Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rahul Satija is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rahul Satija.


Nature | 2013

Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells

Alex K. Shalek; Rahul Satija; Xian Adiconis; Rona S. Gertner; Jellert T. Gaublomme; Raktima Raychowdhury; Schraga Schwartz; Nir Yosef; Christine M. Malboeuf; Diana Lu; John J. Trombetta; Dave Gennert; Andreas Gnirke; Alon Goren; Nir Hacohen; Joshua Z. Levin; Hongkun Park; Aviv Regev

Recent molecular studies have shown that, even when derived from a seemingly homogenous population, individual cells can exhibit substantial differences in gene expression, protein levels and phenotypic output, with important functional consequences. Existing studies of cellular heterogeneity, however, have typically measured only a few pre-selected RNAs or proteins simultaneously, because genomic profiling methods could not be applied to single cells until very recently. Here we use single-cell RNA sequencing to investigate heterogeneity in the response of mouse bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) to lipopolysaccharide. We find extensive, and previously unobserved, bimodal variation in messenger RNA abundance and splicing patterns, which we validate by RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization for select transcripts. In particular, hundreds of key immune genes are bimodally expressed across cells, surprisingly even for genes that are very highly expressed at the population average. Moreover, splicing patterns demonstrate previously unobserved levels of heterogeneity between cells. Some of the observed bimodality can be attributed to closely related, yet distinct, known maturity states of BMDCs; other portions reflect differences in the usage of key regulatory circuits. For example, we identify a module of 137 highly variable, yet co-regulated, antiviral response genes. Using cells from knockout mice, we show that variability in this module may be propagated through an interferon feedback circuit, involving the transcriptional regulators Stat2 and Irf7. Our study demonstrates the power and promise of single-cell genomics in uncovering functional diversity between cells and in deciphering cell states and circuits.


Nature | 2014

Single cell RNA Seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation

Alex K. Shalek; Rahul Satija; Joe Shuga; John J. Trombetta; Dave Gennert; Diana Lu; Peilin Chen; Rona S. Gertner; Jellert T. Gaublomme; Nir Yosef; Schraga Schwartz; Brian Fowler; Suzanne Weaver; Jing-jing Wang; Xiaohui Wang; Ruihua Ding; Raktima Raychowdhury; Nir Friedman; Nir Hacohen; Hongkun Park; Andrew May; Aviv Regev

High-throughput single-cell transcriptomics offers an unbiased approach for understanding the extent, basis and function of gene expression variation between seemingly identical cells. Here we sequence single-cell RNA-seq libraries prepared from over 1,700 primary mouse bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells spanning several experimental conditions. We find substantial variation between identically stimulated dendritic cells, in both the fraction of cells detectably expressing a given messenger RNA and the transcript’s level within expressing cells. Distinct gene modules are characterized by different temporal heterogeneity profiles. In particular, a ‘core’ module of antiviral genes is expressed very early by a few ‘precocious’ cells in response to uniform stimulation with a pathogenic component, but is later activated in all cells. By stimulating cells individually in sealed microfluidic chambers, analysing dendritic cells from knockout mice, and modulating secretion and extracellular signalling, we show that this response is coordinated by interferon-mediated paracrine signalling from these precocious cells. Notably, preventing cell-to-cell communication also substantially reduces variability between cells in the expression of an early-induced ‘peaked’ inflammatory module, suggesting that paracrine signalling additionally represses part of the inflammatory program. Our study highlights the importance of cell-to-cell communication in controlling cellular heterogeneity and reveals general strategies that multicellular populations can use to establish complex dynamic responses.


Nature | 2013

Dynamic regulatory network controlling Th17 cell differentiation

Nir Yosef; Alex K. Shalek; Jellert T. Gaublomme; Hulin Jin; Youjin Lee; Amit Awasthi; Chuan Wu; Katarzyna Karwacz; Sheng Xiao; Marsela Jorgolli; David Gennert; Rahul Satija; Arvind Shakya; Diana Y. Lu; John J. Trombetta; Meenu R. Pillai; Peter J. Ratcliffe; Mathew L. Coleman; Mark Bix; Dean Tantin; Hongkun Park; Vijay K. Kuchroo; Aviv Regev

Despite their importance, the molecular circuits that control the differentiation of naive T cells remain largely unknown. Recent studies that reconstructed regulatory networks in mammalian cells have focused on short-term responses and relied on perturbation-based approaches that cannot be readily applied to primary T cells. Here we combine transcriptional profiling at high temporal resolution, novel computational algorithms, and innovative nanowire-based perturbation tools to systematically derive and experimentally validate a model of the dynamic regulatory network that controls the differentiation of mouse TH17 cells, a proinflammatory T-cell subset that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune diseases. The TH17 transcriptional network consists of two self-reinforcing, but mutually antagonistic, modules, with 12 novel regulators, the coupled action of which may be essential for maintaining the balance between TH17 and other CD4+ T-cell subsets. Our study identifies and validates 39 regulatory factors, embeds them within a comprehensive temporal network and reveals its organizational principles; it also highlights novel drug targets for controlling TH17 cell differentiation.


Nature Biotechnology | 2014

Whole exome sequencing of circulating tumor cells provides a window into metastatic prostate cancer

Jens Lohr; Viktor A. Adalsteinsson; Kristian Cibulskis; Atish D. Choudhury; Mara Rosenberg; Peter Cruz-Gordillo; Joshua M. Francis; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Alex K. Shalek; Rahul Satija; John J. Trombetta; Diana Lu; Naren Tallapragada; Narmin Tahirova; Sora Kim; Brendan Blumenstiel; Carrie Sougnez; Alarice Lowe; Bang Wong; Daniel Auclair; Eliezer M. Van Allen; Mari Nakabayashi; Rosina T. Lis; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Tiantian Li; Matthew S. Chabot; Amy Ly; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Thomas E. Clancy; Massimo Loda

Comprehensive analyses of cancer genomes promise to inform prognoses and precise cancer treatments. A major barrier, however, is inaccessibility of metastatic tissue. A potential solution is to characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs), but this requires overcoming the challenges of isolating rare cells and sequencing low-input material. Here we report an integrated process to isolate, qualify and sequence whole exomes of CTCs with high fidelity using a census-based sequencing strategy. Power calculations suggest that mapping of >99.995% of the standard exome is possible in CTCs. We validated our process in two patients with prostate cancer, including one for whom we sequenced CTCs, a lymph node metastasis and nine cores of the primary tumor. Fifty-one of 73 CTC mutations (70%) were present in matched tissue. Moreover, we identified 10 early trunk and 56 metastatic trunk mutations in the non-CTC tumor samples and found 90% and 73% of these mutations, respectively, in CTC exomes. This study establishes a foundation for CTC genomics in the clinic.


Cell | 2014

Transcriptome-wide Mapping Reveals Widespread Dynamic-Regulated Pseudouridylation of ncRNA and mRNA

Schraga Schwartz; Douglas A. Bernstein; Maxwell R. Mumbach; Marko Jovanovic; Rebecca H. Herbst; Brian X. León-Ricardo; Jesse M. Engreitz; Mitchell Guttman; Rahul Satija; Eric S. Lander; Gerald R. Fink; Aviv Regev

Pseudouridine is the most abundant RNA modification, yet except for a few well-studied cases, little is known about the modified positions and their function(s). Here, we develop Ψ-seq for transcriptome-wide quantitative mapping of pseudouridine. We validate Ψ-seq with spike-ins and de novo identification of previously reported positions and discover hundreds of unique sites in human and yeast mRNAs and snoRNAs. Perturbing pseudouridine synthases (PUS) uncovers which pseudouridine synthase modifies each site and their target sequence features. mRNA pseudouridinylation depends on both site-specific and snoRNA-guided pseudouridine synthases. Upon heat shock in yeast, Pus7p-mediated pseudouridylation is induced at >200 sites, and PUS7 deletion decreases the levels of otherwise pseudouridylated mRNA, suggesting a role in enhancing transcript stability. rRNA pseudouridine stoichiometries are conserved but reduced in cells from dyskeratosis congenita patients, where the PUS DKC1 is mutated. Our work identifies an enhanced, transcriptome-wide scope for pseudouridine and methods to dissect its underlying mechanisms and function.


Cell | 2013

High-Resolution Mapping Reveals a Conserved, Widespread, Dynamic mRNA Methylation Program in Yeast Meiosis

Schraga Schwartz; Sudeep D. Agarwala; Maxwell R. Mumbach; Marko Jovanovic; Philipp Mertins; Alexander A. Shishkin; Yuval Tabach; Tarjei S. Mikkelsen; Rahul Satija; Gary Ruvkun; Steven A. Carr; Eric S. Lander; Gerald R. Fink; Aviv Regev

N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) is the most ubiquitous mRNA base modification, but little is known about its precise location, temporal dynamics, and regulation. Here, we generated genomic maps of m(6)A sites in meiotic yeast transcripts at nearly single-nucleotide resolution, identifying 1,308 putatively methylated sites within 1,183 transcripts. We validated eight out of eight methylation sites in different genes with direct genetic analysis, demonstrated that methylated sites are significantly conserved in a related species, and built a model that predicts methylated sites directly from sequence. Sites vary in their methylation profiles along a dense meiotic time course and are regulated both locally, via predictable methylatability of each site, and globally, through the core meiotic circuitry. The methyltransferase complex components localize to the yeast nucleolus, and this localization is essential for mRNA methylation. Our data illuminate a conserved, dynamically regulated methylation program in yeast meiosis and provide an important resource for studying the function of this epitranscriptomic modification.


Science | 2017

Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors

Alexandra-Chloé Villani; Rahul Satija; Gary Reynolds; Siranush Sarkizova; Karthik Shekhar; James Fletcher; Morgane Griesbeck; Andrew Butler; Shiwei Zheng; Suzan Lazo; Laura Jardine; David Dixon; Emily Stephenson; Emil Nilsson; Ida Grundberg; David McDonald; Andrew Filby; Weibo Li; Philip L. De Jager; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Andrew A. Lane; Muzlifah Haniffa; Aviv Regev; Nir Hacohen

Whats in a drop of blood? Blood contains many types of cells, including many immune system components. Immune cells used to be characterized by marker-based assays, but now classification relies on the genes that cells express. Villani et al. used deep sequencing at the single-cell level and unbiased clustering to define six dendritic cell and four monocyte populations. This refined analysis has identified, among others, a previously unknown dendritic cell population that potently activates T cells. Further cell culture revealed possible differentiation progenitors within the different cell populations. Science, this issue p. eaah4573 Discovery of additional immune cell subtypes will help identify functions and immune monitoring during disease. INTRODUCTION Dendritic cells (DCs) and monocytes consist of multiple specialized subtypes that play a central role in pathogen sensing, phagocytosis, and antigen presentation. However, their identities and interrelationships are not fully understood, as these populations have historically been defined by a combination of morphology, physical properties, localization, functions, developmental origins, and expression of a restricted set of surface markers. RATIONALE To overcome this inherently biased strategy for cell identification, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing of ~2400 cells isolated from healthy blood donors and enriched for HLA-DR+ lineage− cells. This single-cell profiling strategy and unbiased genomic classification, together with follow-up profiling and functional and phenotypic characterization of prospectively isolated subsets, led us to identify and validate six DC subtypes and four monocyte subtypes, and thus revise the taxonomy of these cells. RESULTS Our study reveals: 1) A new DC subset, representing 2 to 3% of the DC populations across all 10 donors tested, characterized by the expression of AXL, SIGLEC1, and SIGLEC6 antigens, named AS DCs. The AS DC population further divides into two populations captured in the traditionally defined plasmacytoid DC (pDC) and CD1C+ conventional DC (cDC) gates. This split is further reflected through AS DC gene expression signatures spanning a spectrum between cDC-like and pDC-like gene sets. Although AS DCs share properties with pDCs, they more potently activate T cells. This discovery led us to reclassify pDCs as the originally described “natural interferon-producing cells (IPCs)” with weaker T cell proliferation induction ability. 2) A new subdivision within the CD1C+ DC subset: one defined by a major histocompatibility complex class II–like gene set and one by a CD14+ monocyte–like prominent gene set. These CD1C+ DC subsets, which can be enriched by combining CD1C with CD32B, CD36, and CD163 antigens, can both potently induce T cell proliferation. 3) The existence of a circulating and dividing cDC progenitor giving rise to CD1C+ and CLEC9A+ DCs through in vitro differentiation assays. This blood precursor is defined by the expression of CD100+CD34int and observed at a frequency of ~0.02% of the LIN–HLA-DR+ fraction. 4) Two additional monocyte populations: one expressing classical monocyte genes and cytotoxic genes, and the other with unknown functions. 5) Evidence for a relationship between blastic plasmacytoid DC neoplasia (BPDCN) cells and healthy DCs. CONCLUSION Our revised taxonomy will enable more accurate functional and developmental analyses as well as immune monitoring in health and disease. The discovery of AS DCs within the traditionally defined pDC population explains many of the cDC properties previously assigned to pDCs, highlighting the need to revisit the definition of pDCs. Furthermore, the discovery of blood cDC progenitors represents a new therapeutic target readily accessible in the bloodstream for manipulation, as well as a new source for better in vitro DC generation. Although the current results focus on DCs and monocytes, a similar strategy can be applied to build a comprehensive human immune cell atlas. Establishing a human blood monocyte and dendritic cell atlas. We isolated ~2400 cells enriched from the healthy human blood lineage− HLA-DR+ compartment and subjected them to single-cell RNA sequencing. This strategy, together with follow-up profiling and functional and phenotypic characterization, led us to update the original cell classification to include six DCs, four monocyte subtypes, and one conventional DC progenitor. Dendritic cells (DCs) and monocytes play a central role in pathogen sensing, phagocytosis, and antigen presentation and consist of multiple specialized subtypes. However, their identities and interrelationships are not fully understood. Using unbiased single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of ~2400 cells, we identified six human DCs and four monocyte subtypes in human blood. Our study reveals a new DC subset that shares properties with plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) but potently activates T cells, thus redefining pDCs; a new subdivision within the CD1C+ subset of DCs; the relationship between blastic plasmacytoid DC neoplasia cells and healthy DCs; and circulating progenitor of conventional DCs (cDCs). Our revised taxonomy will enable more accurate functional and developmental analyses as well as immune monitoring in health and disease.


Cell | 2015

A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Primary Immune Cells to Dissect Regulatory Networks

Oren Parnas; Marko Jovanovic; Thomas Eisenhaure; Rebecca H. Herbst; Atray Dixit; Chun Jimmie Ye; Dariusz Przybylski; Randall Jeffrey Platt; Itay Tirosh; Neville E. Sanjana; Ophir Shalem; Rahul Satija; Raktima Raychowdhury; Philipp Mertins; Steven A. Carr; Feng Zhang; Nir Hacohen; Aviv Regev

Finding the components of cellular circuits and determining their functions systematically remains a major challenge in mammalian cells. Here, we introduced genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 libraries into dendritic cells (DCs) to identify genes that control the induction of tumor necrosis factor (Tnf) by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a key process in the host response to pathogens, mediated by the Tlr4 pathway. We found many of the known regulators of Tlr4 signaling, as well as dozens of previously unknown candidates that we validated. By measuring protein markers and mRNA profiles in DCs that are deficient in known or candidate genes, we classified the genes into three functional modules with distinct effects on the canonical responses to LPS and highlighted functions for the PAF complex and oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex. Our findings uncover new facets of innate immune circuits in primary cells and provide a genetic approach for dissection of mammalian cell circuits.


Nature | 2014

Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells

Roshan M. Kumar; Patrick Cahan; Alex K. Shalek; Rahul Satija; AJay DaleyKeyser; Hu Li; Jin Jin Zhang; Keith Pardee; David Gennert; John J. Trombetta; Thomas C. Ferrante; Aviv Regev; George Q. Daley; James J. Collins

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are capable of dynamic interconversion between distinct substates; however, the regulatory circuits specifying these states and enabling transitions between them are not well understood. Here we set out to characterize transcriptional heterogeneity in mouse PSCs by single-cell expression profiling under different chemical and genetic perturbations. Signalling factors and developmental regulators show highly variable expression, with expression states for some variable genes heritable through multiple cell divisions. Expression variability and population heterogeneity can be influenced by perturbation of signalling pathways and chromatin regulators. Notably, either removal of mature microRNAs or pharmacological blockage of signalling pathways drives PSCs into a low-noise ground state characterized by a reconfigured pluripotency network, enhanced self-renewal and a distinct chromatin state, an effect mediated by opposing microRNA families acting on the Myc/Lin28/let-7 axis. These data provide insight into the nature of transcriptional heterogeneity in PSCs.


Science | 2015

Dynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens

Marko Jovanovic; Michael S. Rooney; Philipp Mertins; Dariusz Przybylski; Nicolas Chevrier; Rahul Satija; Edwin H. Rodriguez; Alexander P. Fields; Schraga Schwartz; Raktima Raychowdhury; Maxwell R. Mumbach; Thomas Eisenhaure; Michal Rabani; Dave Gennert; Diana Lu; Toni Delorey; Jonathan S. Weissman; Steven A. Carr; Nir Hacohen; Aviv Regev

How the immune system readies for battle Although gene expression is tightly controlled at both the RNA and protein levels, the quantitative contribution of each step, especially during dynamic responses, remains largely unknown. Indeed, there has been much debate whether changes in RNA level contribute substantially to protein-level regulation. Jovanovic et al. built a genome-scale model of the temporal dynamics of differential protein expression during the stimulation of immunological dendritic cells (see the Perspective by Li and Biggin). Newly stimulated functions involved the up-regulation of specific RNAs and concomitant increases in the levels of the proteins they encode, whereas housekeeping functions were regulated posttranscriptionally at the protein level. Science, this issue 10.1126/science.1259038; see also p. 1066 Levels of “housekeeping” proteins are maintained directly, but those of immune response proteins depend on more transcription. [Also see Perspective by Li and Biggin] INTRODUCTION Mammalian gene expression is tightly controlled through the interplay between the RNA and protein life cycles. Although studies of individual genes have shown that regulation of each of these processes is important for correct protein expression, the quantitative contribution of each step to changes in protein expression levels remains largely unknown and much debated. Many studies have attempted to address this question in the context of steady-state protein levels, and comparing steady-state RNA and protein abundances has indicated a considerable discrepancy between RNA and protein levels. In contrast, only a few studies have attempted to shed light on how changes in each of these processes determine differential protein expression—either relative (ratios) or absolute (differences)—during dynamic responses, and only one recent report has attempted to quantitate each process. Understanding these contributions to a dynamic response on a systems scale is essential both for deciphering how cells deploy regulatory processes to accomplish physiological changes and for discovering key molecular regulators controlling each process. RATIONALE We developed an integrated experimental and computational strategy to quantitatively assess how protein levels are maintained in the context of a dynamic response and applied it to the model response of mouse immune bone marrow–derived dendritic cells (DCs) to stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We used a modified pulsed-SILAC (stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture) approach to track newly synthesized and previously labeled proteins over the first 12 hours of the response. In addition, we independently measured replicate RNA-sequencing profiles under the same conditions. We devised a computational strategy to infer per-mRNA translation rates and protein degradation rates at each time point from the temporal transcriptional profiles and pulsed-SILAC proteomics data. This allowed us to build a genome-scale quantitative model of the temporal dynamics of differential protein expression in DCs responding to LPS. RESULTS We found that before stimulation, mRNA levels contribute to overall protein expression levels more than double the combined contribution of protein translation and degradation rates. Upon LPS stimulation, changes in mRNA abundance play an even more dominant role in dynamic changes in protein levels, especially in immune response genes. Nevertheless, several protein modules—especially the preexisting proteome of proteins performing basic cellular functions—are predominantly regulated in stimulated cells at the level of protein translation or degradation, accounting for over half of the absolute change in protein molecules in the cell. In particular, despite the repression of their transcripts, the level of many proteins in the translational machinery is up-regulated upon LPS stimulation because of significantly increased translation rates, and elevated protein degradation of mitochondrial proteins plays a central role in remodeling cellular energy metabolism. CONCLUSIONS Our results support a model in which the induction of novel cellular functions is primarily driven through transcriptional changes, whereas regulation of protein production or degradation updates the levels of preexisting functions as required for an activated state. Our approach for building quantitative genome-scale models of the temporal dynamics of protein expression is broadly applicable to other dynamic systems. Dynamic protein expression regulation in dendritic cells upon stimulation with LPS. We developed an integrated experimental and computational strategy to quantitatively assess how protein levels are maintained in the context of a dynamic response. Our results support a model in which the induction of novel cellular functions is primarily driven through transcriptional changes, whereas regulation of protein production or degradation updates the levels of preexisting functions. Protein expression is regulated by the production and degradation of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and proteins, but their specific relationships remain unknown. We combine measurements of protein production and degradation and mRNA dynamics so as to build a quantitative genomic model of the differential regulation of gene expression in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated mouse dendritic cells. Changes in mRNA abundance play a dominant role in determining most dynamic fold changes in protein levels. Conversely, the preexisting proteome of proteins performing basic cellular functions is remodeled primarily through changes in protein production or degradation, accounting for more than half of the absolute change in protein molecules in the cell. Thus, the proteome is regulated by transcriptional induction for newly activated cellular functions and by protein life-cycle changes for remodeling of preexisting functions.

Collaboration


Dive into the Rahul Satija's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aviv Regev

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge