Raihanatou Diallo

Comparative genomic hybridization of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast—evidence of multiple genetic pathways

There is strong evidence that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a precursor lesion of invasive breast cancer. In order to analyse specific chromosomal alterations of DCIS, 38 paraffin‐embedded specimens of DCIS and six associated invasive carcinomas were examined by means of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Losses of 16q material were seen almost exclusively in well‐ and intermediately‐differentiated DCIS. These two subgroups differed in the average number of genetic imbalances, 2·5 and 5·5 respectively. Additionally, a higher frequency of gains of 1q and losses of 11q material was seen in intermediately‐differentiated in contrast to well‐differentiated DCIS. Poorly‐differentiated DCIS displayed a higher frequency of amplifications (17q12, 11q13) and a higher average rate of genetic imbalances (7·1). Analysis of adjacent invasive breast carcinoma revealed a genetic pattern almost identical to the one seen in the DCIS counterpart. These data characterize DCIS as a genetically far‐advanced, heterogeneous lesion and as a direct precursor of invasive breast cancer. Copyright

Common Adult Stem Cells in the Human Breast Give Rise to Glandular and Myoepithelial Cell Lineages: A New Cell Biological Concept

Breast biology and pathology are currently shaped by the two-cell concept that recognizes only glandular and myoepithelial cells. In the present study, we have visualized a previously unidentified cell population within the epithelial compartment of the breast, which displays the phenotypic characteristics of a committed stem cell.Immunofluorescence double labeling with digital image processing and Western blotting were applied to normal breast tissue as well as to noninvasive and invasive breast cancers using antibodies to basal cytokeratin 5 (Ck5), glandular cytokeratins 8/18 (Ck8/18/19), and smooth muscle α-actin (SMA) as markers for myoepithelial cells (SMA).A distinct population of cells was identified that expressed Ck5 in the absence of Ck8/18/19 or SMA. These cells differentiate toward glandular epithelial or myoepithelial Ck5-negative end cells passing through either Ck5/Ck8/18/19 or Ck5/SMA-positive intermediates. Our experiments clearly demonstrate a precursor or committed stem cell function of the Ck5-positive cell that is responsible for regeneration of the human adult breast epithelium. However, the observation that the vast majority of breast cancers display the glandular epithelial immunophenotype strongly suggests that the neoplastic cells derive from a late stage of the glandular epithelial differentiation pathway. The significance of this new cell biological model is that it might serve as a tool to unravel the regulatory mechanisms that govern regeneration and abnormal proliferation of breast epithelium at the cellular level.

Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes.

Invasive breast cancer shows a wide range of morphological differentiation, associated with differences in prognosis, but as yet, the underlying genetic mechanisms cannot be accounted for. In order to establish a model of the possible progression from the different subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast cancer, 77 selected cases of invasive breast cancer representing distinct morphological subtypes were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). There was a high degree of genetic homology between tubular and tubulo‐lobular carcinoma and well‐differentiated DCIS, and between ductal invasive carcinoma G3 and poorly differentiated DCIS. Highly differentiated invasive breast cancers were characterized by a loss of 16q and a low average number of aberrations per case. In high‐grade tumours, losses of this chromosomal region were seen with a much lower frequency in cases with evidence of an aneuploid tumour status. These data demonstrate the close genetic similarity of well‐, intermediately, and poorly differentiated DCIS and distinct morphological types of invasive breast carcinoma, providing further evidence that DCIS is a direct precursor lesion of invasive breast cancer and that various evolutionary genetic pathways exist. Copyright

Ductal invasive G2 and G3 carcinomas of the breast are the end stages of at least two different lines of genetic evolution

Ductal invasive grade (G) 2 and G3 carcinomas represent the majority of invasive breast cancers. Previous morphological and cytogenetic studies have provided evidence that ductal invasive G2 carcinoma may originate from at least two different genetic pathways. The aim of this study was to evaluate further the heterogeneity of G2 breast cancer in comparison with G3 cancers by cytogenetic and quantitative analysis. To this end, 35 cases of ductal invasive G2 and 42 cases of ductal invasive G3 carcinomas were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and these findings were correlated with DNA ploidy status, mitotic activity index (MAI), mean nuclear area (MNA), volume per lumen (VPL), and clinico‐pathological parameters. The findings of this study demonstrate that ductal invasive G2 carcinomas, in contrast to ductal invasive G3 carcinomas, have to be interpreted as the morphological end stage resulting from two different cytogenetic and morphological pathways; the loss of 16q material is the cytogenetic key event in the evolution of a subgroup of this entity. By correlating genetic alterations with DNA ploidy status, an extended morphology‐based cytogenetic progression model is presented, with early and late genetic alterations in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. The correlation with MAI gives rise to the hypothesis that these different genetic pathways significantly differ in their proliferation rate. Further studies will be required to elucidate which genes contribute to an altered proliferation rate in these subgroups and to the associated prognosis. Copyright

Usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast is a committed stem (progenitor) cell lesion distinct from atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ

Current classification systems in proliferative mammary gland pathology are based on a two‐cell system, recognizing only glandular and myoepithelial lines of differentiation. A third cell type has recently been characterized in normal breast tissue by double‐immunofluorescence analysis to express cytokeratin 5 (Ck5) only. These cells were shown to represent progenitor or adult stem cells that give rise to the glandular and myoepithelial cell lineage. The double‐labelling technique has been applied to characterize a spectrum of intraductal epithelial proliferations, namely benign usual ductal hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and ductal carcinoma in situ, all of which are thought to represent the gradual steps of a sequence in the development of breast cancer. Immunofluorescence studies with specific antibodies against Ck5, Ck8/18/19, and smooth muscle actin were complemented by western blotting analysis of Ck5 and Ck8/18/19 expression in normal breast tissue and in proliferative lesions. Usual ductal hyperplasia appears to be a Ck5‐positive committed stem (progenitor) cell lesion with the same differentiation potential as seen in the normal breast. This is in sharp contrast to atypical ductal hyperplasia/ductal carcinoma in situ, which display the differentiated glandular immunophenotype (Ck8/18/19‐positive, but Ck5‐negative). These data require the abandonment of the idea of an obligate biological continuum of intraductal proliferations from benign to malignant. This study provides evidence that cells undergoing malignant transformation tend to be fairly advanced in the glandular lineage of differentiation. The committed stem (progenitor) cell model may contribute to a better understanding of both benign proliferative breast disease and breast cancer development. Copyright

Genetic relation of lobular carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ, and associated invasive carcinoma of the breast

Aims—The mutual relation of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, as accepted precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer, is controversial. Because they display genetic heterogeneity, it is not clear how genetically advanced these entities are and what causes the transition to an invasive carcinoma. Methods—Six cases of LCIS, four of them with associated lobular invasive carcinoma, four cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with an associated invasive lobular carcinoma, and nine cases of intermediately and poorly differentiated DCIS with associated ductal invasive carcinoma were investigated by means of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) after microdissection and immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin. Results—LCIS was characterised by a low average rate of copy number changes, no evidence of amplifications, and a high rate of gains and losses of chromosomal material at 1q and 16q, respectively. A high degree of genetic homology with well differentiated DCIS was obvious, as reported previously. The cases of intermediately differentiated DCIS with associated lobular invasive components and lobular differentiation revealed striking homologies, and a significant difference of E-cadherin expression. The comparison of preinvasive and invasive breast lesions, irrespective of differentiation within the same patient, revealed no specific alteration that might be associated with invasion. Genetic alterations seen in invasive carcinoma were not necessarily seen in the adjacent precursor lesions. Conclusions—These results provide strong evidence that invasive breast cancer is a disease with multiple cytogenetic subclones already present in preinvasive lesions. Moreover, specific CGH alterations associated with invasion were not observed. Furthermore, the close genetic association between well differentiated and a subgroup of intermediately differentiated DCIS and LCIS led to the hypothesis that LCIS and a subgroup of DCIS are different phenotypic forms of a common genotype.

Telomerase as a prognostic marker in breast cancer: high‐throughput tissue microarray analysis of hTERT and hTR

Telomerase activity (TA) has been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in various tumour entities, indicating that tumours expressing this enzyme may be more aggressive and that TA may be a useful prognostic marker. For breast cancer, however, TA is a controversial prognostic marker; whereas some studies suggest an association between TA and disease outcome, others do not find this association. This study used tissue microarrays (breast carcinoma prognosis arrays) containing 611 samples (each 0.6 mm in diameter) from the tumour centre of paraffin‐embedded breast carcinomas to analyse the catalytic subunit of telomerase, human telomerase reverse‐transcriptase (hTERT), and the internal RNA component (hTR), which are the core components of the telomerase holoenzyme complex. hTERT protein expression was obtained by immunohistochemistry (human anti‐telomerase antibody Ab‐2, Calbiochem), and hTR RNA was measured by radioactive in situ hybridization. hTERT and hTR expression were determined semi‐quantitatively and graded (scores 1–4). Clinical data, such as histological subtype, pT stage, tumour diameter, pN stage, BRE grade, tumour‐specific survival (in months), patients age and others, were available for statistical analysis. A statistically significant correlation was found between tumour‐specific survival (overall survival) and hTERT expression (p < 0.0001) or hTR expression (p = 0.00110). Tumours with higher scores (scores 3, 4) for hTR and/or hTERT were associated with a worse prognosis. In multivariate analysis, hTERT expression was an independent prognostic factor. Previous studies, focusing on analysis of TA in smaller numbers of fresh‐frozen breast carcinomas by the TRAP assay, gave controversial results with respect to TA as a prognostic marker. Using tissue microarrays from 611 breast carcinomas, this study has demonstrated that increased expression levels of the telomerase core components, hTERT and hTR, are associated with lower overall survival. These findings suggest that TA should be included in future validation studies as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. Copyright

Ductal epithelial proliferations of the breast : a biological continuum? Comparative genomic hybridization and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin expression patterns

According to current concepts, benign proliferative breast disease (BPBD) is a direct precursor of breast cancer, in a spectrum ranging from ductal hyperplasia to overtly invasive carcinoma. In this study, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to screen ductal hyperplasia and other BPBD lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) for common genomic abnormalities, to test the relationship between these hyperplastic and neoplastic lesions. Immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin 5/6 was used as a diagnostic adjunct to distinguish ductal hyperplasia from DCIS. A total of 42 cases of BPBD comprising ductal hyperplasia of the usual type (n=14), papilloma (n=22), tubular adenoma (n=3), and adenosis (n=3), as well as 52 cases of DCIS, were studied. All cases of BPBD consistently displayed the presence of a subpopulation of cytokeratin 5/6‐expressing basal‐type cells within the proliferative lesion, whereas all of the non‐high‐grade and most of the high‐grade DCIS lesions lacked cytokeratin 5/6‐positive cells. Whereas gross genomic alterations, as determined by CGH, were undetectable in BPBD, distinct genetic changes characterized all cases of DCIS, with one exception. These results confirm the usefulness of cytokeratin 5/6 immunohistology in the diagnosis of BPBD and neoplastic breast lesions and support the view that BPBD and DCIS are not closely related entities and that BPBD is not an obligate direct precursor of DCIS. Copyright

Analysis of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human breast cancer: high throughput tissue microarray analysis

PurposeThe objective of this study was to evaluate breast carcinomas for the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) using a tissue microarray (TMA) and to determine its clinical and prognostic relevance.MethodsWe analyzed Cox-2 expression in 600 samples from 200 breast carcinomas immunohistochemically performing TMA technology and semiquantitative analysis. Results were correlated with various clinicopathological variables and follow-up data. Expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and Her-2/neu-oncogene was analyzed and correlated with Cox-2 status.ResultsWe observed a moderate or strong cytoplasmic staining for Cox-2 in 78 (40.6%) of breast carcinomas. Increased Cox-2 expression corresponded to higher pT stage (P=0.038), amplification of Her-2/neu (P=0.032), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.006), a high MIB-1 labeling index (LI) (P<0.001), and histological grading (P=0.013). We also observed an inverse relationship between strong Cox-2 expression and estrogen and progesterone receptor content of tumors (P=0.037 and P=0.010). However, we could not demonstrate a significant association between Cox-2 staining and overall survival or disease free survival time.ConclusionsThese results suggest that Cox-2 expression is significantly associated with less differentiated and more aggressive breast carcinomas and might therefore be a useful prognostic indicator as well as a target for therapy.

Endothelin-1-, Endothelin-A-, and Endothelin-B-Receptor Expression Is Correlated with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Angiogenesis in Breast Cancer

Purpose: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and its receptors (ETAR and ETBR), referred to as the endothelin (ET) axis, are overexpressed in breast carcinomas, and influence tumorigenesis and tumor progression by various mechanisms, including angiogenesis. The objective of the study was to clarify if expression of the ET axis participates in angiogenesis of breast carcinoma Experimental Design: We analyzed expression of ET-1, ETAR, ETBR, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) immunohistochemically in 600 tissue array specimens from 200 paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas performing tissue microarray technology. Microvessel density (MVD) was determined by counting microvessels (identified by factor VIII) in each core specimen. Results: Moderate or strong immunostaining was observed for ET-1 in 25.4%, for ETAR in 43.7%, and for ETBR in 22.2% of breast carcinomas. Of all cases, 44.7% showed significant expression of VEGF. MVD varied between different tumor specimens (range, 0–80; median, 17). We observed a statistically significant correlation between MVD and ET expression status with higher MVD in ET-positive tumors. Moreover, expression of VEGF was found more frequently in tumors with overexpression of the ET axis (each P < 0.001). Staining of VEGF was correlated positively with MVD Conclusions: These results indicate that increased ET-1, ETAR, and ETBR expression is associated with increased VEGF expression and higher vascularity of breast carcinomas and, thus, could be involved in the regulation of angiogenesis in breast cancer. Our findings provide evidence that the expression pattern of the ET-axis and in particular of ETAR may have clinical relevance in future antiangiogenic targeted therapies for breast cancer.