Rajgopal R. Reddy

Choice of incision for primary repair of unilateral complete cleft lip: a comparative study of outcomes in 796 patients.

Background: No one technique of cleft lip repair consistently produces ideal aesthetic and functional results. This study was carried out in a developing, high-volume center. It compares outcomes attained using two different designs of skin incision used for primary closure of unilateral complete cleft lip and sought to identify the most appropriate technique for clefts of varying morphology. Methods: Seven hundred ninety-six patients were entered into the study. In each group of slightly less than 400 patients, either a modified Millard or Pfeifer wavy line incision was used, both in conjunction with functional repair of the underlying tissues as described by Delaire. Soft-tissue measurements of the lip and nose were recorded preoperatively. Analysis was based on postoperative assessment of the white roll, vermilion border, scar, Cupid’s bow, lip length, and nostril symmetry and appearance of the alar dome and base. Results: Comparison of the two cohorts using Pearson chi-square testing for association and linear trend found a Millard incision gave significantly better results for vermilion match, whereas the Pfeifer method led to a better postoperative lip length. Preconceptions that one particular technique was better suited to certain preoperative cleft anatomical forms were not proven statistically. Conclusions: Certain preoperative anatomical features may lead the surgeon to choose one particular incision pattern in preference to another, but in this study, it was found that one technique was essentially as good as the other. This suggests that the technique for closure of the underlying tissues is probably of more importance.

Incidence of cleft Lip and palate in the state of Andhra Pradesh, South India

Objective: To assess the incidence of cleft lip and palate defects in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India. Design Setting: The study was conducted in 2001 in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India. The state has a population of 76 million. Three districts, Cuddapah, Medak and Krishna, were identified for this study owing to their diversity. They were urban, semi-urban and rural, respectively. Literacy rates and consanguinity of the parents was elicited and was compared to national averages to find correlations to cleft births. Type and side of cleft were recorded to compare with other studies around the world and other parts of India. Results: The birth rate of clefts was found to be 1.09 for every 1000 live births. This study found that 65% of the children born with clefts were males. The distribution of the type of cleft showed 33% had CL, 64% had CLP, 2% had CP and 1% had rare craniofacial clefts. Unilateral cleft lips were found in 79% of the patients. Of the unilateral cleft lips 64% were left sided. There was a significant correlation of children with clefts being born to parents who shared a consanguineous relationship and those who were illiterate with the odds ratio between 5.25 and 7.21 for consanguinity and between 1.55 and 5.85 for illiteracy, respectively. Conclusion: The birth rate of clefts was found to be comparable with other Asian studies, but lower than found in other studies in Caucasian populations and higher than in African populations. The incidence was found to be similar to other studies done in other parts of India. The distribution over the various types of cleft was comparable to that found in other studies.

Primary septoplasty in the repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare nasal symmetry in patients who underwent correction of a complete unilateral cleft lip using the Afroze incision without and with primary septoplasty using a standardized two-dimensional photographic analysis. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 190 consecutive patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and alveolus with cleft palate treated with or without septoplasty using the Afroze incision technique was conducted at a high-volume center. Eighty-two patients operated on without primary septoplasty and 76 patients operated on with primary septoplasty were evaluated. Nasal symmetry was compared between patients using two-dimensional photographic analysis. Ratios between the cleft side and the non–cleft side for five parameters were used to assess symmetry: alar base–to–interpupillary line distance, columella-to–Cupids bow distance, nostril gap area, nostril width, and nostril height. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to calculate differences between the two groups. Results: Patients operated on with primary septoplasty showed more nasal symmetry compared with patients operated on without septoplasty. This difference was statistically significant for columella-to–Cupids bow distance, nostril gap area, and nostril height (p = 0.008, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) and for the distance between alar base and the alar base–to–interpupillary line distance (p = 0.145) the difference was present but not statistically significant. For nostril width, no difference was found (p = 0.850). Conclusion: Patients treated with primary septoplasty showed better results in terms of nasal symmetry when analyzed using two-dimensional photographic analyses.

Comparison of three incisions to repair complete unilateral cleft lip.

BACKGROUND The incision design for correcting a unilateral cleft lip is important because all subsequent stages of surgery depend on the access and maneuverability of the incision. This prospective cohort study compares the aesthetic and functional outcomes of three different skin incisions for primary unilateral cleft lip repair. METHODS Patients with complete unilateral cleft lips (n = 1200) were enrolled and divided into three groups of 400 patients. Each group of patients was operated on with the Millard incision, Pfeifer wave line incision, or Afroze incision. Outcome assessments were performed 2 years postoperatively and consisted of assessment of the white roll, vermilion border, scar, Cupids bow, lip length, nostril symmetry, and appearance of alar dome and base. RESULTS With regard to white roll, vermilion border, scar, Cupids bow, and lip length, the Afroze incision always gave superior results compared with the Millard or Pfeifer incision. Depending on the cut-off for treatment success, the Afroze incision also showed better results regarding nostril symmetry. With respect to the alar base and alar dome, all three incisions showed comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION The Afroze incision is superior regarding a broad spectrum of outcomes in a heterogeneous population of patients with unilateral cleft lip.

Assessment of nostril symmetry after primary cleft rhinoplasty in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

The aim of this study was to assess the nostril symmetry following primary cleft rhinoplasty done with either a dorsal onlay or columellar strut graft in patients with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. In this retrospective study 30 consecutive patients treated with autogenous or alloplastic dorsal onlay grafts and 30 consecutive patients treated with autogenous or alloplastic columellar strut grafts for complete unilateral cleft nose reconstruction were analyzed for nasal symmetry. The autogenous grafts used were costo-chondral or septal cartilage and the alloplastic graft used was high density polyethylene (Medpore(®)). Assessment of the nostril symmetry was done using a two-dimensional nasal analysis 24-30 months postoperatively. Ratios between cleft and noncleft side nostril for three parameters were used to assess symmetry namely nostril width, nostril height and nostril gap area. None of the three parameters showed statistically significant changes. A satisfactory, though not statistically significant, difference in symmetrical outcome could be achieved in both the groups with the exception of nostril width symmetry in group treated with dorsal onlay graft.

Systematic review of “filling” procedures for lip augmentation regarding types of material, outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND The ideal lip augmentation technique provides the longest period of efficacy, lowest complication rate, and best aesthetic results. A myriad of techniques have been described for lip augmentation, but the optimal approach has not yet been established. This systematic review with meta-regression will focus on the various filling procedures for lip augmentation (FPLA), with the goal of determining the optimal approach. METHODS A systematic search for all English, French, Spanish, German, Italian, Portuguese and Dutch language studies involving FPLA was performed using these databases: Elsevier Science Direct, PubMed, Highwire Press, Springer Standard Collection, SAGE, DOAJ, Sweetswise, Free E-Journals, Ovid Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Willey Online Library Journals, and Cochrane Plus. The reference section of every study selected through this database search was subsequently examined to identify additional relevant studies. RESULTS The database search yielded 29 studies. Nine more studies were retrieved from the reference sections of these 29 studies. The level of evidence ratings of these 38 studies were as follows: level Ib, four studies; level IIb, four studies; level IIIb, one study; and level IV, 29 studies. Ten studies were prospective. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review sought to highlight all the quality data currently available regarding FPLA. Because of the considerable diversity of procedures, no definitive comparisons or conclusions were possible. Additional prospective studies and clinical trials are required to more conclusively determine the most appropriate approach for this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.

Perceptions of Family Members of Children With Cleft Lip and Palate in Hyderabad, India, and Its Rural Outskirts Regarding Craniofacial Anomalies: A Pilot Study

Objective This pilot study aimed to understand cultural perspectives on cleft anomalies in the community of Hyderabad, India, and its rural outskirts. Design Interviews focusing on perceptions of cleft lip and palate were conducted using a 21-item interview guide approved by the director of the Gosla Srinivas Reddy Institute of Craniofacial Surgery (GSR). Settings Interviews were conducted at GSR, a specialty surgical center located in Hyderabad, India. Patients and Participants All patients who presented to GSR with either cleft lip, cleft palate, or cleft lip and palate at the time of this study were included. Results Of the 23 families interviewed, 12 mothers believed the cleft was caused by an eclipse, and two believed the scientific explanation their physician offered. Fourteen families were offered no explanation for the cleft lip and/or palate at the time of their first physician visit. No families practiced non-Western methods for treatment of the cleft. One family identified beliefs held in the community that their child with a cleft lip was bad luck. Conclusion A commonly held belief in this community in India is that cleft lip, cleft palate, or cleft lip and palate are caused by an eclipse. Physicians appear to be providing families with insufficient education on cleft impairments. Data generated from studies similar to this can be used to design educational protocols that address this gap in community understanding of orofacial clefting.

Developing and Standardizing a Center to Treat Cleft and Craniofacial Anomalies in a Developing Country Like India

The range of facial deformities is enormous. All produce some degree of disfigurement and result in the impairment of function to some degree, sometimes even to the point of incompatibility with life. Congenital facial defects in India are associated with considerable superstition, social rejection, and failure to integrate into society. In India, cleft defects occur in 1 in 500 births. Congenital facial defects are a pressing problem in India owing to the limited resources to treat such patients. Poverty is a major factor for parents of such children to get appropriate treatment. Setting up an institute to treat children with cleft and craniofacial deformities in India presents problems with financing treatment for poor patients, procuring the right infrastructure, and employing well-trained human resources. The authors have set up such an institute in Hyderabad in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh in India. The logistics of setting up such a facility in a developing country and the future of funding for cleft treatment are important factors to consider while establishing a center for patients with cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The aim of setting up such centers was to provide quality comprehensive treatment for patients from all sections of society with cleft and craniofacial anomalies.

Use of a modified Furlow Z-plasty as a secondary cleft palate repair procedure to reduce velopharyngeal insufficiency

Cleft palate repair is done to allow for normal speech by separating the oral and nasal cavities and creating a functioning velopharyngeal valve. However, despite cleft palate repair, some patients demonstrate velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). An attempt was made to determine the effectiveness of a modified secondary Furlow Z-plasty in improving VPI. Fifty-five children aged between 12 and 15 years, with postoperative VPI following primary palatoplasty, were included in the study. These children underwent a modified Furlow Z-plasty. Nasometry was done to determine the change in velopharyngeal function due to the secondary Furlow Z-plasty by comparing the preoperative with the 1-year postoperative nasalance scores. A test-retest study was performed to determine the reliability of the nasometric measures. Reliability measurements of the nasometer passages revealed good reliability for 18 out of the 25 speech passages. There was a statistically significant reduction in VPI at 1 year postoperative in patients who were treated with the modified Furlow Z-plasty, with a P-value of <0.001 in all passages, except velar plosives, which had a P-value of 0.002. Patients with VPI after primary palatoplasty and treated using a modified Furlow Z-plasty had significantly lower nasalance scores at 1 year postoperative, indicating significantly improved velopharyngeal function.

Options for the nasal repair of non-syndromic unilateral Tessier no. 2 and 3 facial clefts

Background: Non-syndromic Tessier no. 2 and 3 facial clefts primarily affect the nasal complex. The anatomy of such clefts is such that the ala of the nose has a cleft. Repairing the ala presents some challenges to the surgeon, especially to correct the shape and missing tissue. Various techniques have been considered to repair these cleft defects. Aim: We present two surgical options to repair such facial clefts. Materials and Methods: A nasal dorsum rotational flap was used to treat patients with Tessier no. 2 clefts. This is a local flap that uses tissue from the dorsal surface of the nose. The advantage of this flap design is that it helps move the displaced ala of a Tessier no. 2 cleft into its normal position. A forehead-eyelid-nasal transposition flap design was used to treat patients with Tessier no. 3 clefts. This flap design includes three prongs that are rotated downward. A forehead flap is rotated into the area above the eyelid, the flap from above the eyelid is rotated to infra-orbital area and the flap from the infraorbital area that includes the free nasal ala of the cleft is rotated into place. Results and Conclusions: These two flap designs show good results and can be used to augment the treatment options for repairing Tessier no. 2 and 3 facial clefts.