complications including revision. Final data were stratified based upon the type of graft material. RESULTS This search generated 953 related articles, of which 159 studies (5327 patients) met inclusion criteria. The majority (153/159) were retrospective case series. Systematic review demonstrated a trend toward higher union rates for cancellous autograft (OR 1.39, p=0.11), structural autograft (OR 1.52, p=0.09), and cancellous allograft (OR 1.31, p=0.52) relative to no graft material, but none reached statistical significance. Compared to no graft, structural allograft trended toward worse performance (OR 0.62, p=0.17). The overall probability of union was 93.7% for cancellous autograft, 94.2% for structural autograft, 93.3% for cancellous allograft, 91.4% for no graft, and 86.9% for structural allograft. When only comparing the 19 papers that included a no graft arm (91.9% union rate), data revealed the highest union using cancellous autograft (95.1%, OR 1.73, p=0.09) and structural autograft (96.3%, OR 2.33, p=0.06) while only 76% for structural allograft. No significant statistical association existed between union rates and other recorded variables. CONCLUSION Systematic analysis of bone graft use in foot and ankle fusions favors the use of autograft and cancellous allograft for optimized healing rates, although no differences were statistically significant. If we assume that graft material been chosen for more complex procedures having lower anticipated union rates, then these data lend further support to the use of autograft and cancellous allograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.

Clinical Outcomes of Nonunions of Hindfoot and Ankle Fusions.

Background: Generally, autologous bone graft is felt to be an important treatment adjunct in the presence of structural deformity, surface irregularities, defects (due to trauma, surgery, or degenerative changes), or underlying comorbidities that predispose the patient to healing challenges. This study assessed the prognostic and predictive factors used in the clinical decision making for bone graft supplementation in foot and ankle fusion surgery. Methods: Utilizing standard survey research methodology, key-informant interviews, pretesting, and pilot testing; a survey was constructed. The survey consisted of a web-based 5-point Likert-type scale (never, seldom, sometimes, almost always, always) listing 14 clinical and 11 radiologic criteria that may influence the use of autologous bone grafting or other biologic augmentation in foot and ankle surgery. This survey was sent to Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons in North America and Canada. Results: A total of 48 foot and ankle surgeons completed the blinded survey (73% response rate). More than 70% of responders felt bone graft was almost always (AA) or always (A) indicated in prior nonunion of the indicated joint (96%). Fewer than 50% of respondents felt poor soft tissue integrity (20%), prior foot and ankle infection (20%), and current foot and ankle infection (4%) needed bone graft. Radiologic factors marked as AA or A in over 70% of responders include radiographic evidence of nonunion (96%), avascular necrosis (87%), and others. Factors chosen as AA or A by fewer than 50% of surgeons include prior adjacent joint fusions (47%), intra-articular deformity (31%), and extra-articular deformity (13%). Conclusions: There was some uniformity of agreement on the number of both clinical and radiologic factors that prompt a surgeon to utilize autologous bone graft to try to avoid the complication of nonunion. Surgeons may wish to consider these factors when making a decision on the use of bone graft to supplement fusion.

Intensive insulin therapy in practice: can we do it?

BACKGROUND While nonunion after foot and ankle fusion surgery has been associated with poor outcomes, we are not aware of any longitudinal study on this subject. Thus, we prospectively evaluated the impact of nonunion on clinical outcomes of foot and ankle fusions and identified potential risk factors for nonunion after these procedures. METHODS Using data from a randomized clinical trial on recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB; Augment Bone Graft, BioMimetic Therapeutics), union was defined either by assessment of computed tomography (CT) scans at 24 weeks by a reviewer blinded to the type of treatment or by the surgeons composite assessment of clinical and radiographic findings at 52 weeks and CT findings at 24 or 36 weeks. The nonunion and union groups (defined with each assessment) were then compared in terms of clinical outcome scores on the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) as well as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, diabetes status, work status, and arthrodesis site. RESULTS Blinded CT assessment identified nonunion in 67 (18%) of 370 patients, and surgeon assessment found nonunion in 21 (5%) of 389 patients. Postoperatively, the nonunion group scored worse than the union group, regardless of the method used to define the nonunion, on the AOFAS-AHS and FFI, with mean differences of 10 and 12 points, respectively, when nonunion was determined by blinded CT assessment and 19 and 20 points when it was assessed by the surgeon. The nonunion group also had worse SF-12 Physical Component Summary scores. Differences between the union and nonunion groups were clinically meaningful for all outcome measures, regardless of the nonunion assessment method. The concept of an asymptomatic nonunion (i.e., imaging indicating nonunion but the patient doing well) was not supported. Patients with nonunion were more likely to be overweight, smokers, and not working. CONCLUSIONS This prospective longitudinal study demonstrated poorer functional outcomes in patients with a nonunion after foot and ankle fusion, regardless of whether the diagnosis of nonunion was based on CT only or on combined clinical, radiographic, and CT assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.