Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula.
International Journal of Management Practice | 2012
Meenakshi Aggarwal–Gupta; Rajiv Kumar; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Mergers and Acquisitions (M%As) continue to be a dominant business strategy for organisations. Despite evidence of greater number of failures than successes, organisations still view M%A as a beneficial strategic activity. This paper looks at the different factors that impact the success or failure of a merger at each stage of the process and brings out the factors that managers need to keep in mind to ensure a successful merger.
International Journal of Emerging Markets | 2015
Karthik Dhandapani; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of related diversification across service offerings and industry domains for professional service firms (PSFs) in emerging economies by integrating the reputational and economies of scope perspectives of diversification. The paper also provides insights into how related diversification impacts small and medium sized firms differently. Design/methodology/approach – Using unique data from the Indian Information Technology industry, the authors examine the impact of related diversification along service offerings and industry domains on export performance of firms. Findings – The results show that related diversification across specializations and industry domains impact performance differently across different firm sizes. While the authors find that related diversification across service offerings has an inverted U shape with performance for the medium sized firms, they do not impact performance for small sized firms. Performance of small firms ha...
International Journal of Human Resource Management | 2017
Aparna Venugopal; T.N. Krishnan; Manish Kumar; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Abstract Organizational ambidexterity is the organizational capability to simultaneously pursue explorative and exploitative innovation strategies. Studies have examined the Top Management Team (TMT) actions and decisions with the ambidextrous orientation of a firm. Further, studies have also shown that a behaviourally integrated TMT is positively associated with organizational ambidexterity. However, there has been limited research examining the antecedents to the behaviourally integrated TMT. Anchored in the upper echelons perspective, we have examined the influence of TMT processes and mechanisms on organizational ambidexterity. The TMT is observed to positively influence ambidexterity by enhancing the firm’s ability to meet the differentiation-integration challenges, and by facilitating the effective deployment of ambidextrous Human Resource (HR) architectures for employee learning. Thereby, this investigation examines the effect of TMT processes and mechanisms in enabling structural as well as contextual ambidexterity. The results from a sample of 78 hi-tech Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) across different industries were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling. We find the mediating role of TMT behavioural integration in the effect of TMT connectedness and TMT cross-functional interfacing mechanisms on organizational ambidexterity. However, our results show that rewards contingent on organizational performance do not motivate the TMT members to facilitate organizational ambidexterity. The results from this study lend support to the upper echelons perspective and add to two distinct streams of literature namely organizational ambidexterity and behavioural integration.
Industry and Innovation | 2015
Karthik Dhandapani; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula; Amit Karna
It is well-accepted that firms locate in clusters to benefit from spillover effects from similar firms in the location. However, some firms choose to locate in multiple clusters. In this paper, we focus on the phenomenon of multi-cluster presence. Through an empirical investigation of 95 firms from the information technology enabled service industry within India, we analyze the drivers of membership across multiple clusters. Our findings indicate first that firms that are located in lower density clusters show a tendency to locate in a larger number of clusters. Second, firms that are looking for people-based creative capabilities also tend to locate in a larger number of clusters. Finally, the firms that are not founded at the location of ethnic origin of the founder CEO also tend to locate in a larger number of clusters.
Archive | 2014
Amit Karna; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula; Vikas Kumar
Abstract Emerging Market Multinationals (EMNCs) are often seen as firms with singular identity. While they may share certain characteristics, EMNCs are seldom orchestrated and managed in the same manner. Through a cluster analysis of outward foreign direct investment data of EMNCs from India, we propose taxonomy of EMNCs based on their mode of operation, industry in which they operate, region where they invest and the amount invested. We use a dataset spread over 2007–2013, constituting investment data of 4,824 Indian firms into 7,238 foreign entities. Based on a two-step clustering approach, we propose three strategic archetypes of EMNCs: Global Service Providers, Integrated Manufacturers, and Established Internationalizers. The Global Service Providers mainly consists of firms operating in developed markets with an intention to serve their client needs through wholly owned subsidiaries. Integrated Manufacturers are firms that are primarily operating in other developing markets to sell their products through joint ventures and also present in developed markets through wholly owned subsidiaries – to acquire technology and other resources. The Established Internationalizers are large EMNCs with highest levels of investments, and relatively similar to the Western multinationals. We analyze the characteristics of these three groups of EMNCs based on their strategy and investment behavior, to derive insights into the heterogeneity across EMNCs. We discuss our findings and lay out future directions for research in the area.
Archive | 2004
Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula; Rajiv Kumar
Journal of International Management | 2017
Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula; Karthik Dhandapani; Amit Karna
Archive | 2011
Rakesh Basant; Pankaj Chandra; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Academy of Management Proceedings | 2017
Vidya Sukumara Panicker; Sumit Mitra; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula
Archive | 2016
Vidya Sukumara Panicker; Sumit Mitra; Rajesh Srinivas Upadhyayula