Raja Kandaswamy

Potent induction immunotherapy promotes long-term insulin independence after islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes.

The seemingly inexorable decline in insulin independence after islet transplant alone (ITA) has raised concern about its clinical utility. We hypothesized that induction immunosuppression therapy determines durability of insulin independence. We analyzed the proportion of insulin‐independent patients following final islet infusion in four groups of ITA recipients according to induction immunotherapy: University of Minnesota recipients given FcR nonbinding anti‐CD3 antibody alone or T cell depleting antibodies (TCDAb) and TNF‐α inhibition (TNF‐α‐i) (group 1; n = 29); recipients reported to the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) given TCDAb+TNF‐α‐i (group 2; n = 20); CITR recipients given TCDAb without TNF‐α‐i (group 3; n = 43); and CITR recipients given IL‐2 receptor antibodies (IL‐2RAb) alone (group 4; n = 177). Results were compared with outcomes in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (group 5; n = 677). The 5‐year insulin independence rates in group 1 (50%) and group 2 (50%) were comparable to outcomes in PTA (group 5: 52%; p>>0.05) but significantly higher than in group 3 (0%; p = 0.001) and group 4 (20%; p = 0.02). Induction immunosuppression was significantly associated with 5‐year insulin independence (p = 0.03), regardless of maintenance immunosuppression or other factors. These findings support potential for long‐term insulin independence after ITA using potent induction therapy, with anti‐CD3 Ab or TCDAb+TNF‐α‐i.

OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: pancreas.

ABSTRACTu2002 Numbers of pancreas transplants have been decreasing over the past decade, but outcomes continue to improve for all types: simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplant, pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA). The most notable decrease occurred for PAK transplants, possibly due in part to decreases in numbers of living donor kidney transplants. The number of new candidates on the pancreas transplant waiting list has decreased steadily since 2000; only 1005 active candidates were added in 2011. Transplant rates for all pancreas transplant types reached a low in 2011 of 34.9 transplants per 100 wait‐list years. Deceased donation rates have also been decreasing since 2005, but use of donation after circulatory death has been gradually increasing. The discard rate in 2011 was 27.7%, and higher for pancreata recovered from older donors. Improved outcomes during the early posttransplant period largely reflect improved donor and recipient selection and improved technical strategies. Inconsistent definitions of graft failure across reporting centers creates an ongoing challenge in the interpretation of outcome data for pancreas transplants. Rates of posttransplant re‐hospitalization are high, most occurring in the first 6 months. Rejection rates are highest for PTA recipients, who also experience higher incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Kidney, Pancreas and Liver Allocation and Distribution in the United States

Kidney transplant and liver transplant are the treatments of choice for patients with end‐stage renal disease and end‐stage liver disease, respectively. Pancreas transplant is most commonly performed along with kidney transplant in diabetic end‐stage renal disease patients. Despite a steady increase in the numbers of kidney and liver transplants performed each year in the United States, a significant shortage of kidneys and livers available for transplant remains. Organ allocation is the process the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) uses to determine which candidates are offered which deceased donor organs. OPTN is charged with ensuring the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of organ sharing in the national system of organ allocation. The policy has changed incrementally over time in efforts to optimize allocation to meet these often competing goals. This review describes the history, current status and future direction of policies regarding the allocation of abdominal organs for transplant, namely the kidney, liver and pancreas, in the United States.

OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Pancreas: OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Pancreas

Pancreas listings and transplants decreased during the past decade, most notably pancreas after kidney transplants. Center‐reported outcomes of pancreas transplant across all groups, short‐term and long‐term, improved during the same period. Changes to the pancreas allocation system creating an efficient, uniform national system will be implemented in late 2014. Pancreas‐alone and simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) candidates will form a single match‐run list with priority to most SPK candidates ahead of kidney‐alone candidates to decrease waiting times for SPK candidates, given their higher waitlist mortality compared with nondiabetic kidney transplant candidates. The changes are expected to eliminate local variability, providing more consistent pancreas allocation nationwide. Outcomes after pancreas transplant are challenging to interpret due to lack of a uniform definition of graft failure. Consequently, SRTR has not published data on pancreas graft failure for the past 2 years. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Pancreas Transplantation Committee is working on a definition that could provide greater validity for future outcomes analyses. Challenges in pancreas transplantation include high risk of technical failures, rejection (early and late), and surgical complications. Continued outcome improvement and innovation has never been more critical, as alternatives such as islet transplant and artificial pancreas move closer to clinical application.

Ten-Year Outcome after Rapid Discontinuation of Prednisone in Adult Primary Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESnRapid discontinuation of prednisone after kidney transplantation potentially allows for minimization of steroid-related side effects. Although intermediate-term data with rapid discontinuation of prednisone have been promising, concern still exists regarding long-term outcomes. The 10-year experience is reported herein.nnnDESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTSnBetween October 1, 1999 and December 31, 2010, 1241 adult primary kidney transplants (791 living donor and 450 deceased donor) were performed using a protocol in which prednisone is discontinued after postoperative day 5. The 10-year actuarial recipient and graft survival rates and prednisone-related side effects were studied.nnnRESULTSnTen-year actuarial patient survival was 71% for living donor transplants and 62% for deceased donor transplants; 10-year graft survival was 61% for living donor transplants and 51% for deceased donor transplants, and was comparable to 10-year Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients national data. Ten-year death-censored graft survival was 79% for living donor transplants and 80% for deceased donor transplants. Ten-year acute rejection rates were 25% for deceased donor transplants and 31% for living donor transplants; 10-year chronic rejection (interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy) rates were 39% for deceased donor transplants and 47% for living donor transplants. For nondiabetic recipients of living donor or deceased donor allografts, the incidence of new-onset diabetes was significantly lower than in historical controls on prednisone (P<0.001). We also found significantly reduced rates of cataracts, avascular necrosis, and cytomegalovirus infection in some subgroups.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPrednisone-related side effects can be minimized in a protocol incorporating rapid discontinuation of prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression. Ten-year patient and graft outcomes remain acceptable.

A Composite Risk Model for Predicting Technical Failure in Pancreas Transplantation

Technical failure (TF) continues to have a significant impact on the success of pancreas transplantation. We assessed risk factors for TF in 1115 pancreas transplants performed at a single center between 1998 and 2011. The overall TF rate was 10.2%. In a multivariable model, donor BMI ≥30 (HR 1.87, pu2009=u20090.005), donor Cr ≥2.5 (HR 3.16, pu2009=u20090.007), donor age >50 (HR 1.73, pu2009=u20090.082) and preservation time >20u2009h (HR 2.17, pu2009<u20090.001) were associated with TF. Bladder drainage of exocrine secretions was protective (HR 0.54, pu2009=u20090.002). We incorporated these factors in a Composite Risk Model. In this model the presence of one risk factor did not significantly increase risk of TF (HR 1.35, pu2009=u20090.346). Two risk factors in combination increased risk greater than threefold (HR 3.65, pu2009<u20090.001) and three risk factors increased risk greater than sevenfold (HR 7.66, pu2009=u2009<0.001). The analysis also identified many factors that were not predictive of TF, including previous transplants, immunosuppressive agent selection, and almost all recipient demographic parameters. While the model suggests that two or more risk factors predict TF, strategies to reduce preservation time may mitigate some of this risk.

Report from IPITA-TTS Opinion Leaders Meeting on the Future of β-Cell Replacement

At the time the first pancreas transplant was performed by Kelly and Lillehei in 1966, insulin therapy for diabetes was generally available but administered in a form that is known today as “conventional therapy.”1 In this era, as many as half of all juvenile onset diabetics did not reach the age of 55 years. Early mortality from accelerated cardiovascular disease, renal failure, and hypoglycemia-related events were commonplace. The early low success rate and mortality of pancreas transplantation by comparison were also suboptimal. As will be characterized in the succeeding 8 chapters, the outcome of “best medical therapy” with newer forms of insulin and insulin delivery systems along with dramatically improved outcomes of islet and pancreas transplantation and novel β-cell sources hold great promise for those afflicted.

Pushing the envelope: living donor pancreas transplantation.

Purpose of reviewMore than 160 living donor segmental pancreas/islet transplants have been done since the first in 1977, more than three-quarters at one institution. We review this three-decade experience to project future application. Initially, living donor pancreas transplants were done because the results with deceased donors were poor. As the results with deceased donors improved, the incentive to do living donor transplants declined but never disappeared. A living donor simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplant in a uremic diabetic can correct diabetes and pre-empt dialysis with one operation, obviating the high mortality rate of waiting for a deceased donor. Solitary pancreas transplant candidates with preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies but a negative cross match to a living donor volunteer also benefit. Recent findingsThe technical failure rate of living donor pancreas transplants was high in the initial cases (>1/3), nearly double that for deceased donors, but has since declined to nearly zero. Living donor segmental pancreatectomy has little surgical morbidity (currently done laparoscopically) with only a small risk for diabetes by strict selection criteria. living donor and deceased donor graft survival rates are equivalent. Islet allografts have been done from three living donors, the last one successfully, showing the potential for further application. SummaryThe incentives for living donor transplants are to eliminate long-wait times for a deceased donor organ and to improve outcomes. With both the incentive is high, but either by itself is sufficient. As the number of pancreas transplant candidates increase, so will wait times for a deceased donor organ. For this reason, living donor pancreas/islet transplant volume will likely increase in the years to come.

Chylous Ascites Requiring Surgical Intervention after Donor Nephrectomy — Case Series and Single Center Experience

Chylous ascites as a result of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a rare complication that carries significant morbidity, including severe protein‐calorie malnutrition and an associated immunocompromised state. We report a patient who underwent hand‐assisted left LDN and subsequently developed chylous ascites. He failed conservative therapy including low‐fat diet with medium‐chain triglycerides (LFD/MCT) and oral protein supplementation as well as strict NPO status with intravenous (IV) total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and subcutaneous (SQ) somatostatin analogue administration. Laparoscopic re‐exploration and intracorporeal suture ligation and clipping of leaking lymph channels successfully sealed the chyle leak. We review the literature to date including diagnosis, incidence, management options, psychosocial aspects and clinical outcomes of chylous ascites after LDN.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Maintenance Immunosuppression With Rapid Discontinuation of Prednisone in Adult Kidney Transplantation

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid‐related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long‐term (10‐year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n = 440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF,u2002n = 151); high‐level tacrolimus (TAC, 8–12 μg/L) and low‐level sirolimus (SIR, 3–7 μg/L) (TACH/SIRL, n = 149) or low‐level TAC (3–7 μg/L) and high‐level SIR (8–12 μg/L) (TACL/SIRH, n = 140). Median follow‐up was ∼7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10‐year actuarial patient, graft and death‐censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10‐year actuarial rates of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH). Rates of new‐onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TACH/SIRL (p = 0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH (p = 0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post‐KT complications. These data indicate that RDP‐based protocol yield acceptable 10‐year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP.