Raffaele De Lucia

Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leads

Aims The aim of the present study was to describe a 10 years single-centre experience in pacing and defibrillating leads removal using an effective and safe modified mechanical dilatation technique. Methods and results We developed a single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches. We performed a venous entry site approach (VEA) in cases of exposed leads and an alternative transvenous femoral approach (TFA) combined with an internal transjugular approach (ITA) in the presence of very tight binding sites causing failure of VEA extraction or in cases of free-floating leads. We attempted to remove 2062 leads [1825 pacing and 237 implantable cardiac defibrillating (ICD) leads; 1989 exposed at the venous entry site and 73 free-floating] in 1193 consecutive patients. The VEA was effective in 1799 leads, the TFA in 28, and the ITA in 205; in the overall population, we completely removed 2032 leads (98.4%), partially removed 18 (0.9%), and failed to remove 12 leads (0.6%). Major complications were observed in eight patients (0.7%), causing three deaths (0.3%). Conclusion Mechanical single sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches is effective, safe, and with a good cost effective profile for pacing and ICD leads removal.

Major predictors of fibrous adherences in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction

BACKGROUND Percutaneous removal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads is a difficult procedure because of the consequence of massive fibrous tissue growth along the lead. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe the occurrence and location of fibrous adherences in ICD lead extraction and to identify potential predictors among patient and lead characteristics. METHODS We studied 637 consecutive patients who underwent transvenous extraction of 678 ICD leads from 1997 to 2013. RESULTS Procedural success rate was 99%, without major complications. Areas of adherence were found in the subclavian vein (78%), innominate vein (65%), superior vena cava (66%), and heart (73%). Dwell-time, passive fixation, and dual-coil lead design were independently associated with adherences. Dual-coil lead design was associated with adherences in the innominate vein and superior vena cava, whereas coil treatment (eg, expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-coated or medical adhesive back-filled strategies) prevented adherences. Passive fixation mechanism was associated with adherences in the heart. CONCLUSION ICD leads, after long dwell-time, are affected by fibrous adherences uniformly distributed along the lead course. Lead features represent major predictors of the phenomenon. Careful lead selection is recommended at the time of implantation to prevent adherences. In addition, lead-related risk stratification is mandatory before a transvenous extraction procedure.

Large, Single-Center Experience in Transvenous Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction: Procedural Outcomes and Predictors for Mechanical Dilatation

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate procedural outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction, focusing on predictors and need for mechanical dilatation (MD) in the event that manual traction (MT) is ineffective.

Intracardiac echocardiography in patients with pacing and defibrillating leads: a feasibility study.

Background: Lead extraction, an important and necessary component of treatment for many common device and lead‐related complications, is a procedure that can provoke much anxiety in even the most experienced operators given the potentially serious complications. The principal impediment to lead extraction is the bodys response to an intravascular foreign body with matrix intravascular neoformation, which causes the lead to adhere to the endocardium or vascular structure, increasing the risk of vascular or myocardial damage with lead removal. Fluoroscopic visualization, the commonly visualization used tool, has several limits in terms of anatomical structures visualization. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in patients undergoing pacing and defibrillating leads before and during a transvenous device removal, and its potential role in detecting intracardiac leads and areas of fibrous adherence. Methods: ICE interrogation was performed in 25 consecutive patients with pacing and defibrillating implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) leads before and during device removal. Results: A programmed ICE analysis was completed in 23 out of 25 patients with excellent resolution, providing a “qualitative‐quantitative” information on anatomical structures, cardiac leads, and related areas of fibrous adherence. No ICE‐related complications occurred. Conclusions: ICE evaluation is safe and feasible in patients with pacing and defibrillating leads before and during transvenous lead removal, offering an excellent visualization of cardiac leads and related areas of adherence. ICE can assist pacing and ICD lead removal and could improve procedure efficacy and safety.

Safety and efficacy of internal transjugular approach for transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads

AIMS We report our 15 years experience of a mechanical single-sheath technique with a multiple venous entry-site approach. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this technique in implantable defibrillator (ICD) lead extraction and investigated the potential association between clinical and lead-related factors and procedural complexity. METHODS AND RESULTS The proposed technique consists of an initial attempt at manual traction, followed by mechanical dilatation performed through the venous entry-site and, if necessary, by crossover to the internal transjugular approach. The study cohort comprised 545 consecutive patients referred to our institution for transvenous lead extraction from January 1997 to December 2012. Initial manual traction resulted in the effective removal of 6% of leads. Mechanical dilatation increased the success rate to 89% when performed through the venous entry-site, and to 99% when subsequently attempted via the internal jugular vein. No major complications were associated with lead extraction. Dwell-time, a passive fixation mechanism and dual-coil lead design were independently associated with the need for mechanical dilatation. However, dwell-time was the only variable associated with crossover to the internal transjugular approach. Specifically, a dwell-time of 20 months best predicted the need for venous entry-site mechanical dilatation, while a value of 55 months predicted crossover to the internal transjugular approach. CONCLUSION Mechanical transvenous extraction of ICD leads is a complex but safe and effective procedure. A longer lead dwell-time is associated with the need for mechanical dilatation and for crossover to the internal transjugular approach; this should be considered when planning the removal procedure. Moreover, passive lead fixation and dual-coil lead design predict a more challenging extraction procedure.

A Modified Transvenous Single Mechanical Dilatation Technique to Remove a Chronically Implanted Active‐Fixation Coronary Sinus Pacing Lead

We described a 77‐year‐old patient, previously implanted with a dual‐chamber pacemaker later upgraded to a cardiac resynchronization therapy‐defibrillator (CRT‐D) device with an active‐fixation coronary sinus pacing lead, who underwent a transvenous mechanical extraction procedure for a device‐related systemic infection. All leads were removed successfully with a transvenous approach. With regard to the coronary sinus (CS) lead (Attain 4195 StarFix, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), manual traction was ineffective and extraction required long and challenging mechanical dilatation up to distal CS using either conventional sheaths or modified CS lead delivery. (PACE 2010; 34:e66–e69)

Transvenous extraction profile of Riata leads: procedural outcomes and technical complexity of mechanical removal.

BACKGROUND Riata (RT) and Sprint Fidelis (SF) leads were recalled by the United States Food and Drug Administration because of an increased rate of failure mainly due to conductor fracture or insulation abrasion. According to lead design and type of failure, extraction complexity may be different, potentially affecting procedural outcomes and indications. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the extraction profile of RT leads with and without cable externalization in comparison to SF leads. METHODS From January 1997 to April 2014, all consecutive RT and SF leads extracted transvenously were analyzed. Among 661 consecutive patients with 705 ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads extracted, 194 patients with 134 RT leads (RT group) and 61 SF leads (SF group) were identified. Removal indications often were infective (64%), and extracted leads had a prevalence of dual-coil design (89%). Baseline patients and lead characteristics were comparable between groups. RESULTS Success rate was high in both groups (97.8% RT vs 100% SF) without major complications. Mechanical dilation was comparable between groups, but RT leads often required larger sheaths (11.7 ± 1.4 vs 11.3 ± 1.4), a more frequent crossover to the internal transjugular approach (14% vs 3%), and a longer procedural time (23 ± 33 minutes vs 12 ± 16 minutes). Implantation time (odds ratio 4.84, 95% confidence interval 1.05-22.2, P = .042) and RT leads (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.06, P <.001) were independent predictors of the internal transjugular approach. CONCLUSION Extraction of RT leads is feasible and effective. However, extraction of RT leads is more complex than that of SF leads. Lack of coil backfilling and cable externalization in RT group may account for these differences.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia using intracardiac echocardiography in pregnancy

We describe a case report of a 32-year-old woman during the 10th week of pregnancy with symptomatic and recurrent atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia successfully treated by conventional radiofrequency ablation, under intracardiac echocardiography surveillance.

Role of intraoperative electrical parameters in predicting reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy and correlation with interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony

AIMS Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was shown to reverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling in heart failure (HF) patients. We aimed to investigate whether intraoperative electrical parameters (IEP) were predictive factors of LV reverse remodelling and were correlated with mechanical dyssynchrony indexes. METHODS Eighty-six patients with HF underwent CRT. At implant, several electrical and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated and, at 6 months, responders were defined by a relative increase in LV ejection fraction ≥25% compared with baseline. RESULTS Several IEPs were shown to predict LV reverse remodelling. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed the ratio between QRS duration during biventricular pacing (BVp) and right ventricular pacing (RVp) [QRS(BVp)/QRS(RVp)] as the best predictor of LV functional recovery after CRT (AUC = 0.72; 95% confidence limit 0.57-0.82; P < 0.001). Responders showed a lower value of QRS(BVp)/QRS(RVp) when compared with non-responders (0.74 ± 0.05 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1; P < 0.005) and 0.78 was the value associated with the best predictive accuracy. The interval between the onset of RV lead and LV lead electrograms (RVegm-LVegm) during baseline rhythm correlated directly with the interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) (r = 0.68; P < 0.0001) and with its reduction (delta IVMD) at follow-up (r = 0.66; P < 0.0005). CONCLUSION Intraoperative electrical parameters can predict LV functional recovery after CRT and they are correlated with interventricular mechanical resynchronization at follow-up.

Cardiac Resynchronization after Left Ventricular Lead Extraction: Usefulness of Angioplasty in Coronary Sinus Stenosis

A 68‐year‐old man, 54 months after having been implanted with a biventricular device, underwent successful extraction of the malfunctioning left ventricular (LV) lead using mechanical dilation. During LV lead reimplantation, venography documented stenosis of the coronary sinus (CS). To overcome the obstacle, balloon angioplasty was performed and a LV lead was then inserted into a lateral tributary of the CS. The procedure was complicated by local infection and, after 2 months, removal of the entire unit became necessary. During controlateral device implantation, a second angioplasty was carried before insertion of the new LV lead because, in the meantime, restenosis had developed in the CS.