Rahul Anil Bidkar
General Electric
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rahul Anil Bidkar.
Physics of Fluids | 2014
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Luc Stephane Leblanc; Ambarish Jayant Kulkarni; Vaibhav Bahadur; Steven L. Ceccio; Marc Perlin
Technologies for reducing hydrodynamic skin-friction drag have a huge potential for energy-savings in applications ranging from propulsion of marine vessels to transporting liquids through pipes. The majority of previous experimental studies using hydrophobic surfaces have successfully shown skin-friction drag reduction in the laminar and transitional flow regimes (typically Reynolds numbers less than ≃106 for external flows). However, this hydrophobicity induced drag reduction is known to diminish with increasing Reynolds numbers in experiments involving wall bounded turbulent flows. Using random-textured hydrophobic surfaces (fabricated using large-length scalable thermal spray processes) on a flat plate geometry, we present water-tunnel test data with Reynolds numbers ranging from 106 to 9 × 106 that show sustained skin-friction drag reduction of 20%–30% in such turbulent flow regimes. Furthermore, we provide evidence that apart from the formation of a Cassie state and hydrophobicity, we also need a low surface roughness and an enhanced ability of the textured surface to retain trapped air, for sustained drag reduction in turbulent flow regimes. Specifically, for the hydrophobic test surfaces of the present and previous studies, we show that drag reduction seen at lower Reynolds numbers diminishes with increasing Reynolds number when the surface roughness of the underlying texture becomes comparable to the viscous sublayer thickness. Conversely, test data show that textures with surface roughness significantly smaller than the viscous sublayer thickness and textures with high porosity show sustained drag reduction in the turbulent flow regime. The present experiments represent a significant technological advancement and one of the very few demonstrations of skin-friction reduction in the turbulent regime using random-textured hydrophobic surfaces in an external flow configuration. The scalability of the fabrication method, the passive nature of this surface technology, and the obtained results in the turbulent regime make such hydrophobic surfaces a potentially attractive option for hydrodynamic skin-friction drag reduction.
47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit | 2011
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Eric John Ruggiero; Christopher Edward Wolfe
Advanced seals like brush seals, retractable labyrinth seals, leaf seals and film-riding seals are flexible seals capable of accommodating radial and axial motions of the rotor relative to the stator in turbomachinery applications like gas turbines, steam turbines and aircraft engines. In addition to determining the leakage performance of these advanced seals, it is important from a seal-rotor interaction perspective to characterize the seal radial motion relative to the rotor and from a seal reliability perspective to characterize seal vibrations caused by the surrounding air flow. In this paper, we present the development of a high-pressure non-rotating test fixture to study aerostatic performance of a film-riding seal. We present test data for airflow actuated seal radial motion relative to a stationary rotor, flow-induced seal vibrations, and pressure fields around the seal and compare these test data with simple predictive models. We demonstrate the utility of this test fixture as a design tool for characterizing aerostatic performance of advanced seals and as a method for validating mathematical models for predicting seal performance.
ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition | 2011
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Xiaoqing Zheng; Mehmet Demiroglu; Norman Arnold Turnquist
Brush seals are widely used as flexible seals for rotor-stator and stator-stator gaps in power generation turbo-machinery like steam turbines, gas turbines, generators and aircraft engines. Understanding the force interactions between a brush seal bristle pack and the rotor is important for avoiding overheating and rotor dynamic instabilities caused by excessive brush seal forces. Brush seal stiffness (i.e. brush seal force per unit circumferential length per unit incursion of the rotor) is usually measured and characterized at atmospheric pressure conditions. However, the inter-bristle forces, the blow-down forces and the friction forces between the backplate and the bristle pack change in the presence of a pressure loading, thereby changing the stiffness of the brush seal in the presence of this pressure loading. Furthermore, brush seals exhibit different hysteresis behavior under different pressure loading conditions. Understanding the increased brush seal stiffness and the increased hysteresis behavior of brush seals in the presence of a pressure loading is important for designing brush seals for higher pressure applications. In this article, we present the development of a test fixture for measuring the stiffness of brush seals subjected to a pressure loading. The fixture allows for measurement of the bristle pack forces in the presence of a pressure loading on the seal while the rotor is incrementally pushed (radially) into the bristle pack. Following the development of this test fixture, we present representative test results on three sample seals to show the trends in brush seal stiffness as the pressure loading is increased. Specifically, we study the effect of different brush seal design parameters on the stiffness of brush seals over a wide range of pressure loadings. These test data can be used for developing predictive models for brush seal stiffness under pressure loading. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of this fixture in studying the hysteresis exhibited by brush seals along with the importance of the backplate pressure balance feature present in several brush seal designs. The test results validate the bilinear force-displacement curves previously reported in the literature.Copyright
Archive | 2011
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Christopher Edward Wolfe; Biao Fang
Archive | 2012
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Massimiliano Cirri; Azam Mihir Thatte; John Robert Williams
Archive | 2012
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Matthew Michael Langenderfer; Hrishikesh Vishvas Deo; Azam Mihir Thatte
Archive | 2013
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Neelesh Nandkumar Sarawate; Christopher Edward Wolfe; Eric John Ruggiero; Vivek Raja Raj Mohan
Archive | 2016
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Andrew Paul Giametta; Nathan Evan McCurdy Gibson; Nicolas Joseph Cleveland
Archive | 2013
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Azam Mihir Thatte; Nathan Evan McCurdy Gibson; Andrew Paul Giametta
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme | 2016
Rahul Anil Bidkar; Edip Sevincer; Jifeng Wang; Azam Mihir Thatte; Andrew Mann; Maxwell Peter; Grant O. Musgrove; Timothy C. Allison; J. Jeffrey Moore