Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rajeev K. Patel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rajeev K. Patel.


Spine | 2007

A systematic literature review of nonsurgical treatment in adult scoliosis.

Clifford R. Everett; Rajeev K. Patel

Study Design. A formal systematic review of the literature for conservative treatment of adult deformity was performed. Objective. To evaluate evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness of proposed conservative treatment options in adult deformity. Summary of Background Data. Adult deformity is a major demographic health issue in the geriatric population in both the United States and the world communities. Surgeons are often very conservative in the treatment of adult scoliosis because of the complication rates associated with the surgeries and the marginal bone quality endemic to this population. A prerequisite to surgical intervention is usually failure of all appropriate conservative care. There is currently a lack of consensus on the most efficacious conservative treatments for adult deformity. Methods. A systematic review of clinical studies; using the key terms of adult or degenerative and scoliosis combined with any of the following: bracing, casting, physical therapy, chiropractic, and injections for treatment. The database inclusions were PubMed, OVID, and CINAHL. Articles were excluded if the primary patient populations were adolescents or the treatment options performed were primarily surgical. The methodology of the studies was graded and the evidence was classified into 1 of 5 levels based on study types. Based on this, a treatment recommendation was determined. Results. There is indeterminate, Level III/IV evidence on the effectiveness of any conservative care option. Specifically, there is Level IV evidence on the role of physical therapy, chiropractic care, and bracing. There is Level III evidence for injections in the conservative treatment of adult deformity. There is insufficient research for a treatment recommendation beyond Level 2c very weak evidence, but the available literature is supportive of further clinical research in conservative care as a treatment in adult deformity. Conclusion. Conservative care in general may be a helpful option in the care of adult deformity, but evidence for this is lacking. Unfortunately, no treatment option within conservative care has support within the literature as a preferred solution. Basic clinical research at any level would be helpful to further clarify the options.


The Spine Journal | 2009

An evidence-based clinical guideline for the use of antithrombotic therapies in spine surgery

Christopher M. Bono; William C. Watters; Michael H. Heggeness; Daniel K. Resnick; William O. Shaffer; Jamie L. Baisden; Peleg Ben-Galim; John E. Easa; Robert Fernand; Tim J. Lamer; Paul G. Matz; Richard C. Mendel; Rajeev K. Patel; Charles A. Reitman; John F. Toton

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The objective of the North American Spine Society (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline on antithrombotic therapies in spine surgery was to provide evidence-based recommendations to address key clinical questions surrounding the use of antithrombotic therapies in spine surgery. The guideline is intended to address these questions based on the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of February 2008. The goal of the guideline recommendations was to assist in delivering optimum, efficacious treatment with the goal of preventing thromboembolic events. PURPOSE To provide an evidence-based, educational tool to assist spine surgeons in minimizing the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and evidence-based clinical guideline. METHODS This report is from the Antithrombotic Therapies Work Group of the NASS Evidence-Based Guideline Development Committee. The work group was composed of multidisciplinary spine care specialists, all of whom were trained in the principles of evidence-based analysis. Each member of the group was involved in formatting a series of clinical questions to be addressed by the group. The final questions agreed on by the group are the subject of this report. A literature search addressing each question and using a specific search protocol was performed on English language references found in MEDLINE, EMBASE (Drugs and Pharmacology), and four additional, evidence-based databases. The relevant literature was then independently rated by at least three reviewers using the NASS-adopted standardized levels of evidence. An evidentiary table was created for each of the questions. Final grades of recommendation for the answers to each clinical question were arrived at via Web casts among members of the work group using standardized grades of recommendation. When Level I to IV evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation to answer a specific clinical question, expert consensus was arrived at by the work group through the modified nominal group technique and is clearly identified as such in the guideline. RESULTS Fourteen clinical questions were formulated, addressing issues of incidence of DVT and PE in spine surgery and recommendations regarding utilization of mechanical prophylaxis and chemoprophylaxis in spine surgery. The answers to these 14 clinical questions are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded by the strength of the supporting literature that was stratified by levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS A clinical guideline addressing the use of antithrombotic therapies in spine surgery has been created using the techniques of evidence-based medicine and using the best available evidence as a tool to assist spine surgeons in minimizing the risk of DVT and PE. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, suggestions for future research, and all references, is available electronically at the NASS Web site (www.spine.org) and will remain updated on a timely schedule.


Spine | 2001

Side of symptomatic annular tear and site of low back pain: is there a correlation?

Curtis W. Slipman; Rajeev K. Patel; Edward J. Vresilovic; David A. Lenrow; Carl Shin; Richard J. Herzog

Study Design. A retrospective chart review. Objectives. To report the correlation between the side of a concordantly painful, post-discography computer tomography (CT) visualized, annular tear, and the side of a patients’ low back pain. Summary of Background Data. An annular fissure extending from the nucleus to the outer one-third of the annulus is thought to be the nociceptive source stimulated during provocative lumbar discography. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have attempted to delineate whether the side of the annular tear correlates with the side of the patient pain. Methods. One hundred and one post-discography CT scans, performed on patients with single level, concordantly painful, and fissured discs identified during lumbar discography, were randomly obtained from the archived and current files of the Penn Spine Center’s film library. These were reviewed by both the lead author and a spine radiologist, both of who were blinded to the side of the patients pain, to determine which scans demonstrated clearly definable tears extending to the outer one-third of the annulus. Statistical analysis via the exact method was used to determine the correlation between the side of the patients tear and the side of the patients pain. Results. Forty post-discography CT scans met the inclusion criteria. There was a random correlation between the side of the patients concordantly painful annular tear and the side of the patients pain. Conclusions. The results of this study raise several questions regarding the embryologic development of the intervertebral disc and its somite, neurologic transmission of discogenic pain, distribution of chemical inflammagens, validity of discography, technique of ESI, and technique and validity of IDET.


American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation | 2001

Persistent hiccup associated with thoracic epidural injection.

Curtis W. Slipman; Carl Shin; Rajeev K. Patel; Debra L. Braverman; David A. Lenrow; Mark I. Ellen; M. Ali Nematbakhsh

Epidural steroid injections are commonly used to treat lumbosacral radicular and discogenic pain. When used in this manner, these agents can cause minor, transient systemic side effects and rarely result in any serious complications. Because adverse reactions are uncommon and transient, epidural injections are considered a safe therapeutic intervention. We describe the first case of persistent hiccups as a consequence of a thoracic epidural steroid injection in a patient with thoracic discogenic pain.


Pain Medicine | 2002

Etiologies of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Curtis W. Slipman; Carl Shin; Rajeev K. Patel; Zacharia Isaac; Chris W. Huston; Jason S. Lipetz; David A. Lenrow; Debra L. Braverman; Edward J. Vresilovic


The Spine Journal | 2005

Provocative cervical discography symptom mapping

Curtis W. Slipman; Chris T Plastaras; Rajeev K. Patel; Zacharia Isaac; David W. Chow; Cynthia Wilson Garvan; Kevin Pauza; Michael Furman


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2003

Epidemiology of spine tumors presenting to musculoskeletal physiatrists

Curtis W. Slipman; Rajeev K. Patel; Christopher W. Huston; David A. Lenrow; Cynthia Wilson Garvan


Pain Physician | 2004

Flushing as a side effect following lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.

Clifford R. Everett; Baskin Mn; Speech D; Novoseletsky D; Rajeev K. Patel


Pain Physician | 2005

Informed consent in interventional spine procedures: how much do patients understand?

Clifford R. Everett; Novoseletsky D; Cole S; Frank J; Remillard C; Rajeev K. Patel


Pain Physician | 2001

Osseous stress reaction in a rower diagnosed with positron emission tomography (PET): a case report.

Curtis W. Slipman; Rajeev K. Patel; Edward J. Vresilovic; Brautigam P; Mathies A; Adam Le; David A. Lenrow; Atul L. Bhat; Zacharia Isaac; Alavi A

Collaboration


Dive into the Rajeev K. Patel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Curtis W. Slipman

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Lenrow

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl Shin

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zacharia Isaac

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward J. Vresilovic

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Atul L. Bhat

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge