Rainer Seemann
University of Bern
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rainer Seemann.
Periodontology 2000 | 2011
Jonas Almeida Rodrigues; Adrian Lussi; Rainer Seemann; Klaus W. Neuhaus
Dental caries remains a significant challenge in oral health care. This review discusses current evidence regarding methods for the prevention of caries in adults, with particular emphasis on the control and reduction of dietary carbohydrates, the modification and reduction of cariogenic dental biofilm, the inhibition of de-mineralization and promotion of re-mineralization, and micro-invasive ⁄ minimally invasive technologies. In order to assess the efficacy of various caries preventive strategies, the caries increment, i.e. the number of new lesions per year, was the outcome parameter of choice when available. Relevant literature was identified by searching the Cochrane Library and PubMed using the MeSH terms dental caries or root caries in combination with one
Caries Research | 2005
Rainer Seemann; Mozhgan Bizhang; Ilja Klück; J. Loth; Jean-François Roulet
We report on the development and the initial testing of a new microbial-based caries model. Specimens were fixed on a rotating mount within a reaction chamber hermetically surrounded by a sterilised glove box. A cariogenic environment was obtained by inoculation with Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) combined with a continuously repeating supply of sucrose solution, trypticase soy broth and artificial saliva applied by dripping. Twenty-five caries-free upper premolars were used. The mesial parts of the occlusal fissures had been sealed with a resin-based fissure sealant (test group 1). To produce marginal gaps, the distal parts had been moistened with saliva before resin application (test group 2). Five teeth served as control and were exposed to all fluids under sterile conditions before being removed from the system after 7 days. Test specimens were infected with S. mutans and were incubated for another 14 days. No unintentional contamination occurred during the 3-week period of operation. Demineralizations were evaluated by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Only the test specimens showed clearly visible signs of biofilm formation and caries-like lesions. The mean primary lesion depth did not differ significantly between test groups. Wall lesion depths and surface areas of demineralizations underneath the fissure sealants were significantly higher in test group 2. Thus, our model allows the simultaneous production of primary and secondary caries-like enamel lesions in a considerable number of specimens and facilitates the possibility to manipulate and transfer them without necessarily terminating the experiment, opening new possibilities for in vitro caries research.
Journal of Clinical Periodontology | 2013
Klaus W. Neuhaus; Milleman Jl; Kimberly R. Milleman; Kimberly A. Mongiello; Thomas C. Simonton; Courtney E. Clark; Howard M. Proskin; Rainer Seemann
Aims The aim of this single-site, randomized, controlled, double-blind, 3-arm parallel study was to determine the effectiveness of a prophylaxis paste containing 15% calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSPS; NovaMin®) with and without fluoride in reducing dentine hypersensitivity immediately after a single application and 28 days following dental scaling and root planing. Materials & Methods Overall, 151 subjects were enrolled in this study. All subjects received a scaling and root planing procedure followed by a final prophylaxis step using one of three different prophylaxis pastes: Test-A (15% NovaMin® and NaF), Test-B (15% NovaMin®) and a control. Dentine hypersensitivity was assessed by tactile stimulus (Yeaple Probe®) and by air blast (Schiff scale) at baseline, immediately after and 28 days after a prophylaxis procedure. One hundred and forty-nine subjects completed the study. Results Subjects having received the test prophylaxis pastes showed statistically lower (anova, p < 0.05) dentine hypersensitivity compared with the control group immediately after the prophylaxis procedure (Yeaple Probe®: Test-A = 20.9 ± 12.6, Test-B = 22.7 ± 12.9, Control=11.2 ± 3.1; Schiff score: Test-A = 1.1 ± 0.6, Test-B = 1.1 ± 0.6, Control = 2.0 ± 0.7) and after 28 days (Yeaple probe: Test-A = 21.5 ± 11.9, Test-B = 20.6 ± 11.3, Control = 11.8 ± 6.0; Schiff score: Test-A = 1.0 ± 0.6, Test-B = 1.0 ± 0.6, Control = 2.0 ± 0.7). Conclusions In conclusion, the single application of both fluoridated and non-fluoridated prophylaxis pastes containing 15% CSPS (NovaMin®) provided a significant reduction of dentine hypersensitivity up to at least 28 days.
Journal of Dentistry | 2012
Klaus W. Neuhaus; Jonas Almeida Rodrigues; Rainer Seemann; Adrian Lussi
OBJECTIVES To compare the performance of LFpen (DIAGNOdent pen) with two different wedge-shaped tips to conventional bitewing radiography (BW) for detecting proximal secondary caries at the cervical margin of amalgam restorations in vitro. METHODS Seventy-five molars with class II amalgam restorations were selected. Depending on the marginal filling extension, data was subdivided into a crown group (C), when the filling ended in enamel, and into a root group (R), when the filling ended beyond the cementum-enamel junction. Bayesian analysis including calculation of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was performed. Furthermore, Spearman correlations between caries and cofactors, such as presence of plaque or stain, occlusal ditching, marginal gap size, filling overhangs, and shortfalls, were calculated. Additionally, for group R the correlation coefficient between LFpen measurements and lesion depth was calculated. Histology served as gold standard. RESULTS In group C both at the D1 and D3 levels, LFpen with two different tips showed a better performance than bitewing radiography (AUC at D1: 0.83/0.79 (LFpen) and 0.63 (BW); at D3: 0.66/0.66 (LFpen) and 0.53 (BW)). In group R, the respective AUC values were 0.53/0.56 (LF) and 0.59 (BW). A significant medium correlation was observed for occlusal ditching and proximal caries. Stain accumulation at the restoration margins especially in combination with filling overhangs interfered with LFpen readings, resulting in false positive measurements. CONCLUSIONS Compared to BW, LFpen enhances the detection of secondary caries lesions at the cervical margin of amalgam restorations that do not extend below the cementum-enamel junction.
International Dental Journal | 2011
Rainer Seemann; Frank Pfefferkorn; Reinhard Hickel
Because the recommendation to use flowables for posterior restorations is still a matter of debate, the objective of this study was to determine in a nationwide survey in Germany how frequently, for what indications, and for what reasons, German dentists use flowable composites in posterior teeth. In addition, the acceptance of a simplified filling technique for posterior restorations using a low stress flowable composite was evaluated. Completed questionnaires from all over Germany were returned by 1,449 dentists resulting in a response rate of 48.5%; 78.6% of whom regularly used flowable composites for posterior restorations. The most frequent indications were cavity lining (80.1%) and small Class I fillings (74.2%). Flowables were less frequently used for small Class II fillings (22.7%) or other indications (13.6%). Most frequent reasons given for the use of flowables in posterior teeth were the prevention of voids (71.7%) and superior adaptation to cavity walls (72.9%), whereas saving time was considered less important (13.8%). Based on the subjective opinion of the dentists the simplified filling technique seemed to deliver advantages compared to the methods used to date particularly with regard to good cavity adaptation and ease of use. In conclusion, resin composites are the standard material type used for posterior restorations by general dental practitioners in Germany and most dentists use flowable composites as liners.
Journal of Breath Research | 2014
John Greenman; Patricia Lenton; Rainer Seemann; Sushma Nachnani
An organoleptic assessment of an odor is defined as a method that can measure the strength of target odors and expresses the value in terms of a point or number with reference to a pre-defined organoleptic scale. Organoleptic assessments are performed using different scales and are used widely in industry (e.g. for measuring the effectiveness of anti-odor agents), in research (to discover relationships between bad breath and microbiology of the tongue, or the generation of particular volatile compounds), but it is also a prerequisite for the diagnosis of halitosis in individual patients required before directing appropriate treatment. An organoleptic assessment of halitosis patients may be carried out in specialized institutions but--based on the fact that in most cases the odor originates from oral structures--also by dental professionals including general dental practitioners (GDPs). Thus, this paper describes the scientific background for recommendations on how a GDP or dental hygienist or general practitioner with cases of bad breath should use organoleptic methods as a valid approach to assess malodor in patients, with a view to diagnosis and treatment, and subsequent treatment monitoring.
Clinical Oral Investigations | 2013
Karin Kislig; Clive H. Wilder-Smith; Michael M. Bornstein; Adrian Lussi; Rainer Seemann
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with diagnosed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (ERD) have an increased probability of halitosis and tongue coating compared to patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD).Materials and methodsSixty-six patients (33 males and 33 females) were recruited for the study and received an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The presence of ERD (n = 31) and NERD (n = 35) was classified based on the Los Angeles classification for erosive changes in the esophagus. Additionally, the patients filled in a questionnaire regarding their subjective assessment of halitosis, and an organoleptic assessment of halitosis, a measurement of oral volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) with the Halimeter, and a tongue coating index were performed. ERD and NERD subjects were compared with regard to Halitosis-related clinical and anamnestic findings.ResultsNo statistically significant difference could be found between ERD and NERD patients regarding tongue coating index, organoleptic scores, and VSC values as well as self-perceived bad taste, tongue coating, and bad breath.ConclusionsThese data suggest that halitosis is not typically associated with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and the presence of esophageal mucosal damage (ERD patients).Clinical relevanceThe data of this investigation support the findings of interdisciplinary bad breath clinics that gastroesophageal reflux disease is not a leading cause for halitosis.
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry | 2013
Patricia Ammann; Andreas Kolb; Adrian Lussi; Rainer Seemann
BACKGROUND Rubber dam is recommended for isolating the working field during adhesive dentistry procedures; however, dentists often omit rubber dam, particularly in paediatric dentistry, supposing that it would stress the patient. AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate stress parameters during a standardized dental treatment procedure performed with or without rubber dam. The treatment time was measured as a secondary outcome variable. DESIGN This study was designed as a randomized, controlled, clinical study with 72 patients (6-16 years; mean age, 11.1). During standardized fissure sealing procedures, objective parameters of stress (e.g., skin resistance, breath rate) were recorded. The operators stress level was measured by pulse rate. Subjective pain (patients) and stress perception (operator) were evaluated by an interview. RESULTS The breath rate was significantly (P<0.05) lower and the skin resistance level was significantly higher during treatment with rubber dam compared to the control group. Subjective pain perception was significantly lower for the test group. The treatment time needed for the fissure sealing procedure was 12.4% less in the test group. CONCLUSION Isolation with rubber dam caused less stress in children and adolescents compared to relative isolation with cotton rolls if applied by an experienced dentist.
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica | 2006
Rainer Seemann; Ilja Klück; Andreas Kage
Objective. The aim of the study was to develop an in vitro microbial-based caries model to test potentially caries-preventive agents. Material and methods. In this model, cariogenic Streptococcus mutans biofilms are grown on tooth samples within a reaction chamber hermetically surrounded by a bacteria-tight glove box allowing the manipulation of specimens during operation. The specimens were mounted in two rows on the inner and outer rims of a specimen turntable passing several inlet pipes transporting all necessary media. Using 64 lower incisors in 4 experiments, a 10 ppm NaF solution and an experimental potentially caries-preventive glycan solution were tested compared to a water control. The mean lesion depth was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results. The depths of the caries-like lesions showed no statistically significant difference irrespective of whether the specimens were mounted on the inner or outer rim of the specimen turntable. As expected, the NaF solution inhibited the development of caries-like lesions almost completely. The experimental glycan solution revealed a statistically significantly lower demineralization depth compared to the control and a significantly higher depth compared to the NaF group. The system could be operated over a period of more than 9 weeks without unintentional contamination and the manipulation of the tooth specimens could be accomplished. Conclusions. In conclusion, our in vitro system is suitable for testing potential caries-preventive agents in a reproducible way by using whole tooth samples and offers full access together with the possibility of manipulating the specimens during operation.
Journal of Endodontics | 2012
René Tunjan; Martin Rosentritt; Guido Sterzenbach; Arndt Happe; Roland Frankenberger; Rainer Seemann; Michael Naumann
INTRODUCTION This ex vivo pilot study tested the influence of defect extension and quartz-fiber post placement (QFP) on the ex vivo survival rate and fracture resistance of root-treated upper central incisors served as abutments for zirconia 2-unit cantilever fixed partial dentures (2U-FPDs) exposed to 10 years of simulated clinical function. METHODS Human maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated and divided into the following 5 groups (n = 8): (1) access cavity filled with core build-up composite, (2) biproximal class III cavities filled as in group 1, (3) specimens restored as in group 2 with QFP placed, (4) specimens decoronated and core buildup as in group 1, and (5) specimens restored as in group 4 but with QFP as in group 3. On all specimens, 2U-FPDs were placed with dual-curing resin cement. In order to simulate 10 years of clinical function, specimens were exposed to thermal cycling and mechanical loading with subsequent loading to failure. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed, and log-rank tests were performed. Fracture force and patterns were compared by means of Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U (post hoc), and Fisher exact tests, respectively (P = .05). RESULTS For specimens only with an access cavity, it was observed that 25% had catastrophic tooth fractures and the lowest load-to-fracture values. In all other groups, chipping combined with or without debonding occurred. Groups did not differ significantly regarding the survival rate (P = .603) and fracture patterns (P = .633), but they did for fracture load including technical failures (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS After 10 years of simulated clinical function, both defect extension and placement of QFP had no significant influence on survival of root-treated upper central incisors as abutments restored with zirconia-based 2U-FPDs.