Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ralitsa Akins is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ralitsa Akins.


BMC Medical Research Methodology | 2005

Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion

Ralitsa Akins; Homer Tolson; Bryan R. Cole

BackgroundDelphi surveys with panels of experts in a particular area of interest have been widely utilized in the fields of clinical medicine, nursing practice, medical education and healthcare services. Despite this wide applicability of the Delphi methodology, there is no clear identification of what constitutes a sufficient number of Delphi survey participants to ensure stability of results.MethodsThe study analyzed the response characteristics from the first round of a Delphi survey conducted with 23 experts in healthcare quality and patient safety. The panel members had similar training and subject matter understanding of the Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence in Healthcare. The raw data from the first round sampling, which usually contains the largest diversity of responses, were augmented via bootstrap sampling to obtain computer-generated results for two larger samples obtained by sampling with replacement. Response characteristics (mean, trimmed mean, standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals) for 54 survey items were compared for the responses of the 23 actual study participants and two computer-generated samples of 1000 and 2000 resampling iterations.ResultsThe results from this study indicate that the response characteristics of a small expert panel in a well-defined knowledge area are stable in light of augmented sampling.ConclusionPanels of similarly trained experts (who possess a general understanding in the field of interest) provide effective and reliable utilization of a small sample from a limited number of experts in a field of study to develop reliable criteria that inform judgment and support effective decision-making.


Teaching and Learning in Medicine | 2008

Developing Disaster Preparedness Competence: An Experiential Learning Exercise for Multiprofessional Education

Rasa Silenas; Ralitsa Akins; Alan R. Parrish; Janine C. Edwards

Background: The hurricane disasters of 2005 and the threat of pandemic infectious diseases compel medical educators to develop emergency preparedness training for medical students and other health care professional students. Description: This article describes an experiential exercise for learning a number of the general core competencies in the 2003 AAMC report titled “Training Future Physicians about Weapons of Mass Destruction.” A modified tabletop exercise for medical and veterinary students, which was developed and implemented in 2005, is described. The exercise focused on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), an emerging infectious disease scenario that raised the possibility of biological attack. The students were assigned roles in small groups, such as community physicians, hospital personnel, public health officials, veterinarians, school nurses, and emergency managers. Fifteen faculty members were recruited from these various areas of expertise. Pre- and posttesting of medical students showed significant gains in knowledge. The authors describe the scenario, small-group role playing, study questions, injects, Web sites and readings, and evaluation tools. Conclusions: This experiential exercise is an effective, inexpensive, and easily adapted tool for promoting multiple competencies in mass health emergency preparedness for a variety of health care students including medical, veterinary, public health, and nursing students.


Southern Medical Journal | 2012

Pediatricians', obstetricians', gynecologists', and family medicine physicians' experiences with and attitudes about breast-feeding.

Inés Anchondo; Lizabeth Berkeley; Zuber D. Mulla; Theresa L. Byrd; Bahij Nuwayhid; Gilbert A. Handal; Ralitsa Akins

Objectives Investigate physicians’ breast-feeding experiences and attitudes using a survey based on two behavioral theories: theory of reasoned action (TRA) and the health belief model (HBM). Methods There were 73 participants included in the investigation. These participants were resident and faculty physicians from pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, and family medicine at a university campus, located on the US-Mexico border. The sample was reduced to 53 and 56 records for the attitude and confidence variables, respectively. Physicians answered a survey about their breast-feeding experiences and attitudes to learn about intention and ability applying constructs from TRA and HBM. An attitude scale, confidence variable (from self-efficacy items), and a lactation training index were created for the analysis. Results Analysis of the association between physicians’ breastfeeding experiences and their attitudes revealed physicians are knowledgeable about breast-feeding and have positive attitudes towards breast-feeding. They did not seem to remember how long they breast-fed their children or whether they enjoyed breast-feeding, but they wanted to continue breast-feeding. Physicians cite work as a main reason for not continuing to breast-feed. Conclusions Physicians’ attitudes toward breast-feeding are positive. They are expected to practice health-promotion behavior including breast-feeding; however, physicians’ breast-feeding rates are low and although they are knowledgeable about breast-feeding their training lacks on didactic depth and hands-on experience. If physicians learn more about breast-feeding and breast-feed exclusively and successfully, the rates in the United States would increase naturally.


Journal of Graduate Medical Education | 2009

Utilizing Quality Improvement Methods to Improve Patient Care Outcomes in a Pediatric Residency Program

Ralitsa Akins; Gilbert A. Handal

OBJECTIVE Although there is an expectation for outcomes-oriented training in residency programs, the reality is that few guidelines and examples exist as to how to provide this type of education and training. We aimed to improve patient care outcomes in our pediatric residency program by using quality improvement (QI) methods, tools, and approaches. METHODS A series of QI projects were implemented over a 3-year period in a pediatric residency program to improve patient care outcomes and teach the residents how to use QI methods, tools, and approaches. Residents experienced practice-based learning and systems-based assessment through group projects and review of their own patient outcomes. Resident QI experiences were reviewed quarterly by the program director and were a mandatory part of resident training portfolios. RESULTS Using QI methodology, we were able to improve management of children with obesity, to achieve high compliance with the national patient safety goals, improve the pediatric hotline service, and implement better patient flow in resident continuity clinic. CONCLUSION Based on our experiences, we conclude that to successfully implement QI projects in residency programs, QI techniques must be formally taught, the opportunities for resident participation must be multiple and diverse, and QI outcomes should be incorporated in resident training and assessment so that they experience the benefits of the QI intervention. The lessons learned from our experiences, as well as the projects we describe, can be easily deployed and implemented in other residency programs.


Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances | 2012

Computer navigation in orthopedic trauma: safer surgeries with less irradiation and more precision.

Ralitsa Akins; Amr Abdelgawad; Enes Kanlic

Exposure of patients and practitioners to ionizing radiation for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has become the norm rather than the exception. This article discusses the findings from a literature review of intraoperative risks from ionizing radiation to patients and surgeons and the validity of substituting the conventional intraoperative fluoroscopy with computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) in orthopedic trauma surgery. Diversity of study designs and measurements exists in reporting intraoperative ionizing radiation, making direct study comparisons difficult. CAOS can effectively reduce the amount of radiation exposure. There are definite advantages and disadvantages for using CAOS in the field of orthopedic trauma. Implementation of CAOS may hold the answer to better patient and surgeon intraoperative radiation safety with decreased operative time and increased procedure precision. The increased safety for patients and surgeons is a critical consideration in recommending CAOS in trauma surgery.


Journal of Patient Safety | 2005

Barriers to Implementation of Patient Safety Systems in Healthcare Institutions: Leadership and Policy Implications

Ralitsa Akins; Bryan R. Cole


Disaster Management & Response | 2005

The Role of Public Health Nurses in Bioterrorism Preparedness

Ralitsa Akins; Josie R. Williams; Rasa Silenas; Janine C. Edwards


Biosecurity and Bioterrorism-biodefense Strategy Practice and Science | 2005

Lessons Learned from a Regional Strategy for Resource Allocation

Jonathan Stapley; Ralitsa Akins; Rasa Silenas; Josie R. Williams


The Academic Leadership Journal | 2008

Designing and Implementing a Competency-based Curriculum: Leadership Implications

Ralitsa Akins; Oscar A. Ingaramo; Maia Eppler; Gilbert A. Handal


The Academic Leadership Journal | 2010

Resident Block-rotation in Clinical Teaching Improves Student Learning

Ralitsa Akins; Gilbert A. Handal

Collaboration


Dive into the Ralitsa Akins's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amr Abdelgawad

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bahij Nuwayhid

University of Texas at El Paso

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Enes Kanlic

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge