Ralf J. Kohal

Evaluation of a new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration around exposed implant threads. An experimental study in the monkey.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a new bioresorbable barrier alone or in combination with BioOss for guided bone regeneration around dental implants with exposed implant threads. Five adult Macaca fascicularis monkeys were used in this investigation. After extraction of all premolars and first molars, two endosteal oral implants were installed in each quadrant and the bony defects were randomly treated with either: 1) placement of the new bioresorbable device alone (group 1); 2) placement of the new bioresorbable barrier in combination with BioOss (group 2); 3) placement of an ePTFE barrier in combination with BioOss (group 3); or (4) control (group 4). After a period of six months the animals were killed and the histological processing was performed. There was a significant difference in the amount of new bone regeneration around the implants between the four groups (i.e. groups 1, 2, 3 and 4) (P=0.0122). There was no difference, however, between group 2 and group 3. It can be concluded that the new bioresorbable barrier in combination with BioOss appears to obtain the same results in this type of bony defects as the grafting material in combination with an ePTFE barrier.

The gene-expression and phenotypic response of hFOB 1.19 osteoblasts to surface-modified titanium and zirconia.

The osteoblastic cell-line hFOB 1.19 with the potential to proliferate and differentiate revealed that cellular differentiation is not affected by material and roughness on newly developed zirconia implant materials. Materials under investigation were surfaces machined titanium (Ti-m), modified titanium (TiUnite, machined zirconia (TZP-A-m), modified zirconia (ZiUnitemachined alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ-m) and modified alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ-mod). After surface description by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), cellular proliferation (EZ4U, Casy1) and differentiation were examined after days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Osteogenic differentiation was visualized by alkaline phosphatase staining, mineralization assay (alizarin red) and by expression analysis (RT-PCR) of bone- and extracellular matrix-related genes. Proliferation on rough surfaces was reduced on both titanium and zirconia. Cell-attachment and cytoskeleton organization documented by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) elucidated attenuated cell attachment within the first 4h to be the reason for impaired proliferation. A specific up-regulation of m-RNAs in an early event (RUNX2, NELL-1, RUNX3, and BMP7) and a late event (Integrin B3) could be observed on TiUnite and ZiUnite. For titanium an up-regulation of IBSP and Integrin B1 could be described at day 21. In total, differentiation was neither affected by material nor by roughness.

Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat

OBJECTIVE This study aimed at evaluating the integration of zirconia implants in a rat femur model. MATERIAL AND METHODS Zirconia implants with two distinct surface topographies were compared with titanium implants with similar topographies. Titanium and zirconia implants were placed into the femurs of 42 male Sprague-Dawley rats. Four groups of implants were utilized: machined zirconia implants, zirconia implants with a rough surface, machined titanium implants, and titanium implants with an electrochemically roughened surface. After a healing period of 28 days, the load-bearing capacity between the bone and the implant surface was evaluated by a push-in test. Additionally, after a healing period of 14 and 28 days, respectively, bone tissue specimens containing the implants were processed and histologically analyzed. RESULTS The mean mineralized bone-to-implant contact showed the highest values after 14 and 28 days for the rough surfaces (titanium: 36%/45%; zirconia: 45%/59%). Also, the push-in test showed higher values for the textured implant surfaces, with no statistical significance between titanium (34 N) and zirconia (45.8 N). CONCLUSIONS Within the limits of the animal investigation presented, it was concluded that all tested zirconia and titanium implant surfaces were biocompatible and osseoconductive. The presented surface modification of zirconia implants showed no difference regarding the histological and biomechanical results compared with an established electrochemically modified titanium implant surface.

The effects of cyclic loading and preparation on the fracture strength of zirconium‐dioxide implants: an in vitro investigation

OBJECTIVES Zirconia is a potential material for the fabrication of oral implants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of cyclic loading and preparation on the fracture strength of a zirconia implant system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-eight one-piece implants were divided into two groups of 24 implants: group A (without modification) and group B (1 mm chamfer preparation). Groups A and B were divided into three subgroups of eight implants each (1 = no artificial load, 2 = artificial load [98 N; 1.2 million loading cycles], and 3 = artificial load [98 N; 5 million loading cycles]). After completion of the loading, the fracture strength of each implant was determined in a universal testing machine. A two-way analysis of variance was used, the continuous response variable (fracture strength in Newtons) is modeled as a function of preparation, cycles, and the corresponding interaction as explanatory variables. RESULTS The mean fracture strength values obtained for the groups were: A1 (no preparation, no load) = 1928.73 N, A2 (no preparation, 1.2 million cycles) = 2044.84 N, A3 (no preparation, 5 million cycles) = 1364.50 N, B1 (preparation, no load) = 1221.66 N, B2 (preparation, 1.2 million cycles) = 967.11 N, and B3 (preparation, 5 million cycles) = 884.89 N. Fracture values were significantly different between subgroups A1 vs. A3 and B1 vs. B3. There was no significant difference between subgroups A1 vs. A2 and B1 vs. B2. CONCLUSIONS Preparation as well as cyclic loading can decrease the fracture strength resistance of zirconia implants. Nevertheless, even the lowest values of mean fracture strength of the implants used in our study seem to withstand average occlusal forces even after an extended interval of artificial loading.

Osteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materials

OBJECTIVE This study examined the in vitro and in vivo response of osteoblasts to a novel, acid-etched and sandblasted zirconia surface. METHODS Osteoblastic hFOB 1.19 cells were cultured either on electrochemically anodized titanium (TiUnite(®)), machined titanium (Ti-m), sandblasted and acid-etched zirconia (TZP-proc), and machined zirconia (TZP-A-m). The surface topography of the various substrates was analyzed by 3D laserscan measurements and scanning electron microscopy. At culture days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28, cell proliferation was determined. Gene expression was analyzed using RT-PCR. Histologic analysis and biomechanical testing was performed on miniature implants placed in the rat femur. RESULTS During the first 7 days, a retarded cell proliferation was observed on the TiUnite(®) surface. After 28 days of cultivation, cell proliferation reached similar levels on all surfaces. An up-regulation of bone and extracellular matrix specific genes could be seen for TZP-proc at day 21. The mean bone-implant contact rate after a healing period of 14 and 28 days, respectively, was higher for TiUnite(®) than for TZP-proc. At 28 day, the biomechanical test showed significantly higher values for TiUnite(®) than for all other surfaces. SIGNIFICANCE The novel, rough zirconia surface was accepted by hFOB 1.19 cells and integrates into rat bone tissue. However, osseointegration seemed to proceed more slowly and to a lesser extent compared to a moderately roughened titanium surface.

Performance of Zirconia for Dental Healthcare

The positive results of the performance of zirconia for orthopedics devices have led the dental community to explore possible esthetical and mechanical outcomes using this material. However, questions regarding long-term results have opened strong and controversial discussions regarding the utilization of zirconia as a substitute for alloys for restorations and implants. This narrative review presents the current knowledge on zirconia utilized for dental restorations, oral implant components, and zirconia oral implants, and also addresses laboratory tests and developments, clinical performance, and possible future trends of this material for dental healthcare.

Low temperature degradation and reliability of one-piece ceramic oral implants with a porous surface

UNLABELLED Low temperature degradation of zirconia (3Y-TZP) oral implants and its effect on fatigue reliability is poorly documented. OBJECTIVE The aim of this investigation was to follow the aging process occurring at the surface of implants exhibiting a porous coating and to assess its influence on their mechanical (fatigue) properties. METHODS Tetragonal to monoclinic transformation (t-m) was evaluated during accelerated aging tests up to 100h in autoclave (134°C, 2 bars) by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and focused ion beam (FIB). A series of implants were steam-aged for 20h before fatigue testing. Such temperature-time conditions would correspond roughly to 40 years in vivo. The aged specimens and a non-aged control group were step-stress fatigued until failure or survival. RESULTS The evolution of XRD surface monoclinic content was slow, i.e. 16% and 35% for 20 and 100h respectively. However, FIB revealed a significant transformation, initiated at the interface between the porous layer and the bulk, preferentially growing towards the bulk. FIB is therefore better indicated than XRD to follow aging in such implants. Higher average fatigue strength (aged 1235N versus non-aged 826N) and reliability levels were observed for the 20h aged group. SIGNIFICANCE After aging for durations compatible with clinical use, 3Y-TZP with porous surface presented higher fatigue performance. This is in contrast to previous studies where loss of strength due to aging was often reported. Generalizations must therefore be avoided when considering aging of zirconia dental products and every new material/process combination should be tested before drawing conclusions.

In vitro reaction of human osteoblasts on alumina-toughened zirconia.

OBJECTIVES Alumina toughening enhances the mechanical properties of zirconia ceramics but the biocompatibility of this material has rarely been addressed. In this study, we examined the osteoblast response to alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ) with different surface topographies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Human osteoblasts isolated from maxillary biopsies of four patients were cultured and seeded onto disks of the following substrates: ATZ with a machined surface, airborne-particle abraded ATZ, airborne-particle abraded and acid etched ATZ. Airborne-particle abraded and acid etched titanium (SLA) and polystyrene disks served as a reference control. The surface topography of the various substrates was characterized by profilometry (R(a), R(p-v)) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cell proliferation, cell-covered surface area, alkaline phophatase (ALP) and osteocalcin production were determined. The cell morphology was analyzed on SEM images. RESULTS The surface roughness of ATZ was increased by airborne-particle abrasion, but with the R(a) and R(p-v) values showing significantly lower values compared with SLA titanium (Mann-Whitney U-test P<0.05). The proliferation assay revealed no statistically significant differences between the ATZ substrates, SLA titanium and polystyrene (Kruskal-Wallis test, P>0.05). All substrates were densely covered by osteoblasts. ALP and osteocalcin production was similar on the examined surfaces. Cell morphology analysis revealed flat-spread osteoblasts with cellular extensions on all substrates. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that ATZ may be a viable substrate for the growth and differentiation of human osteoblasts. Surface modification of ATZ by airborne-particle abrasion alone or in combination with acid etching seems not to interfere with the growth and differentiation of the osteoblasts.

Clinical and radiological evaluation of a template‐guided (NobelGuide™) treatment concept

OBJECTIVES The study was designed to evaluate the clinical use of the NobelGuide(™) concept over a follow-up period of 12 months with respect to implant success and survival rates, development of soft tissue condition and recording of potential surgical and prosthetic complications. In addition, radiological assessment of peri-implant bone levels was performed at the 1-year follow-up post-implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty patients (male/female = 15/15) with partially dentate and edentulous mandibles and maxillae were included. All patients were planned and operated on using the computer-aided, template-guided treatment concept NobelGuide(™). Overall, 163 implants (NobelReplace(®) Tapered Groovy) were placed (mandible/maxilla = 107/56 implants). Recall appointments were performed after 1-2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after implant placement. Clinical parameters of the soft tissue conditions [e.g. bleeding on probing (BoP), pocket probing depth ≥3 mm (PPD), marginal plaque index (mPI)] and the dentists esthetic and functional evaluation using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were documented. Marginal bone level was evaluated on radiographs made at implant insertion and at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS All 30 patients with 161 implants completed the 1-year follow-up resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.8% (two implant losses). Clinical parameters improved in a majority of the implants. The mean marginal bone level at implant insertion and at 1-year follow-up was reported with 0.17 mm (SD 1.24; n = 125) and -1.39 mm (SD 1.27; n = 110), respectively. The mean change in bone level from implant insertion to 1 year was -1.44 mm (SD 1.35; n = 98). CONCLUSIONS The 1-year follow-up showed a cumulative survival rate and success rate of 98.8% and 96.3%, respectively. Immediate or delayed loading of implants using a flapless, guided surgery approach (NobelGuide(™)) appears to be a viable concept demonstrating good clinical and radiographic outcomes at the 1-year time point.

CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review was to identify and summarize the available literature related to CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the Cochrane Library and the US Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health databases (Pubmed). Several search runs with specific search terms were performed and combined. All published papers available on the databases up to January 15, 2015 were considered with primarily no restrictions. RESULTS About 12 of 3484 identified papers met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the present review. One paper reported results on implant-supported single crowns (SCs), one on partial fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), and 10 papers reported results on full-arch screw-retained FDPs. Publications on SCs and FDPs were very limited but it was possible to identify 10 papers reporting adequate results on full-arch screw-retained FDPs. Survival rates ranged between 92% and 100% with observation times of 1-10 years. CONCLUSION The available data provided promising results for CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations; nonetheless, current evidence is limited due to the quality of available studies and the paucity of data on long-term clinical outcomes of 5 years or more. In the sense of an evidence-based dentistry, the authors recommend further studies designed as randomized controlled clinical trials and reported according to the CONSORT statement.