Raghuveer Vinukollu
Princeton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Raghuveer Vinukollu.
Journal of Climate | 2012
Ming Pan; A. K. Sahoo; Tara J. Troy; Raghuveer Vinukollu; Justin Sheffield; Eric F. Wood
AbstractA systematic method is proposed to optimally combine estimates of the terrestrial water budget from different data sources and to enforce the water balance constraint using data assimilation techniques. The method is applied to create global long-term records of the terrestrial water budget by merging a number of global datasets including in situ observations, remote sensing retrievals, land surface model simulations, and global reanalyses. The estimation process has three steps. First, a conventional analysis on the errors and biases in different data sources is conducted based on existing validation/error studies and other information such as sensor network density, model physics, and calibration procedures. Then, the data merging process combines different estimates so that biases and errors from different data sources can be compensated to the greatest extent and the merged estimates have the best possible confidence. Finally, water balance errors are resolved using the constrained Kalman filt...
Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2012
Craig R. Ferguson; Eric F. Wood; Raghuveer Vinukollu
AbstractLand–atmosphere coupling strength or the degree to which land surface anomalies influence boundary layer development—and in extreme cases, rainfall—is arguably the single most fundamental criterion for evaluating hydrological model performance. The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) showed that strength of coupling and its representation can affect a model’s ability to simulate climate predictability at the seasonal time scale. And yet, the lack of sufficient observations of coupling at appropriate temporal and spatial scales has made achieving “true” coupling in models an elusive goal. This study uses Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) soil moisture (SM), multisensor remote sensing (RS) evaporative fraction (EF), and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) lifting condensation level (LCL) to evaluate the realism of coupling in the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) suite of land surface models (LSMs), Princeton Global Forcing Variable ...
Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2015
Grayson Badgley; Joshua B. Fisher; C. Jiménez; Kevin P. Tu; Raghuveer Vinukollu
AbstractEvapotranspiration ET is a critical water, energy, and climate variable, and recent work has been published comparing different global products. These comparisons have been difficult to interpret, however, because in most studies the evapotranspiration products were derived from models forced by different input data. Some studies have analyzed the uncertainty in regional evapotranspiration estimates from choice of forcings. Still others have analyzed how multiple models vary with choice of net radiation forcing data. However, no analysis has been conducted to determine the uncertainty in global evapotranspiration estimates attributable to each class of input forcing datasets. Here, one of these models [Priestly–Taylor JPL (PT-JPL)] is run with 19 different combinations of forcing data. These data include three net radiation products (SRB, CERES, and ISCCP), three meteorological datasets [CRU, Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) Aqua, and MERRA], and three vegetation index products [MODIS; Global I...
Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2012
Raghuveer Vinukollu; Justin Sheffield; Eric F. Wood; Michael G. Bosilovich; David Mocko
AbstractUsing data from seven global model operational analyses (OA), one land surface model, and various remote sensing retrievals, the energy and water fluxes over global land areas are intercompared for 2003/04. Remote sensing estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) are obtained from three process-based models that use input forcings from multisensor satellites. An ensemble mean (linear average) of the seven operational (mean-OA) models is used primarily to intercompare the fluxes with comparisons performed at both global and basin scales. At the global scale, it is found that all components of the energy budget represented by the ensemble mean of the OA models have a significant bias. Net radiation estimates had a positive bias (global mean) of 234 MJ m−2 yr−1 (7.4 W m−2) as compared to the remote sensing estimates, with the latent and sensible heat fluxes biased by 470 MJ m−2 yr−1 (13.3 W m−2) and −367 MJ m−2 yr−1 (11.7 W m−2), respectively. The bias in the latent heat flux is affected by the bias in th...
Archive | 2010
Matthew F. McCabe; Eric F. Wood; Hongbo Su; Raghuveer Vinukollu; Craig R. Ferguson; Zhongbo Su
Evaporation from water or soil surfaces and transpiration from plants combine to return available water at the surface layer back to the bulk atmosphere in a process called evapotranspiration. Much of our understanding of the complex feedback mechanisms between the Earth’s surface and the surrounding atmosphere is focused on quantifying this process. At its most fundamental level, evapotranspiration is the loss of water from a surface to the atmosphere, achieved through vaporization. The complex nature of the evaporative process, however, includes mechanisms such as turbulent transport, feedback between the surface and atmosphere, and the biophysical nature of transpiration – all of which combine to make both measurement and estimation a difficult task.
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2011
Raghuveer Vinukollu; Eric F. Wood; Craig R. Ferguson; Joshua B. Fisher
Hydrological Processes | 2011
Raghuveer Vinukollu; Remi Meynadier; Justin Sheffield; Eric F. Wood
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2011
A. K. Sahoo; Ming Pan; Tara J. Troy; Raghuveer Vinukollu; Justin Sheffield; Eric F. Wood
Archive | 2009
Matthew F. McCabe; Yi Y. Liu; Raghuveer Vinukollu; Hongbo Su; Jason P. Evans; Eric F. Wood
Archive | 2008
Raghuveer Vinukollu; Kelly K. Caylor; Eric F. Wood