Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rajarshi Roy.
Icarus | 2009
Pascal Descamps; Franck Marchis; Josef Durech; Joshua Patrick Emery; Alan W. Harris; Mikko Kaasalainen; Jerome Berthier; J. P. Teng-Chuen-Yu; A. Peyrot; L. Hutton; J. Greene; J. Pollock; M. Assafin; R. Vieira-Martins; J. I. B. Camargo; F. Braga-Ribas; Frederic Vachier; Daniel E. Reichart; Kevin Ivarsen; J. A. Crain; Melissa C. Nysewander; Aaron Patrick Lacluyze; J. B. Haislip; R. Behrend; Florent Colas; J. Lecacheux; L. Bernasconi; Rajarshi Roy; P. Baudouin; L. Brunetto
We report on the results of a six-month photometric study of the main-belt binary C-type asteroid 121 Hermione, performed during its 2007 opposition. We took advantage of the rare observational opportunity afforded by one of the annual equinoxes of Hermione occurring close to its opposition in June 2007. The equinox provides an edge-on aspect for an Earth-based observer, which is well suited to a thorough study of Hermiones physical characteristics. The catalog of observations carried out with small telescopes is presented in this work, together with new adaptive optics (AO) imaging obtained between 2005 and 2008 with the Yepun 8-m VLT telescope and the 10-m Keck telescope. The most striking result is confirmation that Hermione is a bifurcated and elongated body, as suggested by Marchis et al., (2005). A new effective diameter of 187 +/- 6 km was calculated from the combination of AO, photometric and thermal observations. The new diameter is some 10% smaller than the hitherto accepted radiometric diameter based on IRAS data. The reason for the discrepancy is that IRAS viewed the system almost pole-on. New thermal observations with the Spitzer Space Telescope agree with the diameter derived from AO and lightcurve observations. On the basis of the new AO astrometric observations of the small 32-km diameter satellite we have refined the orbit solution and derived a new value of the bulk density of Hermione of 1.4 +0.5/-0.2 g cm-3. We infer a macroscopic porosity of ~33 +5/-20%.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2007
J. Ďurech; Mikko Kaasalainen; A. Marciniak; W. H. Allen; Roger E. Behrend; C. Bembrick; Thomas Bennett; L. Bernasconi; Jerome Berthier; G. Bolt; S. C. Boroumand; L. Crespo da Silva; Roberto Crippa; M. Crow; Russell I. Durkee; R. Dymock; M. Fagas; Michael Helmut Fauerbach; S. Fauvaud; M. Frey; Rui Soles Gonçalves; R. Hirsch; D. Jardine; K. Kamiński; Robert A. Koff; Tomasz Kwiatkowski; Angel F. Lopez; Francesco Manzini; T. Michałowski; Roberto Carlos Dos Santos Pacheco
Aims. We present physical models of ten asteroids obtained by means of lightcurve inversion. A substantial part of the photometric data was observed by amateur astronomers. We emphasize the importance of a coordinated network of observers that will be of extreme importance for future all-sky asteroid photometric surveys. Methods. The lightcurve inversion method was used to derive spin states and shape models of the asteroids. Results. We derived spin states and shape model for ten new asteroids: (110) Lydia, (125) Liberatrix, (130) Elektra, (165) Loreley, (196) Philomela, (218) Bianca, (306) Unitas, (423) Diotima, (776) Berbericia, and (944) Hidalgo. This increases the number of asteroid models up to nearly one hundred.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2012
A. Marciniak; P. Bartczak; T. Santana-Ros; T. Michalowski; P. Antonini; R. Behrend; C. Bembrick; L. Bernasconi; W. Borczyk; Florent Colas; J. Coloma; R. Crippa; N. Esseiva; M. Fagas; M. Fauvaud; S. Fauvaud; D. D. M. Ferreira; R. P. Hein Bertelsen; D. Higgins; R. Hirsch; Jari J. E. Kajava; K. Kaminski; A. Kryszczynska; T. Kwiatkowski; F. Manzini; J. Michalowski; M. J. Michałowski; A. Paschke; M. Polinska; R. Poncy
Context. The shapes and spin states of asteroids observed with photometric techniques can be reconstructed using the lightcurve inversion method. The resultant models can then be confirmed or exploited further by other techniques, such as adaptive optics, radar, thermal infrared, stellar occultations, or space probe imaging. Aims. During our ongoing work to increase the set of asteroids with known spin and shape parameters, there appeared a need for displaying the model plane-of-sky orientations for specific epochs to compare models from different techniques. It would also be instructive to be able to track how the complex lightcurves are produced by various asteroid shapes. Methods. Basing our analysis on an extensive photometric observational dataset, we obtained eight asteroid models with the convex lightcurve inversion method. To enable comparison of the photometric models with those from other observing/modelling techniques, we created an on-line service where we allow the inversion models to be orientated interactively. Results. Our sample of objects is quite representative, containing both relatively fast and slow rotators with highly and lowly inclined spin axes. With this work, we increase the sample of asteroid spin and shape models based on disk-integrated photometry to over 200. Three of the shape models obtained here are confirmed by the stellar occultation data; this also allowed independent determinations of their sizes to be made. Conclusions. The ISAM service can be widely exploited for past and future asteroid observations with various, complementary techniques and for asteroid dimension determination.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2007
A. Marciniak; T. Michałowski; Mikko Kaasalainen; J. Ďurech; M. Polińska; T. Kwiatkowski; A. Kryszczyńska; R. Hirsch; K. Kamiński; M. Fagas; F. Colas; S. Fauvaud; G. Santacana; Roger E. Behrend; Rajarshi Roy
We report photometric lightcurve observations of 184 Dejopeja (apparition years: 2000, 2002, 2005, 2006), 276 Adelheid (2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006), and 556 Phyllis (1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006) carried out on 48 nights at four observatories. Using all of the available lightcurves, the spin vectors, senses of rotation, and shape models of these three asteroids have been determined.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2011
A. Marciniak; T. Michałowski; M. Polińska; P. Bartczak; R. Hirsch; K. Sobkowiak; K. Kamiński; M. Fagas; Roger E. Behrend; L. Bernasconi; J.-G. Bosch; L. Brunetto; F. Choisay; J. Coloma; M. Conjat; G. Farroni; F. Manzini; H. Pallares; Rajarshi Roy; T. Kwiatkowski; A. Kryszczyńska; R. Rudawska; S. Starczewski; J. Michałowski; P. Ludick
Context. The set of more than 100 asteroids, for which spin parameters have been modelled using an amplitude, magnitude or epoch methods, showed a pronounced gap in the distribution of the asteroid spin axes. These spin axes are rarely aligned with the ecliptic plane. Aims. The number of asteroids with known spin parameters should be increased to allow for statistical investigations. Methods. We gathered extensive photometric datasets on four selected main-belt asteroids to model their spin and shape parameters using the lightcurve inversion method. Our only criterion of selection was their observability for small telescopes. Results. All four of the modelled asteroids happened to have rotational poles that lie close to the ecliptic plane (periods and J2000 north pole coordinates): (94) Aurora − P = 7.226191 h, λp1 = 58 ◦ , βp1 =+ 16 ◦ ; λp2 = 242 ◦ , βp2 =+ 4 ◦ ; (174) Phaedra − P = 5.750249 h, λp = 265 ◦ , βp =+ 5 ◦ ; (679) Pax − P = 8.456016 h, λp1 = 42 ◦ , βp1 = −5 ◦ ; λp2 = 220 ◦ , βp2 =+ 32 ◦ (pole 2 preferred after comparison with AO-resolved observations); (714) Ulula − P = 6.998376 h, λp1 = 42 ◦ , βp1 = −9 ◦ ; λp2 = 227 ◦ , βp2 = −14 ◦ . Conclusions. This work suggests that asteroid spin axes do not avoid the ecliptic plane, contrary to what the classical modelling suggested.
Archive | 2003
Petr Pravec; Peter Kusnirak; Brian D. Warner; Roger E. Behrend; Alan W. Harris; Arto Oksanen; David J. Higgins; Rajarshi Roy; C. Rinner; Ch. Demeautis; F. van den Abbeel; Alain Klotz; N. Waelchli; T. Alderweireldt; V. Cotrez; L. Brunetto
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
P. Tanga; B. Carry; F. Colas; Marco Delbo; A. Matter; J. Hanus; V. Ali Lagoa; A. H. Andrei; M. Assafin; M. Audejean; Roger E. Behrend; J. I. B. Camargo; A. Carbognani; M. Cedres Reyes; M. Conjat; N. Cornero; D. Coward; R. Crippa; E. de Ferra Fantin; Maxime Devogele; G. Dubos; E. Frappa; Michaël Gillon; H. Hamanowa; Emmanuel Jehin; A. Klotz; A. Kryszczyńska; J. Lecacheux; A. Leroy; Jean Manfroid
Archive | 2010
William Jon Merline; B. Carry; Jack D. Drummond; Albert Rudolph Conrad; Clark R. Chapman; Mikko Kaasalainen; C. Leyrat; Harold A. Weaver; Peter M. Tamblyn; Julian C. Christou; Christophe Dumas; A. Kryszczyńska; F. Colas; L. Bernasconi; Roger E. Behrend; Frederic Vachier; M. Polińska; Rajarshi Roy; R. Naves; Raymond Poncy; Paul A. Wiggins
Archive | 2011
Andrzej Marciniak; T. Michałowski; M. Polinska; Przemyslaw Bartczak; Michel Howard Kevin; K. Sobkowiak; K. Kamiński; M. Fagas; Roger E. Behrend; L. Bernasconi; Johan G. Bosch; L. Brunetto; F. Choisay; J. M. Coloma; Matthieu Conjat; G. Farroni; Francesco Manzini; H. Pallares; Rajarshi Roy; Tomasz Kwiatkowski; A. Kryszczyńska; Regina Rudawska; S. Starczewski; Jacek Michalowski; P. Ludick
Archive | 2009
Michael Helmut Fauerbach; Scott A. Marks; Roger E. Behrend; L. Bernasconi; Johan G. Bosch; Matthieu Conjat; C. Rinner; Rajarshi Roy