Ralph DeMasi

Insulin resistance and response to telaprevir plus peginterferon α and ribavirin in treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1

Objective Insulin resistance is a predictor of poor response to peginterferon/ribavirin in patients infected with the chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). There are no data on direct-acting antivirals. This exploratory analysis assessed the effect of metabolic factors and insulin resistance, measured by homoeostatic model assessment (HOMA), on virological response to telaprevir in Study C208. Design Overall, 161 HCV genotype 1-infected, treatment-naïve patients received 12 weeks of telaprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin, then 12/36 weeks of peginterferon/ribavirin depending on on-treatment response criteria. The prognostic significance of several factors, including HOMA-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), on virological response at weeks 4 and 12, end of treatment and 24 weeks after treatment was explored by multiple regression analysis. Results Baseline HOMA-IR data were available for 147 patients; baseline characteristics were consistent with the overall population. Baseline HOMA-IR <2, 2–4 and >4 was seen in 54%, 30% and 16% of patients, respectively. Neither response rates (any time point) nor week 4 viral load decline were significantly influenced by baseline HOMA-IR. In multivariate analyses, fibrosis stage and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level were predictive of sustained virological response (OR 0.47 and 1.02, respectively). After the end of treatment, HOMA-IR was significantly lower in patients with sustained virological response than in those without (0.61 vs 1.34 for relapsers and 1.15 for non-responders; p<0.05). Conclusion In this study, baseline HOMA-IR was not predictive of virological response to telaprevir in HCV genotype 1-infected, treatment-naïve patients, while sustained virological response was associated with improved HOMA-IR. These results suggest that metabolic factors and insulin resistance do not have a significant effect on telaprevir-based treatment efficacy.

Safety and on-treatment efficacy of telaprevir: the early access programme for patients with advanced hepatitis C

Background and aim Severe adverse events (AEs) compromise the outcome of direct antiviral agent-based treatment in patients with advanced liver fibrosis due to HCV infection. HEP3002 is an ongoing multinational programme to evaluate safety and efficacy of telaprevir (TVR) plus pegylated-interferon-α (PEG-IFNα) and ribavirin (RBV) in patients with advanced liver fibrosis caused by HCV genotype 1 (HCV-1). Methods 1782 patients with HCV-1 and bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis were prospectively recruited from 16 countries worldwide, and treated with 12 weeks of TVR plus PEG-IFN/RBV, followed by 12 or 36 weeks of PEG-IFN and RBV (PR) alone dependent on virological response to treatment and previous response type. Results 1587 patients completed 12 weeks of triple therapy and 4 weeks of PR tail (53% cirrhosis, 22% HCV-1a). By week 12, HCV RNA was undetectable in 85% of naives, 88% of relapsers, 80% of partial responders and 72% of null responders. Overall, 931 patients (59%) developed grade 1–4 anaemia (grade 3/4 in 31%), 630 (40%) dose reduced RBV, 332 (21%) received erythropoietin and 157 (10%) were transfused. Age and female gender were the strongest predictors of anaemia. 64 patients (4%) developed a grade 3/4 rash. Discontinuation of TVR due to AEs was necessary in 193 patients (12%). Seven patients died (0.4%, six had cirrhosis). Conclusions In compensated patients with advanced fibrosis due to HCV-1, triple therapy with TVR led to satisfactory rates of safety, tolerability and on-treatment virological response with adequate managements of AEs.

Suboptimal adherence to darunavir/ritonavir has minimal effect on efficacy compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-infected patients: 96 week ARTEMIS data

OBJECTIVES To examine how treatment adherence differences in ARTEMIS (96 week analysis) affected clinical outcome, and to assess factors impacting adherence. PATIENTS AND METHODS ARTEMIS is a Phase III trial, in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients, comparing efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (800/200 mg total daily dose), each with a fixed-dose background tenofovir and emtricitabine regimen. Self-reported treatment adherence was assessed using the Modified Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (M-MASRI). In post-hoc analyses, mean adherence from weeks 4-96 was used to assess overall adherence for each patient, and transformed into a binary variable (>95% , adherent; < or = 95% , suboptimally adherent). RESULTS Overall adherence was high: 83% of darunavir/ritonavir-treated patients and 78% of lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients were >95% adherent. The difference in virological response rate for adherent versus suboptimally adherent patients was smaller for darunavir/ritonavir (6% difference: 82% versus 76%, P = 0.3312) than for lopinavir/ritonavir (25% difference: 78% versus 53%, P < 0.0001). In suboptimally adherent patients, a higher virological response rate was seen with darunavir/ritonavir (76%) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (53%) (P < 0.01). Suboptimally adherent patients (both treatment groups) reported more adverse events (AEs), including gastrointestinal AEs, than adherent patients. Darunavir/ritonavir had a lower rate of AEs, including gastrointestinal AEs, than lopinavir/ritonavir, in adherent and suboptimally adherent patients. CONCLUSIONS Suboptimal adherence had no significant effect on the virological response rate with once-daily darunavir/ritonavir treatment. In contrast, the lopinavir/ritonavir response rate was significantly reduced in suboptimally adherent patients compared with adherent patients. Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir resulted in a higher virological response rate in suboptimally adherent patients compared with lopinavir/ritonavir.

Sustained virological response with telaprevir in 1078 patients with advanced hepatitis C: The international telaprevir access program

BACKGROUND & AIMS There is little information regarding the extent to which difficult to cure patients with advanced liver fibrosis, due to hepatitis C virus genotype-1 (HCV-1) can successfully and safely be treated with triple therapy with telaprevir (TVR), pegylated interferon alpha (P) and ribavirin (R). In the TVR early access program HEP3002 we aimed to explore treatment safety and efficacy, and identify predictors of sustained virological response at week 24 (SVR24). METHODS 1078 patients with bridging fibrosis (n=552) or cirrhosis (n=526) diagnosed by either liver biopsy or non-invasive markers, with compensated bone marrow (neutrophils >1500/mm(3), Hb >12/13 g/dl) and liver function (Albumin >3.3g/dl, Platelets >90,000/ml) received TVR PR for 12 weeks, followed by a PR tail according to label. RESULTS Overall, 614 (57%) achieved SVR24 by intention-to-treat analysis. The SVR24 rate was 68% in 221 treatment naïve patients (62.8% F4), 72% in 356 prior relapsers (64.4% F4), 55% in 139 partial responders (53.2% F4), and 34% in 294 null responders (28.6% F4). The SVR24 rate to response-guided therapy (24 weeks treatment duration if undetectable viremia at weeks 4 and 12) was 84% in 222 naïve/relapser F3 patients. Independent predictors of response were: (A) F3 (odds ratio (OR)=1.51, 95% CI 1.31-2.00, p=0.005), (B) subtype 1b (OR=1.63, 95% CI 1.18-2.24, p=0.0029), (C) alpha-fetoprotein <10 ng/ml (OR=2.50, 95% CI 1.87-3.36, p<0.0001) and (D) any prior response other than null (OR=3.29, 95% CI 2.40-4.52, p<0.0001). SVR24 rose for patients who had more of these predictive factors: 6/32 (19%) for none, 38/139 (27%) for 1, 129/260 (50%) for 2, 202/329 (61%) for 3, and 194/235 (83%) for 4 factors. Grade 2-4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) were experienced by 719 (67%) patients; 169 (16%) discontinued therapy for AE and 7 (0.6%) died during the PR tail. CONCLUSIONS Naïve and experienced patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis due to HCV-1 who have compensated bone marrow and liver function, can effectively and safely be treated by TVR triple therapy. Baseline predictors of outcome have been identified to optimize pre-treatment counselling.

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance does not seem to predict response to telaprevir in chronic hepatitis C in the REALIZE trial.

Baseline homeostasis model assessment‐estimated insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR), a marker for insulin resistance, has been associated with poor virologic response to peginterferon alpha/ribavirin (PR) in chronic hepatitis C. We evaluated the association between baseline HOMA‐IR and pretreatment factors on sustained virologic response (SVR) to telaprevir (TVR) in genotype 1 patients with hepatitis C and prior peginterferon/ribavirin (PR) treatment failure. Patients were randomized to 12 weeks of TVR (750 mg q8h) plus peginterferon (180 μg/week) and ribavirin (1,000‐1,200 mg/day) (with or without a 4‐week lead‐in) followed by PR, or PR alone (PR48), for 48 weeks. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses explored the prognostic significance of baseline HOMA‐IR alone and adjusted for other pretreatment factors and SVR. The TVR arms were pooled for the purposes of this analysis. In all, 662 patients were randomized; 578 had baseline HOMA‐IR and other prognostic data and were included in this analysis. Median baseline HOMA‐IR was 2.6 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.7‐4.3); 207 (36%), 206 (36%), and 165 (29%) patients had baseline HOMA‐IR <2, 2 to <4, and ≥4, respectively. Male gender, higher body mass index, triglycerides, gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase, maximum alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, and fibrosis stage were associated with higher baseline HOMA‐IR. Baseline HOMA‐IR was associated with SVR in univariate analysis, but not after adjustment for other baseline prognostic factors (TVR: OR = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71,1.29; PR48: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.25,1.43). Conclusion: In patients with prior PR treatment failure, baseline HOMA‐IR correlated with SVR in univariate but not multivariate analyses, suggesting other factors have a more direct causal relationship with virologic response to TVR‐based therapy than HOMA‐IR. (Hepatology 2013; 58:1897–1906)

Risk factors predictive of anemia development during telaprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin therapy in treatment-experienced patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS Anemia is a common adverse event associated with telaprevir-based triple therapy of chronic, genotype 1 hepatitis C. Identification of patients at risk of developing anemia could allow evaluation of suitability for therapy, and aid in determining frequency of anemia monitoring and treatment management. METHODS This post-hoc analysis utilized data from the no lead-in telaprevir, peginterferon and ribavirin arm of the REALIZE study. Anemia was defined as a single occurrence of hemoglobin <10 g/dl at any point during treatment. Pre-treatment factors with potential to act as prognostic indicators of anemia including age, sex, BMI, and baseline hemoglobin were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Nomograms (graphical representations of risk factors) were developed to predict the likelihood of developing anemia. RESULTS Among the 265 patients, 102 (38%) had anemia, with 78/102 (77%) developing anemia on or before week 12. Most patients developed anemia after week 2 and an inverse correlation was found between week 2 hemoglobin and the likelihood of developing anemia. Overall, 60% of patients (60/100) with week 2 hemoglobin <13 g/dl subsequently developed anemia. The multivariate analysis revealed older age (>45 years), lower BMI (≤25 mg/m(2)) and baseline hemoglobin (continuous variable) were significantly associated with the probability of developing anemia during telaprevir treatment. CONCLUSIONS These analyses indicate the potential of using predictive risk factors such as low baseline and on-treatment hemoglobin to identify patients at risk of developing anemia on telaprevir-based triple therapy, which may increase the potential for treatment success by careful patient monitoring.

Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for eight or 12 weeks in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced hepatitis C virus genotype 4 patients with or without cirrhosis

The OSIRIS study investigated efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for eight or 12 weeks in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4‐infected patients with METAVIR F0‐F4 fibrosis. Sixty‐three patients (33 treatment‐naïve and 30 peg‐interferon/ribavirin (Peg‐IFN/RBV)‐experienced) enrolled in a partly randomized, open‐label, multicentre, phase IIa study. Patients with F0‐F3 fibrosis were randomized (1:1) into two groups (A1 and A2), stratified according to treatment experience and METAVIR score, to receive either eight weeks (Group A1, n=20) or 12 weeks (Group A2, n=20) of treatment. Patients with compensated cirrhosis (METAVIR F4) received 12 weeks of treatment (Group B, n=23). Treatment comprised simeprevir 150 mg and sofosbuvir 400 mg daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after planned end of treatment (SVR12). Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout. Overall, 92% (95% CI: 82‐97) of patients achieved SVR12; 75% (15/20) in Group A1 and 100% in groups A2 and B. Patients who did not achieve SVR12 (n=5) experienced viral relapse during the first 32 days following treatment and were all prior Peg‐IFN/RBV null responders. The most commonly reported treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asymptomatic lipase increase (14%), pruritus (14%), headache (13%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (11%). No patients discontinued due to TEAEs. In conclusion, simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for 12 weeks achieved a 100% SVR rate in HCV genotype 4‐infected patients with or without compensated cirrhosis (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02278419). The AE and laboratory profile were favourable and consistent with previous data for simeprevir plus sofosbuvir in eight‐ and 12‐week regimens.

Effect of Baseline Characteristics on the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Darunavir/ Ritonavir in HIV-1–Infected, Treatment-Naïve ARTEMIS Patients at Week 96

Abstract Objectives: ARTEMIS demonstrated significantly greater efficacy of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg versus lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg (total daily dose) in treatment-naïve, HIV-1–infected patients at week 96. The influence of baseline characteristics on efficacy and safety was analyzed in DRV/r patients. Methods: Patients received once-daily DRV/r plus fixed-dose tenofovir/emtric-itabine. Week 96 efficacy and safety data were analyzed by gender (males, n = 239; females, n = 104), age (≤30, n = 115; 31–45, n = 175; >45, n = 53), race (Asian, n = 44; Black, n = 80; Caucasian/White, n = 137; Hispanic, n = 77), and hepatitis B and/or C virus coinfection (n = 43). Results: Week 96 virologic response rates (HIV–1 RNA <50 copies/mL) were as follows: gender: 79% for both males and females; age: 72% (?30), 81% (31–45), and 89% (>45); race: 96% (Asian), 71% (Black), 77% (Caucasian/White), and 79% (Hispanic); coinfection status: 72% (coinfected) and 80% (non-coinfected). The incidence of treatment-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and laboratory abnormalities were comparable across gender, age, and race subgroups. Coinfected patients had a higher incidence of liver-related ADRs than non-coinfected patients. Conclusions: DRV/r 800/100 mg qd is an effective, well-tolerated treatment option for treatment-naïve patients of different gender, age, race, or coinfection status.

798 EFFICACY OF TELAPREVIR DOSED TWICE DAILY VERSUS EVERY 8 HOURS BY IL28B GENOTYPE: RESULTS FROM THE PHASE III OPTIMIZE STUDY

798 EFFICACY OF TELAPREVIR DOSED TWICE DAILY VERSUS EVERY 8 HOURS BY IL28B GENOTYPE: RESULTS FROM THE PHASE III OPTIMIZE STUDY M. Buti, K. Agarwal, Y. Horsmans, W. Sievert, E. Janczewska, S. Zeuzem, L. Nyberg, R.S. Brown Jr., C. Hezode, M. Rizzetto, R. Parana, S. De Meyer, R. DeMasi, D. Luo, J. Witek. Hospital Valle Hebron and Ciberehd del Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain; Kings College Hospital, London, UK; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Monash Medical Centre and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Outpatients Clinic for Hepatology, Myslowice, Poland; Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Medical Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA; Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France; University of Torino, Torino, Italy; Medical School, Federal University of Bahia, Bahia, Brazil; Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBA, Beerse, Belgium; Janssen Research & Development LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA E-mail: 14100abf@comb.cat

Low-density lipoprotein and other predictors of response with telaprevir-based therapy in treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1 patients: REALIZE study.

Predictors of response to treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin are well established. In these post‐hoc analyses of the REALIZE study, we sought to identify predictors of response for telaprevir‐based triple therapy.