Rakesh C. Sharma

The propensity for gene amplification: A comparison of protocols, cell lines, and selection agents

We have studied cell lines of rodent and human origin for their propensity to become resistant to antifolates (methotrexate, trimetrexate), phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), and colcemid, resistances associated with amplification of the DHFR, CAD, and MDR1 genes, respectively. We have employed two different methods: (1) a shallow step-wise selection protocol, where time to attain specified resistance is the quantitative measure, (2) the frequency of resistant colonies at specified drug concentrations. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods, the two methods gave the same relative ranking of cell lines. Striking differences in the propensity for gene amplification (resistance) were found: human cell lines were less prone to amplify genes than Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. This ranking was similar with all of the agents employed. Additionally, we observed that whereas PALA resistance in CHO cells is associated with amplification of the CAD gene, PALA resistance in the two human cell lines studied (HeLaS3 and VA13) was not associated with amplification and/or overexpression of the CAD gene, and thus this resistance to PALA occurs by an unknown mechanism.

A model for the recA-dependent repair of excision gaps in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli.

We have tested and supported the hypothesis that, in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli, recA-dependent nucleotide excision repair only functions in the replicated portion of the chromosome (i.e., where sister duplexes exist). Using a dnaA(Ts) mutation to align the chromosomes (i.e., all rounds of DNA replication were completed, and new rounds could not be initiated), we studied the genetic control of excision repair (measured as the repair of excision gaps in DNA) in cells with unreplicated chromosomes, and also in cells with partially replicated chromosomes. The excision repair that occurred in cells with unreplicated chromosomes was recA independent, but the excision repair that occurred in cells with partially replicated chromosomes was partially recA dependent. We found no evidence of interchromosomal recombination in recA-dependent excision repair. The majority of this recA-dependent excision repair was recF dependent, and a small portion was recB dependent. The recF and recB genes are suggested to function in excision repair in a manner similar to their function in postreplication repair, i.e., in the replicated portion of a chromosome, the RecF pathway repairs gaps, and the RecB pathway repairs the DNA double-strand breaks that arise at unrepaired gaps.

POSTREPLICATION REPAIR IN uvrA AND uvrB STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI K-12 IS INHIBITED BY RICH GROWTH MEDIUM

Abstract Escherichia coli K‐12 uvrA or uvrB strains grown to logarithmic phase in minimal medium showed higher survival after ultraviolet (UV) irradiation (254 nm) if plated on minimal medium (MM) instead of rich medium. This‘minimal medium recovery’(MMR) was largely blocked by additional recA56 (92% inhibition) or lexA101 (77%) mutations, was partially blocked by additional recB21 (54%), uvrD3 (31%) or recF143 (22%) mutations, but additional polA1 or polA5 mutations had no effect on MMR. When incubated in MM after UV irradiation, the uvrB5 and uvrB5uvrD3 strains showed essentially complete repair of DNA daughter‐strand gaps (DSG) produced after UV radiation fluences up to ∼ 6 J/m2 and ∼1 J/m2, respectively, and then they accumulated unrepaired DSG as a linear function of UV radiation fluence. However, when they were incubated in rich growth medium after UV irradiation, they did not show the complete repair of DSG and unrepaired DSG accumulated as a linear function of UV radiation fluence. The fluence‐dependent correlation observed for the uvrB and uvrB uvrD cells between UV radiation‐induced killing and the accumulation of unrepaired DSG, indicates that the molecular basis of MMR is the partial inhibition of postreplication repair by rich growth medium. Rich growth medium can be just MM plus Casamino Acids or the 13 pure amino acids therein in order to have an adverse effect on survival, regardless of whether the cells were grown in rich medium or not before UV irradiation.

A minor pathway of postreplication repair in Escherichia coli is independent of the recB, recC and recF genes

After ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, an Escherichia coli K12 uvrB5 recB21 recF143 strain (SR1203) was able to perform a limited amount of postreplication repair when incubated in minimal growth medium (MM), but not if incubated in a rich growth medium. Similarly, this strain showed a higher survival after UV irradiation if plated on MM versus rich growth medium (i.e., it showed minimal medium recovery (MMR]. In fact, its survival after UV irradiation on rich growth medium was similar to that of a uvrB5 recA56 strain, which does not show MMR or postreplication repair. The results obtained with a uvrB5 recF332::Tn3 delta recBC strain and a uvrB5 recF332::Tn3 recB21 recC22 strain were similar to those obtained for strain SR1203, suggesting that the recB21 and recF143 alleles are not leaky in strain SR1203. The treatment of UV-irradiated uvrB5 recB21 recF143 and uvrB5 recF332::Tn3 delta recBC cells with rifampicin for 2 h had no effect on survival or the repair of DNA daughter-strand gaps. Therefore, a pathway of postreplication repair has been demonstrated that is constitutive in nature, is inhibited by postirradiation incubation in rich growth medium, and does not require the recB, recC and recF gene products, which control the major pathways of postreplication repair.

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli uvrB recF cells is inhibited by rich growth medium

Ultraviolet (UV)-irradiated uvrB recF and uvrB recB cells of Escherichia coli K-12 showed similar radiation sensitivities when plated on minimal growth medium (MM), however, the uvrB recF cells were much more UV radiation-sensitive than the uvrB recB cells when plated on rich growth medium. Sedimentation analysis of the DNA from UV-irradiated uvrB recF cells suggests that the rich medium killing of uvrB recF cells is due to the inhibition of the repair of UV-radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks, i.e., the killing is due to the inhibition of the recB-dependent pathway of postreplication repair. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the DNA double-strand breaks that were formed in UV-irradiated uvrB recA200(Ts) cells incubated at 42 degrees C in rich growth medium were not repaired whether the medium during subsequent repair incubation at 30 degrees C was MM or rich growth medium, while DNA double-strand breaks that were formed in MM at 42 degrees C could be repaired in MM or in rich growth medium at 30 degrees C. How the absence of an abrupt slowing of DNA synthesis when UV-irradiated cells are held in rich growth medium (Sharma and Smith, 1985b) may prevent the repair of these DNA double-strand breaks is discussed.

INDUCIBLE POSTREPLICATION REPAIR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MINIMAL MEDIUM RECOVERY IN UV‐IRRADIATED Escherichia coliK–12

Abstract— Ultraviolet (UV)‐irradiated Escherichia coliK–12 uvrA cells showed higher survival if plated on minimal growth medium rather than on rich growth medium, i.e., they showed minimal medium recovery (MMR). A 2‐hour treatment of UV‐irradiated cells with rifampicin inhibited the subsequent expression of MMR, and produced a large reduction in survival. We have recently isolated a new mutant (mmrA1) that does not show MMR. The mmrA mutation protected UV‐irradiated uvrA cells from the effect of rich growth medium on survival, but not from the effect of rifampicin on survival. DNA daughter‐strand gap (DSG) repair in UV‐irradiated (4 J/m2) uvrA cells was inhibited to the same degree whether rich growth medium was added immediately after irradiation or after 10 min of postirradiation incubation in minimal growth medium. However, chloramphenicol added immediately after irradiation greatly reduced this repair; there was less reduction if it was added 10 min after UV irradiation. These findings suggest that MMR is an inducible repair phenomenon, and that rich growth medium inhibits this repair process itself rather than its induction.

New DNA Repair Systems and New Insights on Old Systems in Escherichia coli

One can deduce the extreme importance of maintaining the integrity of cellular DNA, simply by noting the numerous and diverse types of systems that a cell has at its disposal for the repair of damaged DNA (for reviews, see references 1-3). There is a repair system that requires visible light (i. e., photoreactivation), and several systems that can work in the absence of light. There are repair systems that can function in the absence of DNA replication (e. g., excision repair), and systems that can only function after damaged DNA has been replicated (i. e., postreplication repair). There are systems for the repair of DNA base damage, and systems for the repair of single-strand and double-strand breaks in DNA. Certain alterations in DNA can be repaired by more than one type of repair system, suggesting that cells have “backup ” systems for DNA repair. Some of these repair systems are constitutive and some are inducible. Finally, some of these repair systems are error-free and some are error-prone (i. e., the repair is not accurate and, therefore, produces mutations). Within the space limitations for this review, we will describe some new DNA repair systems and discuss new insights on some old repair systems in Escherichia coli.