Raj Dedhia

3D Printing: current use in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery

Purpose of review To review the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, with a focus on current uses in surgical training, surgical planning, clinical outcomes, and biomedical research. To evaluate the limitations and future implications of 3D printing in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Recent findings Studies reviewed demonstrated 3D printing applications in surgical planning including accurate anatomic biomodels, surgical cutting guides in reconstruction, and patient-specific implants fabrication. 3D printing technology also offers access to well tolerated, reproducible, and high-fidelity/patient-specific models for surgical training. Emerging research in 3D biomaterial printing have led to the development of biocompatible scaffolds with potential for tissue regeneration in reconstruction cases involving significant tissue absence or loss. Major limitations of utilizing 3D printing technology include time and cost, which may be offset by decreased operating times and collaboration between departments to diffuse in-house printing costs Summary The current state of the literature shows promising results, but has not yet been validated by large studies or randomized controlled trials. Ultimately, further research and advancements in 3D printing technology should be supported as there is potential to improve resident training, patient care, and surgical outcomes.

Advances in scar management: prevention and management of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Purpose of reviewAbnormal scarring remains a poorly understood but functional and aesthetic consequence of surgical and traumatic wounds. The purpose of this review is to describe the current state of the science behind the prevention and management of these scars. Recent findingsA recent update in the International Clinical Recommendations on Scar Management provides a wealth of information on new and revised treatments for hypertrophic scars and keloids. Silicone-based products continue to be the premier option for prevention and initial treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars. There is growing evidence demonstrating the efficacy of intralesional corticosteroids and 5-fluorouracil. Laser therapy remains a second-line treatment option, with low-level evidence supporting the use of pulse dye lasers and ablative fractional lasers. SummaryAlthough there remains no ‘gold standard’ for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids, silicone gel products and microporous paper tape present the best conservative options. A stepwise algorithm for the treatment of hypertrophic scars or keloids based on the characteristics and responsiveness of the scar presents the best management strategy. Combination therapy (including steroid injections, 5-fluorouracil, and pulse dye laser) proves to be the strongest option for the nonsurgical management of severe hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Health utility values for patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: a nested case control study.

Health utility scores quantify an individuals valuation of particular health states and are vital components of health economic studies and cost‐effectiveness research. We sought to characterize health utility values for patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) both before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), as well as compare health utility to chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP).

Delayed Periorbital Abscess after Silicone Implant to Orbital Floor Fracture.

There is a lack of consensus regarding preferred implant materials for orbital floor fracture reconstruction, leading to surgeon- and institution-dependent preferences. A variety of implants are used for orbital floor fracture reconstruction, each with their own complication profile. Knowledge of different implant materials is critical to identifying complications when they present. We report a delayed periorbital abscess 5 years after orbital floor reconstruction using a silicone implant.

Assessment of a patient-specific, 3-dimensionally printed endoscopic sinus and skull base surgical model

Importance Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging tool in the creation of anatomical models for simulation and preoperative planning. Its use in sinus and skull base surgery has been limited because of difficulty in replicating the details of sinus anatomy. Objective To describe the development of 3D-printed sinus and skull base models for use in endoscopic skull base surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants In this single-center study performed from April 1, 2017, through June 1, 2017, a total of 7 otolaryngology residents and 2 attending physicians at a tertiary academic center were recruited to evaluate the procedural anatomical accuracy and haptic feedback of the printed model. Interventions A 3D model of sinus and skull base anatomy with high-resolution, 3D printed material (VeroWhite) was printed using a 3D printer. Anatomical accuracy was assessed by comparing a computed tomogram of the original patient with that of the 3D model across set anatomical landmarks (eg, depth of cribriform plate). Image-guided navigation was also used to evaluate accuracy of 13 surgical landmarks. Likert scale questionnaires (1 indicating strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; and 5, strongly agree) were administered to 9 study participants who each performed sinus and skull base dissections on the 3D-printed model to evaluate anatomical accuracy and haptic feedback. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes of the study include objective anatomical accuracy through imaging and navigation and haptic evaluation by the study participants. Results Seven otolaryngology residents (3 postgraduate year [PGY]-5 residents, 2 PGY-4 residents, 1 PGY-3 resident, and 1 PGY-2 resident) and 2 attending physicians evaluated the haptic feedback of the 3D model. Computed tomographic comparison demonstrated a less than 5% difference between patient and 3D model measurements. Image-guided navigation confirmed accuracy of 13 landmarks to within 1 mm. Likert scores were a mean (SD) of 4.00 (0.71) for overall procedural anatomical accuracy and 4.67 (0.5) for haptic feedback. Conclusions and Relevance This study shows that high-resolution, 3D-printed sinus and skull base models can be generated with anatomical and haptic accuracy. This technology has the potential to be useful in surgical training and preoperative planning and as a supplemental or alternative simulation or training platform to cadaveric dissection.

Cleft Septorhinoplasty: Form and Function

Nasal deformity associated with typical cleft lip can cause aesthetic and functional issues that are difficult to address. The degree of secondary nasal deformity is based on the extent of the original cleft deformity, growth over time, and any prior surgical correction to the nose or lip. Repair and reconstruction of these deformities require comprehensive understanding of embryologic growth, the cleft anatomy, as well as meticulous surgical technique and using a spectrum of structural grafting. This article reviews cleft lip nasal deformity, presurgical care, primary cleft rhinoplasty, and definitive cleft septorhinoplasty with a focus on aesthetics and function.

Evidence-based Medicine in Facial Plastic Surgery: Current State and Future Directions

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) encompasses the evaluation and application of best available evidence, incorporation of clinical experience, and emphasis on patient preference and values. Different scales are used to rate levels of evidence. Translating available data for interventions to clinical practice guidelines requires an assessment of both the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation. Essential to the practice of EBM is evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention through outcome measures. This article discusses principles essential to EBM, resources commonly used in EBM practice, and the strengths and limitations of EBM in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Outcomes From Lateral Eyelid Coupling for Facial Paralysis Using the Modified Tarsoconjunctival Flap

Importance In the setting of facial paralysis, inadequate eyelid closure and lower eyelid ectropion can lead to corneal exposure and impaired quality of life. Repair of paralytic ectropion is challenging, and an ideal surgical approach for all cases has not been identified. Objective To assess the patient-reported outcomes and eyelid position improvement in patients with flaccid facial paralysis undergoing lateral eyelid coupling with a tarsal strip canthoplasty and modified tarsoconjunctival flap to correct eyelid malposition. Design, Setting, and Participants Review of medical records of adults with flaccid facial paralysis who underwent a single-stage tarsal strip canthoplasty and modified tarsoconjunctival flap at a tertiary academic center. Inclusion criteria included a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. Intervention The lateral upper and lower eyelid are coupled with the hybrid tarsoconjunctival flap. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient-reported outcome measures and objective photograph analysis. Preoperative and postoperative Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scores and Moe Ectropion Grading Scale scores were compared. The relationship between radiation therapy (RT) and outcomes was analyzed. Results Sixteen patients (8 [50%] female; mean [SD] age at surgery, 71.5 [9.6] years) were identified between January 2014 and August 2017. Twelve (75%) had paralysis from facial nerve sacrifice during cancer ablation. The mean time between paralysis and referral for surgical repair of ectropion was 23 months (range, 0-151 months) and mean follow-up after surgery was 9.8 months (range, 3-39 months). The most common symptom was epiphora, which was significantly reduced after surgery (75% vs 25%; P = .01). Median Moe Ectropion Grading Scale score improved from 3 (interquartile range, 2-3) to 0 (interquartile range, 0-1; P < .001). Quality of life measured using the FaCE scale demonstrated a significant improvement in mean eye comfort (from 18.8 [95% CI, 2.3-35.2] to 47.9 [95% CI, 31.9-63.9]; P = .01) and lacrimal control scores (from 12.5 [95% CI, 0-29.2] to 45.8 [95% CI, 29.3-62.3]; P = .03) in the 6 patients in the RT group, but no difference in the 4 patients in the non-RT group. Conclusions and Relevance Ocular symptoms, eyelid appearance, and quality of life were improved after lateral eyelid coupling among patients with flaccid facial paralysis and paralytic ectropion. The tarsoconjunctival flap does limit peripheral vision, but is reversible if dynamic eyelid closure is returned with nerve grafting. Level of Evidence 4.

Cleft Rhinoplasty: Strategies for the Multiply Operated Nose

Abstract Rhinoplasty, as a surgical procedure to improve the appearance of the nose while preserving or improving function, is complicated and difficult to master. Revision cleft rhinoplasty offers another tier of challenge. The symmetry, proportions, and definition of the nose are affected by the native cleft deformity but also previous surgical scars, cartilage grafts, and skin excisions. Our preferred approach is to use structural cartilage grafting to establish septal and lower lateral cartilage resiliency. Internal lining deficiency is addressed with skin or lining transfer, while excess nasal tip thickness is contoured to improve definition. Of the utmost importance, the cleft nasal deformity cannot be considered in isolation, but rather a combined amalgamation of the lip muscle and scar, dentofacial occlusion, and skeletal maxillary deficiency.